Ultrasound-guided injection of carpal tunnel syndrome: A comparative study to blind injection

Comparison of the Impact of Out-of-plane and In-plane Injection Approaches on Injection Pain and Functionality in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Undergoing Ultrasound-guided Injection: A Patient- and Assessor-blinded Randomized Study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the out-of-plane (OP) and in-plane (IP) approaches for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in terms of pain during injection and postinjection adverse effects, and to investigate whether these approaches led to any difference in terms of pain/numbness, symptom severity, functionality, and median nerve cross-sectional area and to examine the relationship of these parameters with the pain during injection.

DESIGN

Patient/assessor-blinded randomized study.

SETTING

Hospital outpatient clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty patients with mild-to-moderate CTS.

INTERVENTIONS

The participants were randomized into OP and IP (both n=25) ultrasound-guided injection groups.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Each patient reported the pain felt during the injection at 1 hour thereafter, and also any adverse effects at 4 weeks after injection. Before and 4 weeks after injection, patients used a visual analog scale to indicate pain/numbness; symptom severity and functionality were assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire. The cross-sectional area of the median nerve was also obtained.

RESULTS

The average pain during injection was 2.64±0.82 in the IP group and 1.96±0.86 in the OP group (P=.017). Postinjection adverse effects were similar between the 2 groups (P<.05). After injection, the percentage change in symptom severity was 49.8±11.8 in the IP group and 40.6±11.5 in the OP group (P=.008). In the IP group, day preinjection pain/numbness, night pain/numbness percentage change scores, and symptom severity percentage change scores were moderately correlated with the pain during injection (r=.439, .469, and .429, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

IP injection caused greater pain during injection than OP injection and led to greater reduction in symptom severity at 1 month after injection. In that group, injection pain was associated with the baseline day pain score, change in night pain score, and change in symptom severity score.

Value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider

OBJECTIVES

To summarise current data on the value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (RMDs) informing an European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology taskforce.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to retrieve prospective and retrospective studies published in English and comparing different (imaging) techniques, different settings and procedural protocols to guide interventions in patients with RMDs. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Epistemonikos databases were searched through October 2021. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool for randomised trials V.2 (ROB2), the RoB tool for Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions and the appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies.

RESULTS

Sixty-six studies were included (most with moderate/high RoB); 49 were randomised controlled trials, three prospective cohort studies and 14 retrospective studies. Fifty-one studies compared either one imaging technique with another imaging technique, or with palpation-guided interventions. Ultrasound (US) was most frequently studied (49/51), followed by fluoroscopy (10/51). Higher accuracy was found for US or fluoroscopy compared with palpation-guided interventions. Studies comparing different imaging techniques (12/51) did not endorse one specific method. Different settings/equipment for imaging-guided procedures (eg, automatic vs manual syringes) were investigated in three studies, reporting heterogeneous results. Fifteen studies compared different imaging-guided procedures (eg, intra-articular vs periarticular injections).

CONCLUSION

Higher accuracy of needle positioning at joints and periarticular structures was seen in most studies when using imaging (especially US) guidance as compared with palpation-guided interventions with the limitation of heterogeneity of data and considerable RoB.

Ultrasound-guided local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided (US-guided) versus landmark-guided (LM-guided) local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

METHODS

Database including Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The outcomes mainly included Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ): Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQs), Functional Status Scale (BCTQf); and electrophysiological indexes: distal motor latency (DML), sensory distal latency (SDL), compound muscle action potential (CAMP), sensory nerve action potential amplitude (SNAP), and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV). Adverse events were also recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, nine RCTs were finally screened out with 469 patients (596 injected hands). Pooled analysis showed that US-guided injection was more effective in BCTQs (SMD, -0.69; 95% CI, -1.08 to -0.31; P = 0.0005), BCTQf (SMD, -0.23; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.07; P = 0.005), CAMP (MD, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.35-0.94; P < 0.0001) improvement, and a lower rate of adverse events (RR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22-0.52; P < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the US-guided injection had significantly better CMAP than the LM-guided for the in-plane approach (MD, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.36-1.01; P < 0.0001) but not for the out-plane approach (MD, 0.39; 95% CI, -0.39 to 1.17; P = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

US-guided injection was superior to LM-guided injection in symptom severity, functional status, electrodiagnostic, and adverse events improvement for CTS. To some extent, the in-plane approach yields better results compared with the out-plane process under US guidance.

Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Comparison Between Radial and Ulnar Approaches

Purpose

To compare two common approaches for ultrasonography (US)-guided injection.

Patients and Methods

Sixty patients with mild-to-moderate CTS were included in this double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT). They received a single shot of corticosteroid injection through either the US-guided in-plane approach: radial or ulnar side. Participants were evaluated using Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, as well as electrodiagnosis (EDX) and US parameters before the intervention, and within 12 weeks of follow-up.

Results

In both groups, all outcomes, except for the electrodiagnostic measures, significantly improved within the follow-up. Pain-VAS and both subscales of BCTQ questionnaire, as our main subjective outcomes, revealed dramatic improvement, with the largest amount of changes in VAS (70%; comparing to baseline value), and about 37% for both of BQSS and BQFS scales, all indicating superiority of radial to ulnar in-plane approach. During the first follow-up, we did not detect any remarkable preference between the groups in either subjective or electrodiagnostic variables. However, there was a significant difference at next follow-up time-points in terms of VAS for pain and BQFS favoring radial approach (Table 3). Furthermore, US-measured parameters including nerve-circumference and CSA improved only in the radial in-plane group.

Conclusion

The current data proved that radial in-plane approach for CTS injection could be at least as effective as the more common ulnar in-plane method. Even the pain-relief effect was longer for the radial in-plane approach. Also, patients’ functional status and objective variables all revealed better outcomes via the new approach.

Upper Limb Interventions

Ultrasound has been reported to be a quick, cheap, and effective imaging modality to guide the interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system. The use of ultrasound results in increased accuracy of needle placement associated with a reduction of complications. In the upper limb, ultrasound-guided procedures are applied to joints and soft tissues around the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand. This article reviews the clinical and technical aspects of the most common procedures performed in this anatomic area.