Dynamic and delayed contrast enhancement in upper abdominal MRI studies: comparison of gadoxetic acid and gadobutrol

Prediction of insufficient hepatic enhancement during the Hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB DTPA-enhanced MRI using machine learning classifier and feature selection algorithms

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to reveal the usefulness of machine learning classifier and feature selection algorithms for prediction of insufficient hepatic enhancement in the HBP.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed 214 patients with chronic liver disease or liver cirrhosis who underwent MRI enhanced with Gd-EOB-DTPA. Various liver function tests, Child-Pugh score (CPS) and Model for End-stage Liver Disease Sodium (MELD-Na) score were collected as candidate predictors for insufficient hepatic enhancement. Insufficient hepatic enhancement was assessed using liver-to-portal vein signal intensity ratio and 5-level visual grading. The clinico-laboratory findings were compared using Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. Relationships between the laboratory tests and insufficient hepatic enhancement were assessed using Pearson's and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Feature importance was assessed by Random UnderSampling boosting algorithms. The predictive models were constructed using decision tree(DT), k-nearest neighbor(KNN), random forest(RF), and support-vector machine(SVM) classifier algorithms. The performances of the prediction models were analyzed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC).

RESULTS

Among four machine learning classifier algorithms using various feature combinations, SVM using total bilirubin(TB) and albumin(Alb) showed excellent predictive ability for insufficient hepatic enhancement(AUC = 0.93, [95% CI: 0.93-0.94]) and higher AUC value than conventional logistic regression(LR) model (AUC = 0.92, [95% CI; 0.92-0.93], predictive models using the MELD-Na (AUC = 0.90 [95% CI: 0.89-0.91]) and CPS (AUC = 0.89 [95% CI: 0.88-0.90]).

CONCLUSION

Machine learning-based classifier (i.e. SVM) and feature selection algorithms can be used to predict insufficient hepatic enhancement in the HBP before performing MRI.

Abdominal Organ Enhancement in Dynamic MRI using 1 M Gadobutrol vs 0.5 M Meglumine Gadoterate in Liver of Hemangioma Patients

BACKGROUND

The utility of gadobutrol (GAD) which is higher r1 value contrast media for evaluating abdominal solid organ have not been fully evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the contrast enhancement of abdominal organs on dynamic MRI using 0.1 mmol/kg 1.0 M GAD or 0.5 M meglumine gadoterate (MG) in patients with a liver hemangioma.

METHODS

A phantom study was performed at different concentrations (0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, 1.0, 5.0 and 10 mmol/L) of GAD and MG. Sixty-two patients with a liver hemangioma were enrolled. Contrast media was injected at a rate of 2 mL/s followed by 40 mL of saline. Two arterial phases, a portal phase and an equilibrium phase were obtained. One certified radiologist set regions of interest on the abdominal aorta, liver, pancreas, spleen and the liver hemangioma. The relative enhancement ratio (RER) was calculated.

RESULTS

In the phantom study the signal intensity of both contrast media was similar at lower concentrations. However, the signal intensity of MG was higher at concentrations of more than 5.0 mmol/L. In the clinical study the RER of the abdominal viscera during the portal and equilibrium phases was higher with GAD. The hemangioma had a higher equilibrium phase enhancement with GAD. The aortic RER was equivalent during all phases and the liver RER during the 2nd arterial phase was higher with GAD. The arterial phase during GAD imaging might have been measured later than was optimal.

CONCLUSION

When the same injection protocol was used for an abdominal dynamic MRI, arterial phase imaging was late when GAD was used. The higher T1 relaxation value was significantly higher in the abdominal viscera during the portal and equilibrium phases, while the liver hemangioma also had significantly higher contrast enhancement during the equilibrium phase.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

3186.

Intracellular accumulation capacity of gadoxetate: initial results for a novel biomarker of liver function

Previous studies have shown gadoxetate disodium’s potential to represent liver function by its retention in the hepatobiliary phase. Additionally, in cardiac imaging, quantitative characterization of altered parenchyma is established by extracellular volume (ECV) calculation with extracellular contrast agents. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to evaluate whether intracellular accumulation capacity (IAC) of gadoxetate disodium derived from ECV calculation provides added scientific value in terms of liver function compared to the established parameter reduction rate (RR). After local review board approval, 105 patients undergoing standard MR examination with gadoxetate disodium were included. Modified Look-Locker sequences were obtained before and 20 min after contrast agent administration. RR and IAC were calculated and correlated with serum albumin, as a marker of synthetic liver function. Correlation was higher between IAC and albumin, than between RR and albumin. Additionally, capacity of both RR and IAC to distinguish between patients with or without liver cirrhosis was investigated, and differed significantly in their respective means between patients with cirrhosis and those without. We concluded, that the formula to calculate ECV can be transferred to calculate IAC of gadoxetate disodium in hepatocytes, and, thereby, IAC may possibly qualify as an imaging-based parameter to estimate synthetic liver function.

A Case of a Huge Inferior Vena Cava Leiomyosarcoma: Precise Preoperative Evaluation with Gadobutrol-Enhanced MRI

Background

Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava (IVC) is a rare malignant tumour with poor prognosis. Surgical resection is the first line of treatment to achieve the best possible outcome. However, precise preoperative evaluation is essential to guide therapeutic decisions. Here, the preoperative evaluation potential of gadobutrol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was assessed in the management of a 42-year-old patient with a large IVC mass.

Methods

The patient first underwent enhanced computed tomography (CT), but the relationship between the left renal vein and the mass in the dilated IVC was ambiguous, and it remained unclear whether the right hepatic vein was invaded by the lesion. To make a precise assessment of the tumour, the patient subsequently underwent high-resolution MRI angiography examination combined with high-concentration contrast medium gadobutrol.

Results

MRI demonstrated the integrity of the right hepatic vein and the left renal vein. Following a multidisciplinary consultation, a complicated surgery including complete resection of the mass, artificial vessel replacement of IVC, total hepatectomy, and bilateral nephrectomy with liver and kidney auto-transplantation was performed successfully. The surgical plan formulated after reviewing the MRI preoperatively was adhered to the course of the surgery. Postoperative CT re-examination showed that the blood flow of the artificial blood vessel and the right hepatic vein was unobstructed. Histopathological examination confirmed the tumour to be a leiomyosarcoma.

Conclusion

Preoperative imaging diagnosis and assessment have important implications for the surgical planning of IVC leiomyosarcoma. High-resolution MRI angiography examination with high concentration contrast medium gadobutrol may be of particular benefit in IVC tumours.

Assessment of Hepatic Perfusion Using GRASP MRI: Bringing Liver MRI on a New Level

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of hepatic perfusion imaging using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for characterizing liver parenchyma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before and after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a potential alternative to volume perfusion computed tomography (VPCT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between November 2017 and September 2018, 10 patients (male = 8; mean age, 66.5 ± 8.6 years) with HCC were included in this prospective, institutional review board-approved study. All patients underwent DCE GRASP MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution after injection of liver-specific MR contrast agent before and after TACE. In addition, VPCT was acquired before TACE serving as standard of reference. From the dynamic imaging data of DCE MRI and VPCT, perfusion maps (arterial liver perfusion [mL/100 mL/min], portal liver perfusion [mL/100 mL/min], hepatic perfusion index [%]) were calculated using a dual-input maximum slope model and compared with assess perfusion measures, lesion characteristics, and treatment response using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. To evaluate interreader agreement for measurement repeatability, the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated.

RESULTS

Perfusion maps could be successfully generated from all DCE MRI and VPCT data. The ICC was excellent for all perfusion maps (ICC ≥ 0.88; P ≤ 0.001). Image analyses revealed perfusion parameters for DCE MRI and VPCT within the same absolute range for tumor and liver tissue. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI further enabled quantitative assessment of treatment response showing a significant decrease (P ≤ 0.01) of arterial liver perfusion and hepatic perfusion index in the target lesion after TACE.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic contrast-enhanced GRASP MRI allows for a reliable and robust assessment of hepatic perfusion parameters providing quantitative results comparable to VPCT and enables characterization of HCC before and after TACE, thus posing the potential to serve as an alternative to VPCT.

Comparison of Visualization Rates of LI-RADS Version 2014 Major Features With IV Gadobenate Dimeglumine or Gadoxetate Disodium in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to compare visualization rates of the major features covered by Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2014 in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma using either gadobenate dimeglumine or gadoxetate disodium IV contrast agent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included liver MRI examinations performed with either gadobenate dimeglumine or gadoxetate disodium contrast enhancement. Using age, sex, underlying liver disease, and presence of cirrhosis, patients were placed into matched cohorts. All hepatic nodules 1 cm or larger (up to five per subject) were included, resulting in 63 subjects with 130 nodules (median nodule size, 1.9 cm) imaged with gadobenate and 64 subjects with 117 nodules (median nodule size, 2.0 cm) imaged with gadoxetate. Three radiologists reviewed the studies for LI-RADS major features independently. Bootstrap resampling with 10,000 repetitions was used to compare feature detection rates.

RESULTS

Arterial phase hyperenhancement was seen in a similar number of nodules with gadobenate dimeglumine (mean, 91.5% [119/130]) and gadoxetate disodium (mean, 88.0% [103/117]) (p = 0.173). Dynamic phase washout was more commonly seen with gadobenate dimeglumine (mean, 60.2% [78.3/130]) than with gadoxetate disodium (mean, 45.3% [53/117]) (p = 0.006). The capsule feature was more often visualized with gadobenate dimeglumine (mean, 50.2% [65.3/130]) than with gadoxetate disodium (mean, 33.3% [39/117]) (p < 0.001). Interreader agreement for arterial phase enhancement and dynamic phase washout was almost perfect for both contrast agents (κ > 0.83). Agreement for the capsule feature was moderate for gadobenate dimeglumine (κ = 0.52) and substantial for gadoxetate disodium (κ = 0.67).

CONCLUSION

The rates of visualization of arterial phase hyperenhancement are similar in studies performed with gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetate disodium, but dynamic phase washout and capsule appearance are more commonly visualized with gadobenate dimeglumine.

Safety profile of gadoxetate disodium in elderly patients (≥65 years)

Background

Safety data on routine clinical use of gadoxetate disodium in elderly patients is not reported yet.

Purpose

To assess the safety of liver specific gadoxetate disodium in contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in elderly patients (≥65 years) in comparison to adults (18–64 years).

Material and Methods

Safety data on gadoxetate disodium were analyzed from 12 clinical phase II–III studies and from our pharmacovigilance database. A comparison between elderly (≥65 years) versus adults (18–64 years) was performed with respect to the frequency of drug-related adverse events (AEs) in clinical phase II–III studies and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the pharmacovigilance database.

Results

In clinical studies, 1989 patients were enrolled: 675 elderly and 1314 adults. Twenty-three elderly patients (3.4%) suffered at least one drug-related AE in contrast to 58 patients (4.4%) in the group of adults (odds ratio = 0.76; 95% confidence interval = 0.45–1.27). Since marketing authorization in 2004, more than 3.5 million patients have been exposed to gadoxetate disodium worldwide: 1.7 million (48.6%) in elderly and 1.8 million (51.4%) in adults. The number of patients with post-marketing ADRs (total n = 793) was 354 (0.021%) in the elderly group and 439 (0.024%) in the adult group. Thus, there were significantly fewer patients with ADRs reported in the group of elderly versus adults (P = 0.028). Hypersensitivity/immune system disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, and respiratory disorders were the most frequent ADRs in both groups, elderly and adults.

Conclusion

The incidence of drug-related AEs in clinical studies was similar and that of patients with ADRs in the post-marketing setting was lower in elderly (≥65 years) compared with younger adults aged 18–64 years. Overall, gadoxetate disodium shows a favorable safety profile in both age groups.

Safety of gadoxetate disodium: results from six clinical phase IV studies in 8194 patients

Background

Safety data on routine clinical use of gadoxetate disodium for liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not reported yet.

Purpose

To assess the safety profile of gadoxetate disodium for liver MRI in the routine clinical setting.

Material and Methods

Six multicenter studies were performed in Europe, USA, Australia, and Asia to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gadoxetate disodium (Primovist®/Eovist®) enhanced liver MRI. Patients received a single intravenous bolus injection of the standard approved dose of 0.025 mmol/kg body weight (0.1 mL/kg). The number of patients, the characteristics of adverse events, related adverse events, and serious adverse events were analyzed.

Results

A total of 8194 patients were included in the database. A total of 141 patients (1.7%) reported 230 AEs of which 129 were considered being related to the use of gadoxetate disodium by the investigators. None of the AEs in the pediatric population (n = 52) were related. The most frequent AEs independent of relationship to the drug included dyspnea (25/0.31%), nausea (22/0.27%), liver disorders (13/0.16%), and renal disorders (9/0.11%). Nine related SAEs were recorded. No patient died during the studies.

Conclusion

Gadoxetate disodium for liver MRI is safe and well tolerated in the routine clinical setting.

Role of Contrast in MR Imaging

Magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agents have been widely used over the last 3 decades in routine clinical practice. Paul Lauterbur recognized the presence of these contrast agents, which act as paramagnetic catalysts that accelerate the T1 relaxation process. The first MR contrast agent to be approved for clinical use was in 1988, and since then, it is estimated that 200 million doses have been administered worldwide. These contrast agents have diverse clinical as well as research applications, involving almost all the body organs. This review will cover some existing as well as many new applications that have emerged over the last few decades. MR imaging now has the potential of being used to monitor enzymatic activity, gene expression, metal ion homeostasis, and cell death in vivo. In future, newer contrast agents will develop and become commercially available, expanding the current clinical applications of MR contrast media.

Evaluation of combined Gd-EOB-DTPA and gadobutrol magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma grading

BACKGROUND

Tumor biopsy is not essential for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, grading remains important for the prognosis.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether combined Gd-EOB-DTPA and gadobutrol liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can predict HCC grading.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty patients (66.6 ± 7.3 years) with histologically confirmed HCC (grade 1, n = 5; grade 1-2, n = 6; grade 2, n = 13; grade 2-3, n = 2; grade 3, n = 4) underwent two liver MRIs, one with gadobutrol and one with Gd-EOB-DTPA, on consecutive days. Blinded to grading, two radiologists reviewed the gadobutrol and Gd-EOB-DTPA images in consensus with respect to: (i) HCC hyper-/iso-/hypointensity in the arterial, portal-venous/delayed, and Gd-EOB-DTPA hepatocellular phase; and (ii) morphologic tumor features (encapsulated growth, vessel invasion, heterogeneity, liver capsule infiltration, satellite metastases).

RESULTS

A significant correlation with grading was not found for either the combined dynamic information of all gadobutrol phases (r = -0.187, P = 0.331) or all the Gd-EOB-DTPA phases (r = 0.052, P = 0.802). No correlation with grading was found for a combination of arterial and hepatocellular phase in Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI (r = 0.209, P = 0.305), a combination of both arterial phases (gadobutrol and Gd-EOB-DTPA) with the Gd-EOB-DTPA hepatocellular phase (r = 0.240, P = 0.248), or a combination of all available gadobutrol and Gd-EOB-DTPA phases (r = 0.086, P = 0.691). For all gadobutrol information (dynamic phases and morphology; r = 0.049, P = 0.801) and for all Gd-EOB-DTPA information (r = 0.040, P = 0.845), no correlation with grading was found. Hepatocellular Gd-EOB-DTPA phase iso-/hyperintensity never occurred in grade 3 HCCs.

CONCLUSION

Histological HCC grading cannot be predicted by combined Gd-EOB-DTPA/gadobutrol MRI. However, Gd-EOB-DTPA hepatocellular phase iso-/hyperintensity was never detected in grade 3 HCCs.

Safety and Efficacy of Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced Liver MRI in Pediatric Patients Aged >2 Months to <18 Years-Results of a Retrospective, Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of gadoxetate disodium–enhanced liver MR imaging in pediatric patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective, multicenter study including pediatric patients aged >2 months to <18 years who underwent contrast-enhanced liver MRI due to focal liver lesions. A single intravenous bolus injection of 0.025 to 0.05 mmol/kg body weight of gadoxetate disodium was administered. Adverse events (AEs) up to 24 hours after injection were recorded and a one-year follow-up was conducted for all serious and unexpected AEs. Efficacy was defined based on the additional diagnostic information obtained from the combined (pre- and postcontrast) image sets as compared with the precontrast image sets by blinded reading.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients for safety and 51 patients for efficacy analyses were evaluated. Twenty-two patients (42.3%) reported a total of 51 serious AEs (SAEs) and one AE after one year. No SAE or AE was related to gadoxetate disodium injection. Gadoxetate disodium–related effects on vital signs were not seen. Additional diagnostic information was obtained for 86.3% of patients. The three most improved efficacy variables were lesion-to-background contrast, lesion characterization, and improved border delineation in 78.4%, 76.5%, and 70.6% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Gadoxetate disodium in pediatric patients did not raise any clinically significant safety concern. Contrast enhancement provided additional clinically relevant information.

The value of contrast-enhanced dynamic and diffusion-weighted MR imaging for distinguishing benign and malignant splenic masses

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of contrast-enhanced dynamic and diffusion-weighted (DW) MR imaging for differentiating malignant from benign splenic lesions.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 51 patients with 35 benign and 16 malignant focal splenic lesions. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced dynamic and DW MR imaging. Two radiologists evaluated the MR images in consensus. Significant imaging findings on univariate and multivariate analyses were identified and their diagnostic performance for predicting the malignant splenic lesion was analyzed. Using receiver-operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cut-off of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value corresponding to the maximal Youden's index (J) for differentiating the two groups was determined.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, low signal intensity (SI) on the arterial, portal and 3-min delayed-phase images, high or iso SI on the DW image, iso or low SI on the ADC map, the presence of diffusion restriction and arterial hypovascularity with a progressive enhancement pattern were more frequently observed (p < 0.05) in malignant splenic lesions. The ADC value was significantly lower for malignancy than for benignancy (0.78 ± 0.24 vs 1.16 ± 0.53 × 10(-3) mm(2) s(-1); p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off ADC value for differentiating the two groups was 0.995 × 10(-3) mm(2) s(-1). In multivariate analysis, findings that differentiated malignant from benign splenic lesions were low SI on the 3-min delayed-phase image [odds ratio (OR), 27.68; p = 0.006] and the presence of diffusion restriction (OR, 48.01; p = 0.002). When two of these criteria were combined, 12 (75.0%) of 16 malignant splenic masses were identified with a specificity of 100%.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced dynamic and DW MR imaging may be helpful for differentiating malignant from benign splenic lesions. A low SI on the 3-min delayed phase and diffusion restriction are the most reliable findings for the differentiation of malignant from benign splenic lesions.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Dynamic and DW MR imaging help in distinguishing malignant from benign splenic lesions. A low SI on the 3-min delayed phase and diffusion restriction are the most reliable findings for the differentiation of malignant from benign splenic lesions.

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis risk after liver magnetic resonance imaging with gadoxetate disodium in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment: results of a prospective, open-label, multicenter study

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess the risk of gadoxetate disodium in liver imaging for the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment.

Materials and Methods

We performed a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label phase 4 study in 35 centers from May 2009 to July 2013. The study population consisted of patients with moderate to severe renal impairment scheduled for liver imaging with gadoxetate disodium. All patients received a single intravenous bolus injection of 0.025-mmol/kg body weight of liver-specific gadoxetate disodium. The primary target variable was the number of patients who develop NSF within a 2-year follow-up period.

Results

A total of 357 patients were included, with 85 patients with severe and 193 patients with moderate renal impairment, which were the clinically most relevant groups. The mean time period from diagnosis of renal disease to liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was 1.53 and 5.46 years in the moderate and severe renal impairment cohort, respectively. Overall, 101 patients (28%) underwent additional contrast-enhanced MRI with other gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents within 12 months before the start of the study or in the follow-up. No patient developed symptoms conclusive of NSF within the 2-year follow-up.

Conclusions

Gadoxetate disodium in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment did not raise any clinically significant safety concern. No NSF cases were observed.

Differentiation of lipid poor angiomyolipoma from hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging

PURPOSE

To investigate magnetic resonance (MR) findings of angiomyolipoma (AML) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging, and to identify features that differentiate AML from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with a low risk of HCC development.

METHODS

This retrospective study was institutional review board approved, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Twelve patients with hepatic AML who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with no risk factors for HCC development were recruited. Twenty-seven patients with HCC under the same inclusion criteria were recruited as control. Two radiologists analyzed the images in consensus for morphologic features, enhancement patterns, and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) findings. All results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test, two-tailed Fisher exact test, and chi-square test.

RESULTS

Patients with AML were younger than those with HCC (48.8 ± 15 years for AML vs. 62.7 ± 14.2 years for HCC, p = 0.008) with female predominance, while most HCC patients were male (75% (9/12) vs. 15% (4/27), p < 0.001). The most prevalent enhancement pattern was arterial enhancement followed by hypointensity at portal or transitional phases for both AMLs (58% (7/12)) and HCCs (74% (20/27)) (p = 0.455). However, during the HBP, AMLs frequently showed more homogeneous hypointensity than HCCs (83% (10/12) vs. 41% (11/27), p = 0.018). When compared with the signal intensity of the spleen, the mean relative signal intensity of the AML was 91.2 ± 15.4%, while in HCCs, it was 128.7 ± 40% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although AMLs showed similar enhancement patterns to HCCs during the dynamic phases of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, using characteristic MR features of AML during the HBP and demographic differences, one can better differentiate AML from HCC.

Abdominal vasculature in dynamic contrast-enhanced liver MRI at 3.0T: an intraindividual comparative study using gadoxetate disodium and gadofosveset trisodium

OBJECTIVES

To intraindividually compare gadoxetate disodium and gadofosveset trisodium regarding vessel contrast, image quality and vessel delineation in dynamic contrast-enhanced liver MRI at 3.0T.

METHODS

Twelve patients underwent 3.0T MRI twice (24 examinations) with a single dose of gadoxetate disodium and gadofosveset trisodium, respectively. Signal intensity in abdominal vessels and tissue was determined. Vessel-to-background ratio (VBR) was calculated for each vessel and dynamic phase. All images were evaluated by two radiologists regarding image quality, vessel delineation and anatomic variants or pathologies with digital subtraction angiography as the standard of reference.

RESULTS

Gadofosveset trisodium demonstrated a significantly higher VBR compared to gadoxetate disodium (arterial phase: 0.57±0.12 [SD] vs. 0.46±0.19; portal venous phase: 0.51±0.11 vs. 0.37±0.14; equilibrium phase: 0.48±0.10 vs. 0.31±0.13; p≤0.01). Image quality and vessel delineation were rated equal or better for gadofosveset trisodium in all cases. These differences were not significant for most vessel segments. All anatomic variants were correctly identified by both readers for both contrast agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Although gadofosveset trisodium provides a significantly higher vessel contrast at 3.0T, gadoxetate disodium is equivalent by qualitative measurements. Thus, gadoxetate-enhanced liver MRI at 3.0T enables reliable assessment of the upper abdominal vasculature with the additional benefit of hepatobiliary imaging.

Safety of gadoxetate disodium: Results from the clinical phase II-III development program and postmarketing surveillance

PURPOSE

To summarize the safety data of gadoxetate disodium, reported in 12 Phase II and III clinical development studies and in the postmarketing surveillance database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with liver lesions received gadoxetate disodium-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded and evaluated with regard to a potential drug relationship. Subgroup analyses were run on patients with special medical history. Worldwide spontaneous AEs and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from postmarketing safety surveillance were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1989 patients were included in the clinical development program. A total of 1581/1989 (79.5%) patients received the finally approved dose of 0.025 mmol/kg body weight. 10.1% of patients reported AEs, 4.1% were classified as related AEs. Nausea and headache were the most frequently reported related AEs, with 1.1% each. Age, history of contrast media allergy, liver cirrhosis, or impaired liver or renal function did not significantly impact the frequency and type of AEs. The postmarketing safety surveillance database encompassed more than 2.2 million patients. Nausea was the most frequent ADR, with a reporting rate of 0.00652%; all other symptoms were below 0.004%.

CONCLUSION

Gadoxetate disodium for liver MRI has an excellent safety profile.

Impact of liver cirrhosis on liver enhancement at Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI at 3 Tesla

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess differences in enhancement effects of liver parenchyma between normal and cirrhotic livers on dynamic, Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI at 3T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

93 patients with normal (n=54) and cirrhotic liver (n=39; Child-Pugh class A, n=18; B, n=16; C, n=5) underwent contrast-enhanced MRI with liver specific contrast media at 3T. T1-weighted volume interpolated breath hold examination (VIBE) sequences with fat suppression were acquired before contrast injection, in the arterial phase (AP), in the late arterial phase (LAP), in the portal venous phase (PVP), and in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) after 20 min. The relative enhancement (RE) of the signal intensity of the liver parenchyma was calculated for all phases.

RESULTS

Mean RE was significantly different among all evaluated groups in the hepatobiliary phase and with increasing severity of liver cirrhosis, a decreasing, but still significant reduction of RE could be shown. Phase depending changes of RE for each group were observed. In case of non-cirrhotic liver or Child-Pugh Score A cirrhosis mean RE showed a significant increase between AP, LAP, PVP and HBP. For Child-Pugh B+C cirrhosis RE increased until PVP, however, there was no change in case of B cirrhosis (p=0.501) and significantly reduced in case of C cirrhosis (p=0.043) during HBP.

CONCLUSION

RE of liver parenchyma is negatively affected by increased severity of liver cirrhosis, therefore diagnostic value of HBP could be limited in case of Child Pugh B+C cirrhosis.

Lesion detection and assessment of extrahepatic findings in abdominal MRI using hepatocyte specific contrast agents--comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA

Background

To evaluate the contrast agent performance of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA for detection and assessment of extrahepatic findings, semi-quantitatively and qualitatively.

Methods

13 patients with 19 extrahepatic lesions underwent liver MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA. Quantitative and relative SNR measurements were performed in each dataset in the arterial and portalvenous phase within the extrahepatic lesion, aorta, inferior vena cava, portal vein, spleen, pancreas and renal cortex. Further, relative CNR measurements were performed. Three readers assessed contrast quality using a five-point scale and choosing the preferred image dataset. Statistical analysis consisted of a Student’s t-test with p < 0.05 deemed significant, a weighted kappa statistic for assessment of interobserver variability and an ROC analysis.

Results

Mean SNR after injection of Gd-BOPTA was significantly higher compared with Gd-EOB-DTPA for all measurements (p < 0.05). Mean relative SNR was also higher for Gd-BOPTA, but without being statistically significant. There was no significant difference in relative CNR. Interobserver agreement for selection of image preference was moderate (mean weighted kappa 0.485). The area under the curve for the ROC-analysis regarding contrast agent performance was 0.464.

Conclusion

Even though mean SNR is significantly higher after injection of Gd-BOPTA compared with Gd-EOB-DTPA, there is no significant difference in relative CNR with extrahepatic lesions being assessed equally well. Visual impression may differ after injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA, but does not influence image interpretation. Extrahepatic findings can be assessed similarly to MRI after injection of Gd-BOPTA.

Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging features of hepatic hemangioma compared with enhanced computed tomography

AIM: To clarify features of hepatic hemangiomas on gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriaminpentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with enhanced computed tomography (CT).

METHODS: Twenty-six patients with 61 hepatic hemangiomas who underwent both Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and enhanced CT were retrospectively reviewed. Hemangioma appearances (presence of peripheral nodular enhancement, central nodular enhancement, diffuse homogenous enhancement, and arterioportal shunt during the arterial phase, fill-in enhancement during the portal venous phase, and prolonged enhancement during the equilibrium phase) on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and enhanced CT were evaluated. The degree of contrast enhancement at the enhancing portion within the hemangioma was visually assessed using a five-point scale during each phase. For quantitative analysis, the tumor-muscle signal intensity ratio (SIR), the liver-muscle SIR, and the attenuation value of the tumor and liver parenchyma were calculated. The McNemar test and the Wilcoxon’s signed rank test were used to assess the significance of differences in the appearances of hemangiomas and in the visual grade of tumor contrast enhancement between Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and enhanced CT.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference between Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and enhanced CT in the presence of peripheral nodular enhancement (85% vs 82%), central nodular enhancement (3% vs 3%), diffuse enhancement (11% vs 16%), or arterioportal shunt (23% vs 34%) during arterial phase, or fill-in enhancement (79% vs 80%) during portal venous phase. Prolonged enhancement during equilibrium phase was observed less frequently on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI than on enhanced CT (52% vs 100%, P < 0.001). On visual inspection, there was significantly less contrast enhancement of the enhancing portion on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI than on enhanced CT during the arterial (3.94 ± 0.98 vs 4.57 ± 0.64, respectively, P < 0.001), portal venous (3.72 ± 0.82 vs 4.36 ± 0.53, respectively, P < 0.001), and equilibrium phases (2.01 ± 0.95 vs 4.04 ± 0.51, respectively, P < 0.001). In the quantitative analysis, the tumor-muscle SIR and the liver-muscle SIR observed with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI were 0.80 ± 0.24 and 1.28 ± 0.33 precontrast, 1.92 ± 0.58 and 1.57 ± 0.55 during the arterial phase, 1.87 ± 0.44 and 1.73 ± 0.39 during the portal venous phase, 1.63 ± 0.41 and 1.78 ± 0.39 during the equilibrium phase, and 1.10 ± 0.43 and 1.92 ± 0.50 during the hepatobiliary phase, respectively. The attenuation values in the tumor and liver parenchyma observed with enhanced CT were 40.60 ± 8.78 and 53.78 ± 7.37 precontrast, 172.66 ± 73.89 and 92.76 ± 17.92 during the arterial phase, 152.76 ± 35.73 and 120.12 ± 18.02 during the portal venous phase, and 108.74 ± 18.70 and 89.04 ± 7.25 during the equilibrium phase, respectively. Hemangiomas demonstrated peak enhancement during the arterial phase, and both the SIR with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and the attenuation value with enhanced CT decreased with time. The SIR of hemangiomas was lower than that of liver parenchyma during the equilibrium and hepatobiliary phases on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. However, the attenuation of hemangiomas after contrast injection was higher than that of liver parenchyma during all phases of enhanced CT.

CONCLUSION: Prolonged enhancement during the equilibrium phase was observed less frequently on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI than enhanced CT, which may exacerbate differentiating between hemangiomas and malignant tumors.

Enhancement of the liver and pancreas in the hepatic arterial dominant phase: comparison of hepatocyte-specific MRI contrast agents, gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine, on 3 and 1.5 Tesla MRI in the same patient

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relative enhancement of liver, pancreas, focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), pancreas-to-liver index, and FNH-to-liver index in the hepatic arterial dominant phase (HADP) after injection of hepatocyte-specific MRI contrast agents, gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine, on 3 and 1.5 Tesla (T) MRI in the same patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MRI database was retrospectively searched to identify consecutive patients who underwent abdominal MRI at 3T and 1.5T systems, using both 0.025 mmol/kg gadoxetic acid-enhanced and 0.05 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI at the same magnetic strength field system. 22 patients were identified, 10 were scanned at 3T system and 12 at 1.5T system. The enhancement of liver, pancreas, and FNH was evaluated quantitatively on MR images.

RESULTS

The relative enhancement of liver in HADP in the gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced group in all subjects was significantly higher than that in gadoxetic acid-enhanced group (P = 0.023). The gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced group in HADP had better relative enhancement of pancreas and FNH, pancreas-to-liver index, and FNH-to-liver index than gadoxetic acid-enhanced group, but the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The 0.05 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced abdominal MRI studies at 3T and 1.5T MR systems are superior in relative enhancement of the liver in HADP to 0.025 mmol/kg gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. This type of assessment may provide comparative effectiveness data.

Significance of the "delayed hyperintense portal vein sign" in the hepatobiliary phase MRI obtained with Gd-EOB-DTPA

PURPOSE

To determine the significance of the delayed hyperintense portal vein sign in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and the requirement for informed patient consent was obtained. Six-hundred and seventy patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI were included in the study. Two readers who were blinded to clinical records reviewed MR images in consensus. The delayed hyperintense portal vein sign was defined if the portal vein appeared more hyperintense than surrounding liver parenchyma on the 30-minute delayed hepatobiliary phase. The frequency of the delayed hyperintense portal vein sign and the association between the sign and serum biochemical tests were assessed. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify which variables were associated with the sign. Optimal cutoff values of variables for reflecting the sign were obtained with ROC analysis.

RESULTS

The delayed hyperintense portal vein sign was observed in 13.0%. In multivariate analysis, a direct bilirubin level was associated with the delayed hyperintense portal vein sign. Optimum cutoff value for reflecting the delayed hyperintense portal vein sign was 2.18 mg/dL (sensitivity, 89%; specificity, 96%).

CONCLUSION

The delayed hyperintense portal vein sign in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI can potentially be used to reflect hepatobiliary function.

Contrast enhanced liver MRI in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: inverse appearance of focal confluent fibrosis on delayed phase MR images with hepatocyte specific versus extracellular gadolinium based contrast agents

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the enhancement pattern of focal confluent fibrosis (FCF) on contrast-enhanced hepatic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using hepatocyte-specific (Gd-EOB-DTPA) and extracellular (ECA) gadolinium-based contrast agents in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After institutional review board approval, 10 patients with PSC (6 male, 4 female; 33-61 years) with 13 FCF were included in this retrospective study. All patients had a Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI exam, and a comparison ECA-enhanced MRI. On each T1-weighted dynamic dataset, the signal intensity (SI) of FCF and the surrounding liver as well as the paraspinal muscle (M) were measured. In the Gd-EOB-DTPA group, hepatocyte phase images were also included. SI FCF/SI M, SI liver/SI M, and [(SI liver - SI FCF)/SI liver] were compared between the different contrast agents for each dynamic phase using the paired Student's t-test.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in SI FCF/SI M in all imaging phases. SI liver/SI M was significantly higher for the Gd-EOB-DTPA group in the delayed phase (P < .001), whereas there was no significant difference in all other imaging phases. In the Gd-EOB-DTPA group, mean [(SI liver - SI FCF)/SI liver] were as follows (values for ECA group in parentheses): unenhanced phase: 0.26 (0.26); arterial phase: 0.01 (-0.31); portal venous phase (PVP): -0.05 (-0.26); delayed phase (DP): 0.14 (-0.54); and hepatocyte phase: 0.26. Differences were significant for the DP (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

On delayed phase MR images the FCF-to-liver contrast is reversed with the lesions appearing hyperintense on ECA enhanced images and hypointense on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced images.

Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part 1, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA), to describe a workflow-optimized pulse sequence protocol, and to illustrate the imaging appearance of focal lesions in the noncirrhotic liver.

CONCLUSION

Gd-EOB-DTPA allows a comprehensive evaluation of the liver with the acquisition of both dynamic and hepatocyte phase images. This provides potential additional information, especially for the detection and characterization of small liver lesions. However, protocol optimization is necessary for improved image quality and workflow.

Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part 2, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the cirrhotic liver

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review the use of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (gadoxetate disodium [Gd-EOB-DTPA]) in the cirrhotic liver and illustrate the imaging appearance of lesions commonly encountered in the cirrhotic liver.

CONCLUSION

Gd-EOB-DTPA shows promise as a problem-solving tool in the cirrhotic liver because it provides additional information that may be helpful in lesion detection and characterization. Further research is needed to optimize Gd-EOB-DTPA imaging protocols in cirrhosis and develop diagnostic criteria for liver lesions in the cirrhotic liver.

Pretreatment assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma: expert consensus statement

Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is complex and relies on multiple factors including tumor extent and hepatic function. No single staging system is applicable to all patients with HCC. The staging of the American Joint Committee on Cancer / International Union for Cancer Control should be used to predict outcome following resection or liver transplantation. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer scheme is appropriate in patients with advanced HCC not candidate for surgery. Dual phase computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging can be used for pretreatment assessment of tumor extent but the accuracy of these methods remains poor to characterize < 1 cm lesions. Assessment of tumor response should not rely only on tumor size and new imaging methods are available to evaluate response to therapy in HCC patients. Liver volumetry is part of the preoperative assessment of patients with HCC candidate for resection as it reflects liver function. Preoperative portal vein embolization is indicated in patients with small future liver remnant (≤ 20% in normal liver; ≤ 40% in fibrotic or cirrhotic liver). Tumor size is not a contraindication to liver resection. Liver resection can be proposed in selected patients with multifocal HCC. Besides tumor extent, surgical resection of HCC may be performed in selected patients with chronic liver disease.

Normal dynamic MRI enhancement patterns of the upper abdominal organs: gadoxetic acid compared with gadobutrol

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether, at dynamic MRI of the upper abdominal organs, contrast enhancement with gadoxetic acid, a hepatobiliary contrast agent, is comparable with that achieved with an extracellular contrast agent.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Dynamic gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI of the pancreas, spleen, kidney, liver, and abdominal aorta was performed on 50 patients; dynamic gadobutrol-enhanced MRI was performed on a control group of 50 patients; and the images were compared. Dynamic imaging with a T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination gradient-echo sequence (TR/TE, 3.35/1.35; flip angle, 12 degrees ) was performed before and 20 (arterial phase), 55 (portal venous phase), and 90 (hepatic venous phase) seconds after bolus injection of gadoxetic acid (0.25 mmol/mL) or gadobutrol (1.0 mmol/mL). Signal-to-noise ratios and enhancement indexes were calculated for each organ and time.

RESULTS

All MR images in both groups were of diagnostic quality. During the early dynamic phases, significantly lower mean enhancement indexes were found in the gadoxetic acid group than in the gadobutrol group in the pancreas (portal venous phase, 0.66, 1.39, p <or= 0.001; hepatic venous phase, 0.51, 1.36, p <or= 0.001), spleen (portal venous phase, 1.54, 2.41, p <or= 0.001; hepatic venous phase, 1.19, 2.23, p <or= 0.001), renal cortex (portal venous phase, 1.76, 2.63, p <or= 0.001; hepatic venous phase, 1.60, 2.63, p <or= 0.001), and liver (portal venous phase, 0.76, 0.94, p = 0.016; hepatic venous phase, 0.76, 1.04, p <or= 0.001). In the abdominal aorta, the mean enhancement index was greater after bolus injection of gadoxetic acid (arterial phase, 3.33, 2.24, p <or= 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Early dynamic MRI of the upper abdominal organs, especially the spleen, pancreas, and kidney, benefits from the higher gadolinium concentration of gadobutrol than in the organ-specific contrast agent gadoxetic acid. Higher protein binding resulting in increased relaxivity of gadoxetic acid compensates for the low gadolinium concentration in the abdominal aorta.

MR imaging of the biliary tract with Gd-EOB-DTPA: effect of liver function on signal intensity

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively evaluate the signal intensity of the biliary tract in gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and to investigate the effect of liver function on the signal intensity of the biliary tract.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 32 patients with and without chronic liver disease (normal liver group, n = 15; chronic liver disease group, n = 17) were included in this study. All patients were prospectively enrolled for evaluation of known or suspected focal liver lesions. In the chronic liver disease group, the etiologies were chronic hepatitis C virus infection (n = 12) and chronic hepatitis B virus infection (n = 5). The median Child-Pugh score was 5 (range, 5-7). Each patient received the standard dose of Gd-EOB-DTPA (0.025 mmol/kg of body weight). Post-contrast T1-weighted MR images were obtained at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA. Maximum signal intensities (SIs) of the right and left hepatic ducts, common hepatic duct, and common bile duct were measured. Relative signal intensity was calculated as follows: relative SI = maximum SI(bileduct)/mean SI(muscle). Serum albumin level, serum total bilirubin level, prothrombin time, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICG-R15), and estimated glomerular filtration rate were entered into regression analysis.

RESULTS

The signal intensity of the bile duct reached a peak 30 min after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA. The mean relative signal intensity of the right and left hepatic ducts at the peak time point was not significantly different between the two groups, while increase in signal intensity was delayed in the chronic liver disease group. The mean relative signal intensity of the common hepatic duct and that of the common bile duct at the peak time point were significantly different between the two groups (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P = 0.03, respectively). Stepwise regression analysis revealed that ICG-R15 was a significant predictor of the signal intensity of the bile duct (right and left hepatic ducts, P = 0.04; common hepatic duct, P = 0.008; common bile duct, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study demonstrate that the presence of chronic liver disease significantly affects the signal intensity of the bile duct in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. ICG-R15 was only a significant predictor of the signal intensity of the bile duct. The signal intensity of the bile duct may reflect underlying liver function.

Diffusion-weighted and Gd-EOB-DTPA-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for characterization of tumor necrosis in an animal model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in determining tumor necrosis and contrast-enhanced MRI using gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in determining maximum tumor size measurement and tumor delineation compared with criterion-standard histologic measurements in the rabbit VX2 liver tumor model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

VX2 tumors were implanted in the livers of 13 rabbits. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed using a 1.5-T MRI scanner and an extremity coil. The imaging protocol included T2-weighted fast spin-echo images, 3-dimensional T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo with and without fat suppression after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA, and diffusion-weighted echo planar images. Rabbits were killed, and the tumor was harvested and sliced at 4-mm intervals in the axial plane. The MRI parameters evaluated were tumor size, tumor delineation, and tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Histologic sections were evaluated to quantify tumor necrosis.

RESULTS

On contrast-enhanced MRI (obtained from 11 rabbits), the mean tumor sizes were 20, 19, and 20 mm in the arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases, respectively. Tumor delineation was most distinguishable in the delayed phase. On diffusion-weighted MRI (acquired in 13 rabbits), the mean tumor ADC value was 1.84 x 10 mm/s. The mean tumor size at pathology was 16 mm. The mean percent necrosis at the tumor's pathologic condition was 36%. The correlation between ADC value and percent necrosis showed an R value of 0.68.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced MRI using Gd-EOB-DTPA may provide additional information about tumor outline in the liver. Moreover, we showed a remarkable correlation between ADC values and tumor necrosis. Thus, diffusion-weighted imaging may be useful to assess tumor necrosis; nevertheless, the search for new modalities remains important.