Additional value of contrast enhanced intraoperative ultrasound for colorectal liver metastases

Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Treatment outcomes for colon cancer are steadily improving due to national health screening programs with advances in diagnostic methods, surgical techniques, and therapeutic agents.. The Korea Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary (KCCM) Committee intends to provide professionals who treat colon cancer with the most up-to-date, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve outcomes and help them make decisions that reflect their patients' values and preferences. These guidelines have been established by consensus reached by the KCCM Guideline Committee based on a systematic literature review and evidence synthesis and by considering the national health insurance system in real clinical practice settings. Each recommendation is presented with a recommendation strength and level of evidence based on the consensus of the committee.

Improved sensitivity and positive predictive value of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound in colorectal cancer liver metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is an effective treatment for improving the survival rate of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). However, accurately determining the resection margin of liver lesions during surgery remains challenging. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and predictive value of intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CE-IOUS) in CRLM patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

We performed a literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Weipu databases using the following search terms: metastatic liver cancer, colorectal cancer, sensitivity, contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound, CE-IOUS, colorectal liver metastases, and CRLM. The search period was set from the date of establishment of the database to September 2021. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2) recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies, and network meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 10 articles met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis results showed that the overall sensitivity and specificity of CE-IOUS were 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95-0.97] and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.70-0.80), respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of IOUS were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.82-0.86) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77-0.87), respectively. The area under the summary receiving operating characteristic (SROC) curves (AUCs) of CE-IOUS and IOUS were 0.9753 and 0.8590, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI of CE-IOUS changed the surgical margin were 0.205 and 0.071-0.465, P=0.000, the difference was statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

Based on the results of this meta-analysis, CE-IOUS improved the sensitivity and predictive value of CRLM detection compared with IOUS, and is more suitable for intraoperative planning of surgical margins. At present, it is the most sensitive imaging method available, and is recommended for use during liver resection to provide doctors with more reliable information during surgery.

A meta-analysis evaluating contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) in the context of surgery for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the outcomes of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) undergoing surgery.

METHOD

A thorough literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The Odds Ratio, Weighted Mean Difference, and 95% Confidence Interval were evaluated, by means of Random-Effects model.

RESULTS

Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria and incorporated 497 patients. The present study shows that CE-IOUS is associated with higher sensitivity and accuracy compared with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in identifying CRLMs (p < 0.05). The positive predictive value was similar among the different modalities. Furthermore, new CRLMs were identified by CE-IOUS, thus affecting the surgical plan in 128 patients (51.8% of the patients with new CRLMs). Moreover, 91 patients (71%) underwent a more extensive hepatectomy and 15 patients (11.7%) were considered non-operable. Two alternative contrast agents, Sonazoid and Sonovue, were employed with similar sensitivity (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These outcomes suggest the superiority of the CE-IOUS over MDCT, MRI, and IOUS for the staging of patients with CRLMs undergoing surgery. However, they should be treated with caution given the small number of the included studies.

Diagnostic and procedural intraoperative ultrasound: technique, tips and tricks for optimizing results

Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) is a valuable adjunctive tool that can provide real-time diagnostic information in surgery that has the potential to alter patient management and decrease complications. Lesion localization, characterization and staging can be performed, as well as surveying for additional lesions and metastatic disease. IOUS is commonly used in the liver for hepatic metastatic disease and hepatocellular carcinoma, in the pancreas for neuroendocrine tumors, and in the kidney for renal cell carcinoma. IOUS allows real-time evaluation of vascular patency and perfusion in organ transplantation and allows for early intervention for anastomotic complications. It can also be used to guide intraoperative procedures such as biopsy, fiducial placement, radiation, or ablation. A variety of adjuncts including microbubble contrast and elastography may provide additional information at IOUS. It is important for the radiologist to be familiar with the available equipment, common clinical indications, technique, relevant anatomy and intraoperative imaging appearance to optimize performance of this valuable imaging modality.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of liver metastases from extrahepatic primary cancers 2021

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy is standard treatment for colorectal liver metastases; however, it is unclear whether liver metastases from other primary cancers should be resected or not. The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery therefore created clinical practice guidelines for the management of metastatic liver tumors.

METHODS

Eight primary diseases were selected based on the number of hepatectomies performed for each malignancy per year. Clinical questions were structured in the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) format. Systematic reviews were performed, and the strength of recommendations and the level of quality of evidence for each clinical question were discussed and determined. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations.

RESULTS

The eight primary sites were grouped into five categories based on suggested indications for hepatectomy and consensus of the guidelines committee. Fourteen clinical questions were devised, covering five topics: (1) diagnosis, (2) operative treatment, (3) ablation therapy, (4) the eight primary diseases, and (5) systemic therapies. The grade of recommendation was strong for one clinical question and weak for the other 13 clinical questions. The quality of the evidence was moderate for two questions, low for 10, and very low for two. A flowchart was made to summarize the outcomes of the guidelines for the indications of hepatectomy and systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines were developed to provide useful information based on evidence in the published literature for the clinical management of liver metastases, and they could be helpful for conducting future clinical trials to provide higher-quality evidence.

Contrast-Enhanced Intraoperative Ultrasound Improved Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value in Colorectal Liver Metastasis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities in colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) has improved in recent years, therefore the role of current imaging techniques needs to be defined.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging, preoperative imaging (magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography), intraoperative ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound in the detection of CRLM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible trials published before 30 March 2020 were identified from the EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, and descriptive and quantitative data were extracted. Study quality was evaluated for the identified studies and a random-effects model was used to determine the integrated diagnosis estimation. Meta-regression was implemented to explore the possible contributors to heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Overall, 13 studies were included for analysis, comprising 682 patients with a total of 2303 liver lesions. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound were 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.97), 0.83 (95% CI 0.67-0.92), and 79 (95% CI 32-196), respectively. The overall weighted area under the curve was 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.97). In univariate meta-regression analysis, disappearing liver metastasis, contrast agent, and Kupffer phase were the potent sources of heterogeneity; however, in multivariate meta-regression, no definite variable was the source of the study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity for screening CRLM.

Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver - Update 2020 - WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS

The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB). The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications.The 2012 guideline requires updating as previously the differences of the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval as well as the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective.These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCA) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCA in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.

Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver-Update 2020 WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS

The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications. The 2012 guideline requires updating as, previously, the differences in the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective. These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCAs in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.

Variations in the vascular and biliary structures of the liver: a comprehensive anatomical study

PURPOSE

Vascular structures of the liver and the bile ducts are crucial during liver transplantation or liver resection surgery. Here, we report on variations in the vascular structures and bile ducts of 200 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic and multiple-detector computed tomographic data.

RESULTS

Michels type 1 was detected in 54% of the patients. The other most common variations were, respectively, Michels type 5 (13%) and type 2 (11%). Unclassified variations were defined as Michels type 11; 5% of patients were in this group. Type 1 variations in the hepatic portal vein were detected in 76% of our study group. Other common variations were type 2 (9%) and type 3 (8.5%). The left and intermediate hepatic veins united to become a single vein and then joined the inferior vena cava in 64% of the patients. The right, intermediate, and left hepatic veins joined the inferior vena cava separately in 36% of the patients. Type A, which represents the classic anatomy of the bile duct, was observed in 51.5% of our patients. Type C1 and type B were detected in 15% and 12% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe vascular and biliary variations in the livers of our patients.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of malignant liver lesions

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a safe, relatively inexpensive, and widely available imaging technique using dedicated imaging ultrasound sequences and FDA-approved contrast microbubbles that allow detection and characterization of malignant focal liver lesions with high diagnostic accuracy. CEUS provides dynamic real-time imaging with high spatial and temporal capability, allowing for unique contributions to the already established protocols for diagnosing focal liver lesions using CT and MR imaging. In patients with lesions indeterminate on CT and MRI, CEUS is a helpful problem-solving complementary tool that improves patient management. Furthermore, CEUS assists guidance of liver biopsies and local treatment. Variations of CEUS such as DCE-US and ultrasound molecular imaging are emerging for quantitative monitoring of treatment effects and possible earlier detection of cancer. In this review, basic principles of CEUS techniques and ultrasound contrast agents along with a description of the enhancement patterns of malignant liver lesions are summarized. Also, a discussion of the role of CEUS for treatment guidance and monitoring, intraoperative CEUS, and an outlook on emerging applications is provided.

Diagnostic performance of CT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, and PET/CT for the diagnosis of colorectal liver metastasis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Imaging studies, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET), have an essential role in the detection and localization of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).

PURPOSE

To systematically determine the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector row CT (MDCT), gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, and PET/CT for diagnosing CRLM and the sources of heterogeneity between the reported results.

STUDY TYPE

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SUBJECTS

In all, 2151 lesions in CT studies, 2301 lesions in MRI studies, 1846 lesions in PET/CT studies, FIELD STRENGTH: 1.5T and 3.0T.

ASSESSMENT

We identified research studies that investigated MDCT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, and PET/CT to diagnose CRLM by performing a systematic search of PubMed MEDLINE and EMBASE. Study quality was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2).

STATISTICAL TESTS

According to the types of imaging tests, study heterogeneity and the threshold effect were analyzed and the meta-analytic summary of sensitivity and specificity were estimated. Meta-regression analysis was performed to further investigate study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of the 860 articles screened, we found 36 studies from 24 articles reporting a diagnosis of CRLM (11 CT studies, 12 MRI studies, and 13 PET/CT studies). The meta-analytic summary sensitivity for CT, MRI, and PET/CT were 82.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74.0-88.1%), 93.1% (95% CI, 88.4-96.0%), and 74.1% (95% CI, 62.1-83.3%), respectively. The meta-analytic summary specificity for CT, MRI, and PET/CT were 73.5% (95% CI, 53.7-86.9%), 87.3% (95% CI, 77.5-93.2%), and 93.9% (95% CI, 83.9-97.8%), respectively. There was no threshold effect in any of the imaging tests. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly decreased the sensitivity of CT and MRI (P < 0.01), although it did not significantly affect the sensitivity of PET/CT. The study design, type of reference standard, and study quality also affected the diagnostic performances of imaging studies.

DATA CONCLUSION

Despite the heterogeneous accuracy between studies, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI showed the highest sensitivity, and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI and PET/CT had similar specificities for diagnosing CRLM.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1237-1250.

Intraoperative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Colorectal Liver Metastasis Surgery Improves the Identification and Characterization of Nodules

INTRODUCTION

The sensitivity of preoperative assessment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) ranges from 74 to 80%. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) associated with contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) may be able to improve this. Thus, the aims of this study were to assess the value of IOUS and CE-IOUS for the surgical approach and to determine risk factors both for the detection of new nodules and for the modification of the surgical strategy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three patients who underwent CRLM surgery were included. These patients had an MRI in the 8 weeks preceding surgery and benefited from intraoperative IOUS and CE-IOUS.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The use of IOUS/CE-IOUS permitted the identification of 43 additional lesions and an improved characterization of nodules in 23 patients with a resulting modification of surgical strategy. Lesions were down-staged in six patients and up-staged in six patients. Chemotherapy (p = 0.02) and the presence of nodules in the left lobe (p = 0.04) were predictive factors for finding new nodules at IOUS/CE-IOUS. The discovery of a new nodule systematically modified surgical management. IOUS/CE-IOUS improved intraoperative management of liver metastases. The techniques enable pertinent modification of surgical resections and a reduction of residual lesions.

Routine Preoperative Liver-specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging Does Not Exclude the Necessity of Contrast-enhanced Intraoperative Ultrasound in Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) during surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) when gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) is performed as a part of preoperative imaging work-up.

BACKGROUND

EOB-MRI is expected to supersede CE-IOUS, which is reportedly indispensable in surgery for CRLM.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients underwent EOB-MRI, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound within 1 month before surgery for CRLM. Conventional IOUS and subsequent CE-IOUS using perflubutane were performed after the laparotomy. All the nodules identified in any of the preoperative or intraoperative examinations were resected and were submitted for histological examination, in principle.

RESULTS

Preoperative imaging examinations identified 242 nodules; 25 additional nodules were newly identified using IOUS, 22 additional nodules were newly identified during CE-IOUS, and a histological examination further identified 4 nodules. Among the 25 nodules newly identified using IOUS, all 21 histologically proven CRLMs and 3 of the 4 benign nodules were correctly diagnosed using CE-IOUS. Among the 22 nodules newly identified using CE-IOUS, 17 nodules in 16 patients were histologically diagnosed as CRLMs. The planned surgical procedure was modified on the basis of IOUS and CE-IOUS findings in 12 and 14 patients, respectively. The sensitivity, positive-predictive value, and accuracy of CE-IOUS were 99%, 98%, and 97%, respectively. Those values of EOB-MRI (82%, 99%, 83%, respectively) were similar to CE-CT (81%, 99%, 81%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

CE-IOUS is useful in hepatic resection for CRLM, even if EOB-MRI and CE-CT are performed.

Is Strain Elastography (IO-SE) Sufficient for Characterization of Liver Lesions before Surgical Resection--Or Is Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Necessary?

Aim

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of IO-SE in comparison to IO-CEUS for the differentiation between malignant and benign liver lesions.

Material and Methods

In a retrospective diagnostic study IO-CEUS and SE examinations of 49 liver lesions were evaluated and compared to histopathological examinations. Ultrasound was performed using a multifrequency linear probe (6–9 MHz). The loops of CEUS were evaluated up to 5 min. The qualitative characterization of IO-SE was based on a color coding system (blue = hard, red = soft). Stiffness of all lesions was quantified by a specific scaling of 0–6 (0 = low, 6 = high) using 7 ROIs (2 central, 5 peripheral).

Results

All malignant lesions displayed a characteristic portal venous washout and could be diagnosed correctly by IO-CEUS. 3/5 benign lesions could not be characterized properly either by IO-CEUS or IO-SE prior to resection. Thus for IO-CEUS sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy were 100%, 40%, 94%, 100% and 94%. Lesion sizes were between 8 and 59 mm in diameter. Regarding the IO-SE, malignant lesions showed a marked variability. In qualitative analysis, 31 of the malignant lesions were blue colored denoting overall induration. Thirteen malignant lesions showed an inhomogenous color pattern with partial indurations. Two of the benign lesions also displayed overall induration. The other benign lesions showed an inhomogenous color mapping. Calculated sensitivity of the SE was 70.5%, specificity 60%, PPV 94%, NPV 18.75%, and accuracy 69%.

Conclusion

IO-CEUS is useful for localization and characterization of liver lesions prior to surgical resection whereas IO-SE provided correct characterization only for a limited number of lesions.

"Vanishing liver metastases"-A real challenge for liver surgeons

Expanded surgical intervention in colorectal liver metastasis (LM) and improved chemotherapy led to increasing problem of disappearing liver metastases (DLM). Treatment of those continues to evolve and poses a real challenge for HPB surgeons. This review discusses a clinical approach to DLM, emphasizing crucial steps in clinical algorithm. Particular issues such as imaging, intraoperative detection and surgical techniques are addressed. A step-by-step algorithm is suggested.

Criteria for the selective use of contrast-enhanced intra-operative ultrasound during surgery for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced intra-operative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) has become a part of clinical practice. Whether it should be selectively or routinely applied remains unclear. The aim of this study was to define criteria for the use of CE-IOUS.

METHODS

One-hundred and twenty-seven patients underwent a hepatectomy for CLMs using IOUS and CE-IOUS. All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 2 weeks prior to surgery. The reference was histology, and imaging at 6 months after surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Statistical significance was set at P = 0.05.

RESULTS

Using IOUS an additional 172 lesions in 51 patients were found. CE-IOUS found 14 additional lesions in 6 patients. Seventy-eight CLMs in 38 patients appeared within 6 months after surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, positive- and negative-predictive value were 63%, 98%, 100% and 27% for pre-operative imaging, 87%, 100%, 100% and 52% for IOUS, and 89%, 100%, 100% and 56% for IOUS+CE-IOUS, respectively. CE-IOUS allowed better tumour margin definition in 23 patients (18%), thus assisting resection. Analyses indicated that the presence of multiple (P = 0.014), and isoechoic CLMs (P = 0.049) were independently correlated with new findings at CE-IOUS.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with IOUS, CE-IOUS improved detection and resection guidance. These additions are significant and demand its use in cases with multiple and isoechoic CLMs.

[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose PET for Interventional Oncology in Liver Malignancy

[(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET is a functional imaging tool that provides metabolic information, which has the potential to detect a lesion before it becomes anatomically apparent. This ability constitutes a strong argument for using FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) in the management of oncology patients. Many studies have investigated the accuracy of FDG-PET or FDG-PET/CT for these purposes, but with small sample sizes based on retrospective cohorts. This article provides an overview of the role of FDG-PET or FDG-PET/CT in patients with liver malignancies treated by means of surgical resection, ablative therapy, chemoembolization, radioembolization, and brachytherapy, all being liver-directed oncologic interventions.

Hepatic veins in presurgical planning of hepatic resection: what a radiologist should know

Hepatic resection is considered to be feasible when all malignant nodules can be technically excised. The goal of the surgical approach is to optimize the oncologic resection (negative margins), sparing the non-cancerous hepatic parenchyma. The outflowing hepatic vein (HV) of that particular liver remnant must be intact in order to preserve its function. The purpose of this article is to familiarize radiologists with anatomy and anatomical variants of HVs, with special emphasis on segmental venous drainage for presurgical planning of hepatic resections. We focus on information which radiologist should give to hepatic surgeon to choose proper surgical approach. Radiologist's familiarity with the anatomy and anatomical variants of HVs is essential for accurate surgical planning to avoid venous congestion as postoperative complication. Any clinically important hepatic vein variation detected on presurgical imaging should be carefully recorded in the radiology report.

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common neoplasm and the third cause of cancer death worldwide. Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been applied for more than ten years and plays increasingly important roles in the management of HCC. On the basis of the Guideline and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for CEUS in the liver-update 2012 and related literature about the management of HCC, we summarize the main roles and applications of CEUS in the management of HCC, including HCC surveillance, diagnosis, CEUS-guided treatment, treatment response evaluation and follow-up. The diagnostic algorithm for HCC is also suggested. Meanwhile, the comparisons between CEUS and contrast enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CECT/CEMRI) in these areas are made. Although CEUS is subject to the same limitation as ordinary US and is inferior to CECT/CEMRI in some aspects, CEUS has proved to be of great value in the management of HCC with inherent advantages, such as sufficient high safety profile making it suitable for patients with renal failure or allergic to iodine, absence of radiation, easy reproducibility and high temporal resolution. The tremendous application of CEUS to the diagnosis and treatment of HCC provides more opportunities for patients with HCC diagnosed at different stages.

Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver - update 2012: A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS

Initially, a set of guidelines for the use of ultrasound contrast agents was published in 2004 dealing only with liver applications. A second edition of the guidelines in 2008 reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines for the liver, as well as implementing some non-liver applications. Time has moved on, and the need for international guidelines on the use of CEUS in the liver has become apparent. The present document describes the third iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using contrast specific imaging techniques. This joint WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative has implicated experts from major leading ultrasound societies worldwide. These liver CEUS guidelines are simultaneously published in the official journals of both organizing federations (i.e., Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology for WFUMB and Ultraschall in der Medizin/European Journal of Ultrasound for EFSUMB). These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of all currently clinically available ultrasound contrast agents (UCA). They are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCA in liver applications on an international basis and improve the management of patients worldwide.

Usefulness of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography (CE-IOUS) in patients with colorectal liver metastases after preoperative chemotherapy

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography to detect colorectal liver metastases after preoperative chemotherapy compared with intraoperative ultrasound and preoperative imaging techniques.

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2011, 28 patients with colorectal liver metastases underwent intraoperative ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography during hepatectomy following preoperative chemotherapy. The findings were compared to preoperative imaging using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

RESULTS

Preoperative imaging techniques detected 58 metastatic lesions in 28 patients. In 32 % of patients (n = 9), intraoperative ultrasound detected 24 missed hepatic nodules. In 14 % of patients (n = 4), contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography detected an additional six nodules and change in operative management occurred in 18 % of patients. Using univariate analysis, we found three factors significantly related to detection of additional metastases with contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography: three or more metastases before chemotherapy (p = 0.047), resolution of at least one metastasis (p = 0.011), and small liver metastases (largest lesion size ≤20 mm) after chemotherapy (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing surgery for colorectal liver metastases after chemotherapy, contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography improved both the sensitivity of intraoperative ultrasonography to detect liver metastases and the R0 hepatic resection rate.

Impact of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound on operation strategy in case of colorectal liver metastasis

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment is the only option for long-term survival in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Contrast-enhanced CT and MRI are usually used for preoperative liver imaging. The initial surgical strategy for liver resection is based upon these findings. Further optimization of the surgical strategy by contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) might further improve the surgical outcome.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the current impact of CE-IOUS with SonoVue(®) on the initial surgical strategy for CRLM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-six consecutive patients undergoing open liver resection for CRLM were evaluated retrospectively over a 2.5-year period. The patients underwent 97 operations. Preoperative staging was performed with contrast-enhanced CT in all patients and MRI was available in 66 of 86 patients. CE-IOUS was performed in all patients according to a standardized examination technique. Curved array and linear transducers were used. CRLM were identified in venous phase as hypovascular lesions. CE-IOUS findings were compared with preoperative staging.

RESULTS

Combined CT/MRI identified preoperatively 328 CRLM (mean 3.4, range 0-14). Seventy-two additional lesions (18%) were identified in 38 patients during the operation. Intraoperatively 41 additional CRLM in 20 patients were identified by inspection, palpation, and CE-IOUS (10%), and another 31 CRLM in 17 patients were identified by CE-IOUS alone (8%). All additional CRLM detected by CE-IOUS were confirmed by histology if resection was performed. CE-IOUS changed planned operation strategy in 29.9% of operations. A larger resection was necessary in 13.4% of the cases, reduced liver resection was found sufficient in 11.3%, and 5.2% were found inoperable. For patients diagnosed preoperatively with solitary lesions CE-IOUS changed operation strategy in 19% and radical tumor resection would have failed in 4.8% without CE-IOUS.

CONCLUSION

CE-IOUS is essential to ensure optimal and complete tumor resection both in patient with solitary CRLM and multiple metastases.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs multidetector-computed tomography for detecting liver metastases in colorectal cancer: a prospective, blinded, patient-by-patient analysis

AIM

This study compared the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and multidetector-computed tomography (MDCT) in the detection of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer.

METHOD

Between September 2004 and December 2008, 271 consecutive patients (146 men and 125 women; median age 68 years, range: 34-91 years) with primary colorectal cancer were evaluated. All underwent combined liver ultrasound and CEUS following intravenous injection of 2.4 ml of SonoVue(TM). The interval from injection to arrival time in the hepatic vein (ATHV) was noted. Contrast-enhanced MDCT in the portal phase was performed and interpreted blindly. In all patients, intra-operative ultrasound was used as the reference point. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or biopsy was performed on all suspicious lesions or if there was inconsistency in the results.

RESULTS

Liver metastases were detected in 21 (8%) patients. Both CEUS and MDCT had a sensitivity of 85.7%, with respective specificities of 97.6% and 95.6%, and positive predictive values of 75%vs 62%. The negative predictive value of both methods was 99%. In patients with and without liver metastases, ATHV was 18 and 22 s, respectively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CEUS has potential as a diagnostic alternative to MDCT in the detection of liver metastases. ATHV was shorter in patients with liver metastases.

Intra-operative contrast-enhanced ultrasound improves image enhancement in the evaluation of liver tumors

BACKGROUND

Intra-operative hepatic tumor ultrasound assessment can be difficult in patients with abnormal hepatic parenchyma because of the inability to enhance echogenic differences.

METHODS

Prospective pilot study of intra-operative ultrasound contrast enhancement in the evaluation of liver tumors to establish safety, dosing, and increased image enhancement with ultrasound contrast evaluation. A single bolus of perfluten lipid microspheres was then injected and ultrasound images were then re-recorded and saved.

RESULTS

Twenty consecutive patients underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation during the operative procedure. All patients received at least one bolus dose of microspheres (median 2 dose, range 1-3), without change in heart rate, blood pressure, end tidal CO(2), oxygen saturation, and sedation monitoring at the time of dosing and until 4 hr post-bolus doses. Two blinded independent readers found the contrasted images to have a statistically greater degree of enhancement (median improvement of 4, P = 0.01) and greater degree of size/border characteristics in the contrasted images (median improvement of 5, P = 0.01) for all histologies. In five patients, the extent of hepatic resection was altered from partial to complete lobectomy in order to obtain acceptable oncologic margin.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is safe and effective in pre-resection and pre-ablation treatment planning.

Colorectal cancer

Substantial progress has been made in colorectal cancer in the past decade. Screening, used to identify individuals at an early stage, has improved outcome. There is greater understanding of the genetic basis of inherited colorectal cancer and identification of patients at risk. Optimisation of surgery for patients with localised disease has had a major effect on survival at 5 years and 10 years. For rectal cancer, identification of patients at greatest risk of local failure is important in the selection of patients for preoperative chemoradiation, a strategy proven to improve outcomes in these patients. Stringent postoperative follow-up helps the early identification of potentially radically treatable oligometastatic disease and improves long-term survival. Treatment with adjuvant fluoropyrimidine for colon and rectal cancers further improves survival, more so in stage III than in stage II disease, and oxaliplatin-based combination chemotherapy is now routinely used for stage III disease, although efficacy must be carefully balanced against toxicity. In stage II disease, molecular markers such as microsatellite instability might help select patients for treatment. The integration of targeted treatments with conventional cytotoxic drugs has expanded the treatment of metastatic disease resulting in incremental survival gains. However, biomarker development is essential to aid selection of patients likely to respond to therapy, thereby rationalising treatments and improving outcomes.

The impact of intraoperative ultrasonography on the surgical treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases

Introduction

Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) has been the standard in surgical decision making in oncologic liver surgery. Preoperative imaging techniques have improved substantially in resent years; therefore, the importance of IOUS might change. The current results of IOUS were compared with preoperative high-resolution helical CT scanning and the impact of IOUS on surgical decision making was evaluated.

Methods

A total of 100 consecutive patients who underwent open surgery for colorectal liver metastases within 4 weeks after preoperative imaging, performed with high-speed helical CT scanners, were included for this study. During surgery, IOUS was performed by a liver specialized radiologist. The findings on preoperative and intraoperative imaging and surgical exploration were compared regarding number, site, and size of the hepatic lesions. The preoperative surgical plan was compared with the final surgical treatment.

Results

One hundred patients with CRLM underwent 117 surgical treatments. In 38 patients IOUS differed from preoperative data. In 23 cases IOUS identified more metastatic lesions. In five patients, intraoperative findings identified smaller or less hepatic lesions. Additional information on the localization of the hepatic lesions was gathered by IOUS and changed the surgical treatment in ten cases. IOUS alone altered the surgical strategy 35 times during 117 procedures. In nearly all cases, discrepancy between the preoperative CT scan and IOUS resulted in a change of surgical treatment.

Conclusions

Despite improvement in preoperative imaging technology, the intraoperative use of ultrasonography remains of crucial importance. The detection of preoperatively unknown lesions remains high with great consequence on surgical therapy.

Role of contrast enhanced ultrasonography in the assessment of hepatic metastases: A review

Contrast enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has improved both the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. It is now possible to evaluate in real time the perfusion of focal liver lesions in the arterial, portal and late contrast phases, and thus to characterize focal liver lesions with high diagnostic accuracy. As a result, CEUS has taken a central diagnostic role in the evaluation of focal liver lesions that are indeterminate upon computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging. The combined use of second generation contrast agents and low mechanical index techniques is essential for the detection of liver metastases, and it now allows the examination of the entire liver in both the portal and late phases. Several studies have shown that using CEUS instead of conventional ultrasonography without contrast agents significantly improves sensitivity in detection of liver metastases. Furthermore, the detection rate with CEUS seems to be similar to that of CT. This review describes the clinical role of CEUS in detecting liver metastases, including details about examination techniques, features of metastases observed with CEUS, and clinical results and guidelines.

Natural history of small, "indeterminate" hepatic lesions in patients with colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The initial staging CT scan for patients with colorectal cancer may reveal small, "indeterminate" hepatic lesions. The significance of these lesions is often unknown at the time of diagnosis. Surveillance of these lesions is often recommended because they may have an impact on the subsequent management of these patients. This study was designed to determine the prevalence and significance of small (<1 cm on CT scan), indeterminate liver lesions detected preoperatively in patients with colorectal cancer and to determine whether further surveillance imaging of these patients is required.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively, from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2005. All colorectal cancer patients with small, indeterminate liver lesions on their initial staging CT scan were included. These lesions were formally reported as being too small to be characterized. All subsequent surveillance images of the liver were reviewed to assess the natural history of these lesions.

RESULTS

Four hundred nineteen patients with colorectal cancer had staging CT performed. Seventy patients (16.7%) had small liver lesions on their initial CT that could not be definitely characterized. Forty-six (65.7%) underwent subsequent imaging of their liver lesions. Forty-one (89.1%) of these were shown to be stable lesions that were likely benign. Only five patients (10.9%) showed progression on subsequent liver imaging, suggestive of early metastases and consistent with their clinical picture.

CONCLUSION

Small, indeterminate liver lesions may occur in up to 16.7% of patients with colorectal cancer. Although most of these lesions remain quiescent, surveillance imaging is recommended because a small but not insignificant proportion of patients with such lesions actually harbor early metastases.