The role of 3D-CTA in the assessment of peripheral vascular lesions in trauma patients

Upper extremity vascular injuries: Etiology, management and outcome

BACKGROUND

Vascular injuries of the upper extremities are considered relatively rare injuries affecting mostly the young population. They often are complex injuries accompanied by other musculoskeletal trauma or trauma in other anatomic locations. Their management is challenging since they can lead to disabilities with major socioeconomic effects.

AIM

To analyze data about the mechanism of injury, the management algorithm and functional outcomes of vascular injuries of the upper extremity.

METHODS

One hundred and fifteen patients (96 males and 19 females) with arterial injuries of the upper extremity treated in a tertiary trauma center from January 2003 to December 2022 was conducted. Mean patients' age was 33.7 years and the mean follow up time was 7.4 years. Patients with Mangled Extremity Severity Score ≥ 7 and Injury Severity Score ≥ 20, previous upper limb surgery or major trauma and any neuromuscular or psychiatric disease were excluded, from the study.

RESULTS

A penetrating trauma was the most common cause of injury. The radial artery was the artery injured in most of the cases (37.4%) followed by the ulnar (29.5%), the brachial (12.1%) and the axillary (6%). A simultaneous injury of both of the forearm's arteries was in 15.6% of the cases. In 93% of the cases there were other concomitant musculoskeletal injuries of the extremity. Tendon lacerations were the most common, followed by nerve injuries. The postoperative functional scores (full Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and VAS) had very satisfactory values.

CONCLUSION

Although vascular injuries of the upper extremity are rare, they may occur in the context of major combined musculoskeletal trauma. Although a multidisciplinary approach is essential to optimize outcome, the ability of trained hand surgeons to repair all injuries in combined vascular and musculoskeletal upper extremity trauma, excluding isolated vascular injuries, ensures shorter operative times and better functional outcomes.

Trends in non-focal neurological chief complaints and CT angiography utilization among adults in the emergency department

Prudent imaging use is essential for cost reduction and efficient patient triage. Recent efforts have focused on head and neck CTA in patients with emergent concerns for non-focal neurological complaints, but have failed to demonstrate whether increases in utilization have resulted in better care. The objective of this study was to examine trends in head and neck CTA ordering and determine whether a correlation exists between imaging utilization and positivity rates. This is a single-center retrospective observational study at a quaternary referral center. This study includes patients presenting with headache and/or dizziness to the emergency department between January 2017 and December 2021. Patients who received a head and neck CTA were compared to those who did not. The main outcomes included annual head and neck CTA utilization and positivity rates, defined as the percent of scans with attributable acute pathologies. Among 24,892 emergency department visits, 2264 (9.1%) underwent head and neck CTA imaging. The percentage of patients who received a scan over the study period increased from 7.89% (422/5351) in 2017 to 13.24% (662/5001) in 2021, representing a 67.4% increase from baseline (OR, 1.14; 95% CI 1.11-1.18; P < .001). The positivity rate, or the percentage of scans ordered that revealed attributable acute pathology, dropped from 16.8% (71/422) in 2017 to 10.4% (69/662) in 2021 (OR, 0.86; 95% CI 0.79-0.94; P = .001), a 38% reduction in positive examinations. Throughout the study period, there was a 67.4% increase in head and neck CTA ordering with a concomitant 38.1% decrease in positivity rate.

Update in combined musculoskeletal and vascular injuries of the extremities

Combined musculoskeletal and vascular injuries of the extremities are conditions in which a multidisciplinary approach is a sine qua non to ensure life initially and limb viability secondarily. Vascular injuries as part of musculoskeletal trauma are usually the result of the release of a high energy load in the wound site so that the prognosis is determined by the degree of soft-tissue damage, duration of limb ischemia, patient’s medical status and presence of associated injuries. The management of these injuries is challenging and requires a specific algorithm of action, because they are usually characterized by increased morbidity, amputation rate, infection, neurological and functional deficits, and they could be life threatening. Although vascular injuries are rare and occur either isolated or in the context of major combined musculoskeletal trauma, the high index of suspicion, imaging control, and timely referral of the patient to organized trauma centers ensure the best functional outcome of the extremity in such challenging cases. Even after a successful initial treatment of a combined trauma pattern, long-term follow-up is crucial to prevent and detect early possible complications. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide an update on diagnosis and treatment of combined musculoskeletal and vascular injuries of the extremities, from an orthopedic point of view.

American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines on diagnosis and management of peripheral vascular injuries

The peripheral arteries and veins of the extremities are among the most commonly injured vessels in both civilian and military vascular trauma. Blunt causes are more frequent than penetrating except during military conflicts and in certain geographic areas. Physical examination and simple bedside investigations of pulse pressures are key in early identification of these injuries. In stable patients with equivocal physical examinations, computed tomography angiograms have become the mainstay of screening and diagnosis. Immediate open surgical repair remains the first-line therapy in most patients. However, advances in endovascular therapies and more widespread availability of this technology have resulted in an increase in the range of injuries and frequency of utilization of minimally invasive treatments for vascular injuries in stable patients. Prevention of and early detection and treatment of compartment syndrome remain essential in the recovery of patients with significant peripheral vascular injuries. The decision to perform amputation in patients with mangled extremities remains difficult with few clear indicators. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma in conjunction with the World Society of Emergency Surgery seeks to summarize the literature to date and provide guidelines on the presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of peripheral vascular injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Review study, level IV.

Innocuous wound with occult central vascular injury: A case report

Penetrating trauma is one of the most common cause of occult vascular injury, especially in low velocity penetrating injury. This is usually in pretext of an innocuous looking small external wound. It is important for clinician to have high index of suspicion for such types of injuries, as the clinical examination with presenting signs and symptoms may be deceptive. Radiological evaluation is of paramount importance and essential to rule out any occult vascular insult. Conventional open surgical exploration is the gold standard for vascular injuries in neck. Minimal invasive endovascular stenting has selective role based on zone of neck, mechanism of injury, hemodynamic stability, neurological status and resource availability at treating centre. Early diagnosis and referral to an appropriate higher centre, preferably a trauma centre with expertise in handling major vascular injuries, improve the outcome. We present a case report of small innocuous looking external wound harbouring major central vessel injury underneath following low-velocity penetrating injury.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Trauma to the Knee

Acute trauma to the knee is a common presentation seen in the emergency department. After a routine clinical examination, imaging is frequently performed to facilitate the diagnosis and almost always starts with radiographs. If clinically indicated, advanced cross-sectional imaging may then be performed for further evaluation. CT is often performed for preoperative planning of the complex tibial plateau and distal femur fractures. Currently, MRI is the study of choice for evaluation of bone marrow, internal derangements, and other soft-tissue injuries about the knee joint. In patients with knee dislocations, MR angiography may be performed simultaneously with MRI for evaluation of internal derangements and vascular injuries with less morbidity compared to conventional angiography. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Over-utilization of computed tomography angiography in extremity trauma

Objectives:

Widespread availability of computed tomography angiography (CTA) for diagnosing arterial injury in injured extremities has created the possibility of overuse. The objective of this study was to evaluate CTA utilization, indications, ordering personnel, and rate of significant findings for blunt or penetrating extremity trauma at a level I trauma center.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective chart review of 1440 consecutive CTAs of upper and lower extremities from 2010 to 2012 at a large level I trauma center, and included only those done for acute trauma. Data were collected with regard to injury, initial exam, reason given for ordering a CTA, specialty of physician ordering CTA, results, and vascular interventions needed. CTAs were categorized as appropriately ordered based on if there was a documented abnormal distal pulse or ankle-brachial index (ABI). Study indication was classified as inconclusive if no vascular exam was documented or physical exam varied.

Results:

A total of 481 CTAs were performed after blunt or penetrating trauma in the emergency room with 31.0% appropriately indicated, 48.0% without indication, and 21.8% inconclusive. Mechanism of injury was most commonly a gunshot wound (40.3%), followed by motor vehicle accidents (39.5%). Overall, 61.5% of the studies had normal arterial flow and only 15.8% of CTAs required vascular operative intervention. Of the studies appropriately indicated, 76.5% had positive findings, with 43% needing operative intervention compared to the inappropriately indicated studies only 11.6% had positive findings, with 0.4% needing operative intervention (P < .0001).

Conclusion:

CTA for blunt or penetrating trauma at a level I trauma center may be over-utilized. Often, this advanced imaging is ordered prior to orthopaedic evaluation or limb reduction, without exam-based indication, and most do not affect patients’ treatment. From our study, CTA utilization based on more stringent exam findings at our hospital could eliminate 48% of all CTA studies for trauma.

Multimodality Imaging Approaches for Evaluating Traumatic Extremity Injuries: Implications for Military Medicine

Significance: Military service members are susceptible to traumatic extremity injuries that often result in limb loss. Tremendous efforts have been made to improve medical treatment that supports residual limb function and health. Despite recent improvements in treatment and novel prosthetic devices, many patients experience a wide range of clinical problems within residual limbs that can negatively impact the progress of rehabilitation programs while also impairing functional capacity and overall quality of life. Recent Advances: In addition to existing standard imaging modalities that are used for clinical evaluation of patients suffering from traumatic extremity injury, novel noninvasive imaging techniques are in development that may facilitate rapid and sensitive assessment of various aspects of traumatic extremity injuries and residual limb health. Critical Issues: Despite recent advances, there remains a clinical need for noninvasive quantitative imaging techniques that are capable of providing rapid objective assessments of residual limb health at the time of initial presentation as well as after various forms of medical treatment. Future Directions: Ongoing development of imaging techniques that allow for assessment of anatomical and physiological characteristics of extremities exposed to traumatic injury should greatly enhance the quality of patient care and assist in optimizing clinical outcomes.

Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a venous phase in CT angiography of the extremities in the setting of trauma: is vein imaging in vain?

PURPOSE

This study examined the value of including a venous phase in addition to the initial arterial phase in the CT angiography evaluation of extremity trauma.

METHODS

CT studies from 157 patients (average age 38 years, age range 18-89 years, male 83%, female 17%) were obtained for trauma to the upper or lower extremity with both arterial and venous phases and retrospectively reviewed. The detection rate and type of vascular injury were evaluated by using the arterial phase alone and compared to the detection rate when interpreting the arterial and venous phases together.

RESULTS

Arterial injury was identified in 35 cases (22%), and venous injury was identified in seven cases (5%). Four cases of discrepant diagnoses were identified between image interpretation of the arterial phase alone and interpretation using both phases, all of which were venous injuries that were visible only on the venous phase. None of the four cases of venous injury required a change in surgical management. Overall, no significant difference in diagnosis between the two methods of image interpretation (arterial phase alone, arterial and venous phases) was discovered (p > 0.125; CI 95%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a venous phase in the CT angiography evaluation of extremity trauma does not add significant arterial diagnostic or clinical management value despite its potential of increasing the diagnostic detection rate of venous injury.

Vascular Injury in Orthopedic Trauma

Vascular injury in orthopedic trauma is challenging. The risk to life and limb can be high, and clinical signs initially can be subtle. Recognition and management should be a critical skill for every orthopedic surgeon. There are 5 types of vascular injury: intimal injury (flaps, disruptions, or subintimal/intramural hematomas), complete wall defects with pseudoaneurysms or hemorrhage, complete transections with hemorrhage or occlusion, arteriovenous fistulas, and spasm. Intimal defects and subintimal hematomas with possible secondary occlusion are most commonly associated with blunt trauma, whereas wall defects, complete transections, and arteriovenous fistulas usually occur with penetrating trauma. Spasm can occur after either blunt or penetrating trauma to an extremity and is more common in young patients. Clinical presentation of vascular injury may not be straightforward. Physical examination can be misleading or initially unimpressive; a normal pulse examination may be present in 5% to 15% of patients with vascular injury. Detection and treatment of vascular injuries should take place within the context of the overall resuscitation of the patient according to the established principles of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocols. Advances in the field, made mostly during times of war, have made limb salvage the rule rather than the exception. Teamwork, familiarity with the often subtle signs of vascular injuries, a high index of suspicion, effective communication, appropriate use of imaging modalities, sound knowledge of relevant technique, and sequence of surgical repairs are among the essential factors that will lead to a successful outcome. This article provides a comprehensive literature review on a subject that generates significant controversy and confusion among clinicians involved in the care of trauma patients. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(4):249-259.].

Radiological assessment of irreducible posterolateral knee subluxation after dislocation due to interposition of the vastus medialis: a case report

Knee dislocation is a serious and relatively uncommon traumatism that every emergency room is supposed to diagnose and treat rapidly. Most of the time these dislocations reduce spontaneously or with closed reduction. If a subluxation persists, an incarceration of soft tissue in the joint must be suspected. Irreducible knee subluxations after dislocation are rare entities better described in the orthopaedic than in the radiological literature. However, the initial radiological assessment is an important tool to obtain the correct diagnosis, to detect neurovascular complications, and to plan the most suitable treatment. In cases of delayed diagnosis, the functional prognosis of the joint and even the limb may be seriously compromised primarily because of vascular lesions. Thereby, vascular imaging is essential in cases of dislocation of the knee, and we will discuss the role of angiography and the more recent use of computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography. Our patient presented with an irreducible knee subluxation due to interposition of the vastus medialis, and we will review the classical clinical presentation and 'do not miss' imaging findings on conventional radiography, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Finally, we will also report the classical imaging pathway indicated in knee dislocation, with a special emphasis on the irreducible form.

Comparing color Doppler ultrasonography and angiography to assess traumatic arterial injuries of the extremities

Background:

Traumatic events are one of the major causes of arterial injuries. Physical examination is not a good predictor of the extent of injuries and arteriography is considered as the gold standard for this purpose. In the recent years, noninvasive modalities are increasingly replacing diagnostic arteriography. Color Doppler ultrasonography (USG) is an excellent method to investigate arterial diseases.

Objectives:

The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of color Doppler USG compared to conventional angiography in traumatic arterial injuries of extremities.

Patients and Methods:

Seventy-five patients with extremity trauma suspicious for arterial injury were examined by color Doppler USG just before angiography. Doppler pattern and flow states were assessed, then angiography was performed. The results of duplex USG were compared with angiography.

Results:

Color Doppler USG had a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 98% in diagnosis of arterial injury. Positive and negative predictive values of Doppler USG were 92.5% and 94.2%, respectively.

Conclusions:

Color Doppler USG can be used as a reliable modality with acceptable sensitivity and specificity values to screen hemodynamically stable patients with limb trauma suspicious for arterial injury.

Management of combat vascular injuries using modern imaging: are we getting better?

Background. Vascular injuries often result in life threatening hemorrhage or limb loss. When they present with a single entry or exit wound, surgery is immediately indicated. With multiple injuries, however, imaging such as CTA is necessary for diagnosis and choice of treatment. Methods. For all combat-related vascular cases admitted to our medical center during the Lebanon wars in 1982 and 2006, we compiled and compared presenting signs and symptoms, means of diagnosis, treatments, and results. Results. 126 patients with vascular injuries were admitted (87 in 1982, 39 in 2006). 90% were male; mean age of 29 years (range 20-53). All injuries were accompanied by insult to soft tissue, bones, and viscera. 75% presented with injury to arteries in the extremities. 75% of these patients presented with limb ischemia, and 25% sustained massive blood loss. Treatments included venous interposition graft, end-to-end anastomosis, venous patch, endovascular technique (only in 2006), and ligation/observation. Complications included thrombosis and wound infections. Mortality and amputations occurred only in 1982, and this may be attributed to the use of imaging, advanced technique, and shorter average time from injury to hospital (7 hours). Conclusions. We recommend CTA as the first line modality for diagnosis of vascular injuries, as its liberal use allowed for early and appropriate treatment. Treatment outcomes improved with fast and effective resuscitation, liberal use of tourniquets and fasciotomies, and meticulous treatment by a multidisciplinary team.

ACR appropriateness criteria(®) acute trauma to the knee

There are more than 1 million visits to the ER annually in the United States for acute knee trauma. Many of these are twisting injuries in young patients who can walk and bear weight, and emergent radiography is not required. Several clinical decision rules have been devised that can considerably reduce the number of radiographic studies ordered without missing a clinically significant fracture. Although fractures are seen on only 5% of emergency department knee radiographs, 86% of knee fractures result from blunt trauma. In patients with falls or twisting injuries who have focal tenderness, effusion, or inability to bear weight, radiography should be the first imaging study performed. If radiography shows no fracture, MRI is best for evaluating for a suspected meniscal or ligament tear or patellar dislocation. Patients with knee dislocation should undergo radiography and MRI, as well as fluoroscopic angiography, CT angiography, or MR angiography. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Pseudoaneurysm and intramuscular haematoma after dynamic hip screw fixation for intertrochanteric femoral fracture: a case report

We report the case of an 83-year-old woman who developed a pseudoaneurysm of the profunda femoris artery after dynamic hip screw fixation for an intertrochanteric femoral fracture. 23 days after the fixation, radiological investigations including colour Doppler ultrasonography and computed tomographic angiography identified a pseudoaneurysm surrounded by a large intramuscular haematoma close to the profunda femoris. The patient underwent emergency evacuation and was under intensive care for 3 days and was discharged 6 weeks later, with no complications. At one-year follow-up, the wound and fracture had healed, but the patient was confined to a wheelchair. A high index of clinical suspicion and radiological imaging are necessary for making the diagnosis.

Vascular injuries in an urban combat setting: experience from the 2006 Lebanon war

Vascular injuries are manifested by life-threatening hemorrhage or limb loss and their diagnosis and treatment are challenging. Angiography is beyond the capability of available teams during wartime. Thus, computed tomographic angiography (CTA) may become a major triage tool. This study reports on the presentation, diagnosis, management and outcome of combat vascular injuries with emphasis on the utility of CTA. Presenting signs and symptoms, means of diagnosis, treatments and results of all combat sustained vascular cases were collected and compiled with follow-up. Of 511 patients, 39 patients (7.6%) with vascular injuries were admitted. Injuries were penetrating and accompanied by soft tissue and bone insult. Diagnosis was made by CTA in 62% and by surgical exploration in 38%. Extremity arteries were injured in 72% of cases. Treatment included surgical and endovascular techniques.

COMPLICATIONS

one late amputation, 5% thrombosis, 24% wound infections with no mortalities or early amputations. Although similarities exist between this experience and recent wartime reports, differences are apparent including the effectiveness of CTA. High index of suspicion and liberal use of CTA allows for an early and accurate diagnosis of a vascular injury resulting in high rates of limb salvage and low mortality. CTA should be the first line modality for diagnosis of vascular injuries, reserving angiography for endovascular treatment.

Postmortem whole-body computed tomography angiography visualizing vascular rupture in a case of fatal car crash

In addition to the increasingly significant role of multislice computed tomography in forensic pathology, the performance of whole-body computed tomography angiography provides outstanding results. In this case, we were able to detect multiple injuries of the parenchymal organs in the upper abdomen as well as lesions of the brain parenchyma and vasculature of the neck. The radiologic findings showed complete concordance with the autopsy and even supplemented the autopsy findings in areas that are difficult to access via a manual dissection (such as the vasculature of the neck). This case shows how minimally invasive computed tomography angiography can serve as an invaluable adjunct to the classic autopsy procedure.

A prospective validation of a current practice: the detection of extremity vascular injury with CT angiography

INTRODUCTION

Arteriography is the current "gold standard" for the detection of extremity vascular injuries. Less invasive than operative exploration, conventional arteriography (CA) still has a 1% to 3% risk of morbidity and may delay definitive repair. Recent improvements in computed tomography (CT) technology has since broadened the application of CT to include the diagnosis of cervical, thoracic, and now extremity vascular injury. We hypothesized that CT angiography (CTA) provides equivalent injury detection compared with the more invasive CA, but is more rapidly completed and more cost effective.

METHODS

A prospective evaluation of patients, ages 18 to 50, with potential extremity vascular injuries was performed during 2006-2007. Ankle-brachial indices (ABI) of injured extremities were measured on presentation in all patients without hard signs of vascular injury. Patients whose injured extremity ABI was <0.9 were enrolled and underwent CTA followed by either CA or operative exploration if CTA findings were limb threatening. Interventionalists were blinded to CTA findings before performing and reading CAs.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (mean age, 26.1 +/- 7.1 years) had 22 extremity CTAs after gunshot (82%), stab (9%), or pedestrian struck by automobile (9%) injuries to either upper (32%) or lower (68%) extremities. Eleven of 22 (50%) extremities had associated orthopedic injuries while the mean ABI of the study population was 0.72 +/- 0.21. Twenty-one of 22 (96%) CTAs were diagnostic and all CTAs were confirmed by either CA alone (n = 18), operative exploration (n = 2), or both CA and operative exploration (n = 2). Diagnostic CTAs had 100% sensitivity and specificity for clinically relevant vascular injury detection. Unlike rapidly obtained CTA, CA required 131 +/- 61 minutes (mean +/- SD) to complete. In our center, CTA saves $12,922 in patient charges and $1,166 in hospital costs per extremity when compared with CA.

CONCLUSIONS

With acceptable injury detection, rapid availability, and a favorable cost profile, our results suggest that CTA may replace CA as the diagnostic study of choice for vascular injuries of the extremities.

Role of Selective Management of Penetrating Injuries in Mass Casualty Incidents

Terrorist violence has emerged as an increasingly common cause of mass casualty incidents (MCI) due to the sequelae of explosive devices and shooting massacres. A proper emergency medical system disaster plan for dealing with an MCI is of paramount importance to salvage lives. Because the number of casualties following a MCI is likely to exceed the medical resources of the receiving health care facilities, patients must be appropriately sorted to establish treatment priorities. By necessity, clinical signs are likely to prove cornerstones of triage during MCI. An appropriate and effective application of experiences learned from the use of selective nonoperative management (SNOM) techniques may prove essential in this triage process. The present appraisal of the available literature strongly supports that the appropriate utilization of these clinical indicators to identify patients appropriate for SNOM is essential, critical, and readily applicable. We also review the initial emergent triage priorities for penetrating injuries to the head, neck, torso, and extremities in a mass casualty setting.

Extremities--indications and techniques for treatment of extremity vascular injuries

Traumatic vascular injuries involving the extremity are rare and penetrating trauma accounts for the majority of such injuries. The remaining arterial injuries are as a result of either blunt or iatrogenic injuries. The rapid detection, localisation and characterisation of vascular injuries in patients who have a traumatic extremity injury is essential for the effective management and treatment of such injuries. This review will discuss the expanding role of multi-detector computed tomography angiography in diagnosing vascular injuries and its implications on conventional diagnostic angiography. The roles of other non-invasive imaging modalities are reviewed. The presentation and types of vascular injuries in blunt and penetrating injuries are discussed. While surgery remains the gold standard in the management of vascular extremity injuries it has significant morbidity rates. Endovascular techniques are increasingly being used for the treatment of vascular traumatic injuries and various techniques including balloon occlusion, embolisation and stent/stent graft placement are discussed.