Anal endosonographic findings in women after vaginal delivery

Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and anal incontinence: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are the commonest cause of anal incontinence in women of reproductive age. We determined the risk of anal sphincter defects diagnosed by ultrasound, and the risk of anal incontinence in (i) all women who deliver vaginally, (ii) in women without clinical suspicion of OASIS, and (iii) after primary repair of sphincter injury, by systematic review.

METHODS

We searched major databases until June 2018, without language restrictions. Random effects meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled estimates of ultrasound diagnosed OASIS and risk of anal incontinence symptoms at various time points after delivery, and of persistent sphincter defects after primary repair. We reported the association between ultrasound diagnosed OASIS and anal incontinence symptoms using relative risk (RR) with 95 % CI.

RESULTS

We included 103 studies involving 16,110 women. Of all women who delivered vaginally, OASIS were diagnosed on ultrasound in 26 % (95 %CI, 21-30, I² = 91 %), and 19 % experienced anal incontinence (95 %CI, 14-25, I² = 92 %). In women without clinical suspicion of OASIS (n = 3688), sphincter defects were observed in 13 % (10-17, I² = 89 %) and anal incontinence experienced by 14 % (95 % CI: 6-24, I² = 95 %). Following primary repair of OASIS, 55 % (46-63, I² = 98 %) of 7549 women had persistent sphincter defect with 38 % experiencing anal incontinence (33-43, I² = 92 %). There was a significant association between ultrasound diagnosed OASIS and anal incontinence (RR 3.74, 2.17-6.45, I² = 98 %).

INTERPRETATION

Women and clinicians should be aware of the high risk for sphincter defects following vaginal delivery even when clinically unsuspected. This underlines the need of careful and systematic perineal assessment after birth to mitigate the risk of missing OASIS. We also noted a high rate of persistent defects and symptoms following primary repair of OASIS. This dictates the need for provision of robust training for clinicians to achieve proficiency and sustain competency in repairing OASIS.

Is obstetric anal sphincter injury a risk factor for levator ani muscle avulsion in vaginal delivery?

OBJECTIVE

To analyze whether women who sustain obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in their first vaginal delivery have a higher incidence of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion than do women without OASI.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of 80 primiparous women who gave birth at our tertiary obstetric unit between September 2011 and July 2013. The women were divided into two groups: women diagnosed with OASI during vaginal delivery (n = 40) and women without OASI (n = 40), matched by mode of delivery and newborn birth weight. Four-dimensional (4D) transperineal ultrasound was performed in all participants at 6-12 months after delivery to assess for integrity or avulsion of the LAM. Ultrasound images were evaluated by two observers who were blinded to group assignment and clinical data. Interobserver agreement was assessed to determine the reproducibility of 4D transperineal ultrasound for diagnosing LAM avulsion.

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant differences between the two groups. The incidence of LAM avulsion was 24.3% in the OASI group and 34.2% in the control group (P = 0.448). Interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of LAM avulsion in the study population using 4D transperineal ultrasound was 89.5%, with a kappa index of 0.76.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings do not support OASI as a risk factor for LAM avulsion. Prospective studies in larger populations are needed to establish the biomechanical relationships of the pelvic floor structures involved in vaginal delivery. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Incontinence after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter tears is related to relative length of reconstructed external sphincter: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To determine if anatomic primary repair with end-to-end reconstruction of the external anal sphincter (EAS) in its full length combined with separate repair of coexisting internal anal sphincter (IAS) tear, when present, results in less incontinence and better anal sphincter integrity compared with conventional primary end-to-end repair in which the IAS is not actively reconstructed.

METHODS

Women who sustained third- or fourth-degree obstetric tears were included prospectively in the study following anatomic primary repair. Women treated with conventional primary repair prior to the study period comprised the control group. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography (3D-EAUS) images were classified according to the EAUS defect score, and incontinence according to St Mark's score.

RESULTS

Sixty-three women were included in the study group and 61 in the control group, with mean follow-up times of 11 and 21 months, respectively. Among women who had not delivered vaginally prior to the tear, St Mark's score ≥ 3 was reported by 9.6% (5/52) in the study group and 37.5% (15/40) in the control group at follow-up (P = 0.002). The corresponding numbers among women who had previously delivered vaginally were 36.4% (4/11) and 42.9% (9/21), respectively (non-significant). St Mark's score correlated with the EAUS defect score (P = 0.017). An EAS defect exceeding 50% of the sphincter length was significantly less common in the study group, and in a multivariable logistic regression model, mode of repair (anatomic vs conventional) was the only factor explaining the difference in EAS sphincter length between the two groups (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Improved continence status after anatomic primary repair was associated with a better longitudinal reconstruction of the EAS, while the integrity of the IAS did not differ between the groups. Women with a history of vaginal delivery prior to the sphincter tear had an inferior outcome regardless of mode of repair.

Long-term outcome after obstetric injury: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To examine problems experienced by women after vaginal delivery with and without a sphincter tear and compare those with less and more severe injuries.

DESIGN

Retrospective questionnaire study. Setting. Regional hospital in Sweden.

SAMPLE

A total of 324 women with and 309 without sphincter tears.

METHODS

Questionnaires were sent out four to eight years after delivery enquiring about the existence and time course of gas incontinence, fecal incontinence, dyspareunia and perineal pain. A question about vacuum delivery was also included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of persisting symptoms.

RESULTS

The reply rate was 77%. About 10% of the women with a sphincter tear had fecal incontinence initially, compared with 3% among those without a sphincter tear. In women with moderate or severe tears, 20 and 31%, respectively, had gas incontinence, compared with 6% of women without a tear. Dyspareunia and perineal pain were present 18-23% of women in the tear groups compared with 9-12% of those without a tear. Almost 45% of women with initial symptoms had remaining problems after four to eight years. There was a significantly higher risk for symptoms after vacuum extraction (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Gas incontinence, fecal incontinence, dyspareunia and perineal pain were common problems after delivery. The prevalence of persisting symptoms was high even among women without a tear. The higher prevalence after vacuum extraction delivery indicates that there are more complications associated with this mode of delivery than previously thought.