Correlations between aorto-popliteal bolus transit speed and aortic and popliteal bolus transit time during CT angiography of aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries

Optimization of scan timing for aortic computed tomographic angiography using the test bolus injection technique

BACKGROUND

With fast computed tomography (CT), it is possible for the scanning to outpace the contrast medium bolus during aortic CT angiography (CTA).

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a new method for reducing the risk of outpacing in which the scan start timing (ST) and speed can be estimated from the peak enhancement time measured at the femoral artery using a single test-bolus injection (femoral artery test injection method [FTI method]).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 30 cases of aortic CTA, we measured the time to peak enhancement at the femoral artery (TPF) and the ascending aorta (TPA) with test-bolus injection performed twice in each examination. From the resultant linear relationship between TPF and transit time (TT = TPF - TPA), we developed a method for determining the ST and TT from TPF. One hundred patients were assigned to two groups: FTI and bolus tracking (BT), each with 50 patients. CT values were measured in main vessels (ascending aorta, descending aorta, femoral artery). The CT values of the vessels and the rate of cases with more than 300 HU (good cases) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The enhancement in the FTI method was significantly higher than that of the BT method (average CT values: FTI, 388.3 ± 52.4; BT, 281.2 ± 59.1; P < 0.001). The rates of good cases for FTI and BT were 86.0% and 46.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The FTI method was very effective in reducing the risk of outpacing of the contrast medium transit in aortic CTA without the need for an additional contrast medium dose.

Low-Voltage, High-Pitch Computerized Tomography Angiography of the Infrarenal Aorta and Lower Extremity Vessels: Assessment of Radiation Dose, Image Quality With Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction, and Efficacy of Test Injection Using a Monitoring Scan at Knee Level

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to assess image quality and radiation dose of low-voltage high-pitch computed tomography angiography of the infrarenal aorta and lower extremities and evaluate the efficacy of test injection technique using a monitoring scan at knee level.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients with suspected peripheral arterial disease were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (30 patients, 80 kVp, high pitch [3.2], and hybrid iterative reconstruction [sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction]) and group 2 (30 patients, 120 kVp, low pitch [1.0], and filtered back projection reconstruction). The test injection technique at knee level was used to determine the scan delay time in group 1. The image quality and radiation exposure were compared.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between the 2 groups in mean (SD) arterial attenuation (80 vs 120 kVp: 507.78 [103.01] vs 317.54 [62.03] Hounsfield units, P < 0.001), mean (SD) signal-to-noise ratio (51.04 [20.29] vs 34.66 [9.94], P < 0.001), and contrast-to-noise ratio (44.83 [17.93] vs 28.26 [9.60], P < 0.001). No difference in subjective image quality was found between the 2 groups (all P > 0.05). The imaging time was significantly shorter in group 1 (2.70 [0.11] vs 14.65 [0.90s], P < 0.001). The mean (SD) effective dose was significantly lower in the 80 kVp group (0.76 [0.06] vs 4.29 [0.63] mSv, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The 80-kVp high-pitch computed tomography angiography of the lower limbs using sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction yields reduction of radiation exposure as well as obtains acceptable image quality if acquisition protocols are used in conjunction with the test injection technique using monitoring scan at knee level to determine the delay time.