When should we biopsy a solitary central cartilaginous tumor of long bones? Literature review and management proposal

A retrospective external validation study of the Birmingham Atypical Cartilage Tumour Imaging Protocol (BACTIP) for the management of solitary central cartilage tumours of the proximal humerus and around the knee

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to externally validate the Birmingham Atypical Cartilage Tumour Imaging Protocol (BACTIP) recommendations for differentiation/follow-up of central cartilage tumours (CCTs) of the proximal humerus, distal femur, and proximal tibia and to propose BACTIP adaptations if the results provide new insights.

METHODS

MRIs of 123 patients (45 ± 11 years, 37 men) with an untreated CCT with MRI follow-up (n = 62) or histopathological confirmation (n = 61) were retrospectively/consecutively included and categorised following the BACTIP (2003-2020 / Ghent University Hospital/Belgium). Tumour length and endosteal scalloping differences between enchondroma, atypical cartilaginous tumour (ACT), and high-grade chondrosarcoma (CS II/III/dedifferentiated) were evaluated. ROC-curve analysis for differentiating benign from malignant CCTs and for evaluating the BACTIP was performed.

RESULTS

For lesion length and endosteal scalloping, ROC-AUCs were poor and fair-excellent, respectively, for differentiating different CCT groups (0.59-0.69 versus 0.73-0.91). The diagnostic performance of endosteal scalloping and the BACTIP was higher than that of lesion length. A 1° endosteal scalloping cut-off differentiated enchondroma from ACT + high-grade chondrosarcoma with a sensitivity of 90%, reducing the potential diagnostic delay. However, the specificity was 29%, inducing overmedicalisation (excessive follow-up). ROC-AUC of the BACTIP was poor for differentiating enchondroma from ACT (ROC-AUC = 0.69; 95%CI = 0.51-0.87; p = 0.041) and fair-good for differentiation between other CCT groups (ROC-AUC = 0.72-0.81). BACTIP recommendations were incorrect/unsafe in five ACTs and one CSII, potentially inducing diagnostic delay. Eleven enchondromas received unnecessary referrals/follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Although promising as a useful tool for management/follow-up of CCTs of the proximal humerus, distal femur, and proximal tibia, five ACTs and one chondrosarcoma grade II were discharged, potentially inducing diagnostic delay, which could be reduced by adapting BACTIP cut-off values.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Mostly, Birmingham Atypical Cartilage Tumour Imaging Protocol (BACTIP) assesses central cartilage tumours of the proximal humerus and the knee correctly. Both when using the BACTIP and when adapting cut-offs, caution should be taken for the trade-off between underdiagnosis/potential diagnostic delay in chondrosarcomas and overmedicalisation in enchondromas.

KEY POINTS

• This retrospective external validation confirms the Birmingham Atypical Cartilage Tumour Imaging Protocol as a useful tool for initial assessment and follow-up recommendation of central cartilage tumours in the proximal humerus and around the knee in the majority of cases. • Using only the Birmingham Atypical Cartilage Tumour Imaging Protocol, both atypical cartilaginous tumours and high-grade chondrosarcomas (grade II, grade III, and dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas) can be misdiagnosed, excluding them from specialist referral and further follow-up, thus creating a potential risk of delayed diagnosis and worse prognosis. • Adapted cut-offs to maximise detection of atypical cartilaginous tumours and high-grade chondrosarcomas, minimise underdiagnosis and reduce potential diagnostic delay in malignant tumours but increase unnecessary referral and follow-up of benign tumours.

A Systematic Review of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Localized Dedifferentiated Chondrosarcoma

Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (DDCS) is a high-grade subtype of chondrosarcoma with the bimorphic histological appearance of a conventional chondrosarcoma component with abrupt transition to a high-grade, non-cartilaginous sarcoma. DDCS can be radiographically divided into central and peripheral types. Wide resection is currently the main therapeutic option for localized DDCS. Moreover, the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of available evidence to evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on localized DDCS. The purpose was to compare the 5-year survival rate among patients treated with surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone for localized DDCS. The search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. Of the 217 studies shortlisted, 11 retrospective non-randomized studies (comprising 556 patients with localized DDCS) were selected. The 5-year survival rates were similar between the two treatment groups (28.2% (51/181) vs. 24.0% (90/375), respectively). The overall pooled odds ratio was 1.25 (95% confidence interval: 0.80-1.94; p = 0.324), and heterogeneity I2 was 2%. However, when limited to peripheral DDCS, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with prolonged survival (p = 0.03). Due to the paucity of included studies and the absence of prospective comparative studies, no conclusions can be drawn regarding the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized DDCS.

Classification of Chondrosarcoma: From Characteristic to Challenging Imaging Findings

Chondrosarcomas can be classified into various forms according to the presence or absence of a precursor lesion, location, and histological subtype. The new 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone classifies chondrogenic bone tumors as benign, intermediate (locally aggressive), or malignant, and separates atypical cartilaginous tumors (ACTs) and chondrosarcoma grade 1 (CS1) as intermediate and malignant tumors. respectively. Furthermore, the classification categorizes chondrosarcomas (including ACT) into eight subtypes: central conventional (grade 1 vs. 2–3), secondary peripheral (grade 1 vs. 2–3), periosteal, dedifferentiated, mesenchymal, and clear cell chondrosarcoma. Most chondrosarcomas are the low-grade, primary central conventional type. The rarer subtypes include clear cell, mesenchymal, and dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas. Comprehensive analysis of the characteristic imaging findings can help differentiate various forms of chondrosarcomas. However, distinguishing low-grade chondrosarcomas from enchondromas or high-grade chondrosarcomas is radiologically and histopathologically challenging, even for experienced radiologists and pathologists.

Assessment of central cartilaginous tumor of the appendicular bone: inter-observer and intermodality agreement and comparison of diagnostic performance of CT and MRI

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic performance, inter-observer agreement, and intermodality agreement between computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the depiction of the major distinguishing imaging features of central cartilaginous tumors have not been investigated.

PURPOSE

To determine the inter-observer and intermodality agreement of CT and MRI in the evaluation of central cartilaginous tumors of the appendicular bones, and to compare their diagnostic performance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two independent radiologists retrospectively reviewed preoperative CT and MRI. Inter-observer and intermodality agreement between CT and MRI in the assessment of distinguishing imaging features, including lesion size, deep endosteal scalloping, cortical expansion, cortical disruption, pathologic fracture, soft tissue extension, and peritumoral edema, were evaluated. The agreement with histopathology and the accuracy of the radiologic diagnoses made with CT and MRI were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients were included. CT and MRI showed high inter-observer and intermodality agreements with regard to size, deep endosteal scalloping, cortical expansion, cortical disruption, and soft tissue extension (ICC = 0.96-0.99, k = 0.60-0.90). However, for the evaluation of pathologic fracture, MRI showed only moderate inter-observer agreement (k = 0.47). Peritumoral edema showed only fair intermodality agreement (k = 0.28-0.33) and moderate inter-observer agreement (k = 0.46) on CT. Both CT and MRI showed excellent diagnostic performance, with high agreement with the histopathology (k = 0.89 and 0.87, respectively) and high accuracy (91.7% for both CT and MRI).

CONCLUSION

CT and MRI showed high inter-observer and intermodality agreement in the assessment of several distinguishing imaging features of central cartilaginous tumors of the appendicular bones and demonstrated comparable diagnostic performance.

Fresh Tissue Multi-omics Profiling Reveals Immune Classification and Suggests Immunotherapy Candidates for Conventional Chondrosarcoma

PURPOSE

There is still no standard nonsurgical regimen for conventional chondrosarcoma (CHS). We aimed to identify whether any CHSs have a favored microenvironment for immunotherapy via multidimensional evaluation of the immunologic characteristics of this tumor.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We obtained 98 newly-diagnosed CHS fresh tumors from several institutions and performed comprehensive analysis of data from CyTOF, whole-exome sequencing, and flow cytometry in 22 cases. Clinical data from immunotherapy responders and nonresponders were compared to explore possible biomarkers of immunotherapy response. Mechanism studies were conducted to interpret the biomarker phenotype.

RESULTS

Based on the integrated data of single-cell CyTOF and flow cytometry, the CHS immune-microenvironment phenotypes were classified into three groups: subtype I, the "granulocytic-myeloid-derived suppressor cell (G-MDSC) dominant" cluster, with high number of HLA-DR^- CD14^- myeloid cells; subtype II, the "immune exhausted" cluster, with high exhausted T-cell and dendritic-cell infiltration; and subtype III, the "immune desert" cluster, with few immune cells. Immune cell-rich subtypes (subtype I and II) were characterized by IDH mutation, pathologic high grade, and peritumoral edema, while subtype I cases were exclusively featured by myxoid transformation. In clinical practice involving 12 individuals who received PD-1 antibody immunotherapy, all of the 3 cases with controlled diseases were retrospectively classified as subtype II. In mechanism, IDH mutation significantly elevated chemokine levels and immune-cell infiltration in immune-inactivated tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to provide immune characterization of CHS, representing a major step to precise immunotherapy against this malignancy. Immunotherapy is promising for the "immune exhausted" subtype of patients with CHS.

Prevalence of Enchondromas of the Proximal Femur in Adults as an Incidental Finding on MRI of the Pelvis

Objective  To determine the prevalence of enchondroma in adults as an incidental finding in the proximal femur on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods  A retrospective review of the MRI scans of the pelvis in a series of adult patients was conducted. All presented with nononcological musculoskeletal complaints. The site, size, and appearances of the enchondromas were identified according to criteria from previous studies. Results  A total of 1,209 proximal femora in 610 patients were reviewed and a total of 9 enchondromas were identified. These ranged from 0.6 to 2.5 cm in length (mean 1.3 cm). None showed aggressive features suggestive of malignancy. Three cases (33%) underwent follow-up MRI scans which showed no change in size or morphology. Conclusion  The prevalence on MRI of incidental enchondromas arising in the proximal femur is 0.7%. This is three to four times less common than seen in the proximal humerus and around the knee.

A Radiological Scoring System for Differentiation between Enchondroma and Chondrosarcoma

Simple Summary

Background: It is challenging to differentiate between enchondromas and atypical cartilaginous tumors (ACTs)/chondrosarcomas. Methods: To evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of radiological findings for differentiation between enchondromas and chondrosarcomas, correlations between various radiological findings and final diagnoses were investigated. Based on the correlations, a scoring system combining these findings was developed. Results: In a cohort of 81 patients, periosteal reaction on X-ray, endosteal scalloping and cortical defect on CT, extraskeletal mass, multilobular lesion, abnormal signal in adjacent tissue on MRI, and increased uptake in bone scan and thallium scan was significantly correlated with final diagnoses. Based on the correlations, a radiological scoring system combining radiological findings was developed. In another cohort of 17 patients, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the radiological score rates for differentiation between enchondromas and chondrosarcomas were 88%, 89%, and 88%, respectively. Conclusion: Comprehensive assessment combining radiological findings is recommended to differentiate between enchondromas and ACTs/chondrosarcomas.

Abstract

Background: It is challenging to differentiate between enchondromas and atypical cartilaginous tumors (ACTs)/chondrosarcomas. In this study, correlations between radiological findings and final diagnosis were investigated in patients with central cartilaginous tumors. Methods: To evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of radiological findings, correlations between various radiological findings and final diagnoses were investigated in a cohort of 81 patients. Furthermore, a new radiological scoring system was developed by combining radiological findings. Results: Periosteal reaction on X-ray (p = 0.025), endosteal scalloping (p = 0.010) and cortical defect (p = 0.002) on CT, extraskeletal mass (p < 0.001), multilobular lesion (p < 0.001), abnormal signal in adjacent tissue (p = 0.004) on MRI, and increased uptake in bone scan (p = 0.002) and thallium scan (p = 0.027) was significantly correlated with final diagnoses. Based on the correlations between each radiological finding and postoperative histological diagnosis, a radiological scoring system combining these findings was developed. In another cohort of 17 patients, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the radiological score rates for differentiation between enchondromas and ACTs/chondrosarcomas were 88%, 89%, and 88%, respectively (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Radiological assessment with combined radiological findings is recommended to differentiate between enchondromas and ACT/chondrosarcomas.

CT radiomics-based machine learning classification of atypical cartilaginous tumours and appendicular chondrosarcomas

Background

Clinical management ranges from surveillance or curettage to wide resection for atypical to higher-grade cartilaginous tumours, respectively. Our aim was to investigate the performance of computed tomography (CT) radiomics-based machine learning for classification of atypical cartilaginous tumours and higher-grade chondrosarcomas of long bones.

Methods

One-hundred-twenty patients with histology-proven lesions were retrospectively included. The training cohort consisted of 84 CT scans from centre 1 (n=55 G1 or atypical cartilaginous tumours; n=29 G2-G4 chondrosarcomas). The external test cohort consisted of the CT component of 36 positron emission tomography-CT scans from centre 2 (n=16 G1 or atypical cartilaginous tumours; n=20 G2-G4 chondrosarcomas). Bidimensional segmentation was performed on preoperative CT. Radiomic features were extracted. After dimensionality reduction and class balancing in centre 1, the performance of a machine-learning classifier (LogitBoost) was assessed on the training cohort using 10-fold cross-validation and on the external test cohort. In centre 2, its performance was compared with preoperative biopsy and an experienced radiologist using McNemar's test.

Findings

The classifier had 81% (AUC=0.89) and 75% (AUC=0.78) accuracy in identifying the lesions in the training and external test cohorts, respectively. Specifically, its accuracy in classifying atypical cartilaginous tumours and higher-grade chondrosarcomas was 84% and 78% in the training cohort, and 81% and 70% in the external test cohort, respectively. Preoperative biopsy had 64% (AUC=0.66) accuracy (p=0.29). The radiologist had 81% accuracy (p=0.75).

Interpretation

Machine learning showed good accuracy in classifying atypical and higher-grade cartilaginous tumours of long bones based on preoperative CT radiomic features.

Funding

ESSR Young Researchers Grant.

Chondroid Tumors of Bone

Recent scholarship on enchondroma, chondrosarcoma, and chondroblastoma is presented. The focus of this article is on the imaging appearance of these tumors and the means by which they can be distinguished from one another by both clinical and imaging criteria.

Solitary bone tumor imaging reporting and data system (BTI-RADS): initial assessment of a systematic imaging evaluation and comprehensive reporting method

OBJECTIVES

Identify the most pertinent imaging features for solitary bone tumor characterization using a multimodality approach and propose a systematic evaluation system.

METHODS

Data from a prospective trial, including 230 participants with histologically confirmed bone tumors, typical "do not touch" lesions, and stable chondral lesions, were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical data, CT, and MR imaging features were analyzed by a musculoskeletal radiologist blinded to the diagnosis using a structured report. The benign-malignant distribution of lesions bearing each image feature evaluated was compared to the benign-malignant distribution in the study sample. Benign and malignant indicators were identified. Two additional readers with different expertise levels independently evaluated the study sample.

RESULTS

The sample included 140 men and 90 women (mean age 40.7 ± 18.3 years). The global benign-malignant distribution was 67-33%. Seven imaging features reached the criteria for benign indicators with a mean frequency of benignancy of 94%. Six minor malignant indicators were identified with a mean frequency of malignancy of 60.5%. Finally, three major malignant indicators were identified (Lodwick-Madewell grade III, aggressive periosteal reaction, and suspected metastatic disease) with a mean frequency of malignancy of 82.4%. A bone tumor imaging reporting and data system (BTI-RADS) was proposed. The reproducibility of the BTI-RADS was considered fair (kappa = 0.67) with a mean frequency of malignancy in classes I, II, III, and IV of 0%, 2.2%, 20.1%, and 71%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

BTI-RADS is an evidence-based systematic approach to solitary bone tumor characterization with a fair reproducibility, allowing lesion stratification in classes of increasing malignancy frequency.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial number NCT02895633 .

KEY POINTS

• The most pertinent CT and MRI criteria allowing bone tumor characterization were defined and presented. • Lodwick-Madewell grade III, aggressive periosteal reaction, and suspected metastatic disease should be considered major malignant indicators associated with a frequency of malignancy over 75%. • The proposed evidence-based multimodality reporting system stratifies solitary bone tumors in classes with increasing frequencies of malignancy.

Team Approach: Evaluation and Management of Low-Grade Cartilaginous Lesions

» Assessment of chondral lesions begins with a clinical evaluation and radiographs. » Longitudinal follow-up with serial radiographs is appropriate in cases without evidence of aggressive radiographic features. » Concerning radiographic features include periosteal reaction, soft-tissue extension, cortical destruction, endosteal scalloping of greater than two-thirds of the native cortex, larger lesion size (≥5 cm), and location in the axial skeleton. » Biomarkers such as IMP3, SOX4, microRNA, and periostin may be used as an adjunct in histologic assessment to help differentiate benign enchondroma from a low-grade chondrosarcoma. » Advanced-imaging studies, such as computed tomography (CT), bone scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), may be considered for borderline cases. » Aggressive or concerning radiographic features should prompt evaluation with advanced imaging or referral to an orthopaedic oncologist.

The changing face of central chondrosarcoma of bone. One UK-based orthopaedic oncology unit's experience of 33 years referrals

AIM

To ascertain the changing incidence over time of the three commonest primary sarcomas of bone. Data obtained with particular reference to central chondrosarcoma from the annual referral rate to a large UK-based specialist orthopaedic oncology unit. To discuss how the "barnyard pen" analogy of cancers previously applied to certain commoner cancers can also be applicable to central chondrosarcoma (CS) of bone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of a computerised database identifying all central cartilage tumours (CCT) of bone, including enchondroma and CS subtypes, between 1985 and 2018. These were compared with the referrals of the other two commonest primary sarcomas of bone, osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma.

RESULTS

There was a total of 1507 CS showing a 68% overall increase in annual referral rate/incidence over the study period. 68% cases were the borderline malignant lesions now known as atypical cartilaginous tumour (ACT). The annual referral rate/incidence of this entity increased by 194% over the 30 years. Whereas, the annual referral rate/incidence for osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma was static for the past 20 years.

CONCLUSION

The annual incidence of central CS of bone showed a marked increase over the 33-year period as compared with both osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. This is especially in the ACT category and is thought to be due to the increased provision of MRI scanning flagging up a rise in incidental findings. The spectrum of CCTs from benign to highly malignant elegantly fits the "barn yard" pen analogy and could prove useful as an explanatory tool for patients and clinicians unfamiliar with these diseases.

Solitary enchondromas-diagnosis and surveillance : Danish guidelines

Enchondromas (EC) are frequent incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed for the diagnosis of joint pathology, especially observed on MRI examinations of the knee and shoulder. Enchondroma has potential for malignant transformation to chondrosarcoma (CS), and it may be difficult to distinguish EC from low-malignant CS on the basis of imaging or histopathology studies. Therefore, EC is mostly followed up to monitor any growth and/or changes indicating aggressive tumor.There is no consensual evidence on when and how to follow up patients with EC with regard to potential malignant transformation. Therefore, the Danish Multidisciplinary Cancer Groups initiated and supported the elaboration of Danish guidelines in 2020 based on a literature review. The guidelines are presented here, in addition to a summary of the background literature.

Chondral tumours: discrepancy rate between needle biopsy and surgical histology

OBJECTIVE

To determine the reliability of image-guided core needle biopsy (IGCNB) for the diagnosis and grading of chondral tumours of bone compared with surgical histology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with a chondral tumour of bone who underwent IGCNB and surgical resection between January 2007 and December 2017. Data collected included age, sex, skeletal location, technique used for IGCNB, IGCNB result including histological grade and comparison with surgical histology.

RESULTS

A total of 237 patients were included (135 males and 102 females with mean age 53.7 years, range 9-89 years). A total of 174 IGCNBs were CT-guided, 57 ultrasound-guided and 6 fluoroscopic-guided. Two hundred thirty-six of 237 (99.6%) IGCNBs were diagnostic for a chondral tumour, although grade could not be determined in 13 (5.5%) due to necrosis. A positive correlation for tumour grade between IGCNB and surgical histology was achieved in 181 cases (76.4%). In 36 patients (15.2%), IGCNB under-graded the tumour, while in 6 (2.5%), IGCNB over-graded the tumour. Discrepancy between IGCNB and surgical histology was significantly greater for surface/peripheral lesions (p = 0.02) and lesions arising from the flat bones or spine (p = 0.002).

DISCUSSION

IGCNB can achieve a diagnosis of a chondral tumour in a high proportion of cases when compared with final diagnosis from surgical resection specimens. However, correlation of tumour grade between IGCNB and resection histology is less reliable with discordance seen in almost one-quarter of cases, most commonly at non-appendicular sites. Therefore, IGCNB results should not be considered in isolation of imaging and clinical features when planning surgical management.

The utility of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the diagnosis and staging of chondrosarcoma: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Chondrosarcoma is the second most common primary bone sarcoma; however, unlike other tumors, the biopsy cannot easily make a definite diagnosis or predict the histological grade. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the utility of ¹⁸F-FDG PET and PET/CT to differentiate chondrosarcoma from benign cartilaginous lesions and to predict the histopathological grade of chondrosarcoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in three electronic databases including Medline/PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase to retrieve diagnostic studies evaluating the role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT for appraising the status of chondrosarcoma. Reference lists of related articles were also scrutinized manually. Useful data were extracted to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC), and the area under the curve (AUC) of ¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT in diagnosing chondrosarcoma, and pooled weighted mean differences (WMD) of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) between different entities of cartilaginous neoplasms by using Stata 19.0.

RESULTS

A total of twelve studies provided sufficient data for the quantitative analysis. For the diagnosis of chondrosarcoma, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of ¹⁸F-FDG PET were 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46 to 0.97), 0.82 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.94), and 24.244 (95% CI 1.985 to 96.148), respectively while those of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were 0.94 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.97), 0.89 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.93), and 112.999 (95% CI 41.341 to 308.866), respectively. The pooled WMD of SUVmax were - 0.89 (95% CI -1.67 to -0.10) between benign cartilaginous lesions and grade 1 (G1) chondrosarcoma, -1.94 (95% CI -2.76 to -1.12) between G1 and grade 2 (G2) chondrosarcoma, and - 2.37 (95% CI -5.79 to 1.05) between G2 and grade 3 (G3) chondrosarcoma.

CONCLUSIONS

In a word, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT revealed excellent accuracy in the diagnosis of chondrosarcoma and might assist in clinical decision-making. Meanwhile, although SUVmax alone showed restricted ability to differentiate benign cartilaginous lesions and G1 chondrosarcoma, as well as between G2 and G3 chondrosarcoma, it can identify intermediate/high-grade chondrosarcoma from low-grade ones.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I evidence, a summary of meta-analysis.

Differential diagnosis and treatment of enchondromas and atypical cartilaginous tumours of the pelvis: analysis of 21 patients

INTRODUCTION

Studies focusing on enchondroma and atypical cartilaginous tumour (ACT) of the pelvis are lacking. The purpose of this study was to verify possible clinical and radiological findings with regard to distinguishing enchondromas from ACT of the pelvis. In addition, this study analysed functional and oncological outcomes in patients with enchondromas or ACT of the pelvis treated with curettage or resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 21 patients with confirmed enchondroma or ACT of the pelvis treated by curettage or resection from 1985 to 2018. The minimum follow-up was 18 months. The relationship between clinical and radiological factors and tumour type or local recurrence was assessed using Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Endosteal scalloping (p = 0.039), tumour size (0.005) and age (0.006) were shown to statistically favour ACT over enchondroma; by contrast, enchondroma and ACT patients had no difference in pain frequency (p = 0.5528). All patients with enchondroma had no local recurrence; in contrast, local recurrence occurred in one patient with ACT, initially treated with resection. The patient with local recurrence had a disease progression with a higher histological grade than the original tumour. Patients treated with curettage had better functional outcomes than patients treated with resection (p = 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Endosteal scalloping, tumour size and age could be helpful in the differential diagnosis between enchondroma and ACT of the pelvis. In addition, our study showed that ACT of the pelvis can be safely treated with curettage due to a low risk of local recurrence and better functional results compared with resection. In case of recurrence, we suggest to treat these patients with resection for the risk of disease progression.

18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of cartilaginous bone neoplasms: the added value of tumor grading

OBJECTIVES

Cartilaginous bone tumors represent a wide variety of neoplasms ranging from benign to extremely aggressive malignant lesions. Unlike other tumors, the biopsy cannot easily predict the histological grade, sometimes not allowing choosing the best therapeutic approach. The aim of the study was to evaluate the ability of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT to differentiate enchondroma from chondrosarcoma and to predict the histological grade as compared to biopsy.

METHODS

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT of 95 patients with chondroid lesions were retrospectively evaluated. The best SUV_max cutoff to predict the post-surgical histological grade were correlated to those of biopsy and to several radiologic aggressiveness features, which were summarized in the parameter "Radiologic Aggressiveness Score" (AgSCORE).

RESULTS

A concordance between the preoperative biopsy and the definitive histological grade was observed overall in 78.3% of patients, the lowest accuracy (58.6%) being in the identification of intermediate/high-grade chondrosarcoma (G2/G3). The best SUV_max cutoff was 2.6 to discriminate enchondroma vs. low-grade chondrosarcoma (sensitivity 0.68, specificity 0.86), 3.7 to differentiate low-grade vs. intermediate/high-grade chondrosarcoma (sensitivity 0.83, specificity 0.84) and 7.7 to differentiate intermediate/high-grade vs. dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (sensitivity 0.92, specificity 0.9). The AgSCORE also showed a high accuracy to differentiate between G1 and G2/G3 chondrosarcoma (cutoff = 4; sensitivity 0.76; specificity 0.89). An even higher accuracy was observed in those cases in which both SUV_max and AgSCORE cutoff were concordant.

CONCLUSIONS

Results in this large series of patients suggest a potential role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for histological grading of cartilaginous tumors, thus helping the orthopedic surgeon towards the most appropriate surgical procedure.

Magnetic resonance imaging follow-up of chondroid tumors: regression vs. progression

OBJECTIVE

To present magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of the regression or progression of chondroid tumors and to investigate whether MRI can be used to predict the evolution of chondroid tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with enchondromas or atypical cartilaginous tumors who had undergone extremity MRI at least twice with a minimum 12-month interval between the MRIs were enrolled in this study. The diagnosis was based on the radiography and MRI findings. We classified the tumors into the following three groups according to changes between the MRIs: no change (NC), progression (P), and regression (R). We assessed the initial MRI features, including anatomical location, size, endosteal scalloping, peritumoral edema, fat entrapment, and direction of progression or regression. Nineteen of the 21 patients had contrast-enhanced images, and we analyzed the presence of atypical lobular enhancement against typical peripheral or septal enhancement.

RESULTS

The R group comprised 11 cases (52%), the P group comprised five cases (24%), and the NC group comprised five cases (24%). None of the MRI features showed statistically significant differences among the groups. Atypical lobular enhancement was observed in the R (6 of 10, 60%) and NC (2 of 5, 40%) groups but not in the P group (0 of 4, 0%), although these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Chondroid tumors can either regress or progress in the MRI follow-up. Atypical lobular enhancement was seen only in stable or regressing tumors.

How to Diagnose Enchondroma, Bone Infarct, and Chondrosarcoma

Enchondromas are among the most common benign tumors seen in the skeleton. They are encountered frequently in routine clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to help radiologists confidently diagnose enchondroma and distinguish it from other entities, such as bone infarct, bone graft, and low-grade chondrosarcoma.

Risk factors for local recurrence from atypical cartilaginous tumour and enchondroma of the long bones

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of our study is to verify possible clinical and radiological findings with regard to distinguishing enchondroma from atypical cartilaginous tumour (ACT). In addition, this study determined risk factors that are associated with local recurrence of enchondroma or ACT treated with curettage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 54 patients with enchondroma and 35 patients with ACT of the long bones treated by curettage between 1986 and 2015. The minimum follow-up was 18 months. The relationship between clinical and radiological factors and the tumour type or local recurrence was assessed using Chi-square test or Fischer exact test.

RESULTS

Endosteal scalloping (p = 0.004) and soft tissue extension (p = 0.017) were shown to statistically favour ACT over enchondroma; by contrast, pain (p = 0.034) was more frequent in enchondroma compared to ACT. All patients with enchondroma had no local recurrence; in contrast, local recurrence occurred in four patients with ACT (11%). Soft tissue extension (p = 0.049) and the diagnosis of ACT (p = 0.021) were associated with an increased risk of local recurrence. We had a disease progression in three of four patients with local recurrence, and these had higher histological grade than the original tumour.

DISCUSSION

Our data show that endosteal scalloping and soft tissue extension could be helpful in the differential diagnosis between enchondroma and ACT. We suggest following only those patients with ACT after surgery to identify any possible recurrence and, in case of recurrence, treat these patients with resection for the risk of disease progression.

Physical Therapist Clinical Reasoning and Action for Individuals With Undiagnosed Lower Extremity Tumors: A Report of 3 Cases

Study Design Resident's case problem. Background Although rare in the general population, bone and soft tissue tumors may be more frequently encountered in patients seeking physical therapy because of the propensity of their initial symptoms to mimic those of commonly treated musculoskeletal disorders. Screening for tumors requires the physical therapist to be attentive to unexpected findings. The purpose of this paper was to describe the clinical-reasoning and screening processes of physical therapists who facilitated the timely recognition of bone and soft tissue tumors in 3 patients referred through medical channels. Diagnosis The referral diagnoses were lumbar spinal stenosis, calcaneal bursitis, and postexcisional quadriceps weakness. When comprehensively examined, each of the patients had either atypical examination findings or failed to respond to physical therapy treatment. After the physical therapists alerted the appropriate medical providers of the examination findings, diagnoses of high-grade osteosarcoma of the pelvis, chondroma of the knee, and liposarcoma of the thigh followed. Discussion Tumors of the lower extremity can initially mimic common musculoskeletal pathology. Physical therapists must remain alert for red flags, atypical signs and symptoms, and poor responses to treatment, even when patients are referred through medical channels. Particular attention is necessary in the case of unusual symptoms in the lower extremity, where over half of primary malignant tumors occur. Level of Evidence Differential diagnosis, level 5. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(5):359-366. Epub 29 Mar 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7037.

Surveillance of intramedullary cartilage tumours in long bones

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to determine if clinical and radiological surveillance of cartilage tumours with low biological activity is appropriate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 98 patients with an intramedullary cartilage neoplasm in a long bone met our inclusion criteria and were included in the study. These patients had undergone a total of 384 scans. Patients with radiological follow-up of more than three years (46 patients) were divided into two groups: an active group (11 patients) and a latent group (35 patients).

RESULTS

Active lesions had a total growth in all three planes that was > 6 mm, whilst latent lesions had < 6 mm of growth. Most latent lesions were heavily calcified: active lesions were calcified less than 50% (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Clinico-radiological surveillance can identify growing cartilage lesions: MRI is the surveillance modality of choice. A CT scan is recommended, in addition, at presentation to assess the amount of calcification within the lesion. A first follow-up MRI is suggested one year from diagnosis. If the total growth in the cartilage lesion is > 6 mm, surgical treatment should be considered. Otherwise, a second surveillance scan can be performed at three years to determine further management. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1542-7.

Radiologic follow-up of untreated enchondroma and atypical cartilaginous tumors in the long bones

Background and Objectives

Both enchondroma and atypical cartilaginous tumors (ACT) are not considered malignant, so inactive and asymptomatic tumors might not need surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that has been done to evaluate the natural course of conservative‐treated enchondroma and ACT in the long bones.

Methods

For this retrospective study, we analyzed the results of patients in whom we refrained from surgery and only regularly performed radiological follow‐up of the tumor. Minimal follow‐up after initial diagnosis was 24 months.

Results

Forty‐nine patients were included in this study. Eight out of forty‐nine cases received surgical treatment during follow‐up of the tumor. The reasons for this surgery were radiologic growth of the tumor in two cases, pain in one case, patient request in three cases, another indication for surgery in the same limb in two cases.

Conclusion

In this small series of conservatively treated enchondroma and ACT, only 6% of the patients had a medical indication for surgery. This study shows that indication for surgery should be discussed more thoroughly. Based on our results, we would recommend annual radiologic follow‐up for asymptomatic enchondroma or ACT in the long bones, irrespective of tumor size. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:987–991. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Bilateral Scapulothoracic Osteochondromas in a Patient With Hereditary Multiple Exostosis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Hereditary multiple exostosis (HME) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by two or more benign growing, cartilage capped tumors of long bones called osteochondromas. If abnormal growth and clinical symptoms of osteochondromas newly appear in adults, malignant transformation of the usually benign growing tumors should be suspected and diagnostic testing should be initiated. Against the background of hypothesized higher malignant transformation of osteochondromas into chondrosarcoma in individuals with shoulder exostoses, we report a case of bilateral scapulothoracic osteochondromas in a patient suffering from HME. A 60-year-old female with HME complained of chest pain while being hospitalized for bilateral femoral fractures. A computed tomography scan of the chest was performed to rule out pulmonary embolism. However, bilateral osteochondromas in the scapulothoracic spaces were detected. Due to absence of radiographic evidences for malignant transformation in the patient, invasive diagnostic procedures such as biopsy and histological examination were recommended in order to exclude malignant transformation of both osteochondromas. Physicians should be aware that patients with HME who present with shoulder pain should be examined for osteochondromas in the scapulothoracic space. Due to possible sarcomatous transformation, regular follow-ups are necessary for adolescents and adults.

Enchondroma versus Chondrosarcoma in Long Bones of Appendicular Skeleton: Clinical and Radiological Criteria-A Follow-Up

As of today two types of cartilage tumors remain a challenge even for the orthopedic oncologist: enchondroma (E), a benign tumor, and chondrosarcoma (LGC), a malignant and low aggressiveness tumor. A prospective study of 133 patients with a cartilaginous tumor of low aggressiveness in the long bones of the appendicular skeleton was done to prove this difficult differential diagnosis. Parameters including medical history and radiological and nuclear imaging were collected and compared to the result of the biopsy. A scale of aggressiveness was applied to each patient according to the number of aggressiveness episodes present. A comparison of the results of the biopsy with the initial diagnosis made by the orthopedic oncologist based solely on clinical data and imaging tests was also made. Finally, a management algorithm for these cases was proposed. A statistical significance for LGC resulted from the parameter as follows: pain on palpation, involvement of cortical in either the CT or MRI, and Tc99 bone scan uptake equal or superior to anterosuperior iliac crest. In our series, a tumor scoring 5 points or higher in the scale of aggressiveness can have 50% more chance of being LGC. When compared with the gold standard (the biopsy), surgeon's initial judgement showed a sensitivity of 73.5% and a specificity of 94.1%.

Prevalence of cartilaginous tumours as an incidental finding on MRI of the knee

Objectives

The purpose was to determine prevalence of enchondromas and atypical cartilaginous tumour/chondrosarcoma grade 1 (ACT/CS1) of the knee on MRI in a large cohort study, namely the Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity (NEO) study.

Methods

Participants aged 45 to 65 years were prospectively included, oversampling overweight and obese persons. Within a subgroup of participants, MRI of the right knee was performed and screened for incidental cartilaginous tumours, as defined by their characteristic location and appearance.

Results

Forty-nine cartilaginous tumours were observed in 44 out of 1285 participants (estimated population prevalence 2.8 %, 95 % CI 2.0–4.0 %). Mean largest tumour diameter was 12 mm (range 2–31 mm). Eight participants with a tumour larger than 20 mm or a tumour with aggressive features were referred to rule out low-grade chondrosarcoma. One was lost to follow-up, three had histologically proven ACT/CS1 and four had dynamic contrast MRI findings consistent with benign enchondroma.

Conclusions

Incidental cartilaginous tumours were relatively common on knee MRI and may be regarded as a normal concurrent finding. However, more tumours than expected were ACT/CS1. Because further examination was performed only when suspicion of chondrosarcoma was high, the actual prevalence might be even higher.

Key Points

• Incidental cartilaginous tumours are relatively common on knee MRI.

• Most incidental cartilaginous tumours are small and lack suspicious features.

• Small cartilaginous tumours without suspicious findings may be a normal concurrent finding.

• Large tumours and/or those with suspicious findings should be further investigated.

• Atypical cartilaginous tumour/chondrosarcoma grade 1 was found more often than expected.

Non-traumatic calcifications/ossifications of the bone surface and soft tissues of the wrist, hand and fingers: a diagnostic approach

In the absence of obvious trauma, the calcifications/ossifications of the bone surface and soft tissues of the wrist, hand and fingers can be challenging and may not be noticed or lead to unnecessary examinations and monitoring. Although these are usually benign conditions and despite a favorable spontaneous outcome, surgical resection may be required and recurrence may occur. In practice, only paraneoplastic syndromes such as secondary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy (Pierre Marie-Bamberger syndrome) may reveal a malignant tumor, most often pulmonary. We suggest a diagnostic approach based on the initial clinical presentation (acute pain, chronic pain, growth±pain) and the radiological features.

MR differentiation of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma

PURPOSE

To evaluate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the discrimination between low-grade chondrosarcoma and enchondroma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MR images of 34 patients who were confirmed with low-grade chondrosarcoma or enchondroma were retrospectively reviewed. After review of medical records, MR findings in 18 patients with low-grade chondrosarcoma and 16 patients with enchondroma were compared. MR images were retrospectively reviewed for the lesion location (central or eccentric; epiphysis, metaphysic, or diaphysis), margin, contour, mineralized matrix, endosteal scalloping, cortical expansion, cortical destruction, soft tissue mass formation, and periosteal reaction. Signal intensity, the patterns of contrast enhancement (unilocular or multilobular), soft tissue mass, and adjacent abnormal bone marrow and soft tissue signal were also reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed with chi-square test.

RESULTS

The patients with low-grade chondrosarcoma had a significantly higher incidence of MR findings (P<.05): predominantly intermediate signal on T1-weighted images [72% (13/18) in low-grade chondrosarcoma vs. 25% (4/16) in enchondroma], multilocular appearance on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images [83% (15/18) vs. 44% (7/16)], cortical destruction [33% (6/18) vs. 0% (0/16)], a soft tissue mass [28% (5/18) vs. 0% (0/16)], adjacent bone marrow and soft tissue abnormal signal [22% (4/18) vs. 0% (0/16)], and an involvement of the epiphysis or flat bone [56% (10/18) vs. 19% (3/16)].

CONCLUSION

MR imaging shows helpful features for differentiating low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma.

Solitary bone lesions: which ones to worry about?

The question is not classic: which signs suggest a possible malignancy when faced with a solitary bone lesion? Usually radiologists try to identify the leave me alone lesions, for which nothing is needed. Here we consider the suspicious lesions. Clinical and radiological indicators are proposed, leading to a probability. Nowadays, a biopsy is nevertheless always requested before treating a malignant lesion, even if suspicion is very high. But histology should integrate with the radiological signs.

Value of the bone scintigraphy in multiple osteochrondromatosis with sarcomatous degeneration

Multiple osteochondromatosis can become malignant in 20% of the cases, this being more common when the lesion is multiple than when it is solitary. A male patient with multiple osteochondromatosis who had several local recurrences of secondary chondrosarcoma and who is still under follow-up by the Nuclear Medicine Department is presented. The bone scintigraphy findings were compared with the histopathologic results, and the importance of the patient's symptoms was verified when a sarcomatous transformation is suspected. The bone scintigraphy has the potential to detect malignization of the benign bone lesions. It also makes it possible to obtain whole-body images in a single examination, this being very useful to detect the presence of new bone lesions.