1
|
Adam SZ, Rabinowich A, Kessner R, Blachar A. Spectral CT of the abdomen: Where are we now? Insights Imaging 2021; 12:138. [PMID: 34580788 PMCID: PMC8476679 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01082-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Spectral CT adds a new dimension to radiological evaluation, beyond assessment of anatomical abnormalities. Spectral data allows for detection of specific materials, improves image quality while at the same time reducing radiation doses and contrast media doses, and decreases the need for follow up evaluation of indeterminate lesions. We review the different acquisition techniques of spectral images, mainly dual-source, rapid kV switching and dual-layer detector, and discuss the main spectral results available. We also discuss the use of spectral imaging in abdominal pathologies, emphasizing the strengths and pitfalls of the technique and its main applications in general and in specific organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Z Adam
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St., 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel. .,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Aviad Rabinowich
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St., 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Rivka Kessner
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St., 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Arye Blachar
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St., 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Navin PJ, Venkatesh SK. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: State of the Art Imaging and Recent Advances. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2019; 7:72-85. [PMID: 30944823 PMCID: PMC6441649 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2018.00032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Revised: 12/31/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing, with this trend expected to continue to the year 2030. Hepatocarcinogenesis follows a predictable course, which makes adequate identification and surveillance of at-risk individuals central to a successful outcome. Moreover, imaging is central to this surveillance, and ultimately to diagnosis and management. Many liver study groups throughout Asia, North America and Europe advocate a surveillance program for at-risk individuals to allow early identification of HCC. Ultrasound is the most commonly utilized imaging modality. Many societies offer guidelines on how to diagnose HCC. The Liver Image Reporting and Data System (LIRADS) was introduced to standardize the acquisition, interpretation, reporting and data collection of HCC cases. The LIRADS advocates diagnosis using multiphase computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging. The 2017 version also introduces contrast-enhanced ultrasound as a novel approach to diagnosis. Indeed, imaging techniques have evolved to improve diagnostic accuracy and characterization of HCC lesions. Newer techniques, such as T1 mapping, intravoxel incoherent motion analysis and textural analysis, assess specific characteristics that may help grade the tumor and guide management, allowing for a more personalized approach to patient care. This review aims to analyze the utility of imaging in the surveillance and diagnosis of HCC and to assess novel techniques which may increase the accuracy of imaging and determine optimal treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sudhakar K. Venkatesh
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- *Correspondence to: Sudhakar K. Venkatesh, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 200 1 Street, Rochester MN 55905, USA. Tel: +1-507-284-1728, Fax: +1-507-284-2405, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morgan DE. The Role of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Assessment of Abdominal Oncology and Beyond. Radiol Clin North Am 2018; 56:565-585. [PMID: 29936948 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2018.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
The added value and strength of dual energy computed tomography for the evaluation of oncologic patients revolve around the use of lower energy reconstructed images and iodine material density images. Lower keV simulated monoenergetic images optimize soft tissue tumor to nontumoral attenuation differences and increase contrast to noise ratios to improve lesion detection. Iodine material density images or maps are helpful from a qualitative standpoint for image interpretation because they result in improved detection and characterization of tumors and lymph node involvement, and from a quantitative assessment by enabling interrogation of specific properties of tissues to predict and assess therapeutic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desiree E Morgan
- Department of Radiology University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th Street South, JTN 456, Birmingham, AL 35249-6830, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Multi-detector CT: Liver protocol and recent developments. Eur J Radiol 2017; 97:101-109. [PMID: 29153359 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 10/26/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Multi-detector computed tomography is today the workhorse in the evaluation of the vast majority of patients with known or suspected liver disease. Reasons for that include widespread availability, robustness and repeatability of the technique, time-efficient image acquisitions of large body volumes, high temporal and spatial resolution as well as multiple post-processing capabilities. However, as the technique employs ionizing radiation and intravenous iodine-based contrast media, the associated potential risks have to be taken into account. In this review article, liver protocols in clinical practice are discussed with emphasis on optimisation strategies. Furthermore, recent developments such as perfusion CT and dual-energy CT and their applications are presented.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Image-guided tumor ablation for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an accepted non-surgical treatment that provides excellent local tumor control and favorable survival benefit. This review summarizes the recent advances in tumor ablation for HCC. Diagnostic imaging and molecular biology of HCC has recently undergone marked improvements. Second-generation ultrasonography (US) contrast agents, new computed tomography (CT) techniques, and liver-specific contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have enabled the early detection of smaller and inconspicuous HCC lesions. Various imaging-guidance tools that incorporate imaging-fusion between real-time US and CT/MRI, that are now common for percutaneous tumor ablation, have increased operator confidence in the accurate targeting of technically difficult tumors. In addition to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), various therapeutic modalities including microwave ablation, irreversible electroporation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation have attracted attention as alternative energy sources for effective locoregional treatment of HCC. In addition, combined treatment with RFA and chemoembolization or molecular agents may be able to overcome the limitation of advanced or large tumors. Finally, understanding of the biological mechanisms and advances in therapy associated with tumor ablation will be important for successful tumor control. All these advances in tumor ablation for HCC will result in significant improvement in the prognosis of HCC patients. In this review, we primarily focus on recent advances in molecular tumor biology, diagnosis, imaging-guidance tools, and therapeutic modalities, and refer to the current status and future perspectives for tumor ablation for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hyunchul Rhim
- *Hyunchul Rhim, MD, Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung, Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Irwon-Dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710 (Republic of Korea), Tel. +82 2 3410 2507, E-mail
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chou R, Cuevas C, Fu R, Devine B, Wasson N, Ginsburg A, Zakher B, Pappas M, Graham E, Sullivan SD. Imaging Techniques for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162:697-711. [PMID: 25984845 DOI: 10.7326/m14-2509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several imaging modalities are available for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PURPOSE To evaluate the test performance of imaging modalities for HCC. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE (1998 to December 2014), the Cochrane Library Database, Scopus, and reference lists. STUDY SELECTION Studies on test performance of ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DATA EXTRACTION One investigator abstracted data, and a second investigator confirmed them; 2 investigators independently assessed study quality and strength of evidence. DATA SYNTHESIS Few studies have evaluated imaging for HCC in surveillance settings. In nonsurveillance settings, sensitivity for detection of HCC lesions was lower for ultrasonography without contrast than for CT or MRI (pooled difference based on direct comparisons, 0.11 to 0.22), and MRI was associated with higher sensitivity than CT (pooled difference, 0.09 [95% CI, 0.07 to 12]). For evaluation of focal liver lesions, there were no clear differences in sensitivity among ultrasonography with contrast, CT, and MRI. Specificity was generally 0.85 or higher across imaging modalities, but this item was not reported in many studies. Factors associated with lower sensitivity included use of an explanted liver reference standard, and smaller or more well-differentiated HCC lesions. For MRI, sensitivity was slightly higher for hepatic-specific than nonspecific contrast agents. LIMITATIONS Only English-language articles were included, there was statistical heterogeneity in pooled analyses, and costs were not assessed. Most studies were conducted in Asia and had methodological limitations. CONCLUSION CT and MRI are associated with higher sensitivity than ultrasonography without contrast for detection of HCC; sensitivity was higher for MRI than CT. For evaluation of focal liver lesions, the sensitivities of ultrasonography with contrast, CT, and MRI for HCC are similar. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. ( PROSPERO CRD42014007016).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Chou
- From Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; University of Washington Centers for Comparative and Health Systems Effectiveness (CHASE) Alliance, Seattle, Washington; and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Carlos Cuevas
- From Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; University of Washington Centers for Comparative and Health Systems Effectiveness (CHASE) Alliance, Seattle, Washington; and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rongwei Fu
- From Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; University of Washington Centers for Comparative and Health Systems Effectiveness (CHASE) Alliance, Seattle, Washington; and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Beth Devine
- From Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; University of Washington Centers for Comparative and Health Systems Effectiveness (CHASE) Alliance, Seattle, Washington; and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ngoc Wasson
- From Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; University of Washington Centers for Comparative and Health Systems Effectiveness (CHASE) Alliance, Seattle, Washington; and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Alexander Ginsburg
- From Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; University of Washington Centers for Comparative and Health Systems Effectiveness (CHASE) Alliance, Seattle, Washington; and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bernadette Zakher
- From Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; University of Washington Centers for Comparative and Health Systems Effectiveness (CHASE) Alliance, Seattle, Washington; and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Miranda Pappas
- From Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; University of Washington Centers for Comparative and Health Systems Effectiveness (CHASE) Alliance, Seattle, Washington; and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Elaine Graham
- From Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; University of Washington Centers for Comparative and Health Systems Effectiveness (CHASE) Alliance, Seattle, Washington; and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sean D. Sullivan
- From Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; University of Washington Centers for Comparative and Health Systems Effectiveness (CHASE) Alliance, Seattle, Washington; and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
CT Liver Imaging: What is New? CURRENT RADIOLOGY REPORTS 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s40134-015-0088-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
8
|
Abstract
Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) imaging is a promising method used in oncology for accurate detection/diagnosis of malignant and benign lesions. Use of dual-energy spectral, weighted average, color-coded map, and virtual unenhanced images provides increased visual detection and easy lesion delineation. Lesion detectability, sensitivity, and conspicuity are significantly improved using DECT. Material characterization and decomposition are promising using DECT. Both anatomical and functional information related to oncology can be provided by DECT using single contrast-enhanced CT.
Collapse
|
9
|
Dual-Energy Liver CT: Effect of Monochromatic Imaging on Lesion Detection, Conspicuity, and Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of Hypervascular Lesions on Late Arterial Phase. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203:601-6. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.13.11337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
10
|
|
11
|
Model-based iterative reconstruction versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection in liver 64-MDCT: focal lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, and image noise. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200:1071-6. [PMID: 23617492 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.12.8986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to compare three CT image reconstruction algorithms for liver lesion detection and appearance, subjective lesion conspicuity, and measured noise. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-six patients with known liver lesions were scanned with a routine clinical three-phase CT protocol using a weight-based noise index of 30 or 36. Image data from each phase were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR), and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). Randomized images were presented to two independent blinded reviewers to detect and categorize the appearance of lesions and to score lesion conspicuity. Lesion size, lesion density (in Hounsfield units), adjacent liver density (in Hounsfield units), and image noise were measured. Two different unblinded truth readers established the number, appearance, and location of lesions. RESULTS Fifty-one focal lesions were detected by truth readers. For blinded reviewers compared with truth readers, there was no difference for lesion detection among the reconstruction algorithms. Lesion appearance was statistically the same among the three reconstructions. Although one reviewer scored lesions as being more conspicuous with MBIR, the other scored them the same. There was significantly less background noise in air with MBIR (mean [± SD], 2.1 ± 1.4 HU) than with ASIR (8.9 ± 1.9 HU; p < 0.001) or FBP (10.6 ± 2.6 HU; p < 0.001). Mean lesion contrast-to-noise ratio was statistically significantly higher for MBIR (34.4 ± 29.1) than for ASIR (6.5 ± 4.9; p < 0.001) or FBP (6.3 ± 6.0; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In routine-dose clinical CT of the liver, MBIR resulted in comparable lesion detection, lesion characterization, and subjective lesion conspicuity, but significantly lower background noise and higher contrast-to-noise ratio compared with ASIR or FBP. This finding suggests that further investigation of the use of MBIR to enable dose reduction in liver CT is warranted.
Collapse
|
12
|
Ichikawa T, Motosugi U, Morisaka H, Sano K, Ali M, Araki T. Volumetric low-tube-voltage CT imaging for evaluating hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma; effects on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance. Jpn J Radiol 2013; 31:521-9. [PMID: 23793776 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-013-0217-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2013] [Accepted: 05/10/2013] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the value of hepatic arterial-phase (HAP) imaging with a low tube voltage (80 kVp), using non-helical, volumetric acquisition with a 320-detector-rows area-detector CT (ADCT) scanner for evaluating hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with routine 120-kVp HAP imaging. METHODS This study enrolled 128 patients with 148 HCCs. Seventy-six patients with 79 HCCs underwent HAP imaging with 80 kVp obtained using a 320-detector-rows ADCT scanner. The remaining 52 patients with 69 HCCs underwent routine HAP imaging with 120 kVp obtained by 64-slice helical acquisition. Image noise and tumor to liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the two sets of images were compared. Three radiologists evaluated both sets of images using receiver operating characteristic analyses. RESULTS Although there was a two-fold increase in the mean image noise with 80 kVp over that with 120 kVp (p < 0.001), no significant differences were observed in CNR among the two sets. The mean area under the curve (Az value) and the sensitivity for detecting HCC with 80 kVp (0.980, 78/79, respectively) were higher than that of 120 kVp (0.892, 55/69, respectively). CONCLUSIONS HAP imaging with 80 kVp obtained by an ADCT scanner significantly improves the diagnostic performance for evaluating hypervascular HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoaki Ichikawa
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
De Cecco CN, Darnell A, Rengo M, Muscogiuri G, Bellini D, Ayuso C, Laghi A. Dual-Energy CT: Oncologic Applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199:S98-S105. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.12.9207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Nicola De Cecco
- Departments of Radiological Sciences, Oncology, and Pathology, University of Rome Sapienza–Polo Pontino, Via Franco Faggiana, 34, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Anna Darnell
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marco Rengo
- Departments of Radiological Sciences, Oncology, and Pathology, University of Rome Sapienza–Polo Pontino, Via Franco Faggiana, 34, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Muscogiuri
- Departments of Radiological Sciences, Oncology, and Pathology, University of Rome Sapienza–Polo Pontino, Via Franco Faggiana, 34, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Davide Bellini
- Departments of Radiological Sciences, Oncology, and Pathology, University of Rome Sapienza–Polo Pontino, Via Franco Faggiana, 34, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Carmen Ayuso
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Departments of Radiological Sciences, Oncology, and Pathology, University of Rome Sapienza–Polo Pontino, Via Franco Faggiana, 34, 04100 Latina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee JM, Yoon JH, Joo I, Woo HS. Recent Advances in CT and MR Imaging for Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Liver Cancer 2012; 1:22-40. [PMID: 24159569 PMCID: PMC3747553 DOI: 10.1159/000339018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Accurate diagnosis and assessment of disease extent are crucial for proper management of patients with HCC. Imaging plays a crucial role in early detection, accurate staging, and the planning of management strategies. A variety of imaging modalities are currently used in evaluating patients with suspected HCC; these include ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear medicine, and angiography. Among these modalities, dynamic MRI and CT are regarded as the best imaging techniques available for the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC. Recent improvements in CT and MRI technology have made noninvasive and reliable diagnostic assessment of hepatocellular nodules possible in the cirrhotic liver, and biopsy is frequently not required prior to treatment. Until now, the major challenge for radiologists in imaging cirrhosis has been the characterization of small cirrhotic nodules smaller than 2 cm in diameter. Further technological advancement will undoubtedly have a major impact on liver tumor imaging. The increased speed of data acquisition in CT and MRI has allowed improvements in both spatial and temporal resolution, which have made possible a more precise evaluation of the hemodynamics of liver nodules. Furthermore, the development of new, tissue-specific contrast agents such as gadoxetic acid has improved HCC detection on MRI. In this review, we discuss the role of CT and MRI in the diagnosis and staging of HCC, recent technological advances, and the strengths and limitations of these imaging modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeong-Hee Yoon
- *Jeong Min Lee, MD, Department of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744 (South Korea), Tel. +82 2 2072 3154, E-Mail
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
|