Contrast timing in computed tomography: Effect of different contrast media concentrations on bolus geometry

Improvement in arterial enhancement using diluted injection of contrast medium in CT angiography

BACKGROUND

Arterial enhancement after contrast injection affects the quality of computed tomography angiography (CTA) images.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether the dilution of contrast medium (CM) for CTA increases arterial enhancement after the adjustment of iodine concentration as per the patient's body weight (BW).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 700 patients who underwent coronary CTA. The first 350 consecutive patients underwent standard CTA with a fixed iodine concentration, whereas the remaining 350 underwent CTA with a diluted CM injection. All patients were classified into three groups according to their BW (<55, 55-65, and 66-73 kg). The mean and proportion of contrast enhancements (CEs) in the ascending aorta of ≥350 Hounsfield units (HUs) (CE₃₅₀) were compared between the standard CTA and diluted CM injection and among the BW groups. The associations between BW and CE were analyzed using linear regression.

RESULTS

Receiving diluted CM increased the mean CE in the <55-kg group (403.4 ± 55.4 HU vs. 382.8 ± 59.3 HU; P < 0.01) but not in the groups with heavier BW. The proportion of patients with CE₃₅₀ increased with BW (<55 kg = 71%, 55-65 kg = 84%, and 66-73 kg = 91%) and increased after dilution (86%, 93%, and 96%, respectively). After CM dilution, the correlation between BW and CE among patients undergoing CTA decreased from 0.37 to 0.22 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CM dilution for CTA improves arterial enhancement.

Revival of monophasic contrast injection protocols: superiority of a monophasic injection protocol compared to a biphasic injection protocol in high-pitch CT angiography

BACKGROUND

Biphasic injection protocols are frequently used because they yield homogenous contrast enhancement. We hypothesize that with faster scanners and shorter scan times, biphasic injection protocols are no longer necessary.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether a monophasic injection protocol is equivalent to a biphasic protocol in terms of contrast enhancement and homogeneity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Repeated high-pitch CTA (pitch 3) and conventional standard-pitch computed tomography angiography (CTA) (pitch 1.2) from the cervical region to the symphysis was performed in seven beagles (11.2 ± 2.5 kg) in a cross-over study design. Arterial contrast enhancement was measured along the z-axis in the ascending, descending, and abdominal aorta and the iliac arteries. The z-axis is the longitudinal axis of the human body and at the same time the direction in which the CT table is moving. The data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA with a post-hoc t-test and visual assessment of the scans.

RESULTS

In high-pitch CTA, monophasic injection protocols were superior to biphasic injection protocols in enhancement levels (P < 0.05) and enhancement homogeneity along the z-axis (P < 0.05). In conventional CTA, enhancement levels did not differ. Contrast homogeneity was better for biphasic protocols.

CONCLUSION

High-pitch CTA monophasic injection protocols are superior to biphasic injection protocols, due to a higher and more homogeneous contrast enhancement with the same amount of contrast medium used.

Automated Tube Voltage Selection for Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Angiography Using Different Contrast Media Concentrations and a Constant Iodine Delivery Rate

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to systematically investigate radiation dose reduction using automated tube voltage selection during CT angiography (CTA) and to evaluate the impact of contrast medium (CM) injection protocols on dose reduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A circulation phantom containing the thoracic and abdominal vasculature was used. Four different concentrations of CM (iopromide 300 and 370 mg I/mL and iomeprol 350 and 400 mg I/mL) were administered while maintaining an identical iodine delivery rate (1.8 g I/s) and total iodine load (20.0 g). Three different scanning protocols for CTA of the thoracoabdominal aorta were used: protocol A, no dose modulation; protocol B, automated tube current modulation (CARE Dose4D); and protocol C, automated tube voltage selection (CARE kV). The dose-length product was recorded to calculate the effective dose. Attenuation values (in Hounsfield units), image noise levels, and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in six predefined intravascular sites (three thoracic and three abdominal) were measured by two readers. All values were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and two-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in the effective dose (in millisieverts) for protocols B (mean ± SD, 2.03 ± 0.1 mSv) and C (1.00 ± 0.0 mSv) compared with protocol A (4.34 ± 0.0 mSv). The dose was reduced by 53% for protocol B and by 77% for protocol C. No significant differences were found in the effective dose among the different CM injection protocols within the scanning protocols; all p values were > 0.05. The attenuation values and SNRs were comparable among all the different CM injection protocols; all p values were > 0.05.

CONCLUSION

A large radiation dose reduction (77%) can be achieved using automated tube voltage selection independent of the CM injection protocol.

Identification of the iodine concentration that yields the highest intravascular enhancement in MDCT angiography

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to identify the iodine concentration that yields the highest intravascular contrast enhancement in MDCT angiography by intraindividual comparison in an animal model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six pigs underwent repeated chest MDCT examinations under standardized conditions using the same contrast medium (iopromide) with different iodine concentrations (150, 240, 300, and 370 mg I/mL). The contrast injection protocol was adapted to ensure an identical iodine delivery rate of 1.5 g I/s and the same total iodine dose of 300 mg/kg of body weight for all studies. Dynamic CT scans were acquired at the levels of the pulmonary artery and the ascending and descending aorta. Pulmonary and aortic peak enhancement values as well as time to peak (TTP) were calculated from time-enhancement curves.

RESULTS

Pulmonary and aortic peak contrast enhancement values were significantly higher with the 240 and 300 mg I/mL contrast media than the 150 and 370 mg I/mL contrast media (e.g., ascending aorta: 240 vs 150, p = 0.0070; 300 vs 150, p = 0.0096; 240 vs 370, p = 0.0262; 300 vs 370, p = 0.0079). TTP values tended to be lower for the 150 mg I/mL contrast medium than for the contrast media with higher iodine concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Comparison of contrast media with iodine concentrations ranging from 150 to 370 mg I/mL showed that contrast enhancement was significantly improved with the use of 240 and 300 mg I/mL contrast media given a fixed identical iodine delivery and normalized total iodine load in a porcine model. Contrast media with a moderate iodine concentration are most suitable for obtaining the highest intravascular contrast enhancement in CT angiography.

Different intravenous contrast media concentrations do not affect clinical assessment of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans in an intraindividual comparison

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to perform an intraindividual comparison of the influences of different iodine contrast media on tracer uptake, contrast enhancement, and image quality in combined positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients underwent baseline and follow-up combined PET/CT consisting of low-dose unenhanced and venous contrast-enhanced CT with contrast media containing a high concentration of iodine (iopromide, 370 mg/mL) and a standard iodine concentration (iopromide, 300 mg/mL). The total iodine load (44.4 g) and the iodine delivery rate (1.29 g/s) were identical for the 2 protocols. The mean and maximum standard uptake values, as measures of tracer uptake and contrast enhancement for unenhanced and contrast-enhanced PET/CT, were quantified at 10 different anatomical sites, and images were analyzed for clinically relevant differences.

RESULTS

The mean and maximum standard uptake values were significantly increased in contrast-enhanced PET/CT compared with unenhanced PET/CT at each anatomical site (P < 0.05). Comparison of tracer uptake between the 300- and 370-mg iodine contrast media showed no significant differences (all P > 0.05). Comparison of contrast enhancement between the 300- and 370-mg iodine contrast media showed no significant difference at any anatomical site (all P > 0.05). Analysis of image quality revealed no clinically relevant differences between the 2 different iodine contrast media (P = 0.739).

CONCLUSION

The use of contrast-enhanced CT scans for attenuation correction in PET/CT does not cause clinically relevant artifacts in PET scan reconstruction, regardless of the iodine concentration used. Standard- and high-iodine contrast media can be used equivalently.