Accuracy and confidence of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging alone and in combination for the diagnosis of liver metastases. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:822-828. [PMID: 23287713 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.12.005]

Value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and DWI in classification, characterization and confidence in diagnosis of solid focal liver lesions

OBJECTIVE

To assess gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) value in classification (benign vs. malignant) and characterization of solid focal liver lesions (SFLLs) and impact on confidence in diagnosis.

METHODS

A total of 195 lesions (46 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCCs], 45 metastases, 32 adenomas, 37 focal nodular hyperplasias [FNHs] and 35 hemangiomas) were retrospectively evaluated in 93 patients. Three imaging datasets were compared: DWI/ apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (set A), Gd-EOB-DTPA (set B) and combination of both (set C). Two radiologists (R) independently classified (on a five-point ordinal scale) and characterized each lesion. The accuracy in classification and characterization was compared, and the diagnostic confidence was assessed.

RESULTS

The classification accuracy on set A, B and C was 86.2%, 91.3% and 91.8% (R1), and 84.6%, 91.8% and 93.3% (R2); and characterization accuracy was 67.2%, 88.2% and 87.7% (R1), and 60.5%, 88.2% and 85.6% (R2). Classification by reader 1 showed no significant difference between set A and B (p=.09). For both readers, there was a significant difference between set A and C in both classification and characterization (all p < .05), but no significant difference between set B and C in neither classification nor characterization. No significant difference between the three datasets in classification and characterization of hemangiomas (all p > .05). The diagnostic confidence of the readers has increased progressively from set A to Set C (all p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

DWI may suggest benignity or malignancy of solid liver lesions, while Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced imaging remains superior in lesions characterization and the combination of both increases the diagnostic confidence. DWI is very helpful in the diagnosis of hepatic hemangiomas.

Detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and liver metastases: comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging vs. extracellular contrast materials

PURPOSE

To compare the detectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and liver metastases between Gd-EOB-DTPA- and extracellular contrast materials (ECCMs) contrast-enhanced MR imaging contrast.

METHODS

Two hundred seventy-two patients with suspected pancreatic disease underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging (EOB group, n = 79) or ECCMs-enhanced MR imaging (ECCM group, n = 193). The ECCM group were administered the following contrast agents: Gd-DTPA (n = 158), Gd-BT-DO3A (n = 28), Gd-DOTA (n = 5), and Gd-DTPA-BMA (n = 2). Signal intensities of pancreatic parenchyma, paraspinal muscle, PDAC (if present), and background noise were measured. The signal intensity ratio (SIR) of the pancreas and tumor-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also calculated. If present, the conspicuity of PDAC was evaluated with the arterial dominant phase images. Liver metastases, if present, were also evaluated for all sequences. Qualitative and quantitative imaging parameters were compared between EOB and ECCM groups.

RESULTS

SIR of the pancreas (P < 0.001) and CNR (P = 0.0037) were significantly lower in EOB group when compared with the ECCM group. However, the sensitivity (97.1% vs. 93.5%, P = 0.42) and specificity (100.0% vs. 99.2%, P = 1.00) for detecting PDAC were not significant between EOB and ECCM groups. The EOB group showed a significantly greater sensitivity for detecting liver metastases compared with the ECCM group (95.0% vs 84.5%, P = 0.04) when evaluating on a lesion-by-lesion basis.

CONCLUSION

Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging performed similarly to ECCMs-enhanced MR imaging in detecting PDAC but had better sensitivity in detecting liver metastases.

Preoperative detection of colorectal liver metastases: DWI alone or combined with MDCT is no substitute for Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with hepatocyte specific contrast has the highest sensitivity for colorectal liver metastases but comes at high costs and long examination times.

Purpose

To evaluate if preoperative detection of colorectal liver metastases with less resource-consuming diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) alone or in combination with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can compete with gadolinium-etoxybenzyl-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI.

Material and Methods

Forty-four patients with 123 colorectal liver metastases received MDCT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI including DWI before liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Five image sets were evaluated by two radiologists. The DWI set consisted of DWI, ADC map, coronal, axial T2-weighted single-shot sequences. The DWI-T2F set contained additionally respiratory-triggered T2-weighted TSE-SPIR sequences. The MDCT set consisted of four-phase MDCT, the MDCT-DWI set also contained DWI. The CE-MRI set contained all MRI sequences including Gd-EOB-DTPA. Reference standards was histopathology and follow-up.

Results

CE-MRI set had highest sensitivity ( P ≤ 0.013) with 95% compared to 72%, 73%, 73%, and 87% the for DWI set, DWI-T2W-FS set, MDCT set, and MDCT-DWI set, respectively. The CE-MRI set had the highest sensitivity ( P≤0.012) for colorectal liver metastases <10 mm with 87% compared to 55%, 52%, 23%, and 58% for the DWI set, DWI-T2W-FS set, MDCT set, and MDCT-DWI set, respectively. The MDCT-DWI set improved sensitivity overall and in size-dependent subgroup analyses compared to the MDCT set ( P ≤ 0.031). The MDCT-DWI set showed the highest specificity of 98% followed by 98%, 98%, 95%, and 88% for the DWI set, DWI-T2W-FS set, MDCT set, and CE-MRI set, respectively.

Conclusion

The less resource and time-consuming DWI sets are inferior to Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI with its excellent sensitivity should be the preferred preoperative modality when meticulous lesion identification is essential. Combination of DWI with MDCT improved significantly sensitivity compared to each modality alone.

Value of hepatocellular phase imaging after intravenous gadoxetate disodium for assessing hepatic metastases from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with other MRI pulse sequences and with extracellular agent

OBJECTIVE

To compare hepatocellular phase imaging after intravenous gadoxetate disodium with other MRI pulse sequences and with extracellular agent for assessing hepatic metastases from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, we included 30 patients (15 women, mean age: 58 years, range 44-77 years) with GEP-NEN metastatic to the liver, who underwent MRI with gadoxetate disodium. Six MRI sequences were reviewed by two radiologists to score tumor-liver interface (TLI) on a 5-point scale, to assess lesion detectability in different liver segments (divided into 3 zones/patient), and to measure lesion size. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated on each sequence. In 19 patients, lesion size and CNR on dynamic imaging with gadopentetate dimeglumine was compared with hepatocellular phase. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare TLI scores, lesion size, and median CNR, using Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Interobserver agreement for TLI was analyzed using Krippendorff's alpha, and for lesion size using concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and mean relative difference.

RESULTS

Hepatocellular phase had the best TLI (mean TLI for reader 1 = 1.2, reader 2 = 1.3) compared to all other sequences (p < 0.0001) with excellent interobserver agreement (Krippendorff's alpha = 1.0), maximum lesion detectability (61/90 zones), highest interobserver agreement for lesion measurement (CCC 0.9875 and smallest mean relative difference - 1.567%), and highest median CNR (31.2, p < 0.008). Hepatocellular phase also had the highest CNR when compared with gadopentetate imaging.

CONCLUSION

Hepatocellular phase imaging offers significant advantages for assessment of hepatic metastasis in GEP-NEN, and should be routinely considered for follow-up of these patients.

A radiologist's point of view in the presurgical and intraoperative setting of colorectal liver metastases

Multidisciplinary management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer requires in each phase an adequate choice of the most appropriate imaging modality. The first challenging step is liver lesions detection and characterization, using several imaging modality ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. The criteria to establish the metastases resectability have been modified. Not only the lesions number and site but also the functional volume remnant after surgery and the quality of the nontumoral liver must be taken into account. Radiologists should identify the liver functional volume remnant and during liver surgical procedures should collaborate with the surgeon to identify all lesions, including those that disappeared after the therapy, using intraoperative ultrasound with or without contrast medium.

Radiomics of liver MRI predict metastases in mice

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether any texture features show a correlation with intrahepatic tumor growth before the metastasis is visible to the human eye.

Methods

Eight male C57BL6 mice (age 8–10 weeks) were injected intraportally with syngeneic MC-38 colon cancer cells and two mice were injected with phosphate-buffered saline (sham controls). Small animal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 4.7 T was performed at baseline and days 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 after injection applying a T2-weighted spin-echo sequence. Texture analysis was performed on the images yielding 32 texture features derived from histogram, gray-level co-occurrence matrix, gray-level run-length matrix, and gray-level size-zone matrix. The features were examined with a linear regression model/Pearson correlation test and hierarchical cluster analysis. From each cluster, the feature with the lowest variance was selected.

Results

Tumors were visible on MRI after 20 days. Eighteen features from histogram and the gray-level-matrices exhibited statistically significant correlations before day 20 in the experiment group, but not in the control animals. Cluster analysis revealed three distinct clusters of independent features. The features with the lowest variance were Energy, Short Run Emphasis, and Gray Level Non-Uniformity.

Conclusions

Texture features may quantitatively detect liver metastases before they become visually detectable by the radiologist.

Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of liver: Principles, clinical applications and recent updates

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), a functional imaging technique exploiting the Brownian motion of water molecules, is increasingly shown to have value in various oncological and non-oncological applications. Factors such as the ease of acquisition and ability to obtain functional information in the absence of intravenous contrast, especially in patients with abnormal renal function, have contributed to the growing interest in exploring clinical applications of DWI. In the liver, DWI demonstrates a gamut of clinical applications ranging from detecting focal liver lesions to monitoring response in patients undergoing serial follow-up after loco-regional and systemic therapies. DWI is also being applied in the evaluation of diffuse liver diseases such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. In this review, we intend to review the basic principles, technique, current clinical applications and future trends of DW-MRI in the liver.

Peribiliary liver metastases MR findings

We described magnetic resonance (MR) features of peribiliary metastasis and of periductal infiltrative cholangiocarcinoma. We assessed 35 patients, with peribiliary lesions, using MR 4-point confidence scale. T1-weighted (T1-W), T2-weighted (T2-W) and diffusion-weighted images (DWI) signal intensity, enhancement pattern during arterial, portal, equilibrium and hepatobiliary phase were assessed. We identified 24 patients with periductal-infiltrating cholangiocellular carcinoma. The lesions in 34 patients appeared as a single tissue, while in a single patient, the lesions appeared as multiple individual lesions. According to the confidence scale, the median value was 4 for T2-W, 4 for DWI, 3.6 for T1-W in phase, 3.6 for T1-W out phase, 3 for MRI arterial phase, 3.2 for MRI portal phase, 3.2 for MRI equilibrium phase and 3.6 for MRI hepatobiliary phase. According to Bismuth classification, all lesions were type IV. In total, 19 (54.3%) lesions were periductal, 15 (42.9%) lesions were intraperiductal, and 1 (2.8%) lesion was periductal intrahepatic. All lesions showed hypointense signal in T1-W and in ADC maps and hyperintense signal in T2-W and DWI. All lesions showed a progressive contrast enhancement. There was no significant difference in signal intensity and contrast enhancement among all metastases and among all metastases with respect to CCCs, for all imaging acquisitions (p value >0.05). MRI is the method of choice for biliary tract tumors thanks to the possibility to obtain morphological and functional evaluations. T2-W and DW sequences have highest diagnostic performance. MRI does not allow a correct differential diagnosis among different histological types of metastasis and between metastases and CCC.

Standard-b-Value Versus Low-b-Value Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Hepatic Lesion Discrimination: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the comparative diagnostic performance of standard-b-value (500-1000s/mm) versus low-b-value (≤500 s/mm) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the discrimination of hepatic lesions.

METHODS

A total of 1775 hepatic malignant lesions and 1120 benign hepatic lesions from 21 studies were included.

RESULTS

(1) The global sensitivity was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.847-0.879), the specificity was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.797-0.842), the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 6.234 (95% CI, 4.260-9.123), the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.175 (95% CI, 0.135-0.227), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 42.836 (95% CI, 24.134-76.031). The area under the curve (AUC) and Q* index were 0.93 and 0.87. Publication bias was not present (P > 0.05). (2)The sensitivity of a subgroup meta-analysis of standard-b-value DWI was 0.858 (95% CI, 0.835-0.880), the specificity was 0.836 (95% CI, 0.807-0.863), the PLR was 6.527 (95% CI, 3.857-11.046), the NLR was 0.168 (95% CI, 0.123-0.239), and the DOR was 49.716 (95% CI, 22.897-107.98). The AUC and Q* index were 0.941 and 0.88. (3)The sensitivity of a subgroup meta-analysis of low-b-value DWI was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.89), the specificity was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83), the PLR was 6.22 (95% CI, 3.29-11.76), the NLR was 0.19 (95% CI, 0.12-0.29), and the DOR was 37.14 (95% CI, 14.80-93.18). The AUC and Q* index were 0.922 and 0.86.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic DWI is useful in differentiating between malignant and benign hepatic lesions. Standard-b-value DWI displayed an overall superior diagnostic accuracy over low-b-value DWI. Further trials needed to determine whether increasing b values beyond 1000 s/mm affects the diagnostic accuracy of hepatic lesion discrimination.

Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: Current applications

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the liver can be performed using most commercially available machines and is currently accepted in routine sequence. This sequence has some potential as an imaging biomarker for fibrosis, tumor detection/characterization, and following/predicting therapy. To improve reliability including accuracy and reproducibility, researchers have validated this new technique in terms of image acquisition, data sampling, and analysis. The added value of DWI in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was established in the detection of malignant liver lesions. However, some limitations remain in terms of lesion characterization and fibrosis detection. Furthermore, the methodologies of image acquisition and data analysis have been inconsistent. Therefore, researchers should make every effort to not only improve accuracy and reproducibility but also standardize imaging parameters.

Role of imaging for patients with colorectal hepatic metastases: what the radiologist needs to know

Surgical resection of colorectal metastatic disease has increased as surgeons have adopted a more aggressive ideology. Current exclusion criteria are patients for whom a negative resection margin is not feasible or a future liver remnant (FLR) of greater than 20% is not achievable. The goal of preoperative imaging is to identify the number and distribution of liver metastases, in addition to establishing their relation to relevant intrahepatic structures. FLR can be calculated utilizing cross-sectional imaging to select out patients at risk for hepatic dysfunction after resection. MRI, specifically with gadoxetic acid contrast, is currently the preferred modality for assessment of hepatic involvement for patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer, to include those who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Employment of liver-directed therapies has recently expanded and they may provide an alternative to hepatectomy in order to obtain locoregional control in poor surgical candidates or convert patients with initially unresectable disease into surgical candidates.

Current evidence for the diagnostic value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for liver metastasis

A variety of imaging techniques, including ultrasonography (US), multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography combined with CT scan (PET/CT), are available for diagnosis and treatment planning in liver metastasis. Contrast-enhanced MDCT is a relatively non-invasive, widely available and standardized method for hepatic work-up. Gadoxetic acid (gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid; EOB Primovist®]) is a recently developed liver-specific hepatobiliary MR contrast agent that offers both dynamic imaging as well as liver-specific static hepatocyte imaging, referred to as the hepatobiliary phase. Following contrast injection, this technique reveals dynamic vascular phases (arterial, portal venous and delayed phases), in addition to the hepatobiliary phase upon uptake by functional hepatocytes. The overall sensitivity of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was significantly higher than that of contrast-enhanced CT. Specifically, the higher sensitivity of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was observed in lesions smaller than 1 cm in diameter. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is considered an extremely useful tool for the diagnosis of liver metastases. Future studies will focus on diagnostic algorithms involving combinations of modalities such as MRI, MDCT and/or (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, which may impact the treatment plan for these patients.

A meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for the detection of liver metastases

OBJECTIVES

To obtain the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) and gadoxetic-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of liver metastases.

METHODS

A comprehensive search (EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane) was performed to identify relevant articles up to June 2015. Inclusion criteria were: liver metastases, DW-MR imaging and/or gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging, and per-lesion statistics. The reference standard was histopathology, intraoperative observation and/or follow-up. Sources of bias were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A linear mixed-effect regression model was used to obtain sensitivity estimates.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine articles were included (1,989 patients, 3,854 metastases). Sensitivity estimates for DW-MR imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and the combined sequence for detecting liver metastases on a per-lesion basis was 87.1 %, 90.6 % and 95.5 %, respectively. Sensitivity estimates by gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and the combined sequence were significantly better than DW-MR imaging (p = 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively), and the combined MR sequence was significantly more sensitive than gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging (p < 0.0001). Similar results were observed in articles that compared the three techniques simultaneously, with only colorectal liver metastases and in liver metastases smaller than 1 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with liver metastases, combined DW-MR and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging has the highest sensitivity for detecting liver metastases on a per-lesion basis.

KEY POINTS

• DW-MRI is less sensitive than gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting liver metastases • DW-MRI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is the best combination • Same results are observed in colorectal liver metastases • Same results are observed in liver metastases smaller than 1 cm • Same results are observed when histopathology alone is the reference standard.

The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: A comparison with unenhanced and Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVES

To compare the role of DWI vs. gadoxetic-acid-disodium enhanced MRI in the detection of colorectal hepatic metastases.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients with 115 hepatic metastases were included in this retrospective study, approved by the Ethical Board. All patients underwent intraoperative-ultrasound and surgical resection within two weeks after MRI. Images were grouped in 4 sets, which were analyzed by two radiologists in different sessions: unenhanced T1-T2w (set A), set A plus DWI (set B), set A plus gadoxetic-acid-disodium (set C), set A plus DWI plus gadoxetic-acid-disodium (set D). For each set, metastases presence/size/site was reported. Interobserver agreement and statistical significance were assessed by Cohen's kappa and Mc-Nemar's test, respectively.

RESULTS

Readers' agreement was always very good (k>0.80). Mean sensitivity values were 84.3/92.1/95.6/97.3% for set A/B/C/D, respectively. Mean specificity, positive predicted, negative predicted, and accuracy values strongly and progressively increased in the various set too: from 62.5% (set A) to 85.0% as for specificity, from 92.8% to 97.3% as for positive predicted value, from 41.0% to 85.1% as for negative predicted value, and from 81.1% to 95.5% as for accuracy. For each reader from set A to D, the number of false negatives progressively decreases.

CONCLUSIONS

For both readers, DWI improved all statistical parameters in the unenhanced examinations, as for nodules either smaller or greater than 1cm, while in the EOB-enhanced examinations DWI prevalently increased specificity/negative predictive value.

Technical advancements and protocol optimization of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in liver

An area of rapid advancement in abdominal MRI is diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). By measuring diffusion properties of water molecules, DWI is capable of non-invasively probing tissue properties and physiology at cellular and macromolecular level. The integration of DWI as part of abdominal MRI exam allows better lesion characterization and therefore more accurate initial diagnosis and treatment monitoring. One of the most technical challenging, but also most useful abdominal DWI applications is in liver and therefore requires special attention and careful optimization. In this article, the latest technical developments of DWI and its liver applications are reviewed with the explanations of the technical principles, recommendations of the imaging parameters, and examples of clinical applications. More advanced DWI techniques, including Intra-Voxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) diffusion imaging, anomalous diffusion imaging, and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI) are discussed.

Accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/MRI for the Detection of Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/MRI with PET/CT for the detection of liver metastases.

METHODS

32 patients with solid malignancies underwent [18F]FDG-PET/CT and subsequent PET/MRI of the liver. Two readers assessed both datasets regarding lesion characterization (benign, indeterminate, malignant), conspicuity and diagnostic confidence. An imaging follow-up (mean interval: 185±92 days) and/-or histopathological specimen served as standards of reference. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for both modalities. Accuracy was determined by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Values of conspicuity and diagnostic confidence were compared using Wilcoxon-signed-rank test.

RESULTS

The standard of reference revealed 113 liver lesions in 26 patients (malignant: n = 45; benign: n = 68). For PET/MRI a higher accuracy (PET/CT: 82.4%; PET/MRI: 96.1%; p<0.001) as well as sensitivity (67.8% vs. 92.2%, p<0.01) and NPV (82.0% vs. 95.1%, p<0.05) were observed. PET/MRI offered higher lesion conspicuity (PET/CT: 2.0±1.1 [median: 2; range 0-3]; PET/MRI: 2.8±0.5 [median: 3; range 0-3]; p<0.001) and diagnostic confidence (PET/CT: 2.0±0.8 [median: 2; range: 1-3]; PET/MRI 2.6±0.6 [median: 3; range: 1-3]; p<0.001). Furthermore, PET/MRI enabled the detection of additional PET-negative metastases (reader 1: 10; reader 2: 12).

CONCLUSIONS

PET/MRI offers higher diagnostic accuracy compared to PET/CT for the detection of liver metastases.

Focal liver lesions: Practical magnetic resonance imaging approach

With the widespread of cross-sectional imaging, a growth of incidentally detected focal liver lesions (FLL) has been observed. A reliable detection and characterization of FLL is critical for optimal patient management. Maximizing accuracy of imaging in the context of FLL is paramount in avoiding unnecessary biopsies, which may result in post-procedural complications. A tremendous development of new imaging techniques has taken place during these last years. Nowadays, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a key role in management of liver lesions, using a radiation-free technique and a safe contrast agent profile. MRI plays a key role in the non-invasive correct characterization of FLL. MRI is capable of providing comprehensive and highly accurate diagnostic information, with the additional advantage of lack of harmful ionizing radiation. These properties make MRI the mainstay for the noninvasive evaluation of focal liver lesions. In this paper we review the state-of-the-art MRI liver protocol, briefly discussing different sequence types, the unique characteristics of imaging non-cooperative patients and discuss the role of hepatocyte-specific contrast agents. A review of the imaging features of the most common benign and malignant FLL is presented, supplemented by a schematic representation of a simplistic practical approach on MRI.

New imaging techniques for liver diseases

Newly developed or advanced methods of ultrasonography and MR imaging provide combined anatomical and quantitative functional information about diffuse and focal liver diseases. Ultrasound elastography has a central role for staging liver fibrosis and an increasing role in grading portal hypertension; dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography may improve tumor characterization. In clinical practice, MR imaging examinations currently include diffusion-weighted and dynamic MR imaging, enhanced with extracellular or hepatobiliary contrast agents. Moreover, quantitative parameters obtained with diffusion-weighted MR imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR elastography have the potential to characterize further diffuse and focal liver diseases, by adding information about tissue cellularity, perfusion, hepatocyte transport function and visco-elasticity. The multiparametric capability of ultrasonography and more markedly of MR imaging gives the opportunity for high diagnostic performance by combining imaging biomarkers. However, image acquisition and post-processing methods should be further standardized and validated in multicenter trials.

Virtual sonography for novice sonographers: usefulness of SYNAPSE VINCENT® with pre-check imaging of tumor location

PURPOSE

To evaluate the usefulness of a virtual ultrasound (US) imaging device as a tool to assist novice sonographers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective blinded pilot study was conducted involving patients with liver lesions. Two sonographers and 2 medical doctors with less than 5 years of experience performed US examinations. The time needed to detect liver lesions on US and the success rate for detecting liver lesions with and without using the virtual US imaging device SYNAPSE VINCENT® (Fujifilm Medical Co., Tokyo, Japan) before US examination were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients with the following 42 liver lesions were included: liver cyst (n = 24), hemangioma (n = 8), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 6), and liver metastasis (n = 4). The maximal diameter of these lesions ranged from 0.3 to 1.5 cm (mean ± SD, 0.8 ± 0.4). The average time for detecting liver lesions on US was 47.8 s (range, 7-113) with VINCENT and 112.9 s (range, 14-313) without VINCENT before US examination. There were significant differences in the duration of US examination with and without VINCENT (p = 0.0002, Student's t test). The rates for accurately detecting liver lesions were 100 and 76.2% (16/21) in US beginners with and without VINCENT, respectively. Significantly higher detection rates were found in the US beginners who used VINCENT compared to those who did not use VINCENT (p = 0.047, Fisher's exact test).

CONCLUSION

Before US examination, a reference with VINCENT could contribute to the successful detection of liver lesions and could be time-saving for US beginners.

Focal liver lesions detection and characterization: The advantages of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI

Since its clinical introduction, several studies in literature have investigated gadolinium ethoxybenzhyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid or gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) properties. Following contrast injection, it provides dynamic vascular phases (arterial, portal and equilibrium phases) and hepatobiliary phase, the latter due to its uptake by functional hepatocytes. The main advantages of Gd-EOB-DTPA of focal liver lesion detection and characterization are discussed in this paper. Namely, we focus on the possibility of distinguishing focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from hepatic adenoma (HA), the identification of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the pre-operative assessment of metastasis in liver parenchyma. Regarding the differentiation between FNH and HA, adenoma typically appears hypointense in hepatobiliary phase, whereas FNH is isointense or hyperintense to the surrounding hepatic parenchyma. As for the identification of early HCCs, many papers recently published in literature have emphasized the contribution of hepatobiliary phase in the characterization of nodules without a typical hallmark of HCC. Atypical nodules (no hypervascularizaton observed on arterial phase and/or no hypovascular appearance on portal phase) with low signal intensity in the hepatobiliary phase, have a high probability of malignancy. Finally, regarding the evaluation of focal hepatic metastases, magnetic resonance pre-operative assessment using gadoxetic acid allows for more accurate diagnosis.

Comparison of monopolar and bipolar diffusion weighted imaging sequences for detection of small hepatic metastases

OBJECTIVE

To compare monopolar (MP) and bipolar (BP) diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in detecting small liver metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-eight patients underwent 3-T MRI. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of the liver parenchyma and lesions, the lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR), and the detection sensitivities were compared. The lesion distortion was scored (LDS) from 4 (no distortion) to 1 (excessive distortion), dichotomised as no-distortion and distortion, and the association between detected lesions for each reader in the MP or BP DWI group and the dichotomised lesion distortion degree was assessed.

RESULT

Forty-six hepatic metastases were confirmed. The CNR with BP images showed significantly higher values than with MP (P=0.017). The detection sensitivities of the three readers were higher in the BP sequence than in MP, and one reader detected significantly more hepatic lesions with BP images (P=0.04). LDS was significantly improved with BP sequence (P=0.002). In the no-distortion group, excluding the MP DWI assessments of one reader, detection sensitivities were significantly higher than in the distortion group (P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Reduced lesion distortion improves the detection of small liver metastases, and BP is more sensitive in detecting small liver metastases than MP DWI.

Detection of liver micrometastases from colorectal origin by perfusion CT in a rat model

BACKGROUND

Some patients with colorectal carcinoma have liver metastases (LMs) which cannot be detected by conventional imaging. This study aimed to assess whether hepatic perfusion changes induced by micrometastases can be detected by perfusion computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

LMs were produced in rats by injecting carcinoma cells into the portal vein. Perfusion CT was performed at microscopic (day 10), interval (day 17), and macroscopic stage (day 34). Perfusion parameters were computed using a dual-input one-compartmental model.

RESULTS

Micro and macro LMs presented a mean diameter of 0.5 and 2.6 mm, respectively. Compared to controls, LMs at interval (1.1 mm) and macroscopic stage induced significant perfusion changes: a decrease of 42% (P=0.004) and 41% (P=0.029) in hepatic transit time and an increase of 292% (P=0.073) and 240% (P=0.001) in portal delay, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LMs with a mean diameter between 1.1 and 2.6 mm induced significant hepatic perfusion changes, detected by CT. Such detection may help to select patients and propose chemotherapy at the time of primary tumor resection.

Does Gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0T MRI in addition to 64-detector-row contrast-enhanced CT provide better diagnostic performance and change the therapeutic strategy for the preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases?

OBJECTIVES

To compare diagnostic performance in the detection of colorectal liver metastases between 64-detector-row contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) alone and the combination of CE-CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) at 3.0T, and to assess whether EOB-MRI in addition to CE-CT results in a change to initially planned operative strategy.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients (27 men, mean age 65 years) with 85 histopathologically confirmed liver metastases were included. At EOB-MRI, unenhanced (T1- and T2-weighted), dynamic, and hepatocyte-phase images were obtained. At CE-CT, four-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced images were obtained. One on-site reader and three off-site readers independently reviewed both CE-CT alone and the combination of CE-CT and EOB-MRI. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (AFROC) method were calculated. Differences in therapeutic strategy before and after the EOB-MRI examination were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and area under the AFROC curve with the combination of CE-CT and EOB-MRI were significantly superior to those with CE-CT alone. Changes in surgical therapy were documented in 13 of 39 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of CE-CT and EOB-MRI may provide better diagnostic performance than CE-CT alone for the detection of colorectal liver metastases, and EOB-MRI in addition to CE-CT resulted in changes to the planned operative strategy in one-third of the patients.

KEY POINTS

• Accurate preoperative imaging is essential for surgical planning and successful hepatic resection. • Combination of CE-CT and EOB-MRI is useful to detect colorectal liver metastases. • EOB-MRI combined with CE-CT contributes to determine the correct therapeutic strategy.