Regional PET/CT after water gastric inflation for evaluating loco-regional disease of gastric cancer

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.

Relationship between total lesion glycolysis of primary lesions based on 18F-FDG PET/CT and lymph node metastasis in gastric adenocarcinoma: a cross-sectional preliminary study

OBJECTIVES

We explored the relationship between lymph node metastasis (LNM) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of primary lesions determined by 18fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, and evaluated the independent effect of this association.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 106 gastric adenocarcinoma patients who were examined by preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging between April 2016 and April 2020. We measured TLG of primary gastric lesions and evaluated its association with LNM. Multivariate logistic regression and a two-piece-wise linear regression were performed to evaluate the relationship between TLG of primary lesions and LNM.

RESULTS

Of the 106 patients, 75 cases (71%) had LNM and 31 cases (29%) did not have LNM. Univariate analyses revealed that a per-SD increase in TLG was independently associated with LNM [odds ratio (OR) = 2.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.42-3.98; P = 0.0010]. After full adjustment of confounding factors, multivariate analyses exhibited that TLG of primary lesions was still significantly associated with LNM (OR per-SD: 2.20; 95% CI, 1.16-4.19; P = 0.0164). Generalized additive model indicated a nonlinear relationship and saturation effect between TLG of primary lesions and LNM. When TLG of primary lesions was <23.2, TLG was significantly correlated with LNM (OR = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07-1.48; P = 0.0053), whereas when TLG of primary lesions was ≥ 23.2, the probability of LNM was greater than 60%, gradually reached saturation effect, as high as 80% or more.

CONCLUSIONS

In this preliminary study, there were saturation and segmentation effects between TLG of primary lesions determined by preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT and LNM. When TLG of primary lesions was ≥ 23.2, the probability of LNM was greater than 60%, gradually reached saturation effect, as high as 80% or more. TLG of primary lesions is helpful in the preoperative diagnosis of LNM in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.

Adrenal Nodules Detected at Staging CT in Patients with Resectable Gastric Cancers Have a Low Incidence of Malignancy

Background Guidelines recommending additional imaging for adrenal nodules lack relevant epidemiologic evidence. Purpose To measure the prevalence of adrenal nodules detected at staging CT in patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer and the proportion of patients with malignant nodules among them. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 10 250 consecutive patients (median age, 63 years; interquartile range, 53-71 years; 6884 men) who underwent staging CT and had potentially resectable gastric cancer in a tertiary center (May 2003 to December 2018). All 10 250 CT studies were retrospectively reviewed, and patients with adrenal nodules (or thickening ≥10 mm) were identified to measure the prevalence of adrenal nodules. Among patients with adrenal nodules, the per-patient proportions of malignant nodules, adrenal metastasis from gastric cancer, and additional adrenal examinations were measured. A secondary analysis was performed by using data from the original CT reports. The same metrics that were used in the retrospective review were assessed. Results The prevalence of adrenal nodules was 4.5% (95% CI: 4.1, 4.9; 462 of 10 250). The proportions of malignant nodules and adrenal metastasis from gastric cancer were 0.4% ( 95% CI: 0.1, 1.6; two of 462) and 0% (95% CI: 0.0, 0.8; 0 of 462), respectively. A total of 27% of the patients (95% CI: 23, 31; 123 of 462) underwent additional adrenal examination. According to original CT reports, the prevalence of adrenal nodules and the proportions of malignant nodules, adrenal metastases from gastric cancer, and additional adrenal examination were 2.7% (95% CI: 2.4, 3.0; 272 of 10 250), 0.7% (95% CI: 0.1, 2.6; two of 272), 0% (95% CI: 0.0, 1.4; 0 of 272), and 42.6% (95% CI: 36.7, 48.8; 116 of 272), respectively. Conclusion Although adrenal nodules were detected frequently on staging CT images of patients with otherwise resectable gastric cancer, these nodules were rarely malignant. ©RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Baumgarten in this issue.

Prognosis prediction of pancreatic cancer after curative intent surgery using imaging parameters derived from F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography

Imaging parameters including metabolic or textural parameters during F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) are being used for evaluation of malignancy. However, their utility for prognosis prediction has not been thoroughly investigated. Here, we evaluated the prognosis prediction ability of imaging parameters from preoperative FDGPET/CT in operable pancreatic cancer patients.Sixty pancreatic cancer patients (male:female = 36:24, age = 67.2 ± 10.5 years) who had undergone FDGPET/CT before the curative intent surgery were enrolled. Clinico-pathologic parameters, metabolic parameters from FDGPET/CT; maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax), glucose-incorporated SUVmax (GI-SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume, total-lesion glycolysis, and 53 textural parameters derived from imaging analysis software (MaZda version 4.6) were compared with overall survival.All the patients underwent curative resection. Mean and standard deviation of overall follow-up duration was 16.12 ± 9.81months. Among them, 39 patients had died at 13.46 ± 8.82 months after operation, whereas 21 patients survived with the follow-up duration of 18.56 ± 9.97 months. In the univariate analysis, Tumor diameter ≥4 cm (P = .003), Preoperative Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 ≥37 U/mL (P = .034), number of metastatic lymph node (P = .048) and GI-SUVmax (P = .004) were significant parameters for decreased overall survival. Among the textural parameters, kurtosis3D (P = .052), and skewness3D (P = .064) were potentially significant predictors in the univariate analysis. However, in multivariate analysis only GI-SUVmax (P = .026) and combined operation (P = .001) were significant independent predictors of overall survival.The current research result indicates that metabolic parameter (GI-SUVmax) from FDGPET/CT, and combined operation could predict the overall survival of surgically resected pancreatic cancer patients. Other metabolic or textural imaging parameters were not significant predictors for overall survival of localized pancreatic cancer.

An application study of low-dose computed tomography perfusion imaging for evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study used low-dose computed tomography (CT) perfusion imaging technology to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma and to determine whether any of the perfusion parameters could predict tumor response to chemotherapy.

METHODS

Forty patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (T3-4NxM0) received three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and low-dose spiral CT perfusion imaging prior to and after the first and third series of chemotherapy. We calculated tissue blood flow (BF) and blood volume (BV) using commercial software. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to detect any significant variation of the tested parameters between different times of scanning. Spearman's test was used to evaluate the correlation among perfusion parameters, tumor size and pathological efficacy grade, and clinical response after chemotherapy, respectively. A receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the optimal diagnostic cutoff value for changes in perfusion parameters and tumor size.

RESULTS

One-way ANOVA showed significant differences in BF and BV values between those before and after chemotherapy (p < 0.01). The BF, BV and size reduction rate after three series of chemotherapy were significantly correlated with pathological efficacy grade. BF and BV values after the first and third series of chemotherapy were also significantly correlated with clinical response (p < 0.01, respectively). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the BV reduction rate were higher than those of size reduction rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose CT perfusion imaging is a valuable tool that permits microcirculation evaluation and therefore can evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

PET/Computed Tomography and Precision Medicine: Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is a disease with low survival rates and high morbidity, requiring accurate and prompt diagnosis and treatment. Although limited in the evaluation of the primary tumor as such, the metabolic information of primary tumors in an ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT study can assist in surgical and treatment planning and differentiating gastric cancers. It detects nodal disease with good specificity and positive predictive value, thus enabling appropriate therapy for individual patients. It provides valuable information about distant metastases, altering therapy decisions. It has reasonably good performance in detecting recurrent disease and in the follow-up of patients.

Can low-dose CT perfusion imaging accurately assess response of advanced gastric cancer with neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

PURPOSE

To explore the value of low-dose CT perfusion imaging (LDCTPI) technology and its perfusion parameters in assessing response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

Thirty patients with AGC were studied prospectively by LDCTPI to measure two parameters including blood flow (BF) and blood volume (BV) of tumor area before and after chemotherapy, respectively. All of the patients received two courses of NAC and surgical resection of gastric tumor within one week after chemotherapy, and then obtained the result of postoperative pathology response for chemotherapy. The comparisons of BF and BV values of AGC before and after chemotherapy were analyzed by paired-samples t-test, respectively; and the correlations between BF as well as BV decrease rates after NAC and the pathology response grade were analyzed by Spearman statistical test. Thirty patients were divided into effective and ineffective groups according to different pathology response grade. Comparisons of BF as well as BV decrease rates between effective and ineffective groups were analyzed by independent-samples t-test, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the cutoff values of BF and BV decrease rates as evaluation indicators of AGC after NAC and calculate area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

There were significant differences in BF and BV values of AGC between before and after NAC (p < 0.001), respectively, and there were obvious correlations between BF as well as BV decrease rates and pathology response grade (r = 0.660, p < 0.001; r = 0.706, p < 0.001), respectively. There were also significant differences in BF and BV decrease rates of AGC between effective and ineffective groups (P = 0.001), respectively. If BF decrease rate of 12.1% (AUC was 0.816, P = 0.005) was used as the cutoff value for chemotherapy effectiveness of AGC, the sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 84% were achieved, and if BV decrease rate of 32.8% (AUC was 0.844, P = 0.002) was used as the cutoff value for chemotherapy effectiveness of AGC, the sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 89% were achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

BF and BV decrease rates have potential to be used as effective indicators to assess chemotherapy efficacy of AGC from the hemodynamics.

CT perfusion imaging of the stomach: a quantitative analysis according to different degrees of adenocarcinoma cell differentiation

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate clinical usefulness of computed tomography perfusion imaging (CTPI) in gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty subjects without gastric diseases (control group) and fifty patients with gastric cancer were studied prospectively using CTPI examinations. Four perfusion parameter values, i.e., blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), mean transit time, and permeability surface (PS), were calculated. The gastric cancer group was divided into three groups: well differentiated, moderately differentiated, and poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Comparing the three groups, differences between the well-differentiated group and the moderately differentiated group or the poorly differentiated group were all statistically significant for BF, BV, and PS.

CONCLUSION

The BF, BV, and PS values could serve as indicators of the degree of malignancy of gastric cancer.

Incremental diagnostic utility of gastric distension FDG PET/CT

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic utility of gastric distension (GD) FDG PET/CT in both patients with known gastric malignancy and those not known to have gastric malignancy but with incidental focal FDG uptake in the stomach.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 88 patients who underwent FDG PET/CT following GD with hyoscine N-butylbromide (Buscopan®) and water ingestion as part of routine clinical evaluation between 2004 and 2014. FDG PET/CT scans before and after GD were reported blinded to the patient clinical details in 49 patients undergoing pretreatment staging of gastric malignancy and 39 patients who underwent GD following incidental suspicious gastric uptake. The PET findings were validated by a composite clinical standard.

RESULTS

In the 49 patients undergoing pretreatment staging of gastric malignancy, GD improved PET detection of the primary tumour (from 80 % to 90 %). PET evaluation of tumour extent was concordant with endoscopic/surgical reports in 31 % (interpreter 1) and 45 % (interpreter 2) using pre-GD images and 73 % and 76 % using GD images. Interobserver agreement also improved with GD (κ = 0.29 to 0.69). Metabolic and morphological quantitative analysis demonstrated a major impact of GD in normal gastric wall but no significant effect in tumour, except a minor increase in SUV related to a delayed acquisition time. The tumour to normal stomach SUVmax ratio increased from 3.8 ± 2.9 to 9.2 ± 8.6 (mean ± SD) with GD (p < 0.0001), facilitating detection and improved assessment of the primary tumour. In 25 (64 %) of the 39 patients with incidental suspicious gastric uptake, acquisition after GD correctly excluded a malignant process. In 10 (71 %) of the remaining 14 patients with persistent suspicious FDG uptake despite GD, malignancy was confirmed and in 3 (21 %) an active but benign pathology was diagnosed.

CONCLUSION

GD is a simple way to improve local staging with FDG PET in patients with gastric malignancy. In the setting of incidental suspicious gastric uptake, GD is also an effective tool for ruling out malignancy and leads to the avoidance of unnecessary endoscopy.

Prognostic value and clinical correlations of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose metabolism quantifiers in gastric cancer

AIM: To investigate the correlations of pre-treatment positron emission tomography-computer tomography (PET-CT) metabolic quantifiers with clinical data of unstratified gastric cancer (GC) patients.

METHODS: Forty PET-CT scans utilising 18-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients who received no prior treatment were analysed. Analysis involved measurements of maximum and mean standardised uptake volumes (SUV), coefficient of variation (COV), metabolic tumour volumes and total lesion glycolysis of different thresholds above which the tumor volumes were identified. The threshold values were: SUV absolute value of 2.5, 30% of SUVmax, 40% of SUVmax, and liver uptake-based (marked _2.5, ₃₀, ₄₀ and _liv, respectively). Clinical variables such as age, sex, clinical stage, performance index, weight loss, tumor histological type and grade, and CEA and CA19.9 levels were included in survival analysis. Patients received various treatment modalities appropriate to their disease stage and the outcome was defined by time to metastasis (TTM) and overall survival (OS). Clinical and metabolic parameters were evaluated by analysis of variance, receiver operating characteristics, univariate Kaplan-Meier, and multivariate Cox models. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between initially disseminated and non-disseminated patients in mean SUV (6.05 vs 4.13, P = 0.008), TLG_2.5 (802 cm³vs 226 cm³; P = 0.031), and TLG₃₀ (436 cm³vs 247 cm³, P = 0.018). Higher COV was associated with poor tumour differentiation (0.47 for G3 vs 0.28 for G1 and G2; P = 0.03). MTV_2.5 was positively correlated to patient weight loss (< 5%, 5%-10% and > 10%: 40.4 cm³vs 123.6 cm³vs 181.8 cm³, respectively, P = 0.003). In multivariate Cox analysis, TLG₃₀ was prognostic for OS (HR = 1.001, 95%CI: 1.0009-1.0017; P = 0.047) for the whole group of patients. In the same model yet only including patients without initial disease dissemination TLG₃₀ (HR = 1.009, 95%CI: 1.003-1.014; P = 0.004) and MTV_2.5 (HR = 1.02, 95%CI: 1.002-1.036; P = 0.025) were prognostic for OS; for TTM TLG₃₀ was the only significant prognostic variable (HR = 1.006, 95%CI: 1.001-1.012; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION: PET-CT in GC may represent a valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool that requires further evaluation in highly standardised environments such as randomised clinical trials.

Diagnosis and evaluation of gastric cancer by positron emission tomography

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. The diagnosis of gastric cancer has been significantly improved with the broad availability of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Effective technologies for accurate staging and quantitative evaluation are still in demand to merit reasonable treatment and better prognosis for the patients presented with advanced disease. Preoperative staging using conventional imaging tools, such as computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasonography, is inadequate. Positron emission tomography (PET), using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) as a tracer and integrating CT for anatomic localization, holds a promise to detect unsuspected metastasis and has been extensively used in a variety of malignancies. However, the value of FDG PET/CT in diagnosis and evaluation of gastric cancer is still controversial. This article reviews the current literature in diagnosis, staging, response evaluation, and relapse monitoring of gastric cancer, and discusses the current understanding, improvement, and future prospects in this area.