Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions--a comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT

Morphology and optical properties of Au-Ag hybrid nanoparticles regulation and its ultra-sensitive SERS immunoassay detection in carbohydrate antigen 19-9

The development of an ultra-sensitive detection method for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is very important for the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. In this work, we developed a new strategy to achieve a variety of Au-Ag hybrid nanoparticles from janus to core-satellite which is controlled by the volume of AgNO3 and the concentration of benzimidazolecarboxylic acid (MBIA). With the volume of AgNO3 increased, Au-Ag hybrid nanoparticles changed from janus to core-satellite and the characteristic absorption peak showed two opposite trends. The size and number of Ag islands were determined by the concentration of MBIA. Au-Ag core-satellites nanoparticles with a large number of small-sized Ag have the highest SERS intensity. Then we used them as SERS nanotags and Au-Polystyrene nanospheres modified by captured anti-CA19-9 antibody as solid substrates to realize the ultra-sensitive detection of CA19-9 with a low limit of detection of 1.25 × 10-6 IU/mL and a wide linear range of 1.00 × 10-5 -1.00 × 104 IU/mL. This work not only demonstrates that MBIA and AgNO3 were the key factors in the growth of Au-Ag hybrid nanoparticles from 2D to 3D structure but also supplies an ultra-sensitive detection method for CA19-9 which has a potential practicability in the clinical early diagnoses of pancreatic cancer.

Application of artificial intelligence in pancreas endoscopic ultrasound imaging- A systematic review

The pancreas is a vital organ in digestive system which has significant health implications. It is imperative to evaluate and identify malignant pancreatic lesions promptly in light of the high mortality rate linked to such malignancies. Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) is a non-invasive precise technique to detect pancreas disorders, but it is highly operator dependent. Artificial intelligence (AI), including traditional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques can play a pivotal role to enhancing the performance of EUS regardless of operator. AI performs a critical function in the detection, classification, and segmentation of medical images. The utilization of AI-assisted systems has improved the accuracy and productivity of pancreatic analysis, including the detection of diverse pancreatic disorders (e.g., pancreatitis, masses, and cysts) as well as landmarks and parenchyma. This systematic review examines the rapidly developing domain of AI-assisted system in EUS of the pancreas. Its objective is to present a thorough study of the present research status and developments in this area. This paper explores the significant challenges of AI-assisted system in pancreas EUS imaging, highlights the potential of AI techniques in addressing these challenges, and suggests the scope for future research in domain of AI-assisted EUS systems.

Unraveling the enigma: A comprehensive review of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas

Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas (SPTP) is a rare neoplasm predominantly observed in young females. Pathologically, CTNNB1 mutations, β-catenin nuclear accumulation, and subsequent Wnt-signaling pathway activation are the leading molecular features. Accurate preoperative diagnosis often relies on imaging techniques and endoscopic biopsies. Surgical resection remains the mainstay treatment. Risk models, such as the Fudan Prognostic Index, show promise as predictive tools for assessing the prognosis of SPTP. Establishing three types of metachronous liver metastasis can be beneficial in tailoring individualized treatment and follow-up strategies. Despite advancements, challenges persist in understanding its etiology, establishing standardized treatments for unresectable or metastatic diseases, and developing a widely recognized grading system. This comprehensive review aims to elucidate the enigma by consolidating current knowledge on the epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathology, molecular characteristics, diagnostic methods, treatment options, and prognostic factors.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: CEUS characteristics are correlated with pathological findings and help predict early recurrence after resection

OBJECTIVES

To identify characteristics of preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) that could predict early recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

From January 2017 to September 2022, a total of 110 patients with PDAC (all confirmed by samples obtained via operation) who underwent CEUS within 1 month before surgery were enrolled. We proposed five CEUS enhancement patterns (Pattern I, homogeneous enhancement; Pattern II, heterogeneous enhancement without cystic components; pattern III, ring enhancement; Pattern IV, starry enhancement; Pattern V, heterogeneous enhancement with cystic components) of PDAC. Clinical-pathologic and CEUS characteristics for predicting early recurrence (recurrence within 1 year after curative resection) were analyzed. Important CEUS characteristics were compared with the pathological findings.

RESULTS

Tumor size and TNM stage were closely associated with early recurrence. Incomplete-enhancement and enhancement pattern III, IV and V at CEUS imaging were more prone to early recurrence. Incomplete-enhancement lesions had higher histological tumor grades, less frequent remaining acini, and more frequent necrosis within the tumor. PDACs with pattern I and II had lower histological tumor grades, and pattern III, IV and V had higher histological tumor grades. PDACs with pattern I, II and IV had less frequent intratumoral necrosis than PDACs with pattern III and V, and PDACs with pattern IV had lower MVD values.

CONCLUSIONS

PDACs with incomplete enhancement and enhancement pattern III, IV and V were more prone to early recurrence after attempted curative resection, and these important CEUS characteristics were closely related to the pathological findings of PDAC.

Treatment of hemolymphangioma by robotic surgery: A case report

BACKGROUND

Hemolymphangioma of the jejunum is rare and lacks clinical specificity, and can manifest as gastrointestinal bleeding, abdominal pain, and intestinal obstruction. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other examinations show certain characteristics of the disease, but lack accuracy. Although capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy make up for this deficiency, the diagnosis also still requires pathology.

CASE SUMMARY

A male patient was admitted to the hospital due to abdominal distension and abdominal pain, but a specific diagnosis by computed tomography examination was not obtained. Partial resection of the small intestine was performed by robotic surgery, and postoperative pathological biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of hemolymphangioma. No recurrence in the follow-up examination was observed.

CONCLUSION

Robotic surgery is an effective way to treat hemolymphangioma through minimally invasive techniques under the concept of rapid rehabilitation.

Protocol for a Multi-Center Confirmatory Trial to Evaluate the Differential Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Using Perflubutane in Patients with a Pancreatic Mass: A Multicenter Prospective Study

For pancreatic masses, an evaluation of their vascularity using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can help improve their characterization. This study was designed to evaluate the utility and safety of contrast-enhanced transabdominal ultrasonography (CE-TUS) and endoscopic ultrasonography (CE-EUS) in the diagnosis of pancreatic masses including solid or cystic masses. This multi-center comparative open-label superiority study is designed to compare Plain (P)-TUS/EUS alone with P-TUS/P-EUS plus CE-TUS/CE-EUS. Three hundred and one patients with a total of 232 solid pancreatic masses and 69 cystic masses were prospectively enrolled. The primary endpoints are to compare the diagnostic accuracy between P-TUS/P-EUS alone and P-TUS/P-EUS plus CE-TUS/CE-EUS for both the TUS and EUS of solid pancreatic masses, and to compare the diagnostic accuracy between P-EUS alone and P-EUS plus CE-EUS in cystic pancreatic masses. The secondary endpoints are to compare the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of P-TUS/P-EUS alone and P-TUS/P-EUS plus CE-TUS/CE-EUS for pancreatic solid/cystic masses, and the accuracy of P-TUS alone and P-TUS plus CE-TUS for pancreatic cystic masses. Other secondary endpoints included comparing the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CE-TUS, CE-EUS and CE-computed tomography (CT) for solid/cystic pancreatic masses. The safety, degree of effective enhancement, and diagnostic confidence obtained with CE-TUS/CE-EUS will also be assessed.

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: The Characteristics of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Are Correlated with the Hypoxic Microenvironment

A hypoxic microenvironment is associated with an increased risk of metastasis, treatment resistance and poor prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to identify contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) characteristics that could predict the hypoxic microenvironment of PDAC. A total of 102 patients with surgically resected PDAC who underwent CEUS were included. CEUS qualitative and quantitative characteristics were analyzed. The expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1) and glucose transporter-1 (GLUT1) were demonstrated by immunohistochemistry. The associations between CEUS characteristics and the HIF-1α and GLUT1 expression of PDACs were evaluated. We found that HIF-1α-high PDACs and GLUT1-high PDACs had a larger tumor size and were more prone to lymph node metastasis. There was a significant positive linear correlation between the expression of HIF-1α and GLUT1. CEUS qualitative characteristics including completeness of enhancement and peak enhancement degree (PED) were related to the expression of HIF-1α and GLUT1. A logistic regression analysis showed that tumor size, lymph node metastasis, incomplete enhancement and iso-enhancement of PED were independent predictors for HIF-1α-high PDACs and GLUT1-high PDACs. As for quantitative characteristics, HIF-1α-high PDACs and GLUT1-high PDACs showed higher peak enhancement (PE) and wash-in rate (WIR). CEUS can effectively reflect the hypoxia microenvironment of PDAC, which may become a noninvasive imaging biomarker for prognosis prediction and individualized treatment.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for differentiating mass-forming pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP) or pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presented similar clinical symptoms, but required different treatment approaches and had different survival outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in differentiating MFP from PDAC.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Weipu (VIP), and WanFang databases to identify original studies published from inception to August 20, 2021. Studies reporting the diagnostic performances of CEUS and CECT for differentiating MFP from PDAC were included. The meta-analysis was performed with Stata 15.0 software. The outcomes included the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (-LR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves of CEUS and CECT. Meta-regression was conducted to investigate heterogeneity. Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to indirectly compare the overall diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies with 2115 pancreatic masses were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for MFP were 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%-88%; I2  = 0.00%) and 95% (95% CI, 90%-97%; I2  = 63.44%), respectively; the overall +LR, -LR, and DOR values were 15.12 (95% CI, 7.61-30.01), 0.19 (95% CI, 0.13-0.29), and 78.91 (95% CI, 30.94-201.27), respectively; and the area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-92). However, the overall sensitivity and specificity of CECT were 81% (95% CI, 75-85%; I2  = 66.37%) and 94% (95% CI, 90-96%; I2  = 74.87%); the overall +LR, -LR, and DOR values were 12.91 (95% CI, 7.86-21.20), 0.21 (95% CI, 0.16-0.27), and 62.53 (95% CI, 34.45-113.51), respectively; and, the SROC AUC was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.94). The overall diagnostic accuracy of CEUS was comparable to that of CECT for the differential diagnosis of MFP and PDAC (relative DOR 1.26, 95% CI [0.42-3.83], P  > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS and CECT have comparable diagnostic performance for differentiating MFP from PDAC, and should be considered as mutually complementary diagnostic tools for suspected focal pancreatic lesions.

Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with time-intensity curve analysis for differentiating hypovascular solid pancreatic lesions

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with time-intensity curve (TIC) in distinguishing different types of hypovascular solid pancreatic lesions.

METHODS

A total of 89 patients with 90 pancreatic lesions (all confirmed by surgery or biopsy pathology) that manifested hypoenhancement on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) were included in this study. Six peak enhancement patterns were proposed for differentiating hypovascular pancreatic lesions. CEUS qualitative and TIC-based quantitative parameters were analyzed, and each lesion was scored based on the statistically significant qualitative parameters to evaluate the diagnostic ability of CEUS for hypovascular solid pancreatic lesions.

RESULTS

Qualitative parameters such as peak enhancement pattern II/III/IV, penetrating vessels, centripetal enhancement, and early washout were reliable indicators of malignant lesions, and lesions scored based on these qualitative parameters, with a score ≥ 2, were highly suspected to be malignant lesions. Pattern I had an accuracy of 83.33% for predicting mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP), pattern V had an accuracy of 96.67% for predicting solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas (SPTP), and pattern VI had an accuracy of 81.11% for predicting neuroendocrine tumors/carcinomas (NETs/NECs). For quantitative analysis, nodule/pancreatic parenchyma echo intensity reduction ratio was significantly greater in malignant lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS qualitative and TIC-based quantitative parameters have clinical value in distinguishing malignant from benign hypovascular pancreatic lesions.

KEY POINTS

• Contrast-enhanced ultrasound helps clinicians assess patients with pancreatic lesions. • Six peak enhancement patterns are proposed for differentiating pancreatic hypovascular lesions. • Qualitative parameters such as peak enhancement pattern II/III/IV, penetrating vessels, centripetal enhancement, early washout, and quantitative parameter nodule/pancreatic parenchyma echo intensity reduction ratio were important characteristics to discriminate malignant from hypovascular benign lesions.

Differential diagnosis between pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumors and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based on contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging features

PURPOSES

To evaluate the application of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in preoperatively differential diagnosis between pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by Institutional Review Board. Patients with surgical resection and histopathological diagnosis as SPTs and pNETs were included. All patients underwent B mode ultrasound (BMUS) and CEUS examinations within one week before surgical operation. On BMUS, the size, location, echogenicity, calcification, and margin of lesions were observed and recorded. On CEUS imaging, enhancement patterns, and enhancement degrees were recorded and analyzed. An independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between continuous variables. Chi-square test was used to compare the CEUS patterns.

RESULTS

From February 2017 to Dec 2022, patients diagnosed as SPTs (n = 39) and pNETs (n = 48) were retrospectively included. On BMUS, anechoic cystic changes (19/39, 48.72%) and hyperechoic calcification (14/39, 35.90%) are more commonly detected in SPTs (P = 0.000). On CEUS imaging, the majority of SPTs (27/39, 69.23%) showed hypo-enhancement in the arterial phase, while most of the pNETs (36/48, 75.00%) showed hyper- or iso-enhancement in the arterial phase (P = 0.000). In the venous phase, most of the SPTs (32/39, 82.05%) showed hypo-enhancement, while over half of pNETs (29/48, 60.42%) showed hyper- or iso-enhancement compared to pancreatic parenchyma (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS is a valuable and non-invasive imaging method to make preoperatively differential diagnoses between SPTs and pNETs.

Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the EFSUMB CEUS Pancreatic Applications guidelines (2017 version): a retrospective single-center analysis of 455 solid pancreatic masses

OBJECTIVES

To explore the diagnostic performance of EFSUMB CEUS Pancreatic Applications guidelines (version 2017) before and after the addition of iso-enhancement and very fast/fast washout as supplementary diagnostic criteria for PDAC.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with solid pancreatic lesions from January 2017 to December 2020 were evaluated. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is reported to show hypo-enhancement in all phases according to the EFSUMB guidelines. First, based on this definition, all lesions were categorized as PDAC and non-PDAC. Then, iso-enhancement and very fast/fast washout were added as supplementary diagnostic criteria, and all lesions were recategorized. The diagnostic performance was assessed in terms of the accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The reference standard consisted of histologic evaluation or composite imaging and clinical follow-up findings.

RESULTS

A total of 455 nodules in 450 patients (median age, 58.37 years; 250 men) were included. The diagnostic performance using the EFSUMB CEUS guidelines for PDAC had an ACC of 69.5%, SEN of 65.4%, SPE of 84%, PPV of 93.5%, NPV of 40.6%, and ROC of 0.747. After recategorization according to the supplementary diagnostic criteria, the diagnostic performance for PDAC had an ACC of 95.8%, SEN of 99.2%, SPE of 84%, PPV of 95.7%, NPV of 96.6%, and ROC of 0.916.

CONCLUSION

The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations for pancreatic lesions can effectively identify PDAC via hypo-enhancement on CEUS. However, the diagnostic performance may be further improved by the reclassification of PDAC lesions after adding iso-enhancement and very fast/fast washout mode.

KEY POINTS

• In the EFSUMB guidelines, the only diagnostic criterion for PDAC is hypo-enhancement, to which iso-enhancement and very fast/fast washout mode were added in our research. • Using hypo-enhancement/iso-enhancement with very fast/fast washout patterns as the diagnostic criteria for PDAC for solid pancreatic masses on CEUS has high diagnostic accuracy. • The blood supply pattern of PDAC can provide important information, and CEUS has unique advantages in this respect due to its real-time dynamic attenuation ability.

Transabdominal ultrasound of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A multi-centered population-based study in sensitivity, associated diagnostic intervals, and survival

OBJECTIVES

To determine the sensitivity of ultrasound (US) in detecting pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in our region, to identify factors associated with US test result, and assess the impact on the diagnostic interval and survival.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015 in Nova Scotia, Canada were identified by a cancer registry. US performed prior to diagnosis were retrospectively graded as true positive (TP), indeterminate or false negative (FN). Amongst US results, differences in age, weight and tumor size were assessed [one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. Associations between result and sex, tumor location (proximal/distal), clinical suspicion of malignancy, and visualization of the pancreas, tumor, secondary signs and liver metastases were assessed (Chi-square). Mean follow-up imaging, diagnostic, and survival intervals were assessed (one-way ANOVA).

RESULTS

One hundred thirteen US of 107 patients (54 women; mean 70 ± 13 years) were graded as follows: 48/113 (42.5%) TPs; 42/113 (37.2%) indeterminates; and 23/113 (20.4%) FNs. Sensitivity was 48/71(67.6%). There was no difference in age, weight or tumor size amongst US result (P > 0.5). FNs had proportionally more men (P = 0.011) and lacked clinical suspicion of malignancy (P = 0.0006); TPs had proportionally more proximal tumors (P = 0.017). US result was associated with visualization of the pancreas, tumor, secondary signs and liver metastases (P < 0.005). FNs had longer mean follow-up imaging (P < 0.0001) and diagnostic (P = 0.0007) intervals, and worse mean survival (P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

In our region, the sensitivity of US in detecting pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is 67.6%. A false negative US is associated with delayed diagnostic work-up and worse mean survival.

The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic carcinoma is a highly fatal disease, and early diagnosis is of vital importance. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) against contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for pancreatic carcinoma, using pathological results or alternative imaging modality as the gold standard.

METHODS

A thorough search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases. Two investigators selected the studies and extracted the data independently. A bivariate mixed-effects regression model was used to calculate the pooled data. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to explore the causes of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 1,227 records were identified, of which 7 articles with 588 patients were assessed for eligibility. The overall sensitivity, specificity of CEUS and CECT with their 95% confidential intervals (95% CI) were 0.91 (0.85-0.94) and 0.88 (0.81-0.92), 0.83 (0.70-0.91) and 0.87 (0.73-0.94), respectively. The area under curve (AUC) of CEUS and CECT were 0.94 and 0.93. Subgroup analysis showed CEUS may be good at diagnosing lesions with diameters less than 2 cm. Tumor features, region and study type were the main causes of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS has a satisfying diagnostic performance for pancreatic carcinoma and it has high sensitivity for small pancreatic carcinomas (≤2 cm); besides, it performs well in discriminating pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis. Therefore, CEUS can be a useful supplement to CECT.

Development and validation of an ultrasound-based prediction model for differentiating between malignant and benign solid pancreatic lesions

OBJECTIVE

To identify the diagnostic ability of precontrast and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating between malignant and benign solid pancreatic lesions (MSPLs and BSPLs) and to develop an easy-to-use diagnostic nomogram.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the institutional review board. Patients with pathologically confirmed solid pancreatic lesions were enrolled from one tertiary medical centre from March 2011 to June 2021 and in two tertiary institutions between January 2015 and June 2021. A prediction nomogram model was established in the training set by using precontrast US and CEUS imaging features that were independently associated with MSPLs. The performance of the prediction model was further externally validated.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients (mean age, 55 ± 14.6 years, M/F = 84/71) and 78 patients (mean age, 59 ± 13.4 years, M/F = 36/42) were included in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. In the training set, an ill-defined border and dilated main pancreatic duct on precontrast ultrasound, CEUS patterns of hypoenhancement in both the arterial and venous phases of CEUS, and hyperenhancement/isoenhancement followed by washout were independently associated with MSPLs. The prediction nomogram model developed with the aforementioned variables showed good performance in differentiating MSPLs from BSPLs with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.938 in the training set and 0.906 in the validation set.

CONCLUSION

Hypoenhancement in all phases, hyperenhancement/isoenhancement followed by washout on CEUS, an ill-defined border, and a dilated main pancreatic duct were independent risk factors for MSPLs. The nomogram constructed based on these predictors can be used to diagnose MSPLs.

KEY POINTS

• An ill-defined border and dilated main pancreatic duct on precontrast ultrasound, hypoenhancement in all phases of CEUS, and hyperenhancement/isoenhancement followed by washout were independently associated with MSPLs. • The ultrasound-based prediction model showed good performance in differentiating MSPLs from BSPLs with an AUC of 0.938 in the training set and 0.906 in the external validation set. • An ultrasound-based nomogram is an easy-to-use tool to differentiate between MSPLs and BSPLs with high efficacy.

Deep learning radiomics based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound images for assisted diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Accurate and non-invasive diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) can avoid unnecessary puncture and surgery. This study aimed to develop a deep learning radiomics (DLR) model based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images to assist radiologists in identifying PDAC and CP.

METHODS

Patients with PDAC or CP were retrospectively enrolled from three hospitals. Detailed clinicopathological data were collected for each patient. Diagnoses were confirmed pathologically using biopsy or surgery in all patients. We developed an end-to-end DLR model for diagnosing PDAC and CP using CEUS images. To verify the clinical application value of the DLR model, two rounds of reader studies were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 558 patients with pancreatic lesions were enrolled and were split into the training cohort (n=351), internal validation cohort (n=109), and external validation cohorts 1 (n=50) and 2 (n=48). The DLR model achieved an area under curve (AUC) of 0.986 (95% CI 0.975-0.994), 0.978 (95% CI 0.950-0.996), 0.967 (95% CI 0.917-1.000), and 0.953 (95% CI 0.877-1.000) in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the DLR model were higher than or comparable to the diagnoses of the five radiologists in the three validation cohorts. With the aid of the DLR model, the diagnostic sensitivity of all radiologists was further improved at the expense of a small or no decrease in specificity in the three validation cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that our DLR model can be used as an effective tool to assist radiologists in the diagnosis of PDAC and CP.

Diagnosing Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography: A Literature Review of Research in Europe and Asia

The National Cancer Institute names pancreatic cancer the 11^th most common type of cancer in the United States. However, even with a somewhat low prevalence, in 2017, the American Cancer Society reported pancreatic cancer as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. With a lack of symptomology and a broad range of risk factors, pancreatic cancer is frequently diagnosed in a later phase than many other types of cancers, thus resulting in higher metastasis along with a poorer prognosis. This highlights the need for early detection and diagnosis. Currently, abdominal ultrasound or contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the abdomen are standard of care. A new technology: contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), which employs contrast agents to act as acoustic enhancers for ultrasound, has FDA approval for use in hepatic and renal lesions, but not pancreatic. By examining seven individual studies from Europe and Asia, this review aims to examine the diagnostic value of CEUS to initially diagnose pancreatic adenocarcinomas, potentially followed by a biopsy to confirm, when compared against modalities currently used such as conventional ultrasound and CT imaging. CEUS would potentially be more accurate when compared to conventional ultrasound due to the addition of contrast, and when compared against CT and MRI, CEUS would be advantageous in its low cost, similar sensitivities, and specificities, limited renal toxicity, lack of ionizing radiation, short half-life, and its safe use in both adult and pediatric patients. Due to this, additional research is warranted for further FDA approval and future clinical implementation.

Nonhypovascular pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: CEUS imaging findings and differentiation from other types of solid pancreatic lesions

OBJECTIVES

To observe and assess the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients with iso-/hypervascular solid pancreatic lesions.

METHODS

70 pancreatic lesions (all confirmed by surgery or biopsy pathology) that manifested iso-/hyperenhancement on CEUS were retrospectively studied from January 2018 to January 2022, including 24 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC), 15 mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP), 24 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) (14 hyper-PNETs, 10 iso-PNETs), and 7 solid pseudopapillary tumors of pancreas (SPTP). 65 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) that manifested hypoenhancement on CEUS were retrospectively studied from January 2020 to January 2022. CEUS patterns and the clinical and pathologic features were analyzed, and the diagnostic ability of CEUS for iso/hyperenhanced solid pancreatic lesions was assessed.

RESULTS

Centripetal enhancement, heterogeneous enhancement, early washout, and hypoenhancement in the late phase mostly appeared in iso-/hyper-PDACs (p < 0.05). Heterogeneous enhancement in small lesions (< 3 cm) as the diagnostic criterion for iso-/hyper-PDACs had an accuracy of 74.3% and a specificity of 91.3%. Iso-PNETs more commonly had larger tumor sizes and more often showed heterogeneous enhancement than hyper-PNETs (p = 0.007, p = 0.035, respectively). The characteristics of the combination of isoenhancement, homogeneous enhancement, and synchronous wash-in/out for MFP had a high accuracy of 90%. Capsular enhancement with heterogeneous enhancement inside for SPTP had an accuracy of 97.1%.

CONCLUSION

CEUS enhancement patterns have potentially great value in the differentiation of iso-/hyperenhanced pancreatic lesions.

Application of dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound in distinguishing focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) in preoperative differential diagnosis of focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From May 2016 to March 2020, patients with biopsy and histopathologically confirmed focal-type AIP (n = 9) were retrospectively included. All patients received contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations one week before surgery/biopsy. Dynamic analysis was performed by VueBox® software (Bracco, Italy). Eighteen cases of resection and histopathologically proved PDAC lesions were also included as control group. B mode ultrasound (BMUS) features, CEUS enhancement patterns, time intensity curves (TICs) and CEUS quantitative parameters were obtained and compared between AIP and PDAC lesions.

RESULTS

After injection of ultrasound contrast agents, most focal-type AIP lesions displayed hyper-enhancement (2/9, 22.2%) or iso-enhancement (6/9, 66.7%) during arterial phase of CEUS, while most of PDAC lesions showed hypo-enhancement (88.9%) (P < 0.01). During late phase, most of AIP lesions showed iso-enhancement (8/9, 88.9%), while most of PDAC lesions showed hypo-enhancement (94.4%) (P < 0.001). Compared with PDAC lesions, TICs of AIP lesions showed delayed and higher enhancement. Among all CEUS perfusion parameters, ratio of PE (peak enhancement), WiAUC (wash-in area under the curve), WiR (wash-in rate), WiPI (wash-in perfusion index, WiPI = WiAUC/ rise time), WoAUC (wash-out area under the curve), WiWoAUC (wash-in and wash-out area under the curve) and WoR (wash-out rate) between pancreatic lesion and surrounding normal pancreatic tissue were significantly higher in AIP lesions than PDAC lesions (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DCE-US with quantitative analysis has the potential to make preoperative differential diagnosis between focal-type AIP and PDAC non-invasively.

Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound enhancement patterns for differentiating solid pancreatic lesions

OBJECTIVES

To explore the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) enhancement patterns for differentiating solid pancreatic lesions and compare them with conventional ultrasound (US) and enhanced computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

A total of 210 patients with solid pancreatic lesions who had definite pathological or clinical diagnoses were enrolled. Six CEUS enhancement patterns were proposed for solid pancreatic lesions. Two US doctors blindly observed the CEUS patterns of solid pancreatic lesions and the interrater agreement was analyzed. The diagnostic value of CEUS enhancement patterns for differentiating solid pancreatic lesions was evaluated, and the diagnostic accuracy was compared with that of US and enhanced CT.

RESULTS

There was good concordance for six CEUS enhancement patterns of solid pancreatic lesions between the two doctors, with a kappa value of 0.767. Hypo-enhancement (Hypo-E) or centripetal enhancement (Centri-E) as the diagnostic criteria for pancreatic carcinoma had an accuracy of 87.62%; hyper-enhancement (Hyper-E) for neuroendocrine tumors had an accuracy of 92.89%; capsular enhancement with low or uneven enhancement inside the tumor (Capsular-E) for solid pseudopapillary tumors had an accuracy of 97.63%; and iso-enhancement (Iso-E) or iso-enhancement with focal hypo-enhancement (Iso-fhypo-E) for focal pancreatitis had an accuracy of 89.10%. The diagnostic accuracy of CEUS was significantly different from that of US for 210 cases of solid pancreatic lesions (p < 0.05) and was not significantly different from that of enhanced CT for 146 cases of solid pancreatic lesions (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The different enhancement patterns of solid pancreatic lesions on CEUS were clinically valuable for differentiation.

KEY POINTS

• Six CEUS enhancement (E) patterns, including Hyper-E, Iso-E, Iso-fhypo-E, Hypo-E, Centri-E, and Capsular-E, are proposed for the characterization of solid pancreatic lesions. • Using Hypo-E or Centri-E as the diagnostic criteria for pancreatic carcinoma, Hyper-E for neuroendocrine tumors, Capsular-E for solid pseudopapillary tumors, and Iso-E or Iso-fhypo-E for focal pancreatitis on CEUS had relatively high diagnostic accuracy. • The diagnostic accuracy of CEUS was greatly increased over that of US and was not different from that of enhanced CT.

Enhancement patterns in the venous phase of contrast-enhanced ultrasounds: diagnostic value for patients with solid pancreatic lesions

Background

To observe and assess the diagnostic value of the venous phase enhancement patterns of contrast-enhanced ultrasounds (CEUS) in patients with solid pancreatic lesions that show iso- to hyperenhancement in the arterial phase of the CEUS.

Methods

Patients who underwent CEUS for pancreatic lesions in the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between April 2017 and August 2019 were identified from the dynamic CEUS imaging database in the hospital. A total of 57 patients with pathologically or clinically diagnosed pancreatic lesions were retrospectively included in this study, and the CEUS images from these patients were evaluated. The enhancement patterns in each phase were analyzed, and each lesion was classified as malignant or benign using a five-point scale of confidence based on morphology, boundary, vascular invasion, blood flow, and enhancement patterns in ultrasound (US) and CEUS images.

Results

Rapid washout in the venous phase of CEUS images was detected in 30 malignant lesions and 4 benign lesions with malignant potential. The specificity for determining malignancy was 77.8%. Continuous isoenhancement with normal pancreatic tissues in the venous phase achieved a high specificity of 95.0% for determining benign lesions. Early hyperenhancement in the arterial phase followed by slow washout in the venous phase showed high specificity of 98.1% for determining metastasis. The diagnostic confidence improved after reviewing CEUS scans (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.737 for baseline US and 0.910 for CEUS; P=0.056).

Conclusions

Enhancement patterns in the venous phase of CEUS images were beneficial in the differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions with iso- to hyperenhancement in the arterial phase on CEUS.

Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors of the Pancreas: Imaging Findings Compared With Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the characterization and usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for diagnosing solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas (SPTP) and compare the enhancement patterns with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT).

METHODS

Forty-three SPTP lesions proved by pathologic findings in 42 patients examined with CEUS and CECT were included in this study. The enhancement characteristics and typical CEUS features of the tumors were investigated. These characteristics were compared according to lesion sizes. The enhancement patterns of CEUS were compared with CECT.

RESULTS

The most common enhancement levels of SPTP in the early phase and late phase for CEUS were isoenhancement (19 of 43 [44.2%]) and hypoenhancement (32 of 43 [74.4%]), respectively. The 4 most common enhancement patterns were hypo-hypo (16 of 43 [37.2%]), iso-iso (11 of 43 [25.6%]), hyper-hypo (8 of 43 [18.6%]), and iso-hypo (8 of 43 [18.6%]) enhancement. For the 43 SPTP lesions, typical CEUS features such as lesion membrane, intralesional vessel, and intralesional compartmentalization enhancements were detected in 30 (69.8%), 27 (62.8%), and 10 (23.2%) cases. Compared with CECT, isoenhancement during the early phase and hypoenhancement during the late phase were the most common imaging characteristics of CEUS.

CONCLUSIONS

Lesion membrane, intralesional vessel, and intralesional compartmentalization enhancements are typical CEUS features of SPTP, especially for large lesions (lesion size ≥3.0 cm). Isoenhancement during the early phase and hypoenhancement during the late phase are the most common imaging characteristics of CEUS and CECT, making CEUS a viable alternative diagnostic method that is noninvasive.

Ultrasound diagnosis of pancreatic solid tumors

INTRODUCTION

Advances and widespread use of various diagnostic imaging modalities have dramatically improved our ability to visualize and diagnose pancreatic diseases. In particular, ultrasonography in pancreatic diseases plays an important role from screening to diagnosis as a simple and safe examination method.

METHODS

The basic scanning method of transabdominal pancreatic ultrasonography, characterization, and differential diagnosis by ultrasonography including contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for solid pancreatic tumors are reviewed with reference to various papers.

RESULTS

In recent years, the ability to visualize and diagnose pancreatic mass lesions has been dramatically improved with advances in ultrasound equipment. In particular, CEUS using an ultrasound contrast agent has made it possible to evaluate hemodynamics in organs or lesions as well as in the flow signal of arterial blood vessels, and it has played an important role not only in diagnosis of the presence of a lesion but also in the qualitative diagnosis. The enhancement behavior and pattern with CEUS of pancreatic solid tumors is shown in text and Fig. 9. Moreover, the flow chart for diagnosing pancreatic solid tumors with CEUS classifying the enhancement behavior and pattern for pancreatic solid tumors on CEUS is shown (Fig. 10). In meta-analyses, the pooled sensitivity in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinomas and other pancreatic focal masses with CEUS was 86-90%, and the pooled specificity was 75-88%.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is a minimally invasive and useful diagnostic method that can be used to make a simple and quick qualitative diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. CEUS provides a lot of information important for diagnosis, and has led to changes in the conventional diagnostic systems in pancreatic diseases.

Biodegradable, pH-Sensitive Hollow Mesoporous Organosilica Nanoparticle (HMON) with Controlled Release of Pirfenidone and Ultrasound-Target-Microbubble-Destruction (UTMD) for Pancreatic Cancer Treatment

The dense extracellular matrix (ECM) and hypovascular networks were often found in solid pancreatic tumors form an impenetrable barrier, leading to limited uptake of chemotherapeutics and thus undesirable treatment outcomes.

Methods: A biodegradable nanoplatform based on hollow mesoporous organosilica nanoparticle (HMON) was designed as an effective delivery system for pirfenidone (PFD) to overcome the challenges in pancreatic tumor treatment. By varying pH producing a mildly acidic environment to emulate tumor cells, results in cleavage of the acetal bond between HMON nanoparticle and gating molecular, gemcitabine (Gem), enabling its controlled release.

Results: The in vitro and in vivo immunocytochemistry evaluations demonstrated an excellent ECM regulation efficacy of the nanoplatform and therefore the improved penetration of drug into the cells. The technique employed was especially enhanced when mediated with ultrasound target microbubble destruction (UTMD). Evaluations culminated with pancreatic cancer bearing mice and demonstrated therapeutic efficacy, good biodegradability, and negligible systemic toxicity.

Conclusion: the designed Gem gated biodegradable nanosystem is expected to provide an alternative way of improving antitumor efficacy by down-regulation of ECM levels and offers a passive-targeted therapy for pancreatic cancer treatment.

The Role of Transabdominal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Early Stage Pancreatic Cancer: Review and Single-Center Experience

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death with a 5-year survival rate less than 10%. In the absence of effective screening methods, such as blood markers, most clinical diagnoses of PC are made at an advanced stage. However, early stage PC is associated with a more favorable five-year survival rate of 85.8% for stage 0, and 68.7% for stage IA. Transabdominal ultrasound (US) is frequently used as a first-line diagnostic tool in the clinical setting and a preferred modality for routine medical evaluations for asymptomatic individuals. Recently published Japanese data show that most PCs diagnosed in early stage had US findings, such as dilated main pancreatic ducts or pancreas cysts. For surveillance of high-risk individuals, such as those with an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), US is an ideal modality in terms of its non-invasive and cost-effective nature. However, the diagnostic performance of ultrasound varies greatly by the operator’s experience and the patient’s condition. This article reviews the present situation of early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by US, along with tips for improving visualization of the pancreas.

Advances in Diagnostic and Intraoperative Molecular Imaging of Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis. To improve outcomes, there is a critical need for improved tools for detection, accurate staging, and resectability assessment. This could improve patient stratification for the most optimal primary treatment modality. Molecular imaging, used in combination with tumor-specific imaging agents, can improve established imaging methods for PDAC. These novel, tumor-specific imaging agents developed to target specific biomarkers have the potential to specifically differentiate between malignant and benign diseases, such as pancreatitis. When these agents are coupled to various types of labels, this type of molecular imaging can provide integrated diagnostic, noninvasive imaging of PDAC as well as image-guided pancreatic surgery. This review provides a detailed overview of the current clinical imaging applications, upcoming molecular imaging strategies for PDAC, and potential targets for imaging, with an emphasis on intraoperative imaging applications.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the pancreas shows impaired perfusion in pancreas insufficient cystic fibrosis patients

Background

Perfusion assessment of the pancreas is challenging and poorly evaluated. Pancreatic affection is a prevalent feature of cystic fibrosis (CF). Little is known about pancreatic perfusion in CF. We aimed to assess pancreatic perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) analysed in the bolus-and-burst model and software.

Methods

We performed contrast enhanced ultrasound of the pancreas in 25 CF patients and 20 healthy controls. Perfusion data was analysed using a dedicated perfusion model providing the mean capillary transit-time (MTT), blood flow (BF) and blood-volume (BV). CF patients were divided according to exocrine function.

Results

The pancreas insufficient CF patients had longer MTT (p ≤ 0.002), lower BF (p < 0.001) and lower BV (p < 0.05) compared to the healthy controls and sufficient CF patients. Interrater analysis showed substantial agreement for the analysis of mean transit time.

Conclusion

The bolus-and-burst method used on pancreatic CEUS-examinations demonstrates reduced perfusion in CF patients with pancreas affection. The perfusion model and software requires further optimization and standardization to be clinical applicable for the assessment of pancreatic perfusion.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12880-018-0259-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinical Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Enhancement Patterns for Differentiating Focal Pancreatitis From Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Comparison Study With Conventional Ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

We explored the clinical value of using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) enhancement patterns for the differential diagnosis of focal pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 136 solid pancreatic lesions with final diagnoses from January 2010 to February 2016 were enrolled in this study. Twenty-five cases were focal pancreatitis; 86 cases were pancreatic carcinoma; and 25 cases were other types. All of the patients received conventional and contrast-enhanced US examinations. Two experienced US physicians analyzed the contrast-enhanced US enhancement patterns and made diagnoses according to the conventional and contrast-enhanced US manifestations. The inter-rater agreement for the contrast enhancement patterns between the readers was analyzed. The diagnostic efficiency of contrast enhancement patterns for differentiating focal pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma was analyzed and compared with that of conventional US.

RESULTS

The κ test showed good concordance for contrast enhancement patterns between the readers (P < .05). The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of isoenhancement or isoenhancement with focal hypoenhancement in both the early and late phases for diagnosing focal pancreatitis were 72.0%, 95.5%, and 91.2%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity of isoenhancement or isoenhancement with focal hypoenhancement in both the early and late phases greatly increased for diagnosing focal pancreatitis in comparison with isoenhancement (72.0% versus 32.0%; P < .05). The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced US was greatly increased over that of conventional US (85.6% versus 49.5%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced US is a valuable tool for differentiating focal pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma and can greatly increase the diagnostic accuracy over conventional US.

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for pancreatic neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is essential to optimize treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for benign and malignant pancreatic neoplasms.

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Retrospective or prospective studies.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of benign and malignant pancreatic neoplasms.

INTERVENTION

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic risk ratio, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals; summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve; a Fagan nomogram.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 641 patients were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 91% (95% CI: 87%, 93%), 87% (95% CI: 78%, 93%), 7.2 (95% CI: 4.3, 12.3), and 0.11 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.15), respectively; and the odds ratio for diagnosis was 67 (95% CI: 34, 113). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound had good diagnostic ability and accuracy. Pre- and post-test probability of disease was 50% and 88%, respectively, when the positive likelihood ratio was 7.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound can be used for qualitative diagnosis of benign and malignant pancreatic neoplasms.

IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

CEUS should be considered as an important imaging tool for the characterization of pancreatic tumors.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017070434 (PROSPERO).

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Time-Intensity Curve in Differential Diagnosis of Cervical Metastatic and Tuberculous Lymph Nodes

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the differential diagnosis of tuberculous and metastatic lymph nodes.

METHODS

Nineteen cervical tuberculous lymph nodes and 43 cervical metastatic lymph nodes were investigated. The CEUS perfusion patterns and parameters of time-intensity curve (TIC) were analyzed. Diagnostic accuracy and consistency of two physicians were compared before and after CEUS and TIC analysis.

RESULTS

Conventional ultrasonography showed no significant differences between tuberculous and metastatic lymph nodes. Concentric enhancement at the arterial phase of CEUS occurred in 15 of 19 (78.9%) tuberculous lymph nodes and 42 of 43 (97.7%) metastatic lymph nodes (P < .05). For the TIC curve, a steep descending curve with an apparent notch was commonly found in tuberculous lymph nodes (13 of 16). Although a shallow descending curve was common (40 of 43) in metastatic lymph nodes, most did not have a notch on the curve (39 of 43) (P < .01). The k-value and the peak intensity (PI) value of tuberculous lymph nodes were significantly higher and the △PI value was significantly lower than that of metastatic lymph nodes (P < .05, respectively). Kappa values for the diagnosis consistency of the two physicians before and after CEUS and TIC analysis were 0.582 and 0.761, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy before and after CEUS and TIC analysis was 47.4% (28 of 59) and 96.6% (57 of 59), respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with TIC analysis is helpful in differentiating tuberculous from metastatic lymph nodes.

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of solid lesions of pancreas (SLP): A systematic review and a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is considered a novel method for diagnosing pancreatic cancer, but currently, there is no conclusive evidence of its accuracy. Using CEUS in discriminating between pancreatic carcinoma and other pancreatic lesions, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in predicting pancreatic tumours.

METHODS

Relevant studies were selected from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Elsevier, CNKI, VIP, and WANFANG databases dating from January 2006 to May 2017. The following terms were used as keywords: "pancreatic cancer" OR "pancreatic carcinoma," "contrast-enhanced ultrasonography" OR "contrast-enhanced ultrasound" OR "CEUS," and "diagnosis." The selection criteria are as follows: pancreatic carcinomas diagnosed by CEUS while the main reference standard was surgical pathology or biopsy (if it involved a clinical diagnosis, particular criteria emphasized); SonoVue or Levovist was the contrast agent; true positive, false positive, false negative, and true negative rates were obtained or calculated to construct the 2 × 2 contingency table; English or Chinese articles; at least 20 patients were enrolled in each group. The Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy was employed to evaluate the quality of articles. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, summary receiver-operating characteristic curves, and the area under curve were evaluated to estimate the overall diagnostic efficiency. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with fixed-effect models.

RESULTS

Eight of 184 records were eligible for a meta-analysis after independent scrutinization by 2 reviewers. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratios were 0.86 (95% CI 0.81-0.90), 0.75 (95% CI 0.68-0.82), 3.56 (95% CI 2.64-4.78), 0.19 (95% CI 0.13-0.27), and 22.260 (95% CI 8.980-55.177), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.9088.

CONCLUSION

CEUS has a satisfying pooled sensitivity and specificity for discriminating pancreatic cancer from other pancreatic lesions.

Improvement of diagnostic efficiency in distinguishing the benign and malignant thyroid nodules via conventional ultrasound combined with ultrasound contrast and elastography

We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic values of conventional ultrasound (US), ultrasound contrast (UC) and ultrasound elastography (UE) in distinguishing the benign and malignant thyroid nodules. A total of 100 patients with thyroid nodules receiving operative treatment were selected; they underwent the conventional US, UE and UC examinations before operation, respectively. The nodules received pathological examination after operation to distinguish benign from malignant lesions. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accordance rate of each diagnostic method was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the area under the curve (AUC) of ROC was calculated. The manifestations of malignant thyroid nodules in conventional US examination were mostly the hypoecho, heterogeneous echo, irregular shape, unclear boundary, aspect ratio <1, microcalcification and irregular peripheral echo halo, and there were statistically significant differences compared with the benign nodules (P<0.05). UE showed that the differences between benign and malignant nodules in 2, 3 and 4 points were statistically significant (P<0.05). The manifestations of malignant nodules in UC were mostly the irregular shape, obscure boundary, no obvious enhancement, heterogeneous enhancement and visible perfusion defects, and there were statistically significant differences compared with the benign nodules (P<0.05). ROC curve showed that both sensitivity and specificity of UE and UC were superior to those of conventional US. AUC was the largest (AUC = 0.908) and the diagnostic value was the highest in the conventional US combined with UE and UC. Conventional US combined with elastography and UC can significantly improve the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of incidental pancreatic lesions are being detected each year. Accurate characterisation of pancreatic lesions into benign, precancerous, and cancer masses is crucial in deciding whether to use treatment or surveillance. Distinguishing benign lesions from precancerous and cancerous lesions can prevent patients from undergoing unnecessary major surgery. Despite the importance of accurately classifying pancreatic lesions, there is no clear algorithm for management of focal pancreatic lesions.

OBJECTIVES

To determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities in detecting cancerous and precancerous lesions in people with focal pancreatic lesions.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Science Citation Index until 19 July 2016. We searched the references of included studies to identify further studies. We did not restrict studies based on language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include studies reporting cross-sectional information on the index test (CT (computed tomography), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), PET (positron emission tomography), EUS (endoscopic ultrasound), EUS elastography, and EUS-guided biopsy or FNA (fine-needle aspiration)) and reference standard (confirmation of the nature of the lesion was obtained by histopathological examination of the entire lesion by surgical excision, or histopathological examination for confirmation of precancer or cancer by biopsy and clinical follow-up of at least six months in people with negative index tests) in people with pancreatic lesions irrespective of language or publication status or whether the data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently searched the references to identify relevant studies and extracted the data. We planned to use the bivariate analysis to calculate the summary sensitivity and specificity with their 95% confidence intervals and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) to compare the tests and assess heterogeneity, but used simpler models (such as univariate random-effects model and univariate fixed-effect model) for combining studies when appropriate because of the sparse data. We were unable to compare the diagnostic performance of the tests using formal statistical methods because of sparse data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 54 studies involving a total of 3,196 participants evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of various index tests. In these 54 studies, eight different target conditions were identified with different final diagnoses constituting benign, precancerous, and cancerous lesions. None of the studies was of high methodological quality. None of the comparisons in which single studies were included was of sufficiently high methodological quality to warrant highlighting of the results. For differentiation of cancerous lesions from benign or precancerous lesions, we identified only one study per index test. The second analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous versus benign lesions, provided three tests in which meta-analysis could be performed. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing cancer were: EUS-FNA: sensitivity 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 1.00), specificity 1.00 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.00); EUS: sensitivity 0.95 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.99), specificity 0.53 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.74); PET: sensitivity 0.92 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.97), specificity 0.65 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.84). The third analysis, of studies differentiating precancerous or cancerous lesions from benign lesions, only provided one test (EUS-FNA) in which meta-analysis was performed. EUS-FNA had moderate sensitivity for diagnosing precancerous or cancerous lesions (sensitivity 0.73 (95% CI 0.01 to 1.00) and high specificity 0.94 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.00), the extremely wide confidence intervals reflecting the heterogeneity between the studies). The fourth analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous (invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (dysplasia) provided three tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing invasive carcinoma were: CT: sensitivity 0.72 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.87), specificity 0.92 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.97); EUS: sensitivity 0.78 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.94), specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.98); EUS-FNA: sensitivity 0.66 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.99), specificity 0.92 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.98). The fifth analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous (high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) versus precancerous (low- or intermediate-grade dysplasia) provided six tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing cancer (high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) were: CT: sensitivity 0.87 (95% CI 0.00 to 1.00), specificity 0.96 (95% CI 0.00 to 1.00); EUS: sensitivity 0.86 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.92), specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.96); EUS-FNA: sensitivity 0.47 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.70), specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.32 to 1.00); EUS-FNA carcinoembryonic antigen 200 ng/mL: sensitivity 0.58 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.83), specificity 0.51 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.81); MRI: sensitivity 0.69 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.86), specificity 0.93 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.00); PET: sensitivity 0.90 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.96), specificity 0.94 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.99). The sixth analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous (invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (low-grade dysplasia) provided no tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The seventh analysis, of studies differentiating precancerous or cancerous (intermediate- or high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (low-grade dysplasia) provided two tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing cancer were: CT: sensitivity 0.83 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.92), specificity 0.83 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.93) and MRI: sensitivity 0.80 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.92), specificity 0.81 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.95), respectively. The eighth analysis, of studies differentiating precancerous or cancerous (intermediate- or high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (low-grade dysplasia) or benign lesions provided no test in which meta-analysis was performed.There were no major alterations in the subgroup analysis of cystic pancreatic focal lesions (42 studies; 2086 participants). None of the included studies evaluated EUS elastography or sequential testing.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to arrive at any firm conclusions because of the differences in the way that study authors classified focal pancreatic lesions into cancerous, precancerous, and benign lesions; the inclusion of few studies with wide confidence intervals for each comparison; poor methodological quality in the studies; and heterogeneity in the estimates within comparisons.

Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Bile Duct Obstruction

PURPOSE

To investigate the ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to differentiate benign from malignant lesions causing biliary duct obstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 2006 and December 2013, 59 patients with bile duct obstruction of undetermined cause in baseline ultrasound underwent CEUS study. The enhancement and posterior washout were analyzed in real time all along the study duration (5'). The final diagnosis suggested by CEUS was compared with histologic diagnosis (47.5%) or with radiologic follow-up with TC, RM or ERCP.

RESULTS

Final diagnoses included 42 malignant lesions (cholangiocarcinoma n=22, metastases n=6, pancreatic carcinoma n=6, hepatocarcinoma n=4, gallbladder carcinoma n=2, ampullary carcinoma n=1 and lymphoma n=1) and 17 benign lesions (lithiasis or biliary sludge n=15, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis n=1 and indeterminate n=1). CEUS accuracy compared with final diagnoses based on combined reference standard was 86.4%. CEUS correctly identified 36 of 42 malignant lesions (sensibility 85.7%) and 15 of 17 benign lesions (specificity 88.2%). The positive predictive value of CEUS for malignancy was 94.7%, while the negative predictive value was 71.4%.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is useful to differentiate between benign and malignant causes of obstructive jaundice. This technique improves the detection of bile duct invasion in hepatic neoplasms and permits better evaluation of intra- and extraductal extension of hilar hepatobiliary tumors.

Pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease, for which mortality closely parallels incidence. Most patients with pancreatic cancer remain asymptomatic until the disease reaches an advanced stage. There is no standard programme for screening patients at high risk of pancreatic cancer (eg, those with a family history of pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis). Most pancreatic cancers arise from microscopic non-invasive epithelial proliferations within the pancreatic ducts, referred to as pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias. There are four major driver genes for pancreatic cancer: KRAS, CDKN2A, TP53, and SMAD4. KRAS mutation and alterations in CDKN2A are early events in pancreatic tumorigenesis. Endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration offer high diagnostic ability for pancreatic cancer. Surgical resection is regarded as the only potentially curative treatment, and adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine or S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, is given after surgery. FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, folinic acid [leucovorin], irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) and gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) are the treatments of choice for patients who are not surgical candidates but have good performance status.

Mathematical Models of Contrast Transport Kinetics for Cancer Diagnostic Imaging: A Review

Angiogenesis plays a fundamental role in cancer growth and the formation of metastasis. Novel cancer therapies aimed at inhibiting angiogenic processes and/or disrupting angiogenic tumor vasculature are currently being developed and clinically tested. The need for earlier and improved cancer diagnosis, and for early evaluation and monitoring of therapeutic response to angiogenic treatment, have led to the development of several imaging methods for in vivo noninvasive assessment of angiogenesis. The combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging with mathematical modeling of the contrast agent kinetics enables quantitative assessment of the structural and functional changes in the microvasculature that are associated with tumor angiogenesis. In this paper, we review quantitative imaging of angiogenesis with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and ultrasound.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography of Pancreatic Carcinoma: Correlation with Pathologic Findings

We concluded that contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has clinical value in identifying the pathologic changes of pancreatic carcinomas. Forty-three patients diagnosed with pancreatic carcinoma through surgery were retrospectively investigated. CEUS examinations were performed on all patients before surgery. Enhancement patterns on CEUS were observed. Time-intensity curves of CEUS were generated for the regions of interest in the pancreas, and quantitative parameters were obtained. Resected cancer specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic analysis, and the microvascular density (MVD) of the specimens was determined by CD34 immunohistochemical staining. Enhancement patterns of CEUS were compared with histopathologic findings in pancreatic carcinomas. Correlations between time-intensity curve parameters and microvascular density were analyzed. Twenty cases manifested centripetal enhancement, and 23 cases, global enhancement. The amount of tumor necrosis or mucus in the centripetally enhanced pancreatic carcinomas was greater than that in the globally enhanced pancreatic carcinomas (p = 0.027). Thirty-eight of 43 (88.4%) pancreatic carcinomas manifested hypo-enhancement with a maximum intensity (IMAX) <90%. Contrast arrival time in pancreatic carcinoma was longer than that in adjacent pancreatic tissue (p < 0.05). IMAX was positively correlated with microvascular density (r = 0.577, p < 0.05). We concluded that CEUS manifestations could reflect the histologic changes of pancreatic carcinomas and CEUS can be used to evaluate blood perfusion of tumors, as IMAX is positively correlated with microvascular density.

Pancreatic tumors imaging: An update

Currently, ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) represent the mainstay in the evaluation of pancreatic solid and cystic tumors affecting pancreas in 80-85% and 10-15% of the cases respectively. Integration of US, CT or MR imaging is essential for an accurate assessment of pancreatic parenchyma, ducts and adjacent soft tissues in order to detect and to stage the tumor, to differentiate solid from cystic lesions and to establish an appropriate treatment. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of pancreatic tumors and the role of imaging in their diagnosis and management. In order to a prompt and accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of pancreatic lesions, it is crucial for radiologists to know the key findings of the most frequent tumors of the pancreas and the current role of imaging modalities. A multimodality approach is often helpful. If multidetector-row CT (MDCT) is the preferred initial imaging modality in patients with clinical suspicion for pancreatic cancer, multiparametric MRI provides essential information for the detection and characterization of a wide variety of pancreatic lesions and can be used as a problem-solving tool at diagnosis and during follow-up.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic findings in three dogs with lung lobe torsion

Lung lobe torsion is rare but life-threatening condition in the dog. Thoracic radiographs and conventional ultrasonography cannot be conclusive for the diagnosis, and computed tomography is useful but is limited by cost and availability. This report describes the findings of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in 3 dogs with lung lobe torsion. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography showed the absence or reduction of pulmonary vascularization secondary to twisting of the lung lobe around its bronchovascular pedicle in all three dogs. Moreover, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography distinguished partial pulmonary atelectasis from a lung lobe torsion. These preliminary results suggest that contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can improve the accuracy of conventional ultrasonography for detection of pulmonary blood flow compromise in dogs with lung lobe torsion.

Diagnosis of malignancy of adult mediastinal tumors by conventional and transesophageal echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a well-established method for detecting and diagnosing heart tumors. In contrast, its role in assessing the presence, growth and evidence of malignant tumors originating from mediastinal sites remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic impact of TEE and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for determining the localization, growth and malignancy of adult mediastinal tumors (MTs).

METHODS

In a prospective and investigator-blinded study, we evaluated 144 consecutive patients with MT lesions to assess the diagnostic impact of TEE and TTE for detecting the presence of tumors spreading both inside and outside of the heart and for determining infiltration and invasion using pathological examination results as a reference.

RESULTS

All tumor lesions were diagnosed and carefully evaluated by biopsy. Biopsy revealed malignant tumors in 79 patients and benign tumors in 65 patients. When compared to histological findings, TEE predicted malignancy from the presence of tumors spreading both inside and outside of the heart and from infiltration and invasion in 49/79 patients (62.0%). TTE predicted malignancy in only 8/79 patients (10.1%, P < 0.005). TEE visualized tumor lesions in 130 patients (90.3%) while the TTE visualized tumor lesions in 110 patients (76.4%) and was less effective at detecting MT lesions (P < 0.001). TTE and TEE could detect anterior MTs and adequately verified MTs (P > 0.05); TEE detected medium MTs better than TTE (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TEE is effective and superior to TTE for predicting the localization and growth of MTs as well as for accessing evidence of tumor malignancy. TTE and TEE were able to detect anterior MTs; TEE was able to detect medium MT better than TTE.

Quantitative contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS in differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses (with videos)

BACKGROUND

The role of EUS with contrast agents can be expanded through the use of time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis and computer-aided interpretation.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the use of parameters derived from TIC analysis in an artificial neural network (ANN) classification model designed to diagnose pancreatic carcinoma (PC) and chronic pancreatitis (CP).

SETTING

Prospective, multicenter, observational trial-endoscopy units from Romania, Denmark, Germany, and Spain.

PATIENTS

A total of 167 consecutive patients with PC or CP.

INTERVENTIONS

Contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CEH-EUS) and EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA), TIC analysis, and ANN processing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) for EUS-FNA, CEH-EUS, and the ANN.

RESULTS

After excluding all of the recordings that did not meet the technical and procedural criteria, 112 cases of PC and 55 cases of CP were included. EUS-FNA was performed in 129 patients, and the diagnosis was confirmed by surgery (n = 15) or follow-up (n = 23) in the remaining cases. Its sensitivity and specificity were 84.82% and 100%, respectively, whereas the PPV and NPV were 100% and 76.63%, respectively. The sensitivity of real-time quantitative assessment of CEH-EUS was 87.5%, specificity 92.72%, PPV 96.07%, and NPV 78.46%. Peak enhancement, wash-in area under the curve, wash-in rate, and the wash-in perfusion index were significantly different between the groups. No significant differences were found between rise time, mean transit time, and time to peak. For the ANN, sensitivity was 94.64%, specificity 94.44%, PPV 97.24%, and NPV 89.47%.

LIMITATIONS

Only PC and CP lesions were included.

CONCLUSION

Parameters obtained through TIC analysis can differentiate between PC and CP cases and can be used in an automated computer-aided diagnostic system with good diagnostic results. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01315548.).

Pancreatic cancer serum biomarker PC-594: Diagnostic performance and comparison to CA19-9

AIM: To investigate serum PC-594 fatty acid levels as a potential biomarker in North American pancreatic cancer (PaC) patients, and to compare its performance to CA19-9.

METHODS: Using tandem mass spectrometry, we evaluated serum PC-594 levels from 84 North American patients with confirmed PaC and 99 cancer-free control subjects. We determined CA19-9 levels by ELISA. Significance between PaC patients and controls, and association with clinical variables was determined by analysis of variance and t-tests. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and PC-594 correlation with age and CA19-9 determined by regression analysis.

RESULTS: Mean PC-594 levels were 3.7 times lower in PaC patients compared to controls (P < 0.0001). The mean level in PaC patient serum was 0.76 ± 0.07 μmol/L, and the mean level in control subjects was 2.79 ± 0.15 μmol/L. There was no correlation between PC-594 and age, disease stage or gender (P > 0.05). Using 1.25 μmol/L as a PC-594 threshold produced a relative risk (RR) of 9.4 (P < 0.0001, 95%CI: 5.0-17.7). The area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) was 0.93 (95%CI: 0.91-0.95) for PC-594 and 0.85 (95%CI: 0.82-0.88) for CA19-9. Sensitivity at 90% specificity was 87% for PC-594 and 71% for CA19-9. Six PaC patients with CA19-9 above 35 U/mL showed normal PC-594 levels, while 24 PaC patients with normal CA19-9 showed low PC-594 levels. Eighty-five of the 99 control subjects (86%) showed normal levels of both markers.

CONCLUSION: PC-594 biomarker levels are significantly reduced in North American PaC patients, and showed superior diagnostic performance compared to CA19-9.

Hemolymphangioma of the waist: A case report and review of the literature

Hemolymphangioma is a malformation of the lymphatic and blood vessels. To the best of our knowledge, only a limited number of hemolymphangioma cases have been reported in the literature thus far, with no cases developed in the waist region. The present study reported the case of a 17-year-old male patient with hemolymphangioma growing on the waist, presented with back pain for four months. Upon physical examination, the lesion was identified to be oval in shape, soft and compressible, with mild tenderness. No abnormalities were detected in the results of laboratory examinations. However, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan revealed a tumor with low signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging (WI) and high signal intensity on T2-WI. The mass was successfully removed during surgery. During the seven-month follow-up period, the patient was asymptomatic with no evidence of recurrence. The present study discussed the imaging findings and pathological features of this uncommon case and reviewed the relevant literature.

Description of the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in four dogs with pancreatic tumours

Canine pancreatic tumours are rare compared to human medicine and the detection and differentiation of pancreatic neoplasia is challenging with B-mode ultrasonography, which often leads to late clinical diagnosis and poor prognosis. This case report describes the findings of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in four dogs with pancreatic adenocarcinoma or insulinoma. B-mode ultrasonography of the pancreas revealed a hypoechoic nodule in three dogs and heterogenous tissue in one dog. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was able to differentiate between two tumour types: adenocarcinomas showed hypoechoic and hypovascular lesions, whereas insulinomas showed uniformly hypervascular lesions. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography findings were confirmed by cytology and/or histopathology. The results demonstrated that contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was able to establish different enhancement patterns between exocrine (adenocarcinoma) and endocrine (insulinoma) tumours in dogs.