Comparison of F-18-FDG PET/CT findings between pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumor and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas: current understanding on its malignant potential and management

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) of the pancreas are presently recognized as low-grade malignant tumors that are frequently observed in young females. This tumor has a low incidence and is associated with an excellent prognosis following surgical resection. Typical SPNs primarily affect the pancreas and tend to have moderate or asymptomatic manifestations. Based on retrospective research, it is anticipated that patients with SPN can achieve disease-free survival, even in cases when metastasis is detected during inspection. However, the incidence of malignant SPN has been consistently underestimated, as evidenced by recent research findings. Malignancy of SPN primarily encompasses invasion and infiltration, metastasis, and recurrence after R0 resection. Imaging technologies such as Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Position Emission Tomography are capable of preliminarily identifying malignant SPN, which is primarily based on its invasive clinical features. Research on risk factors of malignant SPN revealed that larger tumor size, Ki-67 index, and several other parameters had significant correlations with invasive tumor behavior. Pathologic features of malignant SPNs overlay other pancreatic tumors, nevertheless they can provide valuable assistance in the process of diagnosis. Several confirmed specific pathologic biomarkers are related to its cellular origin, characteristic gene mutation, and cell proliferation. Considering the invasiveness of malignant SPN, it is imperative to enhance the comprehensiveness of its therapy. Tumor resection remains a suggested course of action in line with typical SPN, and additional lymph node dissection is seen as reasonable. Compared to benign SPNs, malignant SPNs have worse prognosis, underscoring the necessity of early identification and treatment in comprehensive medical centers to get improved clinical outcomes.

The Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Diagnosing Pancreatic Lesions: Comparison With CA19-9, Enhanced CT or Enhanced MR

Objective: To investigate the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing pancreatic lesions, and compare it with CA19-9, contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), and contrast-enhanced MRI (CEMR). Methods: Cases of patients with suspected pancreatic lesions examined between January 1, 2011 and June 30, 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. CA19-9, CECT and CEMR within 2 weeks of PET/CT were evaluated. We compared the diagnostic efficacy of PET/CT with CA19-9, CECT and CEMR as well as combined tests. Results: A total of 467 cases were examined in this study, including 293 males and 174 females, with an average age of 57.79 ± 12.68 y (16-95 y). Cases in the malignant group (n = 248) had significantly higher SUVmax (7.34 ± 4.17 vs. 1.70 ± 2.68, P < 0.001) and CA19-9 (663.21 ± 531.98 vs. 87.80 ± 218.47, P < 0.001) than those in the benign group (n = 219). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PET/CT were 91.9, 96.3, and 94.0%, respectively. Those for CECT were 83.6, 77.8, 81.2%, respectively; and 91.2, 75.0, 81.7% were for CEMR. PET/CT corrected 14.7% (28/191) CECT diagnoses and 12.2% (10/82) CEMR diagnoses. Although the diagnostic efficiency of CA19-9 was acceptable (80.0, 69.0, 74.9% respectively), the joint application of PET/CT and CA19-9 could significantly enhance the diagnostic efficiency compared with PET/CT alone (sen 97.4 vs. 90.5%, P = 0.0003; spe 100.0 vs. 95.2%, P = 0.0047). Conclusions: PET/CT has sensitivity similar to CECT, CEMR and significantly higher specificity and accuracy, helping reduce false diagnoses of morphological images. Combining PET/CT with CA19-9 could enhance diagnostic efficiency.

Clinical Pattern of Preoperative Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Can Predict the Aggressive Behavior of Resected Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas

Simple Summary

Predicting the aggressiveness of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) remains a worthwhile goal. The present study aimed to identify perioperative factors that can predict patients who will develop clinically aggressive SPN. A total of 98 patients diagnosed with SPNs were analyzed retrospectively. We found that age (≥40 years; p = 0.039), symptomatic presentation (p = 0.001), tumor size (>10 cm; p < 0.001), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) classification (Type III; p < 0.001), and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.003) were significantly correlated with aggressive behavior of SPNs. Among these, age ≥40 years, PET/CT Type III configuration, and lymphovascular invasion were independent factors associated with an aggressive SPN. This information can help clinicians develop individualized management and surveillance plans to manage patients more competently.

Abstract

Predicting the aggressiveness of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) remains an important goal. The present study aimed to identify perioperative factors that can predict patients who will develop clinically aggressive SPN. Records of individuals with pathologically confirmed SPN from 2006 to 2017 were obtained from the patient registry database of Yonsei University, Severance Hospital. For this study, aggressive behavior was defined as SPN that had recurred, metastasized, or involved adjacent organs. A total of 98 patients diagnosed with SPNs were analyzed retrospectively. Of these, 10 were reported to have SPNs with aggressive characteristics. We found that age (≥40 years; p = 0.039), symptomatic presentation (p = 0.001), tumor size (>10 cm; p < 0.001), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) classification (p < 0.001), and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.003) were significantly correlated with aggressive behavior of SPNs. Multivariate analysis showed that PET/CT configuration (p = 0.002) (exp(β)111.353 (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.960–2081), age ≥40 years (p = 0.015) (exp(β) 23.242 (95% CI: 1.854–291.4)), and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.021) (exp(β) 22.511 (95% CI: 1.595–317.6)) were the only independent factors associated with aggressive SPN. Our data suggest that age ≥40 years, PET/CT Type III configuration, and lymphovascular invasion are independent factors associated with aggressive SPN. This information can help clinicians develop individualized management and surveillance plans to manage patients more effectively.

Collision of Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor and Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Pancreas on 18F-FDG PET/CT

ABSTRACT

We report a rare case of pancreatic collision tumor of solid pseudopapillary tumor and neuroendocrine tumor in a 43-year-old woman. A pancreatic mass was found by abdominal ultrasound. A mainly cystic mass with solid component progressive enhancement was revealed using abdominal enhanced CT. Staging 18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a pancreatic tail mass with an increased uneven 18F-FDG uptake. Distal pancreatectomy was performed. Postoperatively, the mass was diagnosed as pancreatic collision tumor of solid pseudopapillary tumor and neuroendocrine tumor.

Investigation of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for the Diagnosis of Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: A Study Associated With a National Survey of Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the utility of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography for solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) diagnosis.

METHODS

The subjects included 53 cases of SPN. We compared the maximal standardized uptake volume (SUVmax) with those of 25 cases of pancreatic duct cancer and 18 cases of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm. In addition, immunopathological testing for SPN with regard to FDG uptake was undertaken.

RESULTS

An increase in SUVmax was observed in all tumors with increased tumor diameter. Among tumors of 20 mm or smaller, the SUVmax of SPN was significantly higher than those of pancreatic duct cancer and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm. The results of a pathological study of FDG uptake in SPN revealed increased glucose transporter protein type 1 expression with tumor enlargement. Furthermore, increased hypoxia-inducible factor-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor expression under hypoxic conditions were observed in the areas of necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases in which high FDG uptake is observed in small pancreatic tumors, FDG positron emission tomography is potentially useful for SPN differentiation. The factors involved in FDG uptake in SPN include cell density and glucose transporter protein expression, as well as hypoxia-inducible factor and vascular endothelia growth factor expression in the hypoxic environment of necrotic areas.

Usefulness of FDG PET/CT derived parameters in prediction of histopathological finding during the surgery in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Purpose

Pancreatic cancer is the 4th most common cause of cancer death in Japan and exhibits a 5-year overall survival rate of approximately 7%. The accurate diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is important for determining the optimal management strategy. Fludeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG PET) integrated with computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) has emerged as a powerful imaging tool for detecting and evaluating various cancers, and it is used for staging, detecting local recurrence and distant metastasis, measuring therapeutic effects, and predicting prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients.

Lately, FDG PET/CT-derived parameters, such as standardized uptake values (SUV), the metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), have been suggested as prognostic factors for various types of cancer, including pancreatic cancer. However, there is no consensus regarding the best parameters for evaluating patient prognosis, operability, etc. The purpose of this study was to examine the differences between operable and non-operable pancreatic cancer using FDG PET/CT-derived parameters, and to investigate whether volumetric parameters (TLG and the MTV) are superior to SUV-based parameters for predicting infiltration status/determining operability.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective study of the cases of 48 patients with clinically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma, who underwent FDG PET/CT imaging before treatment. In the operable group, the surgical specimens were subjected to histopathological examinations, and the cases were separated into those exhibiting less and greater infiltration. SUVmax, SUVpeak, the tumor background ratio (TBR), TLG, and the MTV were compared between these groups as well as between the operable and non-operable groups.

Results

Venous infiltration showed significant associations with several metabolic parameters (SUVmax, SUVpeak, and the TBR). However, it did not display any significant associations with volumetric parameters, such as TLG or the MTV. None of the FDG PET/CT-derived parameters exhibited significant associations with lymphatic or neural infiltration. Significant differences in volumetric parameters, such as the MTV and TLG, were detected between the operable and non-operable subgroups.

Conclusions

Metabolic ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT-derived parameters, such as SUVmax, SUVpeak, and the TBR, are useful for predicting venous infiltration status in patients with operable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Aggressiveness of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas are rare tumors considered to be benign although 10% to 15% of SPNs have been reported to be aggressive. Due to its rarity, there have only been a few cases reported regarding the clinical course of patients with aggressive SPNs. The goal of this study is to describe the clinical course of patients diagnosed with aggressive SPNs.

METHODS

A PubMed search was done looking for articles describing the clinical course of patients diagnosed with SPN that locally invaded, recurred, or metastasized. Institutional experience was also added to the pooled data. Patient information was extracted from the articles. Survival and recurrence curves were plotted and factors associated with survival and recurrences were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients were identified to have aggressive SPN. Seven patients were males and 52 were females and the mean age was 37.44 ± 2.21 years. Systemic metastasis constituted 81.4% while recurrence and deep tissue invasion were found in 11.9% and 6.8% of the patients, respectively. Disease-free survival was 45 ± 6.28 months and disease-specific survival was 152.67 ± 12.8 months. In survival analysis, age, gender, tumor size, tumor location, combined resection, type of recurrence, and stage IV on diagnosis were not significant factors in predicting survival. However, an unresectable tumor (hazards ratio [HR] = 4.871, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.480-16.03, P = .009), and metastasis within 36 months (HR = 6.399, 95% CI: 1.390-29.452, P = .017) were identified as independent variables in predicting survival.

CONCLUSION

SPNs of the pancreas carry a favorable course. Despite having aggressive properties, patients can still survive for more than 10 years as long as the tumor can be resected completely.

Solid Pseudo-Papillary Tumor Mimicking as Complicated Pseudocyst: Multimodality Imaging and Pathological Correlation

Pancreatic neoplasm is very rare in the pediatric population. Malignant tumors represent less than 0.2% of pediatric cancer-related mortality. Pancreas lesions can be from exocrine or endocrine origin or present themselves as cystic masses. Clinical, biological, and radiological findings usually are sufficient to establish diagnosis, but in some cases, they may be misleading. We present the case of a young patient presenting a pancreatic mass where anatomical and metabolic characteristics of the lesion were discordant to the final diagnosis.

Prediction of malignancy and adverse outcome of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas

Since solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas (SPTP) was officially classified by the World Health Organization in 1996, SPTP has recently received special attention in the literature. Studies have shown that SPTP is a heterogeneous tumor, with a small percentage of patients harboring aggressive behaviors. However, criteria for malignancy grade in SPTP have not been well established. The prognosis of SPTP is generally good, with cases having a chance for long-term survival even with recurrence and/or metastasis after surgical resection. The current American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control tumor, node, metastasis staging system is not specific to SPTP. The lack of a predictive staging classification that accurately describes the heterogeneity of this disease hinders meaningful research into optimal individualized therapy. Here we summarize and discuss the associated factors proposed for appraisal of the malignant potential and adverse outcome of SPTP.

Metabolic characteristics of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas: their relationships with high intensity 18F-FDG PET images

Objective

We aimed to investigate the metabolic characteristics of Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) in relation signal intensities on ¹⁸F-FDG PET scans.

Summary Background Data

SPNs of the pancreas commonly show high uptake of 18F-FDG. However, the metabolic characteristics underlying the high ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in SPNs are not well characterized.

Materials and Methods

mRNA expressions for glucose metabolism were analyzed in five SPNs, five pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PCAs), and paired normal pancreatic tissues. Among the proteins involved in glucose metabolism, the expressions of five proteins (GLUT1, HK1, PFKM, ENO2, and PKM2) were evaluated in 36 SPNs by immunohistochemistry. Clinical patterns of SPN on PET scans were classified according to the proportion of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake within the whole tumor volume (hot: ≥ 70%, mixed: 30 ≤ < 70, and defective: < 30%). PET-based parameters, including maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) and metabolic tumor volume (TMV_2.5), were evaluated.

Results

Hot (n = 19), mixed (n = 5), and defective (n = 12) ¹⁸F-FDG uptake patterns were noted in the 36 patients. Radiologic tumor size and SUV_max differed significantly according to these patterns (ANOVA, p < 0.05). GLUT1, HK1, PFKM, ENO2, and PKM2 were highly expressed in SPNs at both the mRNA and protein levels. Defective type SPNs showed lower expression of HK1 (p = 0.014), PKM2 (p = 0.028), and Ki-67 (p = 0.070) with frequent intra-tumoral necrosis (p = 0.007). High Ki-67 expression (≥ 3%) was associated with high SUV_max in pancreatic SPNs (p = 0.002).

Conclusions

SPN cells harbor an active molecular capacity for increased glucose metabolism. Especially, defective type SPNs were associated with low metabolic activity and related to low Ki-67 index.

Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: clinical features and imaging findings

This study aimed to report clinical features and CT, MRI, PET/CT findings of solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) of the pancreas. Thirty-four patients with pathologically proven SPT were retrospectively reviewed. Most patients were asymptomatic. SPTs in male patients mainly appeared as solid and near solid tumors. Mixed tumors and cystic tumors had larger size than solid and near solid tumors. Solid tumors and solid part of mixed tumors were T2 hyperintense and T1 hypointense and had progressive enhancement. Four tumors (80%) showed markedly even or uneven ¹⁸F-FDG uptake. These characteristic features can help differentiate SPT from other pancreatic neoplasms.

Volumetric parameters of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography can predict histopathologic treatment response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical potential of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) to evaluate histopathologic effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with particular focus on volumetric PET/CT parameters.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study included 25 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent radical surgery after gemcitabine- and S-1-based preoperative-CRT. The extent of residual tumor was graded using the Evans grading systems, and patients with more than 50% destruction of tumor cells were defined as responder. Peak SUV corrected for lean body mass (SULpeak), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) with a threshold of SUV=2.0, total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of pre- and post-CRT, and reduction rates of SULpeak in those parameters were assessed by PET/CT. These parameters were compared using the student's t-test between responder and non-responder. The treatment effect was also assessed by contingency table analysis divided with median value of each parameter using chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Eight patients (32%) showed histopathologic poor response (Evans grade I), 11 cases (44%) had mild response (Evans grade IIa), and six cases (24%) had moderate response (Evans grade IIb); therefore, six cases (24%) were assigned to responders and others 19 cases (76%) were non-responders. With regards to volumetric PET parameters, post-CRT SULpeak of responders was significantly lower than that of non-responders (p=0.013). Post-CRT MTV and TLG were negative for all six cases of responders. There were significant differences between responder and non-responder on the contingency table analysis of post-CRT MTV and TLG status (p=0.014 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the volumetric PET/CT parameters, higher post-treatment SULpeak and positive MTV/TLG could predict the unfavorable histopathological effects of CRT in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of incidental pancreatic lesions are being detected each year. Accurate characterisation of pancreatic lesions into benign, precancerous, and cancer masses is crucial in deciding whether to use treatment or surveillance. Distinguishing benign lesions from precancerous and cancerous lesions can prevent patients from undergoing unnecessary major surgery. Despite the importance of accurately classifying pancreatic lesions, there is no clear algorithm for management of focal pancreatic lesions.

OBJECTIVES

To determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities in detecting cancerous and precancerous lesions in people with focal pancreatic lesions.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Science Citation Index until 19 July 2016. We searched the references of included studies to identify further studies. We did not restrict studies based on language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include studies reporting cross-sectional information on the index test (CT (computed tomography), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), PET (positron emission tomography), EUS (endoscopic ultrasound), EUS elastography, and EUS-guided biopsy or FNA (fine-needle aspiration)) and reference standard (confirmation of the nature of the lesion was obtained by histopathological examination of the entire lesion by surgical excision, or histopathological examination for confirmation of precancer or cancer by biopsy and clinical follow-up of at least six months in people with negative index tests) in people with pancreatic lesions irrespective of language or publication status or whether the data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently searched the references to identify relevant studies and extracted the data. We planned to use the bivariate analysis to calculate the summary sensitivity and specificity with their 95% confidence intervals and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) to compare the tests and assess heterogeneity, but used simpler models (such as univariate random-effects model and univariate fixed-effect model) for combining studies when appropriate because of the sparse data. We were unable to compare the diagnostic performance of the tests using formal statistical methods because of sparse data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 54 studies involving a total of 3,196 participants evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of various index tests. In these 54 studies, eight different target conditions were identified with different final diagnoses constituting benign, precancerous, and cancerous lesions. None of the studies was of high methodological quality. None of the comparisons in which single studies were included was of sufficiently high methodological quality to warrant highlighting of the results. For differentiation of cancerous lesions from benign or precancerous lesions, we identified only one study per index test. The second analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous versus benign lesions, provided three tests in which meta-analysis could be performed. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing cancer were: EUS-FNA: sensitivity 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 1.00), specificity 1.00 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.00); EUS: sensitivity 0.95 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.99), specificity 0.53 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.74); PET: sensitivity 0.92 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.97), specificity 0.65 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.84). The third analysis, of studies differentiating precancerous or cancerous lesions from benign lesions, only provided one test (EUS-FNA) in which meta-analysis was performed. EUS-FNA had moderate sensitivity for diagnosing precancerous or cancerous lesions (sensitivity 0.73 (95% CI 0.01 to 1.00) and high specificity 0.94 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.00), the extremely wide confidence intervals reflecting the heterogeneity between the studies). The fourth analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous (invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (dysplasia) provided three tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing invasive carcinoma were: CT: sensitivity 0.72 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.87), specificity 0.92 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.97); EUS: sensitivity 0.78 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.94), specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.98); EUS-FNA: sensitivity 0.66 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.99), specificity 0.92 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.98). The fifth analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous (high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) versus precancerous (low- or intermediate-grade dysplasia) provided six tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing cancer (high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) were: CT: sensitivity 0.87 (95% CI 0.00 to 1.00), specificity 0.96 (95% CI 0.00 to 1.00); EUS: sensitivity 0.86 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.92), specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.96); EUS-FNA: sensitivity 0.47 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.70), specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.32 to 1.00); EUS-FNA carcinoembryonic antigen 200 ng/mL: sensitivity 0.58 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.83), specificity 0.51 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.81); MRI: sensitivity 0.69 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.86), specificity 0.93 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.00); PET: sensitivity 0.90 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.96), specificity 0.94 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.99). The sixth analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous (invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (low-grade dysplasia) provided no tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The seventh analysis, of studies differentiating precancerous or cancerous (intermediate- or high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (low-grade dysplasia) provided two tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing cancer were: CT: sensitivity 0.83 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.92), specificity 0.83 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.93) and MRI: sensitivity 0.80 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.92), specificity 0.81 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.95), respectively. The eighth analysis, of studies differentiating precancerous or cancerous (intermediate- or high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (low-grade dysplasia) or benign lesions provided no test in which meta-analysis was performed.There were no major alterations in the subgroup analysis of cystic pancreatic focal lesions (42 studies; 2086 participants). None of the included studies evaluated EUS elastography or sequential testing.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to arrive at any firm conclusions because of the differences in the way that study authors classified focal pancreatic lesions into cancerous, precancerous, and benign lesions; the inclusion of few studies with wide confidence intervals for each comparison; poor methodological quality in the studies; and heterogeneity in the estimates within comparisons.

Prognostic Value of Metabolic and Volumetric Parameters of Preoperative FDG-PET/CT in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

In this study, we aimed to evaluate prognostic value of metabolic and volumetric parameters measured from F fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.Fifty-one patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent FDG-PET/CT and curative operation were retrospectively enrolled. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured from FDG-PET/CT. Association between FDG-PET/CT and clinicopathologic parameters was evaluated. The prognostic values of the FDG-PET/CT and clinicopathologic parameters for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.The 51 enrolled patients were followed up for a median of 21 months (mean ± SD: 23 ± 16 months, range: 1-78 months) with 33 (65%) recurrences and 30 (59%) deaths during the period. SUVmax, MTV, and TLG were associated with Tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage and presence of lymph node metastasis. MTV and TLG were associated with presence of lymphovascular invasion, whereas SUVmax was not. On the univariate analysis, SUVmax, MTV, and TLG were associated with RFS and OS. Also, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage were associated with OS on the univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, MTV and TLG were independent prognostic factors for RFS and OS. SUVmax was an independent prognostic factor for OS, but not for RFS.Metabolic tumor volume and TLG were independently predictive of RFS and OS in resectable pancreatic cancer. SUVmax was an independent factor for OS, but not for RFS.

Pancreatic tumors imaging: An update

Currently, ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) represent the mainstay in the evaluation of pancreatic solid and cystic tumors affecting pancreas in 80-85% and 10-15% of the cases respectively. Integration of US, CT or MR imaging is essential for an accurate assessment of pancreatic parenchyma, ducts and adjacent soft tissues in order to detect and to stage the tumor, to differentiate solid from cystic lesions and to establish an appropriate treatment. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of pancreatic tumors and the role of imaging in their diagnosis and management. In order to a prompt and accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of pancreatic lesions, it is crucial for radiologists to know the key findings of the most frequent tumors of the pancreas and the current role of imaging modalities. A multimodality approach is often helpful. If multidetector-row CT (MDCT) is the preferred initial imaging modality in patients with clinical suspicion for pancreatic cancer, multiparametric MRI provides essential information for the detection and characterization of a wide variety of pancreatic lesions and can be used as a problem-solving tool at diagnosis and during follow-up.

Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume on (11)C-Methionine PET in Predicting Progression-Free Survival in High-Grade Glioma

PURPOSE

C-11 methionine (MET) PET is commonly used for diagnosing high-grade glioma (HGG). Recently, volumetric analysis has been widely applied to oncologic PET imaging. In this study, we investigated the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) on MET PET in HGG.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (n = 12) and glioblastoma multiforme (n = 18) who underwent MET PET before treatment (surgery followed by chemo-radiotherapy) were retrospectively enrolled. Maximal tumor-to-normal brain ratio (TNRmax, maximum tumor activity divided by mean of normal tissue) and MTV (volume of tumor tissue that shows uptake >1.3-fold of mean uptake in normal tissue) were measured on MET PET. Adult patients were classified into two subgroups according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RTOG RPA) classification. Prognostic values of TNRmax, MTV and clinicopathologic factors were evaluated with regard to progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Median PFS of all patients was 7.9 months (range 1.0-53.8 months). In univariate analysis, MTV (cutoff 35 cm(3)) was a significant prognostic factor for PFS (P = 0.01), whereas TNRmax (cutoff 3.3) and RTOG RPA class were not (P = 0.80 and 0.61, respectively). Treatment of surgical resection exhibited a borderline significance (P = 0.06). In multivariate analysis, MTV was the only independent prognostic factor for PFS (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

MTV on MET PET is a significant and independent prognostic factor for PFS in HGG patients, whereas TNRmax is not. Thus, performing volumetric analysis of MET PET is recommended in HGG for better prognostication.

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology

Since its introduction in the early nineties as a promising functional imaging technique in the management of neoplastic disorders, FDG-PET, and subsequently FDG-PET/CT, has become a cornerstone in several oncologic procedures such as tumor staging and restaging, treatment efficacy assessment during or after treatment end and radiotherapy planning. Moreover, the continuous technological progress of image generation and the introduction of sophisticated software to use PET scan as a biomarker paved the way to calculate new prognostic markers such as the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and the total amount of tumor glycolysis (TLG). FDG-PET/CT proved more sensitive than contrast-enhanced CT scan in staging of several type of lymphoma or in detecting widespread tumor dissemination in several solid cancers, such as breast, lung, colon, ovary and head and neck carcinoma. As a consequence the stage of patients was upgraded, with a change of treatment in 10%-15% of them. One of the most evident advantages of FDG-PET was its ability to detect, very early during treatment, significant changes in glucose metabolism or even complete shutoff of the neoplastic cell metabolism as a surrogate of tumor chemosensitivity assessment. This could enable clinicians to detect much earlier the effectiveness of a given antineoplastic treatment, as compared to the traditional radiological detection of tumor shrinkage, which usually takes time and occurs much later.