Comparison of monopolar and bipolar diffusion weighted imaging sequences for detection of small hepatic metastases

Relevance of lesion size in navigator-triggered and free-breathing diffusion-weighted liver MRI

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relevance of focal liver lesions (FLL) size for lesion detection comparing navigator triggering (TRIG) to free breathing (FB) liver Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI).

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Patients with known or suspected FLL were prospectively (registry number 276_19 B) included from October to December 2019 in this study, out of which 32 had liver lesions. Echo planar spin-echo DWI data both with TRIG and FB were with approximately constant acquisition times acquired at 1.5 T. Lesions were segmented in the b = 800 s/mm² images in both the TRIG and FB images. The lesion size, location (liver segment), liver lesion visibility, as well as contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were recorded. The CNR was assessed with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test and the number of visible lesions with the Fisher test.

RESULTS

Data from 43 patients (22 female) were analyzed. The mean patient age was 58 ± 14 years. A total of 885 FLL (Ntotal) were segmented. Among these, 811 lesions (Nboth) were detected with TRIG and FB, 65 lesions exclusively with TRIG (NTRIG_Only), and nine exclusively in FB (NFB_Only). The largest additional lesion in TRIG/FB had a diameter of 10.4 mm/7.6 mm. The number of additional lesions detected with TRIG decreased with size. Among all lesions ≤ 4.7 mm, the relative number of additional lesions was 15.6%. Additional lesions were found in all liver segments with TRIG. In the left liver lobe, the relative proportion was 9.2%, and in the right liver lobe 5.4%. CNR and visibility were significantly higher in TRIG than in FB (p < 0.001). In relation to size, the difference is significant in terms of visibility and CNR for lesion diameters ≤ 8 mm.

CONCLUSION

Respiration triggering can improve the detection of small liver lesions with diameters up to approx. 1 cm in the whole liver.

KEY POINTS

Question Can respiration triggering (TRIG) improve the detection of small FLL compared to FB diffusion-weighted imaging? Findings Among 885 segmented FLL, TRIG was superior to FB for lesions smaller than 8 mm and had improved CNR and visibility. Clinical relevance Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is used for the detection of focal liver lesions and image quality is influenced by breathing motion. Navigator triggering becomes more important for smaller lesions, and seems recommendable for the detection of small focal liver lesions.

Flow-compensated diffusion encoding in MRI for improved liver metastasis detection

Magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is often used to detect focal liver lesions (FLLs), though DWI image quality can be limited in the left liver lobe owing to the pulsatile motion of the nearby heart. Flow-compensated (FloCo) diffusion encoding has been shown to reduce this pulsation artifact. The purpose of this prospective study was to intra-individually compare DWI of the liver acquired with conventional monopolar and FloCo diffusion encoding for assessing metastatic FLLs in non-cirrhotic patients. Forty patients with known or suspected multiple metastatic FLLs were included and measured at 1.5 T field strength with a conventional (monopolar) and a FloCo diffusion encoding EPI sequence (single refocused; b-values, 50 and 800 s/mm²). Two board-certified radiologists analyzed the DWI images independently. They issued Likert-scale ratings (1 = worst, 5 = best) for pulsation artifact severity and counted the difference of lesions visible at b = 800 s/mm² separately for small and large FLLs (i.e., < 1 cm or > 1 cm) and separately for left and right liver lobe. Differences between the two diffusion encodings were assessed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Both readers found a reduction in pulsation artifact in the liver with FloCo encoding (p < 0.001 for both liver lobes). More small lesions were detected with FloCo diffusion encoding in both liver lobes (left lobe: six and seven additional lesions by readers 1 and 2, respectively; right lobe: five and seven additional lesions for readers 1 and 2, respectively). Both readers found one additional large lesion in the left liver lobe. Thus, flow-compensated diffusion encoding appears more effective than monopolar diffusion encoding for the detection of liver metastases.

Image Quality and Detection of Small Focal Liver Lesions in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Comparison of Navigator Tracking and Free-Breathing Acquisition

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare intraindividual diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the liver acquired with free breathing (FB) versus navigator triggering (NT) for assessing small focal liver lesions (FLLs) in noncirrhotic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with known or suspected multiple FLLs were prospectively included, and spin-echo echo-planar DWI with NT and FB acquisition was performed (b-values, 50 and 800 s/mm2 [b50 and b800]). NT and FB DWI sequences with similar acquisitions times were used. Liver and lesion signal-to-noise ratios were measured at b800. The DWI scans were analyzed independently by 2 readers. Liver edge delineation, presence of stair-step artifacts, vessel sharpness, severity of cardiac motion artifacts, overall image quality, and lesion conspicuity were rated with 5-point Likert scales. Small and large FLLs (ie, <1 cm or ≥1 cm) were rated separately for lesion conspicuity. The FLL detectability was estimated by comparing the number of lesions visible with FB to those visible with NT.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were included in the study. The FB acquisition performed better in terms of severity of cardiac motion artifacts. The NT performed better in terms of liver edge delineation and vessel sharpness. Little difference was found for stair-step artifact, overall image quality, and conspicuity of large FLL, whereas the conspicuity of small FLL was better for NT. For small FLL, both readers found more lesions with NT in 11 cases at b800. For large FLL, this effect was much less pronounced (1 case at b800 reported by 1 of the readers). The mean liver and lesion signal-to-noise ratios were 16.8/41.5 and 19.8/38.4 for NT/FB, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Small FLL detection is better with NT. Large FLL detection by FB and NT is similarly good. We conclude that NT should be used.

Renal Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) for Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM), and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI): Basic Concepts

The specialized function of the kidney is reflected in its unique structure, characterized by juxtaposition of disorganized and ordered elements, including renal glomerula, capillaries, and tubules. The key role of the kidney in blood filtration, and changes in filtration rate and blood flow associated with pathological conditions, make it possible to investigate kidney function using the motion of water molecules in renal tissue. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a versatile modality that sensitizes observable signal to water motion, and can inform on the complexity of the tissue microstructure. Several DWI acquisition strategies are available, as are different analysis strategies, and models that attempt to capture not only simple diffusion effects, but also perfusion, compartmentalization, and anisotropy. This chapter introduces the basic concepts of DWI alongside common acquisition schemes and models, and gives an overview of specific DWI applications for animal models of renal disease.This chapter is based upon work from the COST Action PARENCHIMA, a community-driven network funded by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) program of the European Union, which aims to improve the reproducibility and standardization of renal MRI biomarkers. This introduction chapter is complemented by two separate chapters describing the experimental procedure and data analysis.

An optimized b-value distribution for triexponential intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in the liver

PURPOSE

To find an optimized b-value distribution for reproducible triexponential intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) exams in the liver.

METHODS

A numeric optimization of b-value distributions was performed using the triexponential IVIM equation and 27 different IVIM parameter sets. Starting with an initially optimized distribution of 6 b-values, the number of b-values was increased stepwise. Each new b-value was chosen from a set of 64 predefined b-values based on the computed summed relative mean error of the fitted triexponential IVIM parameters. This process was repeated for up to 100 b-values. In simulations and in vivo measurements, optimized b-value distributions were compared to 4 representative distributions found in literature.

RESULTS

The first 16 optimized b-values were 0, 0.3, 0.3, 70, 200, 800, 70, 1, 3.5, 5, 70, 1.2, 6, 45, 1.5, and 60 in units of s/mm² . Low b-values were much more frequent than high b-values. The optimized b-value distribution resulted in a higher fit stability compared to distributions used in literature in both, simulation and in vivo measurements. Using more than 6 b-values, ideally 16 or more, increased the fit stability considerably.

CONCLUSION

Using optimized b-values, the fit uncertainty in triexponential IVIM can be largely reduced. Ideally, 16 or more b-values should be acquired.

Evaluation of Hepatic Tumors Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted MRI

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the D value, D* value, and f magnitude for identifying benign and malignant hepatic tumors using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

Material/Methods

Data of 89 cases (123 lesions) with hepatic tumor confirmed by surgical pathology and postoperative follow-up were retrospectively collected. Among these cases, 40 cases were benign hepatic tumors (57 lesions) and 49 cases were malignant hepatic tumors (66 lesions). All subjects underwent conventional MRI with T₁WI, T₂WI, multi-b-value DWI, and dynamic enhanced LAVA scan. Diffusion-weighted images with 11 b values (0, 10, 20, 30, 50, 80, 100, 200, 400, 800, and 1000 s/mm²) were obtained to calculate true molecular diffusion (D), perfusion-related diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f). The diagnostic performance in differentiating between malignant and benign hepatic lesions was analyzed.

Results

Malignant lesions had a significantly lower D value ([1.04±0.34]×10⁻³ mm²/s) and D* value ([16.5±7.7]×10⁻³ mm²/s) compared to benign lesions (D value: [1.70±0.55]×10⁻³ mm²/s, P<0.01; D* value: [21.7±9.9]×10⁻³ mm²/s, P<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in f values between malignant (23.3±9.5) and benign lesions (33.5±14.9, P=0.13). In addition, D exhibited a better diagnostic performance than D* in terms of the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity when identifying malignancies from benign lesions.

Conclusions

D and D* are significant parameters for diagnosing hepatic tumors. Moreover, the D value is a more reliable parameter in distinguishing benign and malignant hepatic tumors.

A meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for the detection of liver metastases

OBJECTIVES

To obtain the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) and gadoxetic-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of liver metastases.

METHODS

A comprehensive search (EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane) was performed to identify relevant articles up to June 2015. Inclusion criteria were: liver metastases, DW-MR imaging and/or gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging, and per-lesion statistics. The reference standard was histopathology, intraoperative observation and/or follow-up. Sources of bias were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A linear mixed-effect regression model was used to obtain sensitivity estimates.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine articles were included (1,989 patients, 3,854 metastases). Sensitivity estimates for DW-MR imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and the combined sequence for detecting liver metastases on a per-lesion basis was 87.1 %, 90.6 % and 95.5 %, respectively. Sensitivity estimates by gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and the combined sequence were significantly better than DW-MR imaging (p = 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively), and the combined MR sequence was significantly more sensitive than gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging (p < 0.0001). Similar results were observed in articles that compared the three techniques simultaneously, with only colorectal liver metastases and in liver metastases smaller than 1 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with liver metastases, combined DW-MR and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging has the highest sensitivity for detecting liver metastases on a per-lesion basis.

KEY POINTS

• DW-MRI is less sensitive than gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting liver metastases • DW-MRI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is the best combination • Same results are observed in colorectal liver metastases • Same results are observed in liver metastases smaller than 1 cm • Same results are observed when histopathology alone is the reference standard.