Aortic annulus eccentricity before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding prostheses

Patient-specific multi-scale design optimization of transcatheter aortic valve stents

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard treatment for a wide range of patients with aortic stenosis. Although some of the TAVI post-operative complications are addressed in newer designs, other complications and lack of long-term and durability data on the performance of these prostheses are limiting this procedure from becoming the standard for heart valve replacements. The design optimization of these devices with the finite element and optimization techniques can help increase their performance quality and reduce the risk of malfunctioning. Most performance metrics of these prostheses are morphology-dependent, and the design and the selection of the device before implantation should be planned for each individual patient.

METHODS

In this study, a patient-specific aortic root geometry was utilized for the crimping and implantation simulation of 50 stent samples. The results of simulations were then evaluated and used for developing regression models. The strut width and thickness, the number of cells and patterns, the size of stent cells, and the diameter profile of the stent were optimized with two sets of optimization processes. The objective functions included the maximum crimping strain, radial strength, anchorage area, and the eccentricity of the stent.

RESULTS

The optimization process was successful in finding optimal models with up to 40% decrease in the maximum crimping strain, 261% increase in the radial strength, 67% reduction in the eccentricity, and about an eightfold increase in the anchorage area compared to the reference device.

CONCLUSIONS

The stents with larger distal diameters perform better in the selected objective functions. They provide better anchorage in the aortic root resulting in a smaller gap between the device and the surrounding tissue and smaller contact pressure. This framework can be used in designing patient-specific stents and improving the performance of these devices and the outcome of the implantation process.

Performance of high conformability vs. high radial force devices in the virtual treatment of TAVI patients with bicuspid aortic valve

OBJECTIVE

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) is a consolidated procedure showing a low operative risk and excellent long-term outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis. Patients presenting a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) often require valve replacement due to the highly calcific nature of the aortic leaflets. However, BAV patients have usually been contraindicated for TAVI due to their complex valve anatomy. The aim of this work was to compare the performance of devices featuring high conformability (HC) against those with high radial force (HRF).

METHODS

Four BAV patients undergoing TAVI were retrospectively selected. The aortic roots including the native leaflets and calcifications were reconstructed from pre-operative Computed Tomography scans. In each patient, both HC and HRF devices were virtually implanted using Finite Element Analysis simulations. After implantation, paravalvular orifice area, von Mises stress distribution, root contact area, and device eccentricity were calculated.

RESULTS

Simulations showed good agreement with intraoperative imaging. In 3 out of 4 patients, the HRF device resulted in a lower paravalvular area than the HC. Stress distribution was also more homogeneously distributed in the HRF group as compared with the HC group. Despite their lower adaptability, HRF devices showed consistently higher stent-root contact area.

CONCLUSION

HRF devices showed improved results with respect to HC valves after being deployed in BAV anatomies. We hypothesize that the ability to reshape the annulus is the major determinant of success in this subgroup of patients featuring highly calcified leaflets.

CT in planning transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures and risk assessment

For surgical aortic valve replacement, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (STSS) is the reference standard for the prediction of operative risk. In transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) though, where the procedure itself is minimally invasive, the traditional risk assessment is supplemented by CTA. Through a consistent approach to the acquisition of high-quality images and the standardised reporting of annular measurements and adverse root and vascular features, patients at risk of complications can be identified. In turn, this may allow for a personalised procedural approach and treatment strategies devised to potentially reduce or mitigate this risk. This article provides a systematic and standardised approach to pre-procedural work-up with computed tomography angiography (CTA) and explores the current state of evidence and future areas of development in this rapidly developing field.

Radial Force: An Underestimated Parameter in Oversizing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Prostheses: In Vitro Analysis with Five Commercialized Valves

The goal is to inform in depth on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) prosthesis mechanical behavior, depending on frame type, design, and size, and how it crucially impacts the oversizing issue in clinical use, and ultimately the procedure outcome. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is an established therapy for high-risk patients suffering from aortic stenosis, and the indication for TAVR is progressively expanding to intermediate-risk patients. Choosing the optimal oversizing degree is crucial to safely anchor the TAVR valve-which involves limiting the risks for embolism, aortic regurgitation, conductance disturbance, or annulus rupture-and to increase the valve prosthesis performance. The radial force (RF) profiles of five TAVR prostheses were measured in vitro: the CoreValve 23 and 26 (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), the Acurate neo S (Symetis, Écublens, Vaud, Switzerland), and the SAPIEN XT 23 and 26 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). Measurements were run with the RX Machine equipment (Machine Solutions Inc., Flagstaff, AZ), which is used in ISO standard tests for intravascular stents. Test protocols were adapted for TAVR prostheses. With the prostheses RF profiles' results, mechanical behavior differences could be described and discussed in terms of oversizing strategy and clinical impact for all five valves. Besides, crossing the prostheses' RF profiles with their recommended size windows made the assessment of borderline size cases possible and helped analyze the risks when accurate measurement of patient aortic annulus proves difficult. The prostheses' RF profiles bring new support in clinical decision-making for valve type and size in patients.

Simulated Transcatheter Aortic Valve Flow: Implications of Elliptical Deployment and Under-Expansion at the Aortic Annulus

Clinical use of transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs) has been associated with abnormal deployment, including oval deployment and under-expansion when placed into calcified aortic annuli. In this study, we performed an integrated computational and experimental investigation to quantify the impact of abnormal deployment at the aortic annulus on TAV hemodynamics. A size 23 mm generic TAV computational model, developed and published previously, was subjected to elliptical deployment at the annulus with eccentricity levels up to 0.68 and to under-expansion of the TAV at the annulus by up to 25%. The hemodynamic performance was quantified for each TAV deployment configuration. TAV opening geometries were fabricated using stereolithography and then subjected to steady forward flow testing in accordance with ISO-5840. Centerline pressure profiles were compared to validate the computational model. Our findings show that slight ellipticity of the TAV may not lead to degeneration of hydrodynamic performance. However, under large ellipticity, increases in transvalvular pressure gradients were observed. Under-expanded deployment has a much greater negative effect on the TAV hemodynamics compared with elliptical deployment. The maximum turbulent viscous shear stress (TVSS) values were found to be significantly larger in under-expanded TAVs. Although the maximum value of TVSS was not large enough to cause hemolysis in all cases, it may cause platelets activation, especially for under-expanded deployments.

Comparison of self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves morphology and association with paravalvular regurgitation: Evaluation using multidetector computed tomography

OBJECTIVES

Compare final morphology of self-expanding and balloon-expandable prosthesis and association with paravalvular regurgitation (PVR).

BACKGROUND

PVR after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains a frequent complication. A better understanding of the prosthesis geometry may be important to improve selection of the best device for each case and possibly reduce the rates of PVR.

METHODS

Retrospective study including patients consecutively submitted to transcatheter aortic valve replacement: August/2007-October/2016. Three months after the procedure a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) was performed to assess prosthesis geometry: dimensions, eccentricity, and expansion.

RESULTS

A total of 147 individuals were included (mean age of 78.8 ± 6.7 and 50.3% males), 57% treated with a self-expanding prosthesis. On the postprocedure MDCT, the self-expanding group had higher eccentricity index (15.0 vs. 7.1%, p < .001) and lower expansion (68.3 vs. 82.8%, p < .001). In that group, the volume of calcium of landing zone had a significant correlation with eccentricity index and under-expansion. Patients with ≥mild PVR presented higher eccentricity (12.6 vs. 7.9%, p < .001) and lower expansion (68 vs. 75%, p = .012). Eccentricity index and landing zone calcium volume were independent predictors of PVR.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-expanding prosthesis have greater eccentricity and under-expansion. Calcium burden exerts more influence in the final morphology of that type of valve. Calcification and eccentricity are associated with the development of PVR. These factors should be considered in the selection of the most appropriate type of prosthesis for each scenario.

Three-Dimensional Measurement of Aortic Annulus Dimensions Using Area or Circumference for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Valve Sizing: Does It Make a Difference?

BACKGROUND

The use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasing worldwide. We present our 6-year experience using three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and investigate whether different sizing methods of the aortic annulus lead to different prosthesis size that may impact outcome.

METHODS

We investigated 262 patients who underwent TAVR and had 3D TEE data sets of the aortic annulus. We have used the area-derived diameter (D_area = 2(area/π)) and the circumference-derived diameter (D_circ = Circumference/π) to size the prosthesis in separate populations in different time periods.

RESULTS

The D_circ method is correlated with lower incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PVAR; odds ratio = 0.44, 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.85; P = .015). Other factors associated with PVAR were the cover index, area-mismatch index, and circumference-mismatch index. Retrospectively, for the purposes of the study, we used the Edwards-Sapien 3 Valve 3D sizing guide in all patients, to predict the hypothetical valve size with each method. In the whole population, the calculated D_circ was higher in all cases (D_circ = 23.4 ± 2.3 mm vs D_area = 22.9 ± 2.3 mm; P < .001). The two methods had good agreement in predicting the valve size (kappa = 0.600). In total, 192 (73.3%) patients were assigned for the same prosthesis size, whereas 70 (26.7%) would be eligible for a different size, of which 44 (16.7%) would definitely have had a different valve implanted.

CONCLUSION

Using the aortic annulus area or circumference to calculate the annular diameter provides different values. Comparing the two methods, a different prosthesis size could have been implanted in 26.7% of patients. In our series the use of circumference-derived diameter resulted in lower incidence of PVAR. The findings of this study may be independent of the imaging modality and may therefore also apply to computed tomography-based aortic annulus measurements, but this needs to be further investigated.

Dual source computed tomography based analysis of stent performance, its association with valvular calcification and residual aortic regurgitation after implantation of a balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the mutual influence of valvular calcifications and transcatheter aortic valve stent geometry during and after implantation of a balloon-expandable SAPIEN ® /SAPIEN XT ® prostheses. Aortic valve calcification has been linked with adverse complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, little is known about the fate of the calcifications after TAVI as well as its influence on transcatheter heart valve geometry.

Methods

Thirty one patients underwent cardiac dual source computed tomography (DSCT) before and after a TAVI with the Edwards SAPIEN/SAPIEN XT ® prostheses. Detailed DSCT image analysis was performed with Mimics ® and 3Matic ® (both Materialise, Leuven, Belgium).

Results

Implanted stents reached an average degree of expansion of 84% and achieved good circularity despite the presence of fairly oval native annuli and a heterogeneous degree of valvular calcification. Both, the degree of stent expansion and the degree of stent eccentricity were inversely related to the degree of oversizing, but independent of the degree of valvular calcification and native annular ovality. Visualization of the position of calcific debris before and after TAVI showed that calcifications were shifted upwards and outwards as a consequence of the implantation procedure. The degree of stent eccentricity was related to residual aortic regurgitation grade ≥2.

Conclusions

The SAPIEN ® /SAPIEN XT ® prostheses achieved good degrees of stent expansion and circularity regardless of the morphology of the landing zone. Increased stent ovality was associated with an elevated risk for aortic regurgitation. The total calcification volume, degree of annular ovality and stent expansion were not associated with residual AR.

Comparison of SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve stent-frame expansion: evaluation using multi-slice computed tomography

AIMS

Stent-frame morphology of the newer-generation, balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV), the SAPIEN 3 (S3), after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unknown. We evaluated the THV stent-frame morphology post TAVI of the S3 using multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) compared with the prior-generation THV, SAPIEN XT (S-XT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 94 consecutive participants of RESOLVE registry (NCT02318342) had MSCT after balloon-expandable TAVI (S3 = 39 and S-XT = 55). The morphology of the THV stent-frame was evaluated for expansion area and eccentricity at the THV-inflow, native annulus, mid-THV and THV-outflow levels. Mean %-expansion area for the S3 and the S-XT was 100.9 ± 5.7 and 96.1 ± 5.5%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the S3 group, the THV-inflow level had the largest value of %-expansion area, which decreased from THV-inflow to mid-THV level (105.2 ± 6.4 to 96.5 ± 5.9%, P < 0.001). However, in the S-XT group, %-expansion area increased from THV-inflow level to mid-THV level (93.2 ± 6.2 to 95.1 ± 6.1%, P = 0.0058). On nominal delivery balloon volume, the S3 in 88.5% of cases had overexpansion at the THV-inflow level. The observed degree of THV oversizing of the S3 was significantly lower than the S-XT (6.3 ± 8.6 vs. 11.8 ± 8.5%, P = 0.0027). Nonetheless, the incidence of post-procedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PVR) ≥ mild following the S3 TAVI was also significantly lower than the S-XT TAVI (17.9 vs. 43.6%, P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

The newer-generation, balloon-expandable device, the S3, has a flared inflow morphology, whereas the prior-generation device, the S-XT, has relatively constrained inflow morphology post TAVI. This may contribute to a lesser degree of PVR with the S3.