1
|
Yang L, Jiang Z, Tong J, Li N, Dong Q, Wang K. Development and validation of a preoperative CT‑based radiomics nomogram to differentiate tuberculosis granulomas from lung adenocarcinomas: an external validation study. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:670. [PMID: 38824514 PMCID: PMC11144314 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12422-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An accurate and non-invasive approach is urgently needed to distinguish tuberculosis granulomas from lung adenocarcinomas. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on contrast enhanced-compute tomography (CE-CT) to preoperatively differentiate tuberculosis granuloma from lung adenocarcinoma appearing as solitary pulmonary solid nodules (SPSN). METHODS This retrospective study analyzed 143 patients with lung adenocarcinoma (mean age: 62.4 ± 6.5 years; 54.5% female) and 137 patients with tuberculosis granulomas (mean age: 54.7 ± 8.2 years; 29.2% female) from two centers between March 2015 and June 2020. The training and internal validation cohorts included 161 and 69 patients (7:3 ratio) from center No.1, respectively. The external testing cohort included 50 patients from center No.2. Clinical factors and conventional radiological characteristics were analyzed to build independent predictors. Radiomics features were extracted from each CT-volume of interest (VOI). Feature selection was performed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, as well as the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method. A clinical model was constructed with clinical factors and radiological findings. Individualized radiomics nomograms incorporating clinical data and radiomics signature were established to validate the clinical usefulness. The diagnostic performance was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS One clinical factor (CA125), one radiological characteristic (enhanced-CT value) and nine radiomics features were found to be independent predictors, which were used to establish the radiomics nomogram. The nomogram demonstrated better diagnostic efficacy than any single model, with respective AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.903, 0.857, 0.901, and 0.807 in the training cohort; 0.933, 0.884, 0.893, and 0.892 in the internal validation cohort; 0.914, 0.800, 0.937, and 0.735 in the external test cohort. The calibration curve showed a good agreement between prediction probability and actual clinical findings. CONCLUSION The nomogram incorporating clinical factors, radiological characteristics and radiomics signature provides additional value in distinguishing tuberculosis granuloma from lung adenocarcinoma in patients with a SPSN, potentially serving as a robust diagnostic strategy in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liping Yang
- Department of PET-CT, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Zhiyun Jiang
- Medical Imaging Department, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Jinlong Tong
- Medical Imaging Department, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Nan Li
- Department of Pathology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Qing Dong
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
| | - Kezheng Wang
- Department of PET-CT, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Merchant SA, Shaikh MJS, Nadkarni P. Tuberculosis conundrum - current and future scenarios: A proposed comprehensive approach combining laboratory, imaging, and computing advances. World J Radiol 2022; 14:114-136. [PMID: 35978978 PMCID: PMC9258306 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v14.i6.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global threat, with the rise of multiple and extensively drug resistant TB posing additional challenges. The International health community has set various 5-yearly targets for TB elimination: mathematical modelling suggests that a 2050 target is feasible with a strategy combining better diagnostics, drugs, and vaccines to detect and treat both latent and active infection. The availability of rapid and highly sensitive diagnostic tools (Gene-Xpert, TB-Quick) will vastly facilitate population-level identification of TB (including rifampicin resistance and through it, multi-drug-resistant TB). Basic-research advances have illuminated molecular mechanisms in TB, including the protective role of Vitamin D. Also, Mycobacterium tuberculosis impairs the host immune response through epigenetic mechanisms (histone-binding modulation). Imaging will continue to be key, both for initial diagnosis and follow-up. We discuss advances in multiple imaging modalities to evaluate TB tissue changes, such as molecular imaging techniques (including pathogen-specific positron emission tomography imaging agents), non-invasive temporal monitoring, and computing enhancements to improve data acquisition and reduce scan times. Big data analysis and Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms, notably in the AI sub-field called “Deep Learning”, can potentially increase the speed and accuracy of diagnosis. Additionally, Federated learning makes multi-institutional/multi-city AI-based collaborations possible without sharing identifiable patient data. More powerful hardware designs - e.g., Edge and Quantum Computing- will facilitate the role of computing applications in TB. However, “Artificial Intelligence needs real Intelligence to guide it!” To have maximal impact, AI must use a holistic approach that incorporates time tested human wisdom gained over decades from the full gamut of TB, i.e., key imaging and clinical parameters, including prognostic indicators, plus bacterial and epidemiologic data. We propose a similar holistic approach at the level of national/international policy formulation and implementation, to enable effective culmination of TB’s endgame, summarizing it with the acronym “TB - REVISITED”.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suleman Adam Merchant
- Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Mumbai 400022, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mohd Javed Saifullah Shaikh
- Department of Radiology, North Bengal Neuro Centre, Jupiter magnetic resonance imaging, Diagnostic Centre, Siliguri 734003, West Bengal, India
| | - Prakash Nadkarni
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa 52242, IA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu J, Chen W, Zeng F, Ma L, Xu W, Yang W, Qin G. Improved detection of solitary pulmonary nodules on radiographs compared with deep bone suppression imaging. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2021; 11:4342-4353. [PMID: 34603989 DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-1346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background The present study aimed to investigate whether deep bone suppression imaging (BSI) could increase the diagnostic performance for solitary pulmonary nodule detection compared with digital tomosynthesis (DTS), dual-energy subtraction (DES) radiography, and conventional chest radiography (CCR). Methods A total of 256 patients (123 with a solitary pulmonary nodule, 133 with normal findings) were included in the study. The confidence score of 6 observers determined the presence or absence of pulmonary nodules in each patient. These were first analyzed using a CCR image, then with CCR plus deep BSI, then with CCR plus DES radiography, and finally with DTS images. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the performance of the 6 observers in the detection of pulmonary nodules. Results For the 6 observers, the average area under the curve improved significantly from 0.717 with CCR to 0.848 with CCR plus deep BSI (P<0.01), 0.834 with CCR plus DES radiography (P<0.01), and 0.939 with DTS (P<0.01). Comparisons between CCR and CCR plus deep BSI found that the sensitivities of the assessments by the 3 residents increased from 53.2% to 69.5% (P=0.014) for nodules located in the upper lung field, from 30.6% to 44.6% (P=0.015) for nodules that were partially/completely obscured by the bone, and from 33.2% to 45.8% (P=0.006) for nodules <10 mm. Conclusions The deep BSI technique can significantly increase the sensitivity of radiology residents for solitary pulmonary nodules compared with CCR. Increased detection was seen mainly for smaller nodules, nodules with partial/complete obscuration, and nodules located in the upper lung field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiefang Wu
- Department of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weiguo Chen
- Department of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fengxia Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Le Ma
- Department of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weimin Xu
- Department of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Yang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Genggeng Qin
- Department of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nachiappan AC, Rahbar K, Shi X, Guy ES, Mortani Barbosa EJ, Shroff GS, Ocazionez D, Schlesinger AE, Katz SI, Hammer MM. Pulmonary Tuberculosis: Role of Radiology in Diagnosis and Management. Radiographics 2017; 37:52-72. [PMID: 28076011 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2017160032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Tuberculosis is a public health problem worldwide, including in the United States-particularly among immunocompromised patients and other high-risk groups. Tuberculosis manifests in active and latent forms. Active disease can occur as primary tuberculosis, developing shortly after infection, or postprimary tuberculosis, developing after a long period of latent infection. Primary tuberculosis occurs most commonly in children and immunocompromised patients, who present with lymphadenopathy, pulmonary consolidation, and pleural effusion. Postprimary tuberculosis may manifest with cavities, consolidations, and centrilobular nodules. Miliary tuberculosis refers to hematogenously disseminated disease that is more commonly seen in immunocompromised patients, who present with miliary lung nodules and multiorgan involvement. The principal means of testing for active tuberculosis is sputum analysis, including smear, culture, and nucleic acid amplification testing. Imaging findings, particularly the presence of cavitation, can affect treatment decisions, such as the duration of therapy. Latent tuberculosis is an asymptomatic infection that can lead to postprimary tuberculosis in the future. Patients who are suspected of having latent tuberculosis may undergo targeted testing with a tuberculin skin test or interferon-γ release assay. Chest radiographs are used to stratify for risk and to assess for asymptomatic active disease. Sequelae of previous tuberculosis that is now inactive manifest characteristically as fibronodular opacities in the apical and upper lung zones. Stability of radiographic findings for 6 months distinguishes inactive from active disease. Nontuberculous mycobacterial disease can sometimes mimic the findings of active tuberculosis, and laboratory confirmation is required to make the distinction. Familiarity with the imaging, clinical, and laboratory features of tuberculosis is important for diagnosis and management. ©RSNA, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arun C Nachiappan
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (A.C.N., E.J.M.B., S.I.K., M.M.H.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.R.); Department of Radiology (X.S.) and Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (E.S.G.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (G.S.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.O.); and Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex (A.E.S.)
| | - Kasra Rahbar
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (A.C.N., E.J.M.B., S.I.K., M.M.H.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.R.); Department of Radiology (X.S.) and Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (E.S.G.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (G.S.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.O.); and Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex (A.E.S.)
| | - Xiao Shi
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (A.C.N., E.J.M.B., S.I.K., M.M.H.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.R.); Department of Radiology (X.S.) and Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (E.S.G.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (G.S.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.O.); and Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex (A.E.S.)
| | - Elizabeth S Guy
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (A.C.N., E.J.M.B., S.I.K., M.M.H.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.R.); Department of Radiology (X.S.) and Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (E.S.G.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (G.S.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.O.); and Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex (A.E.S.)
| | - Eduardo J Mortani Barbosa
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (A.C.N., E.J.M.B., S.I.K., M.M.H.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.R.); Department of Radiology (X.S.) and Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (E.S.G.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (G.S.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.O.); and Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex (A.E.S.)
| | - Girish S Shroff
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (A.C.N., E.J.M.B., S.I.K., M.M.H.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.R.); Department of Radiology (X.S.) and Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (E.S.G.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (G.S.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.O.); and Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex (A.E.S.)
| | - Daniel Ocazionez
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (A.C.N., E.J.M.B., S.I.K., M.M.H.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.R.); Department of Radiology (X.S.) and Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (E.S.G.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (G.S.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.O.); and Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex (A.E.S.)
| | - Alan E Schlesinger
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (A.C.N., E.J.M.B., S.I.K., M.M.H.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.R.); Department of Radiology (X.S.) and Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (E.S.G.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (G.S.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.O.); and Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex (A.E.S.)
| | - Sharyn I Katz
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (A.C.N., E.J.M.B., S.I.K., M.M.H.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.R.); Department of Radiology (X.S.) and Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (E.S.G.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (G.S.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.O.); and Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex (A.E.S.)
| | - Mark M Hammer
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (A.C.N., E.J.M.B., S.I.K., M.M.H.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.R.); Department of Radiology (X.S.) and Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (E.S.G.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (G.S.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.O.); and Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex (A.E.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim JH, Lee KH, Kim KT, Kim HJ, Ahn HS, Kim YJ, Lee HY, Jeon YS. Comparison of digital tomosynthesis and chest radiography for the detection of pulmonary nodules: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20160421. [PMID: 27759428 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the diagnostic accuracy of digital tomosynthesis (DTS) with that of chest radiography for the detection of pulmonary nodules by meta-analysis. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant original studies from 1 January 1 1976 to 31 August 31 2016. The quality of included studies was assessed by quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2. Per-patient data were used to calculate the sensitivity and specificity and per-lesion data were used to calculate the detection rate. Summary receiver-operating characteristic curves were drawn for pulmonary nodule detection. RESULTS 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. 1017 patients on a per-patient basis and 2159 lesions on a per-lesion basis from 16 eligible studies were evaluated. The pooled patient-based sensitivity of DTS was 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-0.88] and the specificity was 0.95 (0.93-0.96). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of chest radiography were 0.47 (0.44-0.51) and 0.37 (0.34-0.40), respectively. The per-lesion detection rate was 2.90 (95% CI 2.63-3.19). CONCLUSION DTS has higher diagnostic accuracy than chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules. Chest radiography has low sensitivity but similar specificity, comparable with that of DTS. Advances in knowledge: DTS has higher diagnostic accuracy than chest radiography for the detection of pulmonary nodules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun H Kim
- 1 Department of Radiology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung H Lee
- 1 Department of Radiology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyoung-Tae Kim
- 1 Department of Radiology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun J Kim
- 2 Institute for Evidence-based Medicine, Cochrane Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,3 Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeong S Ahn
- 2 Institute for Evidence-based Medicine, Cochrane Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,3 Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeo J Kim
- 1 Department of Radiology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ha Y Lee
- 1 Department of Radiology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong S Jeon
- 1 Department of Radiology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|