Performance and role of the breast lesion excision system (BLES) in small clusters of suspicious microcalcifications

Vacuum-assisted excision of small breast cancers under ultrasound guidance

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate if it is possible to completely remove small breast cancer tumours with vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) under ultrasound guidance.

METHODS

Women ≥ 50 years old with a biopsy proven invasive cancer ≤ 10 mm were selected between October 2021 and November 2021 based on referrals and enrolled in this prospective study. The patients underwent VAE within six weeks following biopsy to remove the tumour. After the tumour was excised and the biopsy cavities margins were shaved, a radioactive seed was inserted into the biopsy cavity. The VAE excision cavity and surrounding tissue were surgically excised. Preliminary VAE results were evaluated after ten patients. For the study to proceed at least 80 % of the breast cancer tumours had to be completely removed by VAE.

RESULTS

The tumours median size in mammography was 8.5 mm (6-9 mm) and in ultrasound 6.5 mm (4-9 mm). The shape of the lesion was round in three (30 %), oval in two (20 %) and irregular in five (50 %) patients. None of the tumours were completely removed in the first VAE specimen, meaning that there was invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the "shaved margins" and/or the surgical specimen. In five (50 %) cases, the surgical specimen was free of invasive cancer and DCIS.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the small invasive breast cancers were completely excised with VAE under ultrasound guidance, therefore it is not a reliable method to remove small breast cancers.

Minimally invasive breast cancer excision using the breast lesion excision system under ultrasound guidance

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of completely excising small breast cancers using the automated, image-guided, single-pass radiofrequency-based breast lesion excision system (BLES) under ultrasound (US) guidance.

METHODS

From February 2018 to July 2019, 22 patients diagnosed with invasive carcinomas ≤ 15 mm at US and mammography were enrolled in this prospective, multi-center, ethics board-approved study. Patients underwent breast MRI to verify lesion size. BLES-based excision and surgery were performed during the same procedure. Histopathology findings from the BLES procedure and surgery were compared, and total excision findings were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 22 patients, ten were excluded due to the lesion being > 15 mm and/or being multifocal at MRI, and one due to scheduling issues. The remaining 11 patients underwent BLES excision. Mean diameter of excised lesions at MRI was 11.8 mm (range 8.0-13.9 mm). BLES revealed ten (90.9%) invasive carcinomas of no special type, and one (9.1%) invasive lobular carcinoma. Histopathological results were identical for the needle biopsy, BLES, and surgical specimens for all lesions. None of the BLES excisions were adequate. Margins were usually compromised on both sides of the specimen, indicating that the excised volume was too small. Margin assessment was good for all BLES specimens. One technical complication occurred (retrieval of an empty BLES basket, specimen retrieved during subsequent surgery).

CONCLUSIONS

BLES allows accurate diagnosis of small invasive breast carcinomas. However, BLES cannot be considered as a therapeutic device for small invasive breast carcinomas due to not achieving adequate excision.

Effectiveness of the diagnostic pathway of BLES: could it be safely used as a therapeutic method in selected benign lesions?

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to investigate the breast lesion excision system (BLES) as a tool and a practical alternative technique to surgical biopsy and other percutaneous biopsy methods for suspicious lesions. We also wanted to share our initial experience with BLES and compare it with standard percutaneous biopsy methods.

METHODS

From July 2015 to December 2016, a total of 50 patients who had high-risk lesions which were diagnosed with core needle biopsy (CNB) or had lesions with radiology pathology discordance, or had high-risk factors, high-grade anxiety, or suspicious follow-up lesions were enrolled in the study. These lesions were classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 or 4, which are under 2 cm. Pathologic diagnoses before and after BLES were evaluated comparatively. The diagnostic and therapeutic success and the complications of CNB and BLES were analyzed.

RESULTS

After BLES, two cases were diagnosed as atypical lobular hyperplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. Since the surgical margin was negative, re-excision was not required. Two cases were diagnosed as malignant, and no residual tissue was detected in the operation region. Total excision rates were reported as 56%. Minor hematoma was observed in only 1 out of 50 cases (2%), and spontaneous remission was observed. Two patients (4%) complained of pain during the procedure. Radiofrequency-related thermal damage to the specimen showed: Grade 0 (<0.5 mm) damage in 88%, Grade 1 (0.5-1.5 mm) in 10%, Grade 2 (>1.5 mm or thermal damage in diffuse areas) in 2%, and Grade 3 (diffuse thermal damage or inability to diagnose) in 0%. We found a significant positive correlation between classification of thermal damage and lesion fat cell content (r = 0.345, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

BLES is a safe technique that can be effectively used with low complication rates in the excision of benign and high-risk breast lesions in selected cases. It may also provide high diagnostic success and even serve as a therapeutic method in high-risk lesions, such as radial scar, papilloma, and atypical lobular hyperplasia with high complete excision rates without fragmentation of lesions.

Predictive factors for breast lesion excision system (BLES) accuracy and safety in stereotactic biopsy of suspicious calcifications

AIM

To retrospectively assess the effectiveness and safety of BLES stereotactic biopsy of suspicious calcifications and investigate possible predictive factors for underestimation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2014 and January 2016, 400 biopsies of suspicious calcifications were performed in our Department using the BLES stereotactic device. The mean age of our population was 58.5 years (range 39-78 years). The final surgical results were used as gold standard. The effectiveness of the method was statistically evaluated. Mammographic size, grade, molecular type, and presence of comedo type/necrosis were assessed as predictive factors.

RESULTS

90/400 (22.5%) cases were cancers (20% invasive cancers, 80% non-invasive cancers). 38/400 cases were atypical lesions (9.5%). No underestimation was found in atypical lesions that underwent surgery (29/38 cases). Downgrade was achieved in 45.5% of cases (with complete removal in 34.4%), concordance in 43.3%, and upgrade was found in 15.5% of the cases; the initial mammographic size and the grade of the cancers were found to be statistically significant predictive factors. The total complication rate was 8.75%.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast lesion excision system is a highly accurate and safe stereotactic biopsy technique of suspicious calcifications with low underestimations and high downgrade/removal rates with the potential to alter the final surgical decision in selected cases.

Performance of breast lesion excision system (BLES) in complete removal of papillomas presented mammographically as groups of calcifications

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively assess the stereotactic one-pass BLES performance in excision of small groups of calcifications seen on mammogram that proved to be papillomas.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and January 2016, 37/400 cases (9.2%) of stereotactic BLES biopsies performed in our department due to suspicious calcifications proved to be papillomas. Lesions with atypia underwent surgical removal and lesions with no atypia were followed up for 2 years. BLES and surgical histology results, radiological removal and 2-years stability were statistically analysed to assess BLES performance in biopsy and excision of papillomas.

RESULTS

The mean mammographic size of papillomas was 6.54 mm (st dev = 3.85, range 2 mm-17 mm) and within the size excised by the BLES needle (20 mm). 4/37 cases (10.8%) showed atypia. BLES excision was achieved in 29/37 cases (78.4%); radiological removal based on post BLES mammogram was achieved in 25/29 cases (86.2%). In the remaining 8/37 cases the papillomas were seen at the ink of the specimens' margins; 3/8 cases showed residual calcifications on post-BLES mammogram. The BLES histology result of removal and the mammographic size of the papillomas were found to be statistically significant predictive factors of excision (p < 0,001, Fisher's exact test, Mann Whitney test). Follow up mammograms showed no change for a period of 2 years.

CONCLUSION

BLES is a safe and accurate technique to biopsy papillomas with high success rates of excision which could potentially minimize the need of subsequent radiological or surgical excision.

A systematic review on the use of the breast lesion excision system in breast disease

Purpose

To outline the current status of and provide insight into possible future research on the breast lesion excision system (BLES) as a diagnostic and therapeutic device.

Methods

A systematic search of the literature was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases to identify relevant studies published between January 2002 and April 2018. Studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they evaluated the diagnostic or therapeutic accuracy or safety of BLES.

Results

Ultimately, 17 articles were included. The reported underestimation rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) ranged from 0 to 14.3% and from 0 to 22.2%, respectively. Complete excision rates for invasive ductal carcinoma and DCIS ranged from 5.3 to 76.3%. Bleeding was the most frequently reported complication (0–11.8%). Device-related complications may arise, with an empty basket being the most common (0.6–3.6%). Thermal damage of the specimen, caused by the use of a radiofrequency cutting wire, was reported in eight of the included studies. Most thermal artifacts were reported as superficial and small (0.1–1.9 mm).

Conclusions

The BLES, an automated, image-guided, single-pass biopsy system for breast lesions using radiofrequency is designed to excise and retrieve an intact tissue specimen. It is an efficient and safe breast biopsy method with acceptable complication rates, which may be used as an alternative to vacuum-assisted biopsies. The variable rate of complete excision raises questions about the possibility to use BLES as a therapeutic device for the excision of small lesions. Further research should focus on this aspect of BLES.

Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Suspicious Calcifications From Various Populations: A Comparison With Full-field Digital Mammography

The diagnostic performance difference between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and conventional full-field digital mammography (FFDM) for breast suspicious calcifications from various populations is unclear. The objective of this study is to determine whether DBT exhibits the diagnostic advantage for breast suspicious calcifications from various populations compared with FFDM. Three hundred and five patients were enrolled (of which seven patients with bilateral lesions) and 312 breasts images were retrospectively analyzed by three radiologists independently. The postoperative pathology of breast calcifications was the gold standard. Breast cancer was diagnosed utilizing DBT and FFDM with sensitivities of 92.9% and 88.8%, specificities of 87.9% and 75.2%, positive predictive values of 77.8% and 62.1%, negative predictive values of 96.4% and 93.6%, respectively. DBT exhibited significantly higher diagnostic accuracy for benign calcifications compared with FFDM (87.9% vs 75.2%), and no advantage in the diagnosis of malignant calcifications. DBT diagnostic accuracy was notably higher than FFDM in premenopausal (88.4% vs 78.8%), postmenopausal (90.2% vs 77.2%), and dense breast cases (89.4% vs 81.9%). There was no significant difference in non-dense breast cases. In our study, DBT exhibited a superior advantage in dense breasts and benign calcifications cases compared to FFDM, while no advantage was observed in non-dense breasts or malignant calcifications cases. Thus, in the breast cancer screening for young women with dense breasts, DBT may be recommended for accurate diagnosis. Our findings may assist the clinicians in applying the optimal techniques for different patients and provide a theoretical basis for the update of breast cancer screening guideline.

Advances in breast intervention: where are we now and where should we be?

In the past four decades, a variety of methods for minimal or non-invasive diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer have been introduced. Although breast imaging has become more and more specific for diagnosis, specimen biopsy with histopathological confirmation is still necessary. Core-needle biopsy under ultrasound guidance is the appropriate first choice for the diagnosis of most lesions. Fine-needle aspiration is of interest for identification of the presence of metastatic disease in abnormal lymph nodes. For microcalcifications, vacuum-assisted biopsy is recommended, especially with stereotactic guidance. In recent years different therapeutic techniques have been developed for the treatment of solid lesions, including breast cancer. Certainly, with the improvement of technology and medical scientific progress, it is becoming more common to use minimal- or non-invasive therapies. The proposed minimally invasive techniques may offer complete treatment of breast cancer, with better cosmetic results, less psychological stress, and shorter hospital stays. In this article, the strengths and weaknesses of the different diagnostic and therapeutic techniques are presented, and promising techniques for the future are discussed.

Breast Lesion Excision System in the diagnosis and treatment of intraductal papillomas - A feasibility study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of Breast Lesion Excision System (BLES) in the treatment of intraductal papillomas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients with a needle biopsy -based suspicion of an intraductal papilloma who consequently underwent a BLES procedure at Helsinki University Hospital between 2011 and 2016 were included in this retrospective study. The purpose of the BLES procedure was either to excise the entire lesion or in few cases to achieve better sampling.

RESULTS

In total, 74 patients underwent 80 BLES procedures. Pathological diagnosis after the BLES biopsy confirmed an intraductal papilloma without atypia in 43 lesions, whereas 10 lesions were upgraded to high-risk lesions (HRL) with either atypical ductal hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ. Five cases were upgraded to malignancy, two were invasive ductal carcinomas and three were ductal carcinoma in situ. Additionally, 18 lesions were diagnosed as other benign lesions. Four procedures failed. Complete excision with BLES was achieved in 19 out of 43 intraductal papillomas, 6 out of 10 HRL and two out of five malignant lesions. No major complications occurred. The BLES procedure was adequate in the management of the 71 breast lesions.

CONCLUSION

The BLES procedure is an acceptable method for the management of small benign and high-risk breast lesions such as intraductal papillomas in selected patients. Thus, a great amount of diagnostic surgical biopsies can be avoided.

Margin-free excision of small solid breast carcinomas using the Intact Breast Lesion Excision System®: is it feasible?

BACKGROUND

The Breast Lesion Excision System^® (BLES^®) is a stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy device that utilizes radiofrequency in order to excise non-palpable mammographic lesions for pathologic diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of BLES^® in performing complete, margin-free excisions of small solid carcinomas.

METHODS

Our retrospective study of prospectively enrolled patients included 50 cases of non-palpable, BIRADS ≥ 4, solid by means of mammography and sonography, lesions. All these patients underwent a BLES^® breast biopsy procedure from June 2010 to June 2014 and had a malignant diagnosis. According to each patient's pathologic diagnosis, appropriate surgical treatment was recommended. Postoperatively, surgical specimens were histologically analyzed, aiming to determine whether residual malignant disease was present in the specimen cavity formatted by BLES^®.

RESULTS

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was diagnosed in 5 patients and invasive carcinoma (IC) in 45 patients, at primary BLES^® pathology report. Tumor-free resection margins (< 0.5 and < 1 mm) were accomplished in only 8/24 subcentimeter cases (33.3%). Absence of residual disease upon surgical excision was confirmed in 23/24 subcentimeter cases (95.8%) and 2/26 of the cases measuring > 1 cm (7.69%). Statistical analysis revealed that mammographic size was the only significant prognostic factor for complete excision (i.e., with no residual disease in the biopsy cavity) of a malignant lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that it is possible, when using the BLES^® device, to completely excise small (≤ 10 mm) breast carcinomas that appear radiologically as solid lesions. This subset of patients should be investigated regarding the therapeutic potential of this method.

The breast lesion excision system (BLES) under stereotactic guidance cannot be used as a therapeutic tool in the excision of small areas of microcalcifications in the breast

OBJECTIVE

The breast lesion excision system (BLES) is a new, automatic percutaneous breast biopsy device that excises single large specimens using radiofrequency cutting. The aim of this study was to determine whether BLES, under stereotactic guidance, can be used as a therapeutic tool in the assessment of small areas of microcalcifications in the breast by providing samples with clear margins.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 149 patients with suspicious (BIRADS 4 or 5) small areas of microcalcifications underwent stereotactic-guided BLES. Of these, 34 patients (22.8%) with microcalcifications that had a diameter smaller than the basket size (≤15mm) underwent both BLES and subsequent surgery. Histopathology findings from BLES and subsequent surgery were compared. Identical, underestimation and total excision findings were assessed.

RESULTS

BLES revealed fourteen (41.1%) high-risk lesions, ten (29.4%) ductal carcinomas in situ, and ten (29.4%) invasive cancers. Identical results between BLES and surgery were seen in 17/34 (50%) lesions. Surgery confirmed total excision of BLES in 15/34 (44.1%) lesions. Underestimation was seen in 2/34 (5.8%) lesions.

CONCLUSION

BLES allows accurate diagnosis of small areas of microcalcifications, with few underestimates. BLES is a diagnostic, but cannot be considered to be a therapeutic tool in the case of suspicious microcalcifications because total excision was seen in only 44.1% of these lesions. Studies are needed to address the therapeutic benefit of this procedure in solid lesions.