Value of ultra-low-dose chest CT with iterative reconstruction for selected emergency room patients with acute dyspnea

Detection of Pulmonary Nodules on Ultra-low Dose Chest Computed Tomography With Deep-learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of ultra-low dose (ULD) chest computed tomography (CT), with a radiation exposure equivalent to a 2-view chest x-ray, for pulmonary nodule detection using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study included 60 patients referred to our institution for assessment or follow-up of solid pulmonary nodules. All patients underwent low-dose (LD) and ULD chest CT within the same examination session. LD CT data were reconstructed using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V (ASIR-V), whereas ULD CT data were reconstructed using DLIR and ASIR-V. ULD CT images were reviewed by 2 readers and LD CT images were reviewed by an experienced thoracic radiologist as the reference standard. Quantitative image quality analysis was performed, and the detectability of pulmonary nodules was assessed according to their size and location.

RESULTS

The effective radiation dose for ULD CT and LD CT were 0.13±0.01 and 1.16±0.6 mSv, respectively. Over the whole population, LD CT revealed 733 nodules. At ULD, DLIR images significantly exhibited better image quality than ASIR-V images. The overall sensitivity of DLIR reconstruction for the detection of solid pulmonary nodules from the ULD CT series was 93% and 82% for the 2 readers, with a good to excellent agreement with LD CT (ICC=0.82 and 0.66, respectively). The best sensitivities were observed in the middle lobe (97% and 85%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

At ULD, DLIR reconstructions, with minimal radiation exposure that could facilitate large-scale screening, allow the detection of pulmonary nodules with high sensitivity in an unrestricted BMI population.

Ultra-low dose chest CT for the diagnosis of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare ultra-low dose (ULD) and standard low-dose (SLD) chest computed tomography (CT) in terms of radiation exposure, image quality and diagnostic value for diagnosing pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective board-approved study consecutive patients with HHT referred to a reference center for screening and/or follow-up chest CT examination were prospectively included from December 2020 to January 2022. Patients underwent two consecutive non-contrast chest CTs without dose modulation (i.e., one ULD protocol [80 kVp or 100 kVp, CTDIvol of 0.3 mGy or 0.6 mGy] and one SLD protocol [140 kVp, CTDIvol of 1.3 mGy]). Objective image noises measured at the level of tracheal carina were compared between the two protocols. Overall image quality and diagnostic confidence were scored on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = insufficient to 4 = excellent). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ULD CT for diagnosing pulmonary AVM with a feeding artery of over 2 mm in diameter were calculated along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) using SLD images as the standard of reference.

RESULTS

A total of 44 consecutive patients with HHT (31 women; mean age, 42 ± 16 [standard deviation (SD)] years; body mass index, 23.2 ± 4.5 [SD] kg/m2) were included. Thirty-four pulmonary AVMs with a feeding artery of over 2 mm in diameter were found with SLD images versus 35 with ULD images. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive value, and predictive negative value of ULD CT for the diagnosis of PAVM were 100% (34/34; 95% CI: 90-100), 96% (18/19; 95% CI: 74-100), 97% (34/35; 95% CI: 85-100) and 100% (18/18; 95% CI: 81-100), respectively. A significant difference in diagnostic confidence scores was found between ULD (3.8 ± 0.4 [SD]) and SLD (3.9 ± 0.1 [SD]) CT images (P = 0.03). No differences in overall image quality scores were found between ULD CT examinations (3.9 ± 0.2 [SD]) and SLD (4 ± 0 [SD]) CT examinations (P = 0.77). Effective radiation dose decreased significantly by 78.8% with ULD protocol, with no significant differences in noise values between ULD CT images (16.7 ± 5.0 [SD] HU) and SLD images (17.7 ± 6.6 [SD] HU) (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

ULD chest CT provides 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity for the diagnosis of treatable pulmonary AVM with a feeding artery of over 2 mm in diameter, leading to a 78.8% dose-saving compared with a standard low-dose protocol.

Ultra-low-dose CT vs. chest X-ray in non-traumatic emergency department patients - a prospective randomised crossover cohort trial

Background

Ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT) examinations of the chest at only twice the radiation dose of a chest X-ray (CXR) now offer a valuable imaging alternative to CXR. This trial prospectively compares ULDCT and CXR for the detection rate of diagnoses and their clinical relevance in a low-prevalence cohort of non-traumatic emergency department patients.

Methods

In this prospective crossover cohort trial, 294 non-traumatic emergency department patients with a clinically indicated CXR were included between May 2nd and November 26th of 2019 (www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03922516). All participants received both CXR and ULDCT, and were randomized into two arms with inverse reporting order. The detection rate of CXR was calculated from 'arm CXR' (n = 147; CXR first), and of ULDCT from 'arm ULDCT' (n = 147; ULDCT first). Additional information reported by the second exam in each arm was documented. From all available clinical and imaging data, expert radiologists and emergency physicians built a compound reference standard, including radiologically undetectable diagnoses, and assigned each finding to one of five clinical relevance categories for the respective patient.

Findings

Detection rates for main diagnoses by CXR and ULDCT (mean effective dose: 0.22 mSv) were 9.1% (CI [5.2, 15.5]; 11/121) and 20.1% (CI [14.2, 27.7]; 27/134; P = 0.016), respectively. As an additional imaging modality, ULDCT added 9.1% (CI [5.2, 15.5]; 11/121) of main diagnoses to prior CXRs, whereas CXRs did not add a single main diagnosis (0/134; P < 0.001). Notably, ULDCT also offered higher detection rates than CXR for all other clinical relevance categories, including findings clinically irrelevant for the respective emergency department visit with 78.5% (CI [74.0, 82.5]; 278/354) vs. 16.2% (CI [12.7, 20.3]; 58/359) as a primary modality and 68.2% (CI [63.3, 72.8]; 245/359) vs. 2.5% (CI [1.3, 4.7]; 9/354) as an additional imaging modality.

Interpretation

In non-traumatic emergency department patients, ULDCT of the chest offered more than twice the detection rate for main diagnoses compared to CXR.

Funding

The Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy of Medical University of Vienna received funding from Siemens Healthineers (Erlangen, Germany) to employ two research assistants for one year.

Implementation of Individualized Low-Dose Computed Tomography-Guided Hook Wire Localization of Pulmonary Nodules: Feasibility and Safety in the Clinical Setting

Background: CT-guided hook-wire localization is an essential step in the management of small pulmonary nodules. Few studies, however, have focused on reducing radiation exposure during the procedure. Purpose: This study aims to explore the feasibility of implementing a low-dose computed tomography (CT)-guided hook wire localization using tailored kVp based on patients' body size. Materials and Methods: A total of 151 patients with small pulmonary nodules were prospectively enrolled for CT-guided hook wire localization using individualized low-dose CT (LDCT) vs. standard-dose CT (SDCT) protocols. Radiation dose, image quality, characteristics of target nodules and procedure-related variables were compared. All variables were analyzed using Chi-Square and Student's t-test. Results: The mean CTDIvol was significantly reduced for LDCT (for BMI ≤ 21 kg/m2, 0.56 ± 0.00 mGy and for BMI > 21 kg/m2, 1.48 ± 0.00 mGy) when compared with SDCT (for BMI ≤ 21 kg/m2, 5.24 ± 0.95 mGy and for BMI > 21 kg/m2, 6.69 ± 1.47 mGy). Accordingly, the DLP of LDCT was significantly reduced as compared with that of SDCT (for BMI ≤ 21 kg/m2, 56.86 ± 4.73 vs. 533.58 ± 122.06 mGy.cm, and for BMI > 21 kg/m2, 167.02 ± 38.76 vs. 746.01 ± 230.91 mGy.cm). In comparison with SDCT, the effective dose (ED) of LDCT decreased by an average of 89.42% (for BMI ≤ 21 kg/m2) and 77.68% (for BMI > 21 kg/m2), respectively. Although the images acquired with the LDCT protocol yielded inferior quality to those acquired with the SDCT protocol, they were clinically acceptable for hook wire localization. Conclusions: LDCT-guided localization can provide safety and nodule detection performance comparable to SDCT-guided localization, benefiting radiation dose reduction dramatically, especially for patients with small body mass indexes.

Ultra-low-dose emergency chest computed tomography protocols in three vendors: A technical note

Background

In suspected community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), chest CT is superior to the routinely obtained radiographs (CXR), but administers higher radiation doses. However, ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT) has shown promising results.

Purpose

To compare radiation dose and image quality using standard and ULDCT protocols designed for a multicenter study encompassing three CT scanner models from GE, Canon, and Siemens.

Material and methods

Patients with suspected CAP were referred for non-contrast standard dose chest CT (NCCT) and ULDCT. Effective radiation dose and Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR) was calculated.

Results

Mean effective doses were GE (n = 10) 6.93 mSv in NCCT and 0.27 mSv in ULDCT; Canon (n = 9) 3.48 in mSv NCCT and 1.11 mSv in ULDCT; Siemens (n = 10) 2.85 mSv in NCCT and 0.45 mSv in ULDCT. CNR was reduced by 29-39% in ULDCT.

Conclusion

The proposed CT protocols yielded dose reductions of 96%, 68%, and 84% using a GE, Canon, and Siemens scanner, respectively.

Task-Based Image Quality Assessment Comparing Classical and Iterative Cone Beam CT Images on Halcyon®

BACKGROUND

Despite the development of iterative reconstruction (IR) in diagnostic imaging, CBCT are generally reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) in radiotherapy. Varian medical systems, recently released with their latest Halcyon^® V2.0 accelerator, a new IR algorithm for CBCT reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To assess the image quality of radiotherapy CBCT images reconstructed with FBP and an IR algorithm.

METHODS

Three CBCT acquisition modes (head, thorax and pelvis large) available on a Halcyon^® were assessed. Five acquisitions were performed for all modes on an image quality phantom and reconstructed with FBP and IR. Task-based image quality assessment was performed with noise power spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF) and detectability index (d'). To illustrate the image quality obtained with both reconstruction types, CBCT acquisitions were made on 6 patients.

RESULTS

The noise magnitude and the spatial frequency of the NPS peak was lower with IR than with FBP for all modes. For all low and high-contrast inserts, the values for TTF at 50% were higher with IR than with FBP. For all inserts and all modes, the contrast values were similar with FBP and IR. For all low and high-contrast simulated lesions, d' values were higher with IR than with FBP for all modes. These results were also found on the 6 patients where the images were less noisy but smoother with IR-CBCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the IR algorithm for CBCT images in radiotherapy improve image quality and thus could increase the accuracy of online registration and limit positioning errors during processing.

Association of Respiratory Functional Indices and Smoking with Pleural Movement and Mean Lung Density Assessed Using Four-Dimensional Dynamic-Ventilation Computed Tomography in Smokers and Patients with COPD

Purpose

To correlate the ratio of the non-dependent to dependent aspects of the maximal pleural movement vector (MPMV_ND/D) and gravity-oriented collapse ratio (GCR_ND/D), and the mean lung field density (MLD) obtained using four-dimensional (4D) dynamic-ventilation computed tomography (DVCT) with airflow limitation parameters and the Brinkman index.

Materials and Methods

Forty-seven patients, including 22 patients with COPD, 13 non-COPD smokers, and 12 non-smokers, with no/slight pleural adhesion confirmed using a thoracoscope, underwent 4D-DVCT with 16 cm coverage. Coordinates for the lung field center, as well as ventral and dorsal pleural points, set on the central trans-axial levels in the median and para-median sagittal planes at end-inspiration, were automatically measured (13-17 frame images, 0.35 seconds/frame). MPMV_ND/D and GCR_ND/D were calculated based on MPMV and GCR values for all the included points and the lung field center. MLD was automatically measured in each of the time frames, and the maximal change ratio of MLD (MLD_CR) was calculated. These measured values were compared among COPD patients, non-COPD smokers, and non-smokers, and were correlated with the Brinkman index, FEV₁/FVC, FEV₁ predicted, RV/TLC, and FEF_25-75% using Spearman's rank coefficients.

Results

MPMV_ND/D was highest in non-smokers (0.819±0.464), followed by non-COPD smokers (0.405±0.131) and patients with COPD (-0.219±0.900). GCR_ND/D in non-smokers (1.003±1.384) was higher than that in patients with COPD (-0.164±1.199). MLD_CR in non-COPD smokers (0.105±0.028) was higher than that in patients with COPD (0.078±0.027). MPMV_ND/D showed positive correlations with FEV₁ predicted (r=0.397, p=0.006), FEV₁/FVC (r=0.501, p<0.001), and FEF_25-75% (r=0.368, p=0.012). GCR_ND/D also demonstrated positive correlations with FEV₁ (r=0.397, p=0.006), FEV₁/FVC (r=0.445, p=0.002), and FEF_25-75% (r=0.371, p=0.011). MPMV_ND/D showed a negative correlation with the Brinkman index (r=-0.398, p=0.006).

Conclusion

We demonstrated that reduced MPMV_ND/D and GCR_ND/D were associated with respiratory functional indices, in addition to a negative association of MPMV_ND/D with the Brinkman index, which should be recognized when assessing local pleural adhesion on DVCT, especially for ventral pleural aspects.

Comparison of acquisition and iterative reconstruction parameters in abdominal computed tomography-guided procedures: a phantom study

BACKGROUND

Many computed tomography (CT) navigation systems have been developed to help radiologists improve the accuracy and safety of the procedure. We evaluated the accuracy of one CT computer-assisted guided procedure with different reduction dose protocols.

METHODS

A total of 128 punctures were randomly made by two operators on two different anthropomorphic phantoms. The tube voltage was fixed to 100 kVp. Tube currents (mAs) were defined to obtain 4 dose levels: 180 mAs (D1.00), 90 mAs (D0.50), 45 mAs (D0.25) and 15 mAs (D0.10) with respective volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) of 7.02, 3.52, 1.75 and 0.59 mGy. The raw data were reconstructed using level 2 of advanced model-based iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) (A2) for D1.00, A3 for D0.50, A4 for D0.25 and A5 for D0.10. Two 12-mm targets per phantom were selected. The mean Euclidean distance (EuD) between the tip of the needle and the isocenter of the target was measured for each puncture. The different measures were compared by paired Student's t-tests.

RESULTS

The mean EuD was 7.0±3.1 mm for the 128 punctures performed. Regardless of which phantom was considered, no significant difference in accuracy occurred between the 4 dose levels, which were 7.1±3.5 mm for D1.00; 7.1±3.1 mm for D0.50; 7.2±3.0 mm for D0.25 and 6.6±2.6 mm for D0.10.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal CT-guided procedures, using computer-assisted navigation and iterative reconstruction algorithms, allow precise punctures on anthropomorphic phantoms with a dose reduction of -92% compared to a standard protocol.

Comparison of two deep learning image reconstruction algorithms in chest CT images: A task-based image quality assessment on phantom data

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of two deep learning image reconstruction (DLR) algorithms in chest computed tomography (CT) with different clinical indications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Acquisitions on image quality and anthropomorphic phantoms were performed at six dose levels (CTDI_vol: 10/7.5/5/2.5/1/0.5mGy) on two CT scanners equipped with two different DLR algorithms (TrueFidelity^TM and AiCE). Raw data were reconstructed using the filtered back-projection (FBP) and the lowest/intermediate/highest DLR levels (L-DLR/M-DLR/H-DLR) of each algorithm. Noise power spectrum, task-based transfer function (TTF) and detectability index (d') were computed: d' modelled detection of a soft tissue mediastinal nodule, ground-glass opacity, or high-contrast pulmonary lesion. Subjective image quality of anthropomorphic phantom images was analyzed by two radiologists.

RESULTS

For the L-DLR/M-DLR levels, the noise magnitude was lower with TrueFidelity^TM than with AiCE from 2.5 to 10 mGy. For H-DLR, noise magnitude was lower with AiCE . For L-DLR and M-DLR, the average NPS spatial frequency (f_av) values were greater for AiCE except for 0.5 mGy. For H-DLR levels, f_av was greater for TrueFidelity^TM than for AiCE. TTF_50% values were greater with AiCE for the air insert, and lower than TrueFidelity^TM for the polyethylene insert. From 2.5 to10 mGy, d' was greater for AiCE than for TrueFidelity^TM for H-DLR for all lesions, but similar for L-DLR and M-DLR. Image quality was rated clinically appropriate for all levels of both algorithms, for dose from 2.5 to 10 mGy, except for L-DLR of AiCE.

CONCLUSION

DLR algorithms reduce the image-noise and improve lesion detectability. Their operations and properties impacted both noise-texture and spatial resolution.

Comparison of two versions of a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm on CT image quality and dose reduction: A phantom study

PURPOSE

To compare the impact on CT image quality and dose reduction of two versions of a Deep Learning Image Reconstruction algorithm.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Acquisitions on the CT ACR 464 phantom were performed at five dose levels (CTDI_vol : 10/7.5/5/2.5/1 mGy) using chest or abdomen pelvis protocol parameters. Raw data were reconstructed using the filtered-back projection (FBP), the enhanced level of AIDR 3D (AIDR 3De), and the three levels of AiCE (Mild, Standard, and Strong) for the two versions (AiCE V8 vs AiCE V10). The noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) for bone (high-contrast insert) and acrylic (low-contrast insert) inserts were computed. To quantify the changes of noise magnitude and texture, the square root of the area under the NPS curve and the average spatial frequency (f_av ) of the NPS curve were measured. The detectability index (d') was computed to model the detectability of either a large mass in the liver or lung, or a small calcification or high contrast tissue boundaries.

RESULTS

The noise magnitude was lower with both AiCE versions than with AIDR 3De. The noise magnitude was lower with AiCE V10 than with AiCE V8 (-4 ± 6% for Mild, -13 ± 3% for Standard, and -48 ± 0% for Strong levels). f_av and TTF_50% values for both inserts shifted towards higher frequencies with AiCE than with AIDR 3De. Compared to AiCE V08, f_av shifted towards higher frequencies with AiCE V10 (45 ± 4%, 36 ± 3%, and 5 ± 4% for all levels, respectively). The TTF_50% values shifted towards higher frequencies with AiCE V10 as compared with AiCE V8 for both inserts, except for the Strong level for the acrylic insert. Whatever the dose and AiCE levels, d' values were higher with AiCE V10 than with AiCE V8 for the small object/calcification and for the large object/lesion.

CONCLUSION

As compared to AIDR 3De, lower noise magnitude and higher spatial resolution and detectability index were found with both versions of AiCE. As compared to AiCE V8, AiCE V10 reduced noise and improved spatial resolution and detectability without changing the noise texture in a simple geometric phantom, except for the Strong level. AiCE V10 seems to have a greater potential for dose reduction than AiCE V8.

Impact of Morphotype on Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of Ultra-Low-Dose Chest CT

Objectives: The image quality of an Ultra-Low-Dose (ULD) chest CT depends on the patient’s morphotype. We hypothesize that there is a threshold beyond which the diagnostic performance of a ULD chest CT is too degraded. This work assesses the influence of morphotype (Body Mass Index BMI, Maximum Transverse Chest Diameter MTCD and gender) on image quality and the diagnostic performance of a ULD chest CT. Methods: A total of 170 patients from three prior prospective monocentric studies were retrospectively included. Renewal of consent was waived by our IRB. All the patients underwent two consecutive unenhanced chest CT acquisitions with a full dose (120 kV, automated tube current modulation) and a ULD (135 kV, fixed tube current at 10 mA). Image noise, subjective image quality and diagnostic performance for nine predefined lung parenchyma lesions were assessed by two independent readers, and correlations with the patient’s morphotype were sought. Results: The mean BMI was 26.6 ± 5.3; 20.6% of patients had a BMI > 30. There was a statistically significant negative correlation of the BMI with the image quality (ρ = −0.32; IC95% = (−0.468; −0.18)). The per-patient diagnostic performance of ULD was sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 99%; PPV, 94% and NPV, 65%. There was no statistically significant influence of the BMI, the MTCD nor the gender on the per-patient and per-lesion diagnostic performance of a ULD chest CT, apart from a significant negative correlation for the detection of emphysema. Conclusions: Despite a negative correlation between the BMI and the image quality of a ULD chest CT, we did not find a correlation between the BMI and the diagnostic performance of the examination, suggesting a possible use of the ULD protocol in obese patients.

Ultra-low-dose chest CT performance for the detection of viral pneumonia patterns during the COVID-19 outbreak period: a monocentric experience

Background

Ultra low dose chest computed tomography (CT) acquisitions have been used for selected emergency room patients with acute dyspnea or minor thoracic trauma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultra-low-dose (ULD) chest CT for detecting viral pneumonia patterns compared to standard (STD) dose chest CT.

Methods

All consecutive adult patients with two non-enhanced chest CT acquisitions, one STD and one ULD, for suspicion of viral pneumonia between March 5^th and April 2^nd 2020 were included. CT results were divided into two groups: non-viral pneumonia CT or compatible with viral pneumonia CT based on viral pneumonia CT patterns: ground-glass opacity (GGO), consolidation, crazy paving, air bronchogram signs and fibrous stripes. The diagnostic performance of ULD CT for suspicion of viral pneumonia was evaluated. For CTs compatible with viral pneumonia, CT pattern detection on ULD CT was assessed and STD CT was used as a reference.

Results

The study included 380 patients with 97 CTs (25.5%) compatible with viral pneumonia. The mean effective doses (EDs) were 1.66 (1.29; 2.18) mSv for STD and 0.20 (0.18; 0.22) mSv for ULD CT (P<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of ULD CT for viral pneumonia detection were 98.9% and 99.0%, respectively. GGO, consolidation and fibrous stripes were equally visible in STD and ULD in 100% (n=97), 36% (n=35) and 23% (n=22) of compatible viral pneumonia-CT patients, respectively. Air bronchogram sign detection was equivalent, concerning 23% (n=22) of patients in STD and 22% (n=21) in ULD. Crazy paving was visible in 24% (n=23) of patients in STD and only 8% (n=8) in ULD (P=0.003).

Conclusions

In comparison to STD dose chest CT, ULD chest CT, with a mean reduction dose of 88.0%, has comparable diagnostic performance for detecting viral pneumonia on CT.

Diagnostic performance of ultra-low dose versus standard dose CT for non-traumatic abdominal emergencies

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of ultra-low dose (ULD) to that of standard (STD) computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of non-traumatic abdominal emergencies using clinical follow-up as reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients requiring emergency abdomen-pelvic CT examination from March 2017 to September 2017 were prospectively included. ULD and STD CTs were acquired after intravenous administration iodinated contrast medium (portal phase). CT acquisitions were performed at 125mAs for STD and 55mAs for ULD. Diagnostic performance was retrospectively evaluated on ULD and STD CTs using clinical follow-up as a reference diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 308 CT examinations from 308 patients (145 men; mean age 59.1±20.7 (SD) years; age range: 18-96 years) were included; among which 241/308 (78.2%) showed abnormal findings. The effective dose was significantly lower with the ULD protocol (1.55±1.03 [SD] mSv) than with the STD (3.67±2.56 [SD] mSv) (P<0.001). Sensitivity was significantly lower for the ULD protocol (85.5% [95%CI: 80.4-89.4]) than for the STD (93.4% [95%CI: 89.4-95.9], P<0.001) whereas specificities were similar (94.0% [95%CI: 85.1-98.0] vs. 95.5% [95%CI: 87.0-98.9], respectively). ULD sensitivity was equivalent to STD for bowel obstruction and colitis/diverticulitis (96.4% [95%CI: 87.0-99.6] and 86.5% [95%CI: 74.3-93.5] for ULD vs. 96.4% [95%CI: 87.0-99.6] and 88.5% [95%CI: 76.5-94.9] for STD, respectively) but lower for appendicitis, pyelonephritis, abscesses and renal colic (75.0% [95%CI: 57.6-86.9]; 77.3% [95%CI: 56.0-90.1]; 90.5% [95%CI: 69.6-98.4] and 85% [95%CI: 62.9-95.4] for ULD vs. 93.8% [95%CI: 78.6-99.2]; 95.5% [95%CI: 76.2-100.0]; 100.0% [95%CI: 81.4-100.0] and 100.0% [95%CI: 80.6-100.0] for STD, respectively). Sensitivities were significantly different between the two protocols only for appendicitis (P=0.041).

CONCLUSION

In an emergency context, for patients with non-traumatic abdominal emergencies, ULD-CT showed inferior diagnostic performance compared to STD-CT for most abdominal conditions except for bowel obstruction and colitis/diverticulitis detection.

Multi-factorial considerations for intra-thoracic lymph node evaluations of healthy cats on computed tomographic images

Background

It is difficult to examine mild to moderate feline intra-thoracic lymphadenopathy via and thoracic radiography. Despite previous information from computed tomographic (CT) images of intra-thoracic lymph nodes, some factors from animals and CT setting were less elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of internal factors from animals and external factors from the CT procedure on the feasibility to detect the intra-thoracic lymph nodes. Twenty-four, client-owned, clinically healthy cats were categorized into three groups according to age. They underwent pre- and post-contrast enhanced CT for whole thorax followed by inter-group evaluation and comparison of sternal, cranial mediastinal, and tracheobronchial lymph nodes.

Results

Post contrast-enhanced CT appearances revealed that intra-thoracic lymph nodes of kittens were invisible, whereas the sternal, cranial mediastinal, and tracheobronchial nodes of cats aged over 7 months old were detected (6/24, 9/24 and 7/24, respectively). Maximum width of these lymph nodes were 3.93 ± 0.74 mm, 4.02 ± 0.65 mm, and 3.51 ± 0.62 mm, respectively. By age, lymph node sizes of these cats were not significantly different. Transverse lymph node width of males was larger than that of females (P = 0.0425). Besides, the detection score of lymph nodes was affected by slice thickness (P < 0.01) and lymph node width (P = 0.0049). Furthermore, an irregular, soft tissue structure, possibly the thymus, was detected in all juvenile cats and three mature cats.

Conclusions

Despite additional information on intra-thoracic lymph nodes in CT images, which can be used to investigate lymphatic-related abnormalities, age, sex, and slice thickness of CT images must be also considered.

Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose and ultra-low-dose CT in detection of chest pathology: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Studies have evaluated imaging modalities with a lower radiation dose than standard-dose CT (SD-CT) for chest examination. This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence on diagnostic accuracy of these modalities - low-dose and ultra-low-dose CT (LD- and ULD-CT) - for chest pathology.

METHOD

Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched April 29th-30th, 2019 and screened by two reviewers. Studies on diagnostic accuracy were included if they defined their index tests as 'LD-CT', 'Reduced-dose CT' or 'ULD-CT' and had SD-CT as reference standard. Risk of bias was evaluated on study level using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. A narrative synthesis was conducted to compare the diagnostic accuracy measurements.

RESULTS

Of the 4257 studies identified, 18 were eligible for inclusion. SD-CT (3.17 ± 1.47 mSv) was used as reference standard in all studies to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of LD- (1.22 ± 0.34 mSv) and ULD-CT (0.22 ± 0.05 mSv), respectively. LD-CT had high sensitivities for detection of bronchiectasis (82-96%), honeycomb (75-100%), and varying sensitivities for nodules (63-99%) and ground glass opacities (GGO) (77-91%). ULD-CT had high sensitivities for GGO (93-100%), pneumothorax (100%), consolidations (90-100%), and varying sensitivities for nodules (60-100%) and emphysema (65-90%).

CONCLUSION

The included studies found LD-CT to have high diagnostic accuracy in detection of honeycombing and bronchiectasis and ULD-CT to have high diagnostic accuracy for pneumothorax, consolidations and GGO. Summarizing evidence on diagnostic accuracy of LD- and ULD-CT for other chest pathology was not possible due to varying outcome measures, lack of precision estimates and heterogeneous study design and methodology.

Ultra-low-dose CT versus radiographs for minor spine and pelvis trauma: a Bayesian analysis of accuracy

OBJECTIVES

To compare diagnosis performance and effective dose of ultra-low-dose CT (ULD CT) versus radiographs in suspected spinal or pelvic ring or hip fracture for minor trauma.

METHODS

ULD CT, in addition to radiography, was prospectively performed in consecutive patients admitted to the emergency department for minor traumas, during working hours over 2 months. Presence of a recent fracture was assessed by two blind radiologists independently. Sensitivities and specificities were estimated using the best valuable comparator (BVC) as a reference and using a latent class model in Bayesian inference (BLCM). Dosimetric indicators were recorded and effective doses (E) were calculated using conversion coefficient.

RESULTS

Eighty areas were analyzed in 69 patients, including 22 dorsal spine, 28 lumbar spine, and 30 pelvic ring/hip. Thirty-six fractures (45%) were observed. Applying the BVC method, depending on location, ULD CT sensitivity was 80 to 100% for reader 1 and 85 to 100% for reader 2, whereas radiographic sensitivity was 60 to 85% for reader 1 and 50 to 92% for reader 2. With BLCM approach for reader 2, ULD CT sensitivity for all locations/dorsal spine/lumbar spine and pelvic ring-hip was 87.1/75.9/84.2/76.9% respectively. Corresponding radiograph sensitivity was 73.8, 54.8, 80.4, and 68.7%. Effective doses of ULD CT were similar to radiographs for dorsal and hip locations whereas for lumbar spine, ULD CT effective dose was 1.83 ± 0.59 mSv compared with 0.96 ± 0.59 mSv (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Sensitivity for fracture detection was higher for ULD CT compared with radiographs with an effective dose comparable to radiographs.

KEY POINTS

• Ultra-low-dose spine and pelvis CT demonstrates better fracture detection when compared with radiographs. • The effective dose of ultra-low-dose spine and pelvis CT scan and radiographs is comparable. • Replacement of radiographs by ULD CT in daily practice for trauma patients is an option to consider and should be evaluated by a randomized trial.

OPTimal IMAging strategy in patients suspected of non-traumatic pulmonary disease at the emergency department: chest X-ray or ultra-low-dose chest CT (OPTIMACT) trial-statistical analysis plan

Background

A chest X-ray is a standard imaging procedure in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of having non-traumatic pulmonary disease. Compared to a chest X-ray, an ultra-low-dose (ULD) chest computed tomography (CT) scan provides substantially more detailed information on pulmonary conditions. To what extent this translates into an improvement in patient outcomes and health care efficiency is yet unknown. The OPTimal IMAging strategy in patients suspected of non-traumatic pulmonary disease at the emergency department: chest X-ray or ultra-low-dose chest CT (OPTIMACT) study is a multicenter, pragmatic, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate replacement of chest X-ray by ULD chest CT in the diagnostic work-up of such patients, in terms of patient-related health outcomes and costs. During randomly assigned periods of 1 calendar month, either conventional chest X-ray or ULD chest CT scan was used as the imaging strategy. This paper presents in detail the statistical analysis plan of the OPTIMACT trial, developed prior to data analysis.

Methods/results

Functional health at 28 days is the primary clinical outcome. Functional health at 28 days is measured by the physical component summary scale of the Short Form (SF)-12 questionnaire version 1. Secondary outcomes are mental health (mental component summary scale of the SF-12), length of hospital stay, mortality within 28 days, quality-adjusted life year equivalent during the first 28 days (derived from the EuroQol five-dimension, five-level instrument), correct diagnoses at emergency department discharge as compared to the final post hoc diagnosis at day 28, number of patients in follow-up because of incidental findings on chest X-ray or ULD chest CT, and health care costs.

Conclusions

After this pragmatic trial we will have precise estimates of the effectiveness of replacing chest X-ray with ULD chest CT in terms of patient-related health outcomes and costs.

Trial registration

Netherlands National Trial Register: NTR6163. Registered on 6 December 2016.

Added Value of Ultra-low-dose Computed Tomography, Dose Equivalent to Chest X-Ray Radiography, for Diagnosing Chest Pathology

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical value of ultra–low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) compared with chest x-ray radiography (CXR) for diagnosing chest pathology.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 200 patients referred for CXR by outpatient clinics or general practitioners were enrolled prospectively. They underwent CXR (posteroanterior and lateral) and ULDCT (120 kV, 3 mAs) on the same day. In-room time and effective dose were recorded for each examination. Studies were categorized whether they were diagnostic or not, relevant radiologic diagnostic findings were reported, and confidence for diagnosis was recorded by a Likert scale. Differences in diagnostic confidence and effect on management decision were compared.

Results:

In-room time was <2 minutes for CXR and <3 minutes for ULDCT. Effective dose was 0.040 mSv for CXR and 0.071 mSv for ULDCT. CXR was considered diagnostic in 98% and ULDCT in 100%. The mean perceived confidence for diagnosis was 88±12% with CXR and 98±2% with ULDCT (P<0.0001), whereas discrepant findings between CXR and ULDCT were found in 101 of 200 patients. As compared with CXR, ULDCT had added value for management decisions in 40 of 200 patients.

Conclusions:

ULDCT provided added value to the radiologist by improved perceived confidence with a reduction in false-positive and false-negative CXR investigations that had management implications in 20% of patients. The effective dose of ULDCT will not be a limiting factor for introducing ULDCT of the chest on a broad scale in clinical practice.

CARE Dose 4D combined with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction improved the image quality and reduced the radiation dose in low dose CT of the small intestine

OBJECTIVE

Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) has been used for diagnosis of small intestinal diseases. However, the radiation dose is a big problem. This study was to investigate whether CARE Dose 4D combined with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) can provide better image quality at a lower dose for imaging small intestinal diseases compared to MSCT.

METHODS

The noise reduction ability of SAFIRE was assessed by scanning the plain water mold using SOMATOM Definition Flash double-source spiral CT. CT images at each stage of radiography for 239 patients were obtained. The patients were divided into groups A and B were based on different tube voltage and current or the image recombination methods. The images were restructured using with filtered back projection (FBP) and SAFIRE (S1-S5). The contrast noise ratio (CNR), CT Dose index (CTDI), subjective scoring, and objective scoring were compared to obtain the best image and reformation parameters at different stages of CT.

RESULTS

Twenty-six restructuring patterns of tube voltage and current were obtained by FBP and SAFIRE. The average radiation dose using CARE Dose 4D combined with SAFIRE (S4-S5) reduced approximately 74.85% compared to conditions where the tube voltage of 100 kV and tube current of 131 mAs for patients with MSCT small intestinal CT enterography at plain CT scan, arterial stage, small intestine, and portal venous phase. The objective and subjective scoring were all significantly different among groups A and B at each stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of CARE Dose 4D and SAFIRE is shown to decrease the radiation dose while maintaining image quality.

OPTimal IMAging strategy in patients suspected of non-traumatic pulmonary disease at the emergency department: chest X-ray or ultra-low-dose CT (OPTIMACT)-a randomised controlled trial chest X-ray or ultra-low-dose CT at the ED: design and rationale

BACKGROUND

Chest X-ray has been the standard imaging method for patients suspected of non-traumatic pulmonary disease at the emergency department (ED) for years. Recently, ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography (ULD chest CT) has been introduced, which provides substantially more detailed information on pulmonary conditions that may cause pulmonary disease, with a dose in the order of chest X-ray (0.1 vs. 0.05 mSv). The OPTimal IMAging strategy in patients suspected of non-traumatic pulmonary disease at the emergency department: chest X-ray or CT (OPTIMACT) study is a randomized trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of replacing chest X-ray for ULD chest CT in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of non-traumatic pulmonary disease at the ED.

METHODS

Two thousand four hundred patients presenting at the ED with pulmonary complaints and suspected of non-traumatic pulmonary disease will be enrolled in this multicenter, pragmatic, randomized trial. During randomly assigned periods of one calendar month, either conventional chest X-ray or ULD chest CT scan will be used as the imaging strategy. Randomization will rely on computer-generated blocks of 2 months to control for seasonal effects. Chest X-ray and ULD chest CT will be performed in a standardized way, after obtaining the clinical history and performing physical examination and initial laboratory tests. The primary outcome measure is functional health at 28 days. Secondary outcome measures are mental health, length of hospital stay, mortality within 28 days, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) during the first 28 days, correct diagnoses at ED discharge as compared to the final post hoc diagnosis, and number of patients in follow-up because of incidental findings on chest X-ray or ULD chest CT. In an economic evaluation, we will estimate total health care costs during the first 28 days.

DISCUSSION

This pragmatic trial will clarify the effects of replacing chest X-ray by ULD chest CT in daily practice, in terms of patient-related health outcomes and costs, in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of non-traumatic pulmonary disease at the ED.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The OPTIMACT trial is registered in the Netherlands National Trial Register under number NTR6163. The date of registration is December 6, 2016.

Submillisievert chest dual energy computed tomography: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To assess if diagnostic dual energy CT (DECT) of the chest can be achieved at submillisievert (sub-mSv) doses.

METHODS

Our IRB-approved prospective study included 20 patients who were scanned on dual-source multidector CT(MDCT). All patients gave written informed consent for acquisition of additional image series at reduced radiation dose on a dual-source MDCT (80/140 kV) within 10 s after the standard of care acquisition. Dose reduction was achieved by reducing the quality reference milliampere-second, with combined angular exposure control. Four readers, blinded to all clinical data, evaluated the image sets. Image noise, signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratio were assessed. Volumetric CT dose index (CTDI_vol), doselength product (DLP), size specific dose estimate, and effective dose were also recorded.

RESULTS

The mean age and body mass index of the patients were 71 years ± 9 and 24 kg m^-2 ± 3, respectively. Although images became noisier, overall image quality and image sharpness on blended images were considered good or excellent in all cases (20/20). All findings made on the reduced dose images presented with good demarcation. The intraobserver and interobserver agreements were κ = 0.83 and 0.73, respectively. Mean CTDI_vol, size specific dose estimate, DLP and effective dose for reduced dose DECT were: 1.3 ± 0.2 mGy, 1.8 ± 0.2 mGy, 51 ± 9.9 mGy.cm and 0.7 ± 0.1 mSv, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Routine chest DECT can be performed at sub-mSv doses with good image quality and without loss of relevant diagnostic information. Advances in knowledge: (1) Contrast-enhanced DECT of the chest can be performed at sub-mSv doses, down to mean CTDI_vol 1.3 mGy and DLP 51 mGy.cm in patients with body mass index <31 kg m^-2. (2) To our knowledge, this is the first time that sub-mSv doses have been successfully applied in a patient study using a dual source DECT scanner.

Value of 100 kVp scan with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm on a single-source CT system during whole-body CT for radiation and contrast medium dose reduction: an intra-individual feasibility study

AIM

To perform an intra-individual investigation of the usefulness of a contrast medium (CM) and radiation dose-reduction protocol using single-source computed tomography (CT) combined with 100 kVp and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) for whole-body CT (WBCT; chest-abdomen-pelvis CT) in oncology patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three oncology patients who had undergone WBCT under both 120 and 100 kVp protocols at different time points (mean interscan intervals: 98 days) were included retrospectively. The CM doses for the 120 and 100 kVp protocols were 600 and 480 mg iodine/kg, respectively; 120 kVp images were reconstructed with filtered back-projection (FBP), whereas 100 kVp images were reconstructed with FBP (100 kVp-F) and the SAFIRE (100 kVp-S). The size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), iodine load and image quality of each protocol were compared.

RESULTS

The SSDE and iodine load of 100 kVp protocol were 34% and 21%, respectively, lower than of 120 kVp protocol (SSDE: 10.6±1.1 versus 16.1±1.8 mGy; iodine load: 24.8±4versus 31.5±5.5 g iodine, p<0.01). Contrast enhancement, objective image noise, contrast-to-noise-ratio, and visual score of 100 kVp-S were similar to or better than of 120 kVp protocol.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the 120 kVp protocol, the combined use of 100 kVp and SAFIRE in WBCT for oncology assessment with an SSCT facilitated substantial reduction in the CM and radiation dose while maintaining image quality.

What Is the Applicability of a Novel Surveillance Concept of Ventilator-Associated Events?

BACKGROUND

In 2013, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a novel surveillance concept called the “ventilator-associated event,” which focused surveillance on objective measures of complications among patients that underwent invasive ventilations.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the concordance and possible differences in efficacy (ie, disease severity and outcomes) between 2 surveillance paradigms: (1) infection-related ventilator-associated complications (iVAC) and (2) on conventional ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

DESIGN

Prospective, observational, single-center cohort study.

PATIENTS

This study included 85 adult patients that received invasive ventilation for at least 2 consecutive calendar days in a 22-bed, adult, mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit in Finland between October 2014 and June 2015.

RESULTS

Among these patients, 9 (10.1 per 1,000 days of mechanical ventilation) developed iVAC (10.6%) and 20 (22.4 per 1,000 days of mechanical ventilation) developed conventional VAP (23.5%). The iVAC indicators were most often caused by atelectasis and fluid overload. Compared with patients with conventional VAP, patients with iVAC had significantly worse respiratory status but no other differences in disease severity or outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of conventional VAP was >2-fold that of iVAC, and the surveillance paradigms for VAP and iVAC capture different patterns of disease. Our results suggest that this novel surveillance concept, although based on objective measures of declining oxygenation, actually identified deteriorations of oxygenation due to noninfectious causes.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:983–988