Prospective intra-individual comparison of standard dose versus reduced-dose thoracic CT using hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction in a follow-up cohort of pulmonary nodules—Effect of detectability of pulmonary nodules with lowering dose based on nodule size, type and body mass index

Deep learning-based image domain reconstruction enhances image quality and pulmonary nodule detection in ultralow-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the image quality and lung nodule detectability of ultralow-dose CT (ULDCT) with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASiR-V) post-processed using a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR)-based image domain compared to low-dose CT (LDCT) and ULDCT without DLIR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 210 patients undergoing lung cancer screening underwent LDCT (mean ± SD, 0.81 ± 0.28 mSv) and ULDCT (0.17 ± 0.03 mSv) scans. ULDCT images were reconstructed with ASiR-V (ULDCT-ASiR-V) and post-processed using DLIR (ULDCT-DLIR). The quality of the three CT images was analyzed. Three radiologists detected and measured pulmonary nodules on all CT images, with LDCT results serving as references. Nodule conspicuity was assessed using a five-point Likert scale, followed by further statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 463 nodules were detected using LDCT. The image noise of ULDCT-DLIR decreased by 60% compared to that of ULDCT-ASiR-V and was lower than that of LDCT (p < 0.001). The subjective image quality scores for ULDCT-DLIR (4.4 [4.1, 4.6]) were also higher than those for ULDCT-ASiR-V (3.6 [3.1, 3.9]) (p < 0.001). The overall nodule detection rates for ULDCT-ASiR-V and ULDCT-DLIR were 82.1% (380/463) and 87.0% (403/463), respectively (p < 0.001). The percentage difference between diameters > 1 mm was 2.9% (ULDCT-ASiR-V vs. LDCT) and 0.5% (ULDCT-DLIR vs. LDCT) (p = 0.009). Scores of nodule imaging sharpness on ULDCT-DLIR (4.0 ± 0.68) were significantly higher than those on ULDCT-ASiR-V (3.2 ± 0.50) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

DLIR-based image domain improves image quality, nodule detection rate, nodule imaging sharpness, and nodule measurement accuracy of ASiR-V on ULDCT.

KEY POINTS

Question Deep learning post-processing is simple and cheap compared with raw data processing, but its performance is not clear on ultralow-dose CT. Findings Deep learning post-processing enhanced image quality and improved the nodule detection rate and accuracy of nodule measurement of ultralow-dose CT. Clinical relevance Deep learning post-processing improves the practicability of ultralow-dose CT and makes it possible for patients with less radiation exposure during lung cancer screening.

Ultra-low-dose vs. standard-of-care-dose CT of the chest in patients with post-COVID-19 conditions-a prospective intra-patient multi-reader study

OBJECTIVES

To conduct an intrapatient comparison of ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) and standard-of-care-dose CT (SDCT) of the chest in terms of the diagnostic accuracy of ULDCT and intrareader agreement in patients with post-COVID conditions.

METHODS

We prospectively included 153 consecutive patients with post-COVID-19 conditions. All participants received an SDCT and an additional ULDCT scan of the chest. SDCTs were performed with standard imaging parameters and ULDCTs at a fixed tube voltage of 100 kVp (with tin filtration), 50 ref. mAs (dose modulation active), and iterative reconstruction algorithm level 5 of 5. All CT scans were separately evaluated by four radiologists for the presence of lung changes and their consistency with post-COVID lung abnormalities. Radiation dose parameters and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ULDCT were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 153 included patients (mean age 47.4 ± 15.3 years; 48.4% women), 45 (29.4%) showed post-COVID lung abnormalities. In those 45 patients, the most frequently detected CT patterns were ground-glass opacities (100.0%), reticulations (43.5%), and parenchymal bands (37.0%). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ULDCT compared to SDCT for the detection of post-COVID lung abnormalities were 92.6, 87.2, and 94.9%, respectively. The median total dose length product (DLP) of ULDCTs was less than one-tenth of the radiation dose of our SDCTs (12.6 mGy*cm [9.9; 15.5] vs. 132.1 mGy*cm [103.9; 160.2]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

ULDCT of the chest offers high accuracy in the detection of post-COVID lung abnormalities compared to an SDCT scan at less than one-tenth the radiation dose, corresponding to only twice the dose of a standard chest radiograph in two views.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Ultra-low-dose CT of the chest may provide a favorable, radiation-saving alternative to standard-dose CT in the long-term follow-up of the large patient cohort of post-COVID-19 patients.

Biomarkers for Early Detection of Stroke: A Systematic Review

Stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide. Identifying reliable biomarkers for stroke diagnosis and risk prediction could significantly improve patient outcomes through earlier intervention and better risk management. The objective of this systematic review is to systematically review recent studies investigating biomarkers for stroke diagnosis and risk prediction and to synthesize the most promising findings. We conducted a systematic review of 10 studies published between 2008 and 2023 that examined various biomarkers in relation to stroke. Studies were evaluated for quality using a simplified version of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The reviewed studies investigated a diverse array of biomarkers, including lipids, inflammatory markers, hemodynamic markers, microRNAs, metabolites, and neurodegenerative markers. Key findings include the following: (1) non-traditional lipid markers such as triglycerides and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol may be more predictive of stroke risk than low-density lipoprotein; (2) inflammatory markers, particularly IL-6, showed strong associations with stroke risk; (3) hemodynamic markers like midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide (MRproANP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) demonstrated potential in distinguishing stroke subtypes; (4) specific microRNAs (miR-125a-5p, miR-125b-5p, miR-143-3p) were upregulated in acute ischemic stroke; (5) metabolomic studies identified novel markers such as tetradecanedioate and hexadecanedioate associated with cardioembolic stroke; (6) neurodegenerative markers (total-tau, neurofilament light chain) were linked to increased stroke risk. This review highlights the potential of various biomarkers in improving stroke diagnosis and risk prediction. While individual markers show promise, a multi-marker approach combined with clinical variables appears most likely to yield clinically useful tools. Further large-scale validation studies are needed before these biomarkers can be implemented in routine clinical practice.

Clinical value of deep learning image reconstruction on the diagnosis of pulmonary nodule for ultra-low-dose chest CT imaging

PURPOSE

To compare the image quality and pulmonary nodule detectability between deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) in ultra-low-dose CT (ULD-CT).

METHODS

142 participants required lung examination who underwent simultaneously ULD-CT (UL-A, 0.57 ± 0.04 mSv or UL-B, 0.33 ± 0.03 mSv), and standard CT (SDCT, 4.32 ± 0.33 mSv) plain scans were included in this prospective study. SDCT was the reference standard using ASIR-V at 50% strength (50%ASIR-V). ULD-CT was reconstructed with 50%ASIR-V, DLIR at medium and high strength (DLIR-M, DLIR-H). The noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and subjective scores were measured. The presence and accuracy of nodules were analyzed using a combination of a deep learning-based nodule evaluation system and a radiologist.

RESULTS

A total of 710 nodules were detected by SDCT, including 358 nodules in UL-A and 352 nodules in UL-B. DLIR-H exhibited superior noise, SNR, and CNR performance, and achieved comparable or even higher subjective scores compared to 50%ASIR-V in ULD-CT. Nodules sensitivity detection of 50%ASIR-V, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H in ULD-CT were identical (96.90%). In multivariate analysis, body mass index (BMI), nodule diameter, and type were independent predictors for the sensitivity of nodule detection (p<.001). DLIR-H provided a lower absolute percent error (APE) in volume (3.10% ± 95.11% vs 8.29% ± 99.14%) compared to 50%ASIR-V of ULD-CT (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ULD-CT scanning has a high sensitivity for detecting pulmonary nodules. Compared with ASIR-V, DLIR can significantly reduce image noise, and improve image quality, and accuracy of the nodule measurement in ULD-CT.

Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Improves the Image Quality of Low-Dose CT Colonography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the image quality of low-dose CT colonography (CTC) using deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) compared to iterative reconstruction (IR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults included in the study were divided into four groups according to body mass index (BMI). Routine-dose (RD: 120 kVp) CTC images were reconstructed with IR (RD-IR); low-dose (LD: 100kVp) images were reconstructed with IR (LD-IR) and DLR (LD-DLR). The subjective image quality was rated on a 5-point scale by two radiologists independently. The parameters for objective image quality included noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The Friedman test was used to compare the image quality among RD-IR, LD-IR and LD-DLR. The KruskalWallis test was used to compare the results among different BMI groups.

RESULTS

A total of 270 volunteers (mean age: 47.94 years ± 11.57; 115 men) were included. The effective dose of low-dose CTC was decreased by approximately 83.18% (5.18mSv ± 0.86 vs. 0.86mSv ± 0.05, P < 0.001). The subjective image quality score of LD-DLR was superior to that of LD-IR (3.61 ± 0.56 vs. 2.70 ± 0.51, P < 0.001) and on par with the RD- IR's (3.61 ± 0.56 vs. 3.74 ± 0.52, P = 0.486). LD-DLR exhibited the lowest noise, and the maximum SNR and CNR compared to RD-IR and LD-IR (all P < 0.001). No statistical difference was found in the noise of LD-DLR images between different BMI groups (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared to IR, DLR provided low-dose CTC with superior image quality at an average radiation dose of 0.86mSv, which may be promising in future colorectal cancer screening.

Ultra-low-dose computed tomography and chest X-ray in follow-up of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma-a prospective comparative study

Ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULD-CT) may combine the high sensitivity of conventional computed tomography (CT) in detecting sarcoma pulmonary metastasis, with a radiation dose in the same magnitude as chest X-ray (CXR). Fifty patients with non-metastatic high-grade soft tissue sarcoma treated with curative intention were recruited. Their follow-up involved both CXR and ULD-CT to evaluate their different sensitivity. Suspected findings were confirmed by conventional CT if necessary. Patients with isolated pulmonary metastases were treated with surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with curative intent if possible. The median effective dose from a single ULD-CT study was 0.27 mSv (range 0.12 to 0.89 mSv). Nine patients were diagnosed with asymptomatic lung metastases during the follow-up. Only three of them were visible in CXR and all nine in ULD-CT. CXR had therefore only a 33% sensitivity compared to ULD-CT. Four patients were operated, and one had SBRT to all pulmonary lesions. Eight of them, however, died of the disease. Two patients developed symptomatic metastatic recurrence involving extrapulmonary sites+/-the lungs between two imaging rounds. ULD-CT has higher sensitivity for the detection of sarcoma pulmonary metastasis than CXR, with a radiation dose considerably lower than conventional CT.Clinical trial registration: NCT05813808. 04-14-2023.

Ultra-low-dose CT vs. chest X-ray in non-traumatic emergency department patients - a prospective randomised crossover cohort trial

Background

Ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT) examinations of the chest at only twice the radiation dose of a chest X-ray (CXR) now offer a valuable imaging alternative to CXR. This trial prospectively compares ULDCT and CXR for the detection rate of diagnoses and their clinical relevance in a low-prevalence cohort of non-traumatic emergency department patients.

Methods

In this prospective crossover cohort trial, 294 non-traumatic emergency department patients with a clinically indicated CXR were included between May 2nd and November 26th of 2019 (www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03922516). All participants received both CXR and ULDCT, and were randomized into two arms with inverse reporting order. The detection rate of CXR was calculated from 'arm CXR' (n = 147; CXR first), and of ULDCT from 'arm ULDCT' (n = 147; ULDCT first). Additional information reported by the second exam in each arm was documented. From all available clinical and imaging data, expert radiologists and emergency physicians built a compound reference standard, including radiologically undetectable diagnoses, and assigned each finding to one of five clinical relevance categories for the respective patient.

Findings

Detection rates for main diagnoses by CXR and ULDCT (mean effective dose: 0.22 mSv) were 9.1% (CI [5.2, 15.5]; 11/121) and 20.1% (CI [14.2, 27.7]; 27/134; P = 0.016), respectively. As an additional imaging modality, ULDCT added 9.1% (CI [5.2, 15.5]; 11/121) of main diagnoses to prior CXRs, whereas CXRs did not add a single main diagnosis (0/134; P < 0.001). Notably, ULDCT also offered higher detection rates than CXR for all other clinical relevance categories, including findings clinically irrelevant for the respective emergency department visit with 78.5% (CI [74.0, 82.5]; 278/354) vs. 16.2% (CI [12.7, 20.3]; 58/359) as a primary modality and 68.2% (CI [63.3, 72.8]; 245/359) vs. 2.5% (CI [1.3, 4.7]; 9/354) as an additional imaging modality.

Interpretation

In non-traumatic emergency department patients, ULDCT of the chest offered more than twice the detection rate for main diagnoses compared to CXR.

Funding

The Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy of Medical University of Vienna received funding from Siemens Healthineers (Erlangen, Germany) to employ two research assistants for one year.

Personalized Chest Computed Tomography: Minimum Diagnostic Radiation Dose Levels for the Detection of Fibrosis, Nodules, and Pneumonia

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the minimum diagnostic radiation dose level for the detection of high-resolution (HR) lung structures, pulmonary nodules (PNs), and infectious diseases (IDs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A preclinical chest computed tomography (CT) trial was performed with a human cadaver without known lung disease with incremental radiation dose using tin filter-based spectral shaping protocols. A subset of protocols for full diagnostic evaluation of HR, PN, and ID structures was translated to clinical routine. Also, a minimum diagnostic radiation dose protocol was defined (MIN). These protocols were prospectively applied over 5 months in the clinical routine under consideration of the individual clinical indication. We compared radiation dose parameters, objective and subjective image quality (IQ).

RESULTS

The HR protocol was performed in 38 patients (43%), PN in 21 patients (24%), ID in 20 patients (23%), and MIN in 9 patients (10%). Radiation dose differed significantly among HR, PN, and ID (5.4, 1.2, and 0.6 mGy, respectively; P < 0.001). Differences between ID and MIN (0.2 mGy) were not significant (P = 0.262). Dose-normalized contrast-to-noise ratio was comparable among all groups (P = 0.087). Overall IQ was perfect for the HR protocol (median, 5.0) and decreased for PN (4.5), ID-CT (4.3), and MIN-CT (2.5). The delineation of disease-specific findings was high in all dedicated protocols (HR, 5.0; PN, 5.0; ID, 4.5). The MIN protocol had borderline IQ for PN and ID lesions but was insufficient for HR structures. The dose reductions were 78% (PN), 89% (ID), and 97% (MIN) compared with the HR protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Personalized chest CT tailored to the clinical indications leads to substantial dose reduction without reducing interpretability. More than 50% of patients can benefit from such individual adaptation in a clinical routine setting. Personalized radiation dose adjustments with validated diagnostic IQ are especially preferable for evaluating ID and PN lesions.

Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose and ultra-low-dose CT in detection of chest pathology: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Studies have evaluated imaging modalities with a lower radiation dose than standard-dose CT (SD-CT) for chest examination. This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence on diagnostic accuracy of these modalities - low-dose and ultra-low-dose CT (LD- and ULD-CT) - for chest pathology.

METHOD

Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched April 29th-30th, 2019 and screened by two reviewers. Studies on diagnostic accuracy were included if they defined their index tests as 'LD-CT', 'Reduced-dose CT' or 'ULD-CT' and had SD-CT as reference standard. Risk of bias was evaluated on study level using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. A narrative synthesis was conducted to compare the diagnostic accuracy measurements.

RESULTS

Of the 4257 studies identified, 18 were eligible for inclusion. SD-CT (3.17 ± 1.47 mSv) was used as reference standard in all studies to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of LD- (1.22 ± 0.34 mSv) and ULD-CT (0.22 ± 0.05 mSv), respectively. LD-CT had high sensitivities for detection of bronchiectasis (82-96%), honeycomb (75-100%), and varying sensitivities for nodules (63-99%) and ground glass opacities (GGO) (77-91%). ULD-CT had high sensitivities for GGO (93-100%), pneumothorax (100%), consolidations (90-100%), and varying sensitivities for nodules (60-100%) and emphysema (65-90%).

CONCLUSION

The included studies found LD-CT to have high diagnostic accuracy in detection of honeycombing and bronchiectasis and ULD-CT to have high diagnostic accuracy for pneumothorax, consolidations and GGO. Summarizing evidence on diagnostic accuracy of LD- and ULD-CT for other chest pathology was not possible due to varying outcome measures, lack of precision estimates and heterogeneous study design and methodology.

Ultra-low-dose CT reconstructed with ASiR-V using SmartmA for pulmonary nodule detection and Lung-RADS classifications compared with low-dose CT

AIM

To evaluate the accuracy of ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) with ASiR-V using a noise index (SmartmA) for pulmonary nodule detection and Lung CT Screening Reporting And Data System (Lung-RADS) classifications compared with low-dose CT (LDCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two-hundred and ten patients referred for lung cancer screening underwent conventional chest LDCT (0.80 ± 0.28 mSv) followed immediately by ULDCT (0.16 ± 0.03 mSv). ULDCT was scanned using 120 kV/SmartmA with a noise index of 28 HU and reconstructed with ASiR-V70%. The types and diameters of all nodules were recorded. The attenuation of pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) was measured on LDCT. All nodules were further classified using Lung-RADS. Sensitivities of nodule detection on ULDCT were analysed using LDCT as the reference standard. Logistic regression was used to establish a prediction model for the sensitivity of nodules.

RESULTS

LDCT revealed 362 nodules and the overall sensitivity on ULDCT was 90.1%. The sensitivity for solid nodules (SNs) of ≥1 mm diameter was 96.6% (228/236) and 100% (26/26) for SNs of ≥6 mm diameter. For pGGNs of ≥6 mm, the overall sensitivity was 93% (40/43) and 100% (29/29) for nodules with a attenuation value -700 HU or more. The agreement of Lung-RADS classification between two scans was good. On logistic regression, diameter was the only independent predictor for sensitivity of SNs (p<0.05). Diameter and attenuation value were predictors for pGGNs (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

ULDCT with ASiR-V using SmartmA is suitable for lung-cancer screening in people with a BMI ≤35 kg/m² as it has a low radiation dose of 0.16 mSv, high sensitivity for nodule detection and good performance of Lung-RADS classifications.

Feasibility of bronchial wall quantification in low- and ultralow-dose third-generation dual-source CT: An ex vivo lung study

PURPOSE

To investigate image quality and bronchial wall quantification in low- and ultralow-dose third-generation dual-source computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

A lung specimen from a formerly healthy male was scanned using third-generation dual-source CT at standard-dose (51 mAs/120 kV, CTDI_vol 3.41 mGy), low-dose (1/4th and 1/10th of standard dose), and ultralow-dose setting (1/20th). Low kV (70, 80, 90, and Sn100 kV) scanning was applied in each low/ultralow-dose setting, combined with adaptive mAs to keep a constant dose. Images were reconstructed at advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) levels 1, 3, and 5 for each scan. Bronchial wall were semi-automatically measured from the lobar level to subsegmental level. Spearman correlation analysis was performed between bronchial wall quantification (wall thickness and wall area percentage) and protocol settings (dose, kV, and ADMIRE). ANOVA with a post hoc pairwise test was used to compare signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), noise and bronchial wall quantification values among standard- and low/ultralow-dose settings, and among ADMIRE levels.

RESULTS

Bronchial wall quantification had no correlation with dose level, kV, or ADMIRE level (|correlation coefficients| < 0.3). SNR and noise showed no statistically significant differences at different kV in the same ADMIRE level (1, 3, or 5) and in the same dose group (P > 0.05). Generally, there were no significant differences in bronchial wall quantification among the standard- and low/ultralow-dose settings, and among different ADMIRE levels (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combined use of low/ultralow-dose scanning and ADMIRE does not influence bronchial wall quantification compared to standard-dose CT. This specimen study suggests the potential that an ultralow-dose scan can be used for bronchial wall quantification.

Observer Performance for Detection of Pulmonary Nodules at Chest CT over a Large Range of Radiation Dose Levels

Background There is a wide variation in radiation dose levels that can be used with chest CT in order to detect indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Purpose To compare the performance of lower-radiation-dose chest CT with that of routine dose in the detection of indeterminate pulmonary nodules 5 mm or greater. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, CT projection data from 83 routine-dose chest CT examinations performed in 83 patients (120 kV, 70 quality reference mAs [QRM]) were collected between November 2013 and April 2014. Reference indeterminate pulmonary nodules were identified by two nonreader thoracic radiologists. By using validated noise insertion, five lower-dose data sets were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) or iterative reconstruction (IR; 30 QRM with FBP, 10 QRM with IR, 5 QRM with FBP, 5 QRM with IR, and 2.5 QRM with IR). Three thoracic radiologists circled pulmonary nodules, rating confidence that the nodule was a 5-mm-or-greater indeterminate pulmonary nodule, and graded image quality. Analysis was performed on a per-nodule basis by using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic figure of merit (FOM) and noninferiority limit of -0.10. Results There were 66 indeterminate pulmonary nodules (mean size, 8.6 mm ± 3.4 [standard deviation]; 21 part-solid nodules) in 42 patients (mean age, 51 years ± 17; 21 men and 21 women). Compared with the FOM for routine-dose CT (size-specific dose estimate, 6.5 mGy ± 1.8; FOM, 0.86 [95% confidence interval: 0.80, 0.91]), FOM was noninferior for all lower-dose configurations except for 2.5 QRM with IR. The sensitivity for subsolid nodules at 70 QRM was 60% (range, 48%-72%) and was significantly worse at a dose of 5 QRM and lower, whether or not IR was used (P < .05). Diagnostic image quality decreased with decreasing dose (P < .001) and was better with IR at 5 QRM (P < .05). Conclusion CT images reconstructed at dose levels down to 10 quality reference mAs (size-specific dose estimate, 0.9 mGy) had noninferior performance compared with routine dose in depicting pulmonary nodules. Iterative reconstruction improved subjective image quality but not performance at low dose levels. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by White and Kazerooni in this issue.

Evaluation of Image Quality for 7 Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms in Chest Computed Tomography Imaging: A Phantom Study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the image quality of 7 iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms in comparison to filtered back-projection (FBP) algorithm.

METHODS

An anthropomorphic chest phantom was scanned on 4 computed tomography scanners and reconstructed with FBP and IR algorithms. Image quality of anatomical details-large/medium-sized pulmonary vessels, small pulmonary vessels, thoracic wall, and small and large lesions-was scored. Furthermore, general impression of noise, image contrast, and artifacts were evaluated. Visual grading regression was used to analyze the data. Standard deviations were measured, and the noise power spectrum was calculated.

RESULTS

Iterative reconstruction algorithms showed significantly better results when compared with FBP for these criteria (regression coefficients/P values in parentheses): vessels (FIRST: -1.8/0.05, AIDR Enhanced: <-2.3/0.01, Veo: <-0.1/0.03, ADMIRE: <-2.1/0.04), lesions (FIRST: <-2.6/0.01, AIDR Enhanced: <-1.9/0.03, IMR1: <-2.7/0.01, Veo: <-2.4/0.02, ADMIRE: -2.3/0.02), image noise (FIRST: <-3.2/0.004, AIDR Enhanced: <-3.5/0.002, IMR1: <-6.1/0.001, iDose: <-2.3/0.02, Veo: <-3.4/0.002, ADMIRE: <-3.5/0.02), image contrast (FIRST: -2.3/0.01, AIDR Enhanced: -2.5/0.01, IMR1: -3.7/0.001, iDose: -2.1/0.02), and artifacts (FIRST: <-3.8/0.004, AIDR Enhanced: <-2.7/0.02, IMR1: <-2.6/0.02, iDose: -2.1/0.04, Veo: -2.6/0.02). The iDose algorithm was the only IR algorithm that maintained the noise frequencies.

CONCLUSIONS

Iterative reconstruction algorithms performed differently on all evaluated criteria, showing the importance of careful implementation of algorithms for diagnostic purposes.

A feasibility study of pulmonary nodule detection by ultralow-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical value of ultralow-dose CT (ULDCT) with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASiR-V) in the detection of pulmonary nodules in a Chinese population.

METHOD

One hundred eighty-eight patients (16.41 ≤ BMI ≤ 29.87 kg/m²) with pulmonary nodules detected on low-dose chest CT (LDCT) underwent local ULDCT at the center of the chosen nodule with a scan length of 3 cm. LDCT was performed using the Assist kV (120/100 kV)/Smart mA mode and at 120 kV/2.8 mAs for ULDCT. After scanning, CT images were reconstructed with ASiR-V 50%. For both scans, nodule diameters were measured and reference standards were established for the presence and types of lung nodules found on LDCT. The sensitivity of ULDCT was compared against the standard, and logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictors for nodule detection.

RESULTS

Compared with LDCT (0.93 ± 0.32 mSv), a 89.7% dose decrease was seen with ULDCT, for which the calculated effective dose was 0.096 ± 0.006 mSv (P < 0.001). LDCT showed 188 nodules, including 123 solid and 65 subsolid nodules. The overall sensitivity for nodule detection in ULDCT was 90.4% (170/188), and 98.2% (54/55) for nodules ≥ 6 mm. In multivariate analysis, nodule types and diameters were independent predictors of sensitivity (P < 0.05). However, patients' BMI had no effect on nodule detection (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

ULDCT can be used in the management of pulmonary nodules for people with BMI ≤ 30 kg/m² at 10% radiation dose of LDCT.

Detection of pulmonary nodules: a clinical study protocol to compare ultra-low dose chest CT and standard low-dose CT using ASIR-V

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer screening in individuals at risk has been recommended by various scientific institutions. One of the main concerns for CT screening is repeated radiation exposure, with the risk of inducing malignancies in healthy individuals. Therefore, lowering the radiation dose is one of the main objectives for radiologists. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that an ultra-low dose (ULD) chest CT protocol, using recently introduced hybrid iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V, GE medical Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA), is as performant as a standard 'low dose' (LD) CT to detect non-calcified lung nodules ≥4 mm.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The total number of patients to include is 150. Those are referred for non-enhanced chest CT for detection or follow-up of lung nodule and will undergo an additional unenhanced ULD CT acquisition, the dose of which is on average 10 times lower than the conventional LD acquisition. Total dose of the entire exam (LD+ULD) is lower than the French diagnostic reference level for a chest CT (6.65 millisievert). ULD CT images will be reconstructed with 50% and 100% ASiR-V and LD CT with 50%. The three sets of images will be read in random order by two pair of radiologists, in a blind test, where patient identification and study outcomes are concealed. Detection rate (sensitivity) is the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes will include concordance of nodule characteristics; interobserver reproducibility; influence of subjects' characteristics, nodule location and nodule size; and concordance of emphysema, coronary calcifications evaluated by visual scoring and bronchial alterations between LD and ULD CT. In case of discordance, a third radiologist will arbitrate.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the relevant ethical committee. Each study participant will sign an informed consent form.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03305978; Pre-results.

Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations: a systematic review and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of lung cancer frequently occurs in its later stages. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) could detect lung cancer early.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of LDCT lung cancer screening in high-risk populations.

DATA SOURCES

Bibliographic sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library.

METHODS

Clinical effectiveness - a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LDCT screening programmes with usual care (no screening) or other imaging screening programmes [such as chest X-ray (CXR)] was conducted. Bibliographic sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library. Meta-analyses, including network meta-analyses, were performed. Cost-effectiveness - an independent economic model employing discrete event simulation and using a natural history model calibrated to results from a large RCT was developed. There were 12 different population eligibility criteria and four intervention frequencies [(1) single screen, (2) triple screen, (3) annual screening and (4) biennial screening] and a no-screening control arm.

RESULTS

Clinical effectiveness - 12 RCTs were included, four of which currently contribute evidence on mortality. Meta-analysis of these demonstrated that LDCT, with ≤ 9.80 years of follow-up, was associated with a non-statistically significant decrease in lung cancer mortality (pooled relative risk 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 1.19). The findings also showed that LDCT screening demonstrated a non-statistically significant increase in all-cause mortality. Given the considerable heterogeneity detected between studies for both outcomes, the results should be treated with caution. Network meta-analysis, including six RCTs, was performed to assess the relative clinical effectiveness of LDCT, CXR and usual care. The results showed that LDCT was ranked as the best screening strategy in terms of lung cancer mortality reduction. CXR had a 99.7% probability of being the worst intervention and usual care was ranked second. Cost-effectiveness - screening programmes are predicted to be more effective than no screening, reduce lung cancer mortality and result in more lung cancer diagnoses. Screening programmes also increase costs. Screening for lung cancer is unlikely to be cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), but may be cost-effective at a threshold of £30,000/QALY. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for a single screen in smokers aged 60-75 years with at least a 3% risk of lung cancer is £28,169 per QALY. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted. Screening was only cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000/QALY in only a minority of analyses.

LIMITATIONS

Clinical effectiveness - the largest of the included RCTs compared LDCT with CXR screening rather than no screening. Cost-effectiveness - a representative cost to the NHS of lung cancer has not been recently estimated according to key variables such as stage at diagnosis. Certain costs associated with running a screening programme have not been included.

CONCLUSIONS

LDCT screening may be clinically effective in reducing lung cancer mortality, but there is considerable uncertainty. There is evidence that a single round of screening could be considered cost-effective at conventional thresholds, but there is significant uncertainty about the effect on costs and the magnitude of benefits.

FUTURE WORK

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness estimates should be updated with the anticipated results from several ongoing RCTs [particularly the NEderlands Leuvens Longkanker Screenings ONderzoek (NELSON) screening trial].

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016048530.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Ultralow-dose CT with knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR) in evaluation of pulmonary tuberculosis: comparison of radiation dose and image quality

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the image quality of ultralow-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) reconstructed with knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR) in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB).

METHODS

This IRB-approved prospective study enrolled 59 consecutive patients (mean age, 43.9 ± 16.6 years; F:M 18:41) with known or suspected pulmonary TB. Patients underwent a low-dose CT (LDCT) using automatic tube current modulation followed by an ULDCT using fixed tube current. Raw image data were reconstructed with filtered-back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose), and IMR. Objective measurements including CT attenuation, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed and compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Overall image quality and visualization of normal and pathological findings were subjectively scored on a five-point scale. Radiation output and subjective scores were compared by the paired Student t test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively.

RESULTS

Compared with FBP and iDose, IMR yielded significantly lower noise and higher CNR values at both dose levels (p < 0.01). Subjective ratings for pathological findings including centrilobular nodules, consolidation, tree-in-bud, and cavity were significantly better with ULDCT IMR images than those with LDCT iDose images (p < 0.01), but blurred edges were observed. With IMR implementation, a 59% reduction of the mean effective dose was achieved with ULDCT (0.28 ± 0.02 mSv) compared with LDCT (0.69 ± 0.15 mSv) without impairing image quality (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

IMR offers considerable noise reduction and improvement in image quality for patients with pulmonary TB undergoing chest ULDCT at an effective dose of 0.28 mSv.

KEY POINTS

• Radiation dose is a major concern for tuberculosis patients requiring repeated follow-up CT. • IMR allows substantial radiation dose reduction in chest CT without compromising image quality. • ULDCT reconstructed with IMR allows accurate depiction of CT features of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Use of an Anthropomorphic Chest Model to Evaluate Multiple Scanning Protocols for High-Definition and Standard-Definition Computed Tomography to Detect Small Pulmonary Nodules

BACKGROUND This study aimed to use the LUNGMAN N1 anthropomorphic chest model to evaluate protocols for high-definition computed tomography (HDCT) and standard-definition CT (SDCT) to detect and compare small pulmonary nodules and determine the most appropriate low-dose scanning protocols. MATERIAL AND METHODS HDCT imaging used the Discovery HD750 scanner (80, 100, 120 and 140 kVp; 360, 320, 280, 240, 200, 160, 120, 80, 40, and 20 mA), and SDCT imaging used the Lightspeed VCT scanner (80, 120, and 140 kVp; 360, 320, 280, 240, 200, 160, 120, 80, 40, and 20 mA). The LUNGMAN N1 anthropomorphic chest model contained artificial pulmonary nodules (diameter: 5, 8, 10, and 12 mm). Low-dose scanning protocols were used in image acquisition. Two experienced radiologists evaluated the image quality. The combinations of voltage, tube current, image noise, and radiation dose were recorded. Consistency of the image quality between raters was assessed by kappa statistical analysis. RESULTS Seventy CT scans of pulmonary nodules (diameter, 5-12 mm) were performed. There was a high degree of consistency for image quality between the two observers (K=0.929 for 5 mm nodules; K=0.819 for overall image quality). For 8 mm nodules, 100% were detected on both SDCT and HDCT. HDCT outperformed SDCT by 5%, in terms of effective dose. There was no significant difference in image quality between the SDCT and HDCT scanners. CONCLUSIONS Using an anthropomorphic chest model, the identification and image quality using SDCT was similar to that of HDCT for small pulmonary nodules between 5-12 mm.

Radiation dose reduction techniques for chest CT: Principles and clinical results

Computer tomography plays a major role in the evaluation of thoracic diseases, especially since the advent of the multidetector-row CT (MDCT) technology. However, the increase use of this technique has raised some concerns about the resulting radiation dose. In this review, we will present the various methods allowing limiting the radiation dose exposure resulting from chest CT acquisitions, including the options of image filtering and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms. The clinical applications of reduced dose protocols will be reviewed, especially for lung nodule detection and diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism. The performance of reduced dose protocols for infiltrative lung disease assessment will also be discussed. Lastly, the influence of using IR algorithms on computer-aided detection and volumetry of lung nodules, as well as on quantitative and functional assessment of chest diseases will be presented and discussed.

Ultralow dose CT for follow-up of solid pulmonary nodules: A pilot single-center study using Bland-Altman analysis

Solid pulmonary nodules are a common finding requiring serial computed tomography (CT) imaging. We sought to explore the detection and measurement accuracy of an ultralow-dose CT (ULDCT) protocol compared with our standard low-dose CT (LDCT) nodule follow-up protocol.In this pragmatic single-center pilot prospective cohort study, patients scheduled for clinically indicated CT surveillance of 1 or more known solid pulmonary nodules >2 mm underwent ULDCT immediately after routine LDCT. The Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement for diameter and volumetry were calculated.In all, 57 patients underwent 60 imaging episodes, with 170 evaluable nodules. ULDCT detected all known solid pulmonary nodules >2 mm. Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated clinically agreement for both nodule diameter and volume, both of which fell within prespecified limits.This single-center pilot study suggests that ULDCT may be of use in surveillance of known solid pulmonary nodules >2 mm.