Comparison between multi-shot gradient echo EPI and balanced SSFP in unenhanced 3T MRA of thoracic aorta in healthy volunteers

Identification of peroneal artery perforators using non-contrast-enhanced T2prep multi-shot gradient echo planar imaging MRA

The purpose of this study was to investigate the spatial resolution of non-contrast-enhanced (CE) T2prep multi-shot gradient echo planar imaging (MSG-EPI) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) required to identify peroneal artery perforators and demonstrate its effectiveness in preoperative simulation. Twenty-six legs of 13 volunteers were scanned using non-CE T2prep MSG-EPI-MRA at three spatial resolutions: 1.0-, 0.8-, and 0.6-mm isotropic voxels. The location and number of peroneal artery perforators that could be candidates for free fibula flaps were identified by consensus among three plastic surgeons. Surgeons distinguished between septocutaneous and musculocutaneous perforators using MRA, and confirmed the accuracy of their presence and identification using ultrasonography (US). The ability to detect hypoplasia or stenosis of the anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and peroneal arteries was evaluated by confirming the consistency between the MRA and US results. The number of cutaneous perforators identified using MRA and confirmed using US was 39, 51, and 52 at each respective resolution. The discrimination accuracies between septocutaneous and musculocutaneous perforators were 92.3%, 96.1%, and 96.2%. The number of identified septocutaneous perforators was 1.3 ± 0.6, 1.6 ± 0.8, and 1.7 ± 0.8 at 1.0-, 0.8-, and 0.6-mm data, respectively. All the MRA results, including hypoplasia and stenosis, were consistent with the US results. Non-CE T2prep MSG-EPI-MRA with a spatial resolution of 0.8 mm or less shows promise for identifying septocutaneous perforators of the peroneal artery, suggesting its potential as an alternative to conventional imaging methods for the preoperative planning of free fibula osteocutaneous flap transfers.

Feasibility study of the multishot gradient-echo planar imaging sequence in non-enhanced and free-breathing whole-heart magnetic resonance coronary angiography

AIM

To investigate the feasibility of non-enhanced and free-breathing whole-heart magnetic resonance coronary angiography (MRCA) using multishot gradient-echo planar imaging (MSG-EPI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 29 healthy volunteers were recruited for free-breathing whole-heart MRCA acquisition using the MSG-EPI sequence and fast gradient echo (GRE) sequence. After the examination, the actual scanning times, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the left main (LM) coronary artery, subjective quality scores for each segment, and evaluable length of the coronary artery were recorded and statistically analysed.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the SNRLM of the MSG-EPI sequence and fast GRE sequence (p=0.130), but the CNRLM of the MSG-EPI sequence was higher (p=0.001). The subjective quality score of the mid- and distal left anterior descending branch as well as the distal circumflex branch of the coronary artery in the MSG-EPI sequence was higher than that in the fast GRE sequence (p=0.003, 0.001, and 0.003, respectively). The evaluable length of the left anterior descending branch and the circumflex branch was better using the MSG-EPI sequence than that of the fast GRE sequence (p=0.015 and < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, the scanning time of the MSG-EPI sequence was 54.5% less than that of the fast GRE sequence (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The MSG-EPI sequence improves the subjective and objective image quality of MRCA as well as reduces the scanning time.

Echo planar imaging with compressed sensitivity encoding (EPICS): Usefulness for head and neck diffusion-weighted MRI

PURPOSE

To evaluate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using echo planar imaging (EPI) with compressed SENSE (EPICS) of the head and neck magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHOD

We retrospectively observed 32 patients who underwent head and neck DWI according to either the conventional method (SENSE, reduction factor = 2), fast scanning method (SENSE, reduction factor = 4), or fast scanning method with EPICS (EPICS, reduction factor = 4). For quantitative analysis, contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, geometric distortion, and coefficient of variations (CV) were measured and compared. For qualitative analysis, all images were independently and blindly evaluated by two board-certified radiologists.

RESULTS

EPICS revealed the higher CNR between all location compared to those of SENSE with reduction factor = 4. Distortion in the anterior-posterior direction was significantly lower on EPICS than on the conventional scan (p = 0.02). A comparison between the ADC values of the EPICS and conventional scan revealed no significant differences. The CV was significantly lower for EPICS than the conventional scan [DWI: 0.22 (IQR: 0.15-0.30) vs 0.32 (IQR: 0.24-0.40), p = 0.02].

CONCLUSIONS

Compressed SENSE combined with the high acceleration factor can improve image quality, homogeneity, and distortion in the head and neck DWI maintaining ADC values and the scan time duration.

Three-dimensional multicontrast blood imaging with a single acquisition: Simultaneous non-contrast-enhanced MRA and vessel wall imaging in the thoracic aorta

PURPOSE

To evaluate MRA and vessel wall imaging (VWI) image quality in the thoracic aorta using a novel method named BRIDGE (bright and dark blood images with multishot gradient-echo EPI).

METHODS

The BRIDGE method consists of 3D multishot gradient-echo EPI acquisition using pulse gating, navigator gating, and magnetization preparation with a T₂ -preparation pulse and a nonselective inversion-recovery pulse. The BRIDGE and conventional methods (noncontrast MRA based on 3D turbo-field-echo [TFE] and VWI based on 3D turbo spin echo with variable refocusing flip angle [VRFA-TSE]) were performed in 10 healthy volunteers and 10 patients. The SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and sharpness in the thoracic aorta were compared for MRA evaluation. The values of SNR_lumen , SNR_wall , CNR_wall-lumen , contrast ratio (CR)_lumen-muscle , coefficient of variation, sharpness, lumen area, and wall area in the thoracic aorta were compared for VWI evaluation. Two radiologists independently performed qualitative image-analysis assessments.

RESULTS

When MRA and VWI were acquired, the acquisition time was 26.6% to 27.8% shorter with BRIDGE than the conventional method. In the MRA evaluation, BRIDGE and TFE methods were comparable. In the VWI evaluation, BRIDGE was superior to the VRFA-TSE method in blood suppression and evaluation of the ascending aorta. Because the blood signal suppression of BRIDGE is based on the T₁ value of blood, the blood signal can be suppressed more uniformly than with the VRFA-TSE method, regardless of age, blood flow velocity, or vascular anatomy.

CONCLUSION

The BRIDGE method can provide both MRA, to assess vascular anatomy and luminal changes, and VWI, to assess the vessel wall and detect vulnerable plaques, in a single scan.