3D hybrid profile order technique in a single breath-hold 3D T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence: Usefulness in diagnosis of small liver lesions

Deep learning-based reconstruction and 3D hybrid profile order technique for MRCP at 3T: evaluation of image quality and acquisition time

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the image quality of the 3D hybrid profile order technique and deep-learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) within a single breath-hold (BH) at 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 32 patients with biliary and pancreatic disorders. BH images were reconstructed with and without DLR. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the common bile duct (CBD) and periductal tissues, and full width at half maximum (FWHM) of CBD on 3D-MRCP were evaluated quantitatively. Two radiologists scored image noise, contrast, artifacts, blur, and overall image quality of the three image types using a 4-point scale. Quantitative and qualitative scores were compared using the Friedman test and post hoc Nemenyi test.

RESULTS

The SNR and CNR were not significantly different when under respiratory gating- and BH-MRCP without DLR. However, they were significantly higher under BH with DLR than under respiratory gating (SNR, p = 0.013; CNR, p = 0.027). The contrast and FWHM of MRCP under BH with and without DLR were lower than those under respiratory gating (contrast, p < 0.001; FWHM, p = 0.015). Qualitative scores for noise, blur, and overall image quality were higher under BH with DLR than those under respiratory gating (blur, p = 0.003; overall, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of the 3D hybrid profile order technique and DLR is useful for MRCP within a single BH and does not lead to the deterioration of image quality and space resolution at 3 T MRI.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Considering its advantages, this sequence might become the standard protocol for MRCP in clinical practice, at least at 3.0 T.

KEY POINTS

• The 3D hybrid profile order can achieve MRCP within a single breath-hold without a decrease in spatial resolution. • The DLR significantly improved the CNR and SNR of BH-MRCP. • The 3D hybrid profile order technique with DLR reduces the deterioration of image quality in MRCP within a single breath-hold.

Single-breath-hold T2WI MRI with artificial intelligence-assisted technique in liver imaging: As compared with conventional respiratory-triggered T2WI

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical feasibility of single-breath-hold T2-weighted (SBH-T2WI) liver MRI using Artificial Intelligence-assisted Compressed Sensing (ACS) technique in liver imaging as compared with conventional respiratory-triggered T2WI (RT-T2WI).

METHODS

From January 2021 to October 2021, 81 patients suspected of liver lesions were enrolled in this prospective study. The liver MRI was performed, including both RT-T2WI and ACS SBH-T2WI. Two experienced radiologists reviewed all images of each studied sequence, and recorded the lesion location and the largest diameter of the lesions. The image quality was quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed regarding signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast ratio (CR), motion artifact, lesion conspicuity, liver boundary sharpness, and overall image quality. The lesion detection and image quality were compared between two sequences using the Chi-square test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

For lesion detection, 64 lesions were identified in 53 enrolled patients as the reference standard. The average size was 12.09 ± 7.4 mm for the benign lesions and 45.89 ± 22.01 mm for the malignant lesions. Of 64 liver lesions, ACS SBH-T2WI detected 60 lesions (93.8%), and RT-T2WI detected 58 lesions (90.6%). For image quality analysis, the motion artifact of ACS SBH-T2WI sequence was significantly reduced compared with the conventional RT-T2WI sequence (p < 0.05). The SNR, liver boundary sharpness, and overall image quality showed no statistical differences between the two sequences. While the CNR, CR, and lesion conspicuity of ACS SBH-T2WI were significantly better than RT-T2WI (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The SBH-T2WI with ACS technique showed promising performance as it provided significantly better image quality and lesion detectability with a considerable decrease in scanning time as compared with the conventional RT-T2WI.

Single-breath-hold T2WI liver MRI with deep learning-based reconstruction: A clinical feasibility study in comparison to conventional multi-breath-hold T2WI liver MRI

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical feasibility of single-breath-hold (SBH) T2-weighted (T2WI) liver MRI with deep learning-based reconstruction in the evaluation of image quality and lesion delineation, compared with conventional multi-breath-hold (MBH) T2WI.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-two adult patients with suspected liver disease were prospectively enrolled. Two independent readers reviewed images acquired with conventional MBH-T2WI and SBH-T2WI at 3.0 T MR scanner. For image quality analyses, motion artifacts scores and boundary sharpness scores were compared using nonparametric Wilcoxon matched pairs tests between MBH-T2WI and SBH-T2WI. With the reference standard, 89 patients with 376 index lesions were included for lesion analyses. The lesion detection rates were compared by chi-square test, the lesion conspicuity scores and lesion-liver contrast ratio (CR) were compared using nonparametric Wilcoxon matched pairs tests between the two sequences.

RESULTS

For both readers, motion artifacts scores of SBH-T2WI were significantly lower than MBH-T2WI (P < 0.001). Boundary sharpness scores of SBH-T2WI were significantly higher than MBH-T2WI (P < 0.001). The lesion detection rates for SBH-T2WI were significantly higher than MBH-T2WI (P < 0.001); the differences of lesion detection rates between the two sequences were statistically significant for small (≤ 10 mm) liver lesions (P < 0.001), while not significant for larger (> 10 mm) lesions (P > 0.05). Lesion conspicuity scores were significantly higher on SBH-T2WI than MBH-T2WI in the entire cohort as well as in both stratified subgroups of lesions ≤10 mm and > 10 mm (P < 0.001 for all). CRs for focal liver lesions were also significantly higher with SBH-T2WI (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The SBH-T2WI sequence with deep-learning based reconstruction showed promising performance as it provided significantly better image quality, lesion detectability, lesion conspicuity and contrast within a single breath-hold, compared with the conventional MBH-T2WI.