Clinical utility of real-time ultrasound-multimodality fusion guidance for percutaneous biopsy of focal liver lesions

Image-Guided Liver Biopsy: Perspectives from Interventional Radiology

Liver biopsy is a crucial aspect of interventional radiology and plays a significant role in the management of hepatobiliary diseases. Radiologists commonly perform two major image-guided liver biopsy techniques: percutaneous and transjugular approaches. It is essential for radiologists to understand the role of liver biopsy in diagnosing and treating hepatobiliary conditions, the procedural details involved, and how to manage potential complications. This article reviews the indications, contraindications, techniques, and efficacy of image-guided liver biopsy, with a focus on both percutaneous and transjugular methods.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnostic value of focal liver lesions: A systematic analysis of 88 cases (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an important diagnostic tool for suspected parenchymal lesions in the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent organs. Our study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of EUS-FNA in focal liver lesions (FLLs).

METHOD

Data from 88 patients diagnosed with FLLs by imaging who underwent EUS-FNA from 1 January 2017 to 31 August 2022 were reviewed in our retrospective study at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and Ruijin Hospital of the School of Medicine of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. The EUS-FNA biopsy results were compared with the final diagnosis to evaluate diagnostic value. The relevant factors were analysed to determine their influence on EUS-FNA biopsy results.

RESULTS

The 88 patients analysed in this study resulted in a final diagnosis of 86 malignant and two benign cases. The overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA in FLLs was 93.18 % (82/88; 95 % Confidence Interval [CI], 87.9-98.5), with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 93.02 % (80/86; 95 %CI, 87.6-98.4), 100 % (2/2; 95 %CI, 100-100), 100 % (80/80; 95 %CI, 100-100), and 25 % (2/8; 95 %CI, -5-55.0), respectively. The parameters related to lesion and procedure were not significantly different between these two groups (p > 0.05). The number of puncture needles in the groups showed a statistically significant difference between multiple and single punctures (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our data revealed that EUS-FNA is a safe and reliable diagnostic method for FLLs that shows high accuracy.

Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus conventional ultrasound in biopsy of focal liver lesions

BACKGROUND

Focal liver lesions (FLLs) are a common form of liver disease, and identifying accurate pathological types is required to guide treatment and evaluate prognosis.

PURPOSE

To compare and analyze the application effect of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and conventional ultrasound (US) in the clinical diagnosis of focal liver lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 682 patients with space-occupying liver lesions admitted to our hospital between December 2015 and August 2021. Of these, 280 underwent CEUS-guided biopsies and 402 underwent conventional US biopsies, with the results of each biopsy subsequently compared between the two groups. The success rate and accuracy of the biopsies and their relationship with different pathological features were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The success rate, sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the CEUS group were significantly higher than those of the US group (P < 0.05). Lesion size accuracy in the CEUS group was significantly higher than that in the US group (89.29% vs. 40.55%; P < 0.05). Lesion type accuracy in the CEUS group was significantly higher than that in the US group (86.49% vs. 43.59%), and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The logistic regression analysis indicated that malignant lesions, lesions ≥5 cm, and lesions ≤1 cm were independent factors affecting the success rate of the puncture procedure (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of lesion size and type in the CEUS group were higher than those in the US group.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography-CT/MRI fusion guidance for percutaneous ablation of inconspicuous, small liver tumors: improving feasibility and therapeutic outcome

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is pivotal for treating small malignant liver tumors, but tumors often remain inconspicuous on B-mode ultrasound (US). This study evaluates the potential of CEUS-CT/MRI fusion imaging (FI) to improve tumor visibility and the associated RFA outcomes for small (≤ 3 cm) malignant liver tumors that were inconspicuous on US.

METHODS

Between January 2019 and April 2021, a prospective study enrolled 248 patients with liver malignancies (≤ 3 cm) that were poorly visible on B-mode US. Tumor visibility and ablation feasibility were assessed using B-mode US, US-CT/MRI FI, and CEUS-CT/MRI FI, and graded on a 4-point scale. CEUS was employed post-registration of US and CT/MRI images, utilizing either SonoVue or Sonazoid. Comparisons between US-based and CEUS-based fusion visibility and feasibility scores were undertaken using the Friedman test. Moreover, rates of technical success, technique efficacy, local tumor progression (LTP), and major complications were assessed.

RESULTS

The cohort included 223 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) (89.9%) and 23 metastases (9.3%), with an average tumor size of 1.6 cm. CEUS-CT/MRI FI demonstrated a significant advantage in tumor visibility (3.4 ± 0.7 vs. 1.9 ± 0.6, P < 0.001) and technical feasibility (3.6 ± 0.6 vs. 2.9 ± 0.8, P < 0.001) compared to US-FI. In 85.5% of patients, CEUS addition to US-FI ameliorated tumor visibility. Technical success was achieved in 99.6% of cases. No severe complications were reported. One and two-year post CEUS-CT/MRI FI-guided RFA estimates for LTP were 9.3% and 10.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS-CT/MRI FI significantly improves the visualization of tumors not discernible on B-mode US, thus augmenting percutaneous RFA success and delivering improved therapeutic outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05445973. Registered 17 June 2022 - Retrospectively registered, http://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05445973?id=NCT05445973&rank=1 .

CT-guided biopsies of unspecified suspect intrahepatic lesions: pre-procedure Lipiodol-marking improves the biopsy success rate

BACKGROUND

While computed tomography (CT)-guided liver biopsies are commonly performed using unenhanced images, contrast-enhanced images are beneficial for challenging puncture pathways and lesion locations. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CT-guided biopsies for intrahepatic lesions using unenhanced, intravenous (IV)-enhanced, or intra-arterial Lipiodol-marked CT for lesion marking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six-hundred-seven patients (men: 358 [59.0%], mean age 61 years; SD ±12.04) with suspect hepatic lesions and CT-guided liver biopsies were retrospectively evaluated. Successful biopsies were histopathological findings other than typical liver tissue or non-specific findings. Data was ascertained regarding the use of contrast medium for the biopsy-planning CT, unenhanced (group 1) vs. Lipiodol (group 2) vs. IV contrast (group 3). Technical success and influencing factors were insulated. Complications were noted. The results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon-Man-Whitney t-test, Chi-square test, and Spearman-Rho.

RESULTS

Overall lesion hitting rate was 73.1%, with significantly better rates using Lipiodol-marked lesions (79.3%) compared to group 1 (73.8%) and group 3 (65.2%) (p = 0.037). Smaller lesions (<20 mm diameter) benefited significantly from Lipiodol-marking with 71.2% successful biopsy rate compared to group 1 (65.5%) and group 3 (47.7%) (p = 0.021). Liver cirrhosis (p = 0.94) and entity of parenchymal lesions (p = 0.78) had no impact on the hitting rate between the groups. No major complications occurred during the interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-biopsy Lipiodol marking of suspect hepatic lesions significantly increases the lesion-hitting rate and is especially beneficial for biopsy of smaller targets below 20 mm diameter. Further, Lipiodol marking is superior to IV contrast for non-visible lesions in unenhanced CT. Target lesion entity has no impact on the hitting rate.

Lumbar nerve root blocks using MRI - the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound/MRI fusion image guidance

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcome of nerve root injection guided by ultrasound/MRI fusion with radiofrequency needle tracking (eTRAX^©) and the same procedure undertaken by fluoroscopic guidance.

METHODS

This is a retrospective audit of anonymised clinical records from before and after a change in the imaging technique used to perform nerve root blocks.We studied 181 consecutive patients who had undergone a nerve root block, the first 124 guided by fluoroscopic technique and the next 57 guided by ultrasound/MRI fusion with radiofrequency needle guidance.Using pain diaries, we reviewed the outcome scores at 24 h and 2 weeks. We recorded the use of analgesia, the patient's satisfaction, complications and the duration of the procedures.

RESULTS

Completed pain diaries were returned by 61% in the fluoroscopy group and 67% in the fusion imaging group.The visual analogue pain score was reduced at 24 h by 3.29 [standard deviation (SD) 2.35] for the fluoroscopy group and by 3.69 (SD 2.58) in the fusion group (p 0.399).At two weeks the pain reduction was 3.27 (SD 2.57) for the fluoroscopic group and 4.21 (SD 2.95) for the fusion group (p 0.083). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups.The patient's satisfaction scores were similar for both groups.The procedure by the two guidance methods took a similar time to perform.There were no serious complications in either group. One patient in the fusion-guided nerve root block group experienced paraesthesia in the nerve distribution for 2 h.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound/MRI fusion imaging with needle tracking is an effective alternative to fluoroscopic image-guided injection.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Fusion imaging guidance provides the same outcome as fluoroscopic guidance.Fusion imaging guidance avoids the need for ionising radiation.

Ultrasound fusion biopsy

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound (US)-guided biopsy is widely used for the diagnostic confirmation of focal lesions. For sampling of prostate tissue, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/US fusion-guided biopsy has already been implemented in routine clinical practice and has shown a superior detection rate of significant prostate cancer in risk assessment compared with standard systematic biopsy. Newer three-dimensional software tools with volumetric mapping of the prostate and biopsy core channels provide a better overview of systematic biopsy and thus contribute to more accurate treatment planning. Automatic fusion is a time-saver and can reduce potential examiner errors through greater standardization of the fusion process itself.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

In abdominal pathologies, US fusion biopsy can improve the rate of successful tissue sampling by using fused imaging to target lesions that are barely visible or difficult to delineate on B‑mode US scans. In addition, solid portions within larger tumors with enhancement on contrast-enhanced US can be targeted selectively, thereby avoiding sampling of necrotic areas and improving the quality of tissue cores for histopathological work-up.

CONCLUSION

Especially in complex situations, use of US fusion not only saves time but also improves sampling accuracy, which in turn reduces the rate of insufficient tissue specimens that necessitate repeat biopsy.

Utility of Real-time CT/MRI-US Automatic Fusion System Based on Vascular Matching in Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinomas: A Prospective Study

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the technical success rate of real-time computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound (CT/MRI-US) automatic fusion system and the long-term therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) guided by automatic fusion in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

139 patients with 151 HCCs were prospectively enrolled for RFA guided by an automatic CT/MRI-US fusion system (PercuNav system, Philips, the Netherlands). Automatic fusion imaging, based on vascular segmentation and registration, was performed by sonographic sweeping at the intercostal plane. The fusion quality, tumor localization confidence and technical feasibility were recorded before and after fusion using a scoring system. Technical success rate of the RFA procedure and local tumor progression (LTP) were assessed during follow-up. Analysis of technical success and LTP was performed using generalized estimating equations and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

The success rate of the fusion system was 82.7% (115/139) per patient. The mean sonographic scan time for fusion was 154.4 ± 108.4 s. In patients with successful fusion, the score indicating tumor localization confidence (2.2 ± 0.8 vs. 2.7 ± 0.9) and technical feasibility (2.6 ± 0.8 vs. 3.4 ± 0.7) increased after fusion (p < 0.001). The technical success rate of the RFA procedure was 96.8% (120/124) per tumor in patients with successful fusion, including poorly localized tumors. LTP rates were 8.6%, 12.2% and 15.2% at 1, 2 and 3 years.

CONCLUSION

The CT/MRI-US automatic fusion system showed a high success rate for image registration and facilitated better feasibility and a high technical success rate of RFA in HCCs, even with poor localization on US.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3b, Nonrandomized prospective study.

Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology

Liver biopsy is required when clinically important information about the diagnosis, prognosis or management of a patient cannot be obtained by safer means, or for research purposes. There are several approaches to liver biopsy but predominantly percutaneous or transvenous approaches are used. A wide choice of needles is available and the approach and type of needle used will depend on the clinical state of the patient and local expertise but, for non-lesional biopsies, a 16-gauge needle is recommended. Many patients with liver disease will have abnormal laboratory coagulation tests or receive anticoagulation or antiplatelet medication. A greater understanding of the changes in haemostasis in liver disease allows for a more rational, evidence-based approach to peri-biopsy management. Overall, liver biopsy is safe but there is a small morbidity and a very small mortality so patients must be fully counselled. The specimen must be of sufficient size for histopathological interpretation. Communication with the histopathologist, with access to relevant clinical information and the results of other investigations, is essential for the generation of a clinically useful report.

Complications After Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of a Population of More Than 12,000 Patients From 51 Cohort Studies

OBJECTIVES

Percutaneous liver biopsy (LB) has been considered the reference standard in distinguishing the degree of liver disease, but there has been no definitive systematic review to assess complication rates or potential risk factors for them.

METHODS

In this study, we searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for studies appraising complication rates after percutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided LB published until October 11, 2018. The safety and efficacy of US-guided LB were estimated according to major and minor complications. Subgroups including the biopsy style, needle styles, mean number of needle insertions, study period, and specific complication items were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 12,481 patients from 51 studies, pooled results showed a low rate (0; 95% confidence interval, 0-0) of major and minor complications. The subgroup analysis indicated that US-guided LB had a low major complication rate of 0 (0-0) for both fine-needle aspiration and core biopsy, with rates of 0.016 (0-0.032) for 14-gauge, 0.010 (0.003-0.017) for 15-gauge, 0.002 (-0.001-0.005) for 20-gauge, and 0 (0-0) for 16-, 17-, 18-, 21-, and 22-gauge needles, and low minor complication rates of 0 (0-0) for fine-needle aspiration and 0.001 (0-0.002) for core biopsy, with rates of 0.164 (0.137-0.191) for 15-gauge, 0.316 (0.113-0.519) for 16-gauge, and 0 (0-0) for 14-, 17-, 18-, 20-, 21-, and 22-gauge needles. Furthermore, specific complication rates of bleeding, pain, pneumothorax, vasovagal reactions, and death were all 0 (0-0).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that it is possible to safely perform percutaneous US-guided LB.

The AFSUMB Consensus Statements and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound using Sonazoid

The first edition of the guidelines for the use of ultrasound contrast agents was published in 2004, dealing with liver applications. The second edition of the guidelines in 2008 reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines for the liver, as well as implementing some nonliver applications. The third edition of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guidelines was the joint World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology-European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB-EFSUMB) venture in conjunction with other regional US societies such as Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, resulting in a simultaneous duplicate on liver CEUS in the official journals of both WFUMB and EFSUMB in 2013. However, no guidelines were described mainly for Sonazoid due to limited clinical experience only in Japan and Korea. The new proposed consensus statements and recommendations provide general advice on the use of Sonazoid and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of Sonazoid in hepatic and pancreatobiliary applications in Asian patients and to improve patient management.

The AFSUMB Consensus Statements and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound using Sonazoid

The first edition of the guidelines for the use of ultrasound contrast agents was published in 2004, dealing with liver applications. The second edition of the guidelines in 2008 reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines for the liver, as well as implementing some nonliver applications. The third edition of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guidelines was the joint World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology-European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB-EFSUMB) venture in conjunction with other regional US societies such as Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, resulting in a simultaneous duplicate on liver CEUS in the official journals of both WFUMB and EFSUMB in 2013. However, no guidelines were described mainly for Sonazoid due to limited clinical experience only in Japan and Korea. The new proposed consensus statements and recommendations provide general advice on the use of Sonazoid and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of Sonazoid in hepatic and pancreatobiliary applications in Asian patients and to improve patient management.

Decision-making based on 3D printed models in laparoscopic liver resections with intraoperative ultrasound: a prospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate impact of 3D printed models on decision-making in context of laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) performed with intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) guidance.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with liver malignances (74% were colorectal cancer metastases) were prospectively qualified for LLR or radiofrequency ablation in a single center from April 2017 to December 2018. Models were 3DP in all cases based on CT and facilitated optical visualization of tumors' relationships with portal and hepatic veins. Planned surgical extent and its changes were tracked after CT analysis and 3D model inspection, as well as intraoperatively using IOUS.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were included in the analysis. Information from either 3DP or IOUS led to changes in the planned surgical approach in 13/19 (68%) patients. In 5/19 (26%) patients, the 3DP model altered the plan of the surgery preoperatively. In 4/19 (21%) patients, 3DP independently changed the approach. In one patient, IOUS modified the plan post-3DP. In 8/19 (42%) patients, 3DP model did not change the approach, whereas IOUS did. In total, IOUS altered surgical plans in 9 (47%) cases. Most of those changes (6/9; 67%) were caused by detection of additional lesions not visible on CT and 3DP.

CONCLUSIONS

3DP can be helpful in planning complex and major LLRs and led to changes in surgical approach in 26.3% (5/19 patients) in our series. 3DP may serve as a useful adjunct to IOUS.

KEY POINTS

• 3D printing can help in decision-making before major and complex resections in patients with liver cancer. • In 5/19 patients, 3D printed model altered surgical plan preoperatively. • Most surgical plan changes based on intraoperative ultrasonography were caused by detection of additional lesions not visible on CT and 3D model.

Real-Time Contrast-Enhanced-Guided Biopsy Compared with Conventional Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Hepatic Tumors on a Background of Advanced Chronic Liver Disease: A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial

We aimed to compare contrast-enhanced-guided liver biopsy (CEUSLB) and ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (USLB) in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs) developed on a background of advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD). Between 2011 and 2019, patients diagnosed with liver tumors on a background of ACLD were evaluated for inclusion in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to the CEUSLB or USLB group. In total, 144 patients were randomly assigned to either CEUSLB (n = 79) or USLB (n = 65). Overall, in the CEUSLB group, the sensitivity was significantly better (94.74% vs. 74.6%, respectively; p = 0.001). Both the fragment length of the biopsy specimen and the single puncture success rate were statistically higher in the CEUSLB group (p = 0.022 and p = 0.0006, respectively). There was no difference in terms of major or minor complications (p = 0.682). CEUSLB is a feasible technique that increases the diagnostic sensitivity for liver tumors developed in ACLD.

Intraprocedural computed tomography/magnetic resonance-contrast-enhanced ultrasound fusion imaging improved thermal ablation effect of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison with conventional ultrasound

AIM

To retrospectively compare the treatment effect of intraprocedural computed tomography/magnetic resonance-contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CT/MR-CEUS) fusion imaging (FI) with that of conventional ultrasound (US) in the guidance and assessment of thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

The FI group (112 patients with 129 HCC) was treated between April 2010 and December 2012, whereas the US group (83 patients with 90 HCC) was treated between January 2008 and March 2010. Either CT/MR-CEUS FI or US was used to guide puncture, provide immediate assessment, and guide supplementary ablation. Technical efficacy, cumulative local tumor progression rate (LTP), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated and compared during follow-up. Technical success rate of CT/MR-CEUS FI was also recorded.

RESULTS

Technical efficacy was significantly higher in the FI group than in the US group (100% vs. 86.7%, P < 0.001). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year cumulative LTP rates in the FI group were significantly lower than in the US group (3.8%, 4.9%, 6.0%, 6.0%, 7.2%, and 7.2% vs. 16.9%, 20.1%, 25%, 25%, 25%, and 25%, respectively; P < 0.001); RFS and OS were significantly higher in the FI group than in the US group (P = 0.027 and P = 0.049, respectively). The technical success rate of FI was 85.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraprocedural CT/MR-CEUS FI improved the treatment effect of thermal ablation of HCC by immediately assessing treatment response and guiding supplementary ablation relative to those resulting from the use of conventional US.