Are contralateral parenchymal enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and genomic ER-pathway activity in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer related?

Background parenchymal enhancement and uptake as breast cancer imaging biomarkers: A state-of-the-art review

Within the past decade, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and background parenchymal uptake (BPU) have emerged as novel imaging-derived biomarkers in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of breast cancer. Growing evidence supports the role of breast parenchyma vascularity and metabolic activity as probable risk factors for breast cancer development. Furthermore, in the presence of a newly-diagnosed breast cancer, added clinically-relevant data was surprisingly found in the respective imaging properties of the non-affected contralateral breast. Evaluation of the contralateral BPE and BPU have been found to be especially instrumental in predicting the prognosis of a patient with breast cancer and even anticipating their response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Simultaneously, further research has found a link between these two biomarkers, even though they represent different physical properties. The aim of this review is to provide an up to date summary of the current clinical applications of BPE and BPU as breast cancer imaging biomarkers with the hope that it propels their further usage in clinical practice.

Contralateral parenchymal enhancement on MRI is associated with tumor proteasome pathway gene expression and overall survival of early ER+/HER2-breast cancer patients

Purpose

To assess whether contralateral parenchymal enhancement (CPE) on MRI is associated with gene expression pathways in ER+/HER2-breast cancer, and if so, whether such pathways are related to survival.

Methods

Preoperative breast MRIs were analyzed of early ER+/HER2-breast cancer patients eligible for breast-conserving surgery included in a prospective observational cohort study (MARGINS). The contralateral parenchyma was segmented and CPE was calculated as the average of the top-10% delayed enhancement. Total tumor RNA sequencing was performed and gene set enrichment analysis was used to reveal gene expression pathways associated with CPE (N = 226) and related to overall survival (OS) and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in multivariable survival analysis. The latter was also done for the METABRIC cohort (N = 1355).

Results

CPE was most strongly correlated with proteasome pathways (normalized enrichment statistic = 2.04, false discovery rate = .11). Patients with high CPE showed lower tumor proteasome gene expression. Proteasome gene expression had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.40 (95% CI = 0.89, 2.16; P = .143) for OS in the MARGINS cohort and 1.53 (95% CI = 1.08, 2.14; P = .017) for IDFS, in METABRIC proteasome gene expression had an HR of 1.09 (95% CI = 1.01, 1.18; P = .020) for OS and 1.10 (95% CI = 1.02, 1.18; P = .012) for IDFS.

Conclusion

CPE was negatively correlated with tumor proteasome gene expression in early ER+/HER2-breast cancer patients. Low tumor proteasome gene expression was associated with improved survival in the METABRIC data.

•

Contralateral parenchymal enhancement on MRI was associated with tumor proteasome gene expression in ER+/HER2-breast cancer.

•

A high contralateral parenchymal enhancement was associated with a low proteasome gene expression in the breast cancer.

•

Low proteasome tumor gene expression was associated with improved survival in an independent patient cohort.

Background parenchymal enhancement and breast cancer: a review of the emerging evidences about its potential use as imaging biomarker

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review of evidences about the relationship between background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of the contralateral healthy breast and breast cancer: its association with clinicopathological breast cancer characteristics, its potential as predictive and prognostic biomarker and the biological linkage between BPE and breast cancer.

METHODS

A computerized literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar was performed up to June 2020. Two authors independently conducted search, screening, quality assessment, and extraction of data from the eligible studies. Studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool.

RESULTS

Of the 476 articles identified, 22 articles met the inclusion criteria. No significant association was found between BPE and invasiveness, histological cancer type, T- and N-stage, multifocality, lymphatic and vascular invasion and histological tumour grade while the association between BPE and molecular subtypes is still unclear. As predictive biomarker, a greater decrease in BPE during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with pathological complete response. Results about the role of BPE as prognostic factor were inconsistent. An association between high BPE and microvessel density, CD34 and VEGF (histological markers of vascularization and angiogenesis) was found.

CONCLUSIONS

BPE of the contralateral breast is associated with breast cancer in several aspects, therefore it has been proposed as a tool to refine breast cancer decision-making process.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Additional researches with standardized BPE assessment are needed to translate this emerging biomarker into clinical practice in the era of personalized medicine.

Contralateral parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI before and during neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in relation to the preoperative endocrine prognostic index

Objectives

To investigate whether contralateral parenchymal enhancement (CPE) on MRI during neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is associated with the preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) of ER+/HER2− breast cancer.

Methods

This retrospective observational cohort study included 40 unilateral ER+/HER2− breast cancer patients treated with NET. Patients received NET for 6 to 9 months with MRI response monitoring after 3 and/or 6 months. PEPI was used as endpoint. PEPI is based on surgery-derived pathology (pT- and pN-stage, Ki67, and ER-status) and stratifies patients in three groups with distinct prognoses. Mixed effects and ROC analysis were performed to investigate whether CPE was associated with PEPI and to assess discriminatory ability.

Results

The median patient age was 61 (interquartile interval: 52, 69). Twelve patients had PEPI-1 (good prognosis), 15 PEPI-2 (intermediate), and 13 PEPI-3 (poor). High pretreatment CPE was associated with PEPI-3: pretreatment CPE was 39.4% higher on average (95% CI = 1.3, 91.9%; p = .047) compared with PEPI-1. CPE decreased after 3 months in PEPI-2 and PEPI-3. The average reduction was 24.4% (95% CI = 2.6, 41.3%; p = .032) in PEPI-2 and 29.2% (95% CI = 7.8, 45.6%; p = .011) in PEPI-3 compared with baseline. Change in CPE was predictive of PEPI-1 vs PEPI-2+3 (AUC = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.57, 0.96).

Conclusions

CPE during NET is associated with PEPI-group in ER+/HER2− breast cancer: a high pretreatment CPE and a decrease in CPE during NET were associated with a poor prognosis after NET on the basis of PEPI.

Key Points

• Change in contralateral breast parenchymal enhancement on MRI during neoadjuvant endocrine therapy distinguished between patients with a good and intermediate/poor prognosis at final pathology.

• Patients with a poor prognosis at final pathology showed higher baseline parenchymal enhancement on average compared to patients with a good prognosis.

• Patients with an intermediate/poor prognosis at final pathology showed a higher average reduction in parenchymal enhancement after 3 months of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07058-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Preliminary study on discriminating HER2 2+ amplification status of breast cancers based on texture features semi-automatically derived from pre-, post-contrast, and subtraction images of DCE-MRI

Objective

To investigate whether texture features extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) are associated with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) 2+ status of breast cancer.

Materials and methods

92 MRI cases including 52 HER2 2+ positive and 40 negative patients confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization were retrospectively selected. The lesion area was semi-automatically delineated, and a total of 488 texture features were respectively extracted from precontrast, postcontrast, and subtraction images. The Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was performed to identify statistically significant features between different HER2 2+ amplification groups. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to search for the optimal feature subsets. Three machine learning classifiers, logistic regression analysis (LRA), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), and support vector machine (SVM), were used with a leave-one-out cross validation method to establish the classification models of HER2 2+ status. Classification performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results

Based on the texture analysis with SVM model, the areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were 0.890 for subtraction images, 0.736 for postcontrast images, and 0.672 for precontrast images, respectively. For LRA model, the AUCs were 0.884, 0.733, and 0.623, respectively. For QDA model, the AUCs were 0.831, 0.726, and 0.568, respectively. LRA and the SVM model with subtraction images reached significantly better performance than the QDA model (P = 0.0227 and P = 0.0088, respectively).

Conclusion

Texture features of breast cancer extracted from DCE-MRI are associated with HER2 2+ status. Additional studies are necessary to confirm the present preliminary findings.

Harmonization of Quantitative Parenchymal Enhancement in T1 -Weighted Breast MRI

Background

Differences in imaging parameters influence computer‐extracted parenchymal enhancement measures from breast MRI.

Purpose

To investigate the effect of differences in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI acquisition parameter settings on quantitative parenchymal enhancement of the breast, and to evaluate harmonization of contrast‐enhancement values with respect to flip angle and repetition time.

Study Type

Retrospective.

Phantom/Populations

We modeled parenchymal enhancement using simulations, a phantom, and two cohorts (N = 398 and N = 302) from independent cancer centers.

Sequence Field/Strength

1.5T dynamic contrast‐enhanced T₁‐weighted spoiled gradient echo MRI. Vendors: Philips, Siemens, General Electric Medical Systems.

Assessment

We assessed harmonization of parenchymal enhancement in simulations and phantom by varying the MR parameters that influence the amount of T₁‐weighting: flip angle (8°–25°) and repetition time (4–12 msec). We calculated the median and interquartile range (IQR) of the enhancement values before and after harmonization. In vivo, we assessed overlap of quantitative parenchymal enhancement in the cohorts before and after harmonization using kernel density estimations. Cohort 1 was scanned with flip angle 20° and repetition time 8 msec; cohort 2 with flip angle 10° and repetition time 6 msec.

Statistical Tests

Paired Wilcoxon signed‐rank‐test of bootstrapped kernel density estimations.

Results

Before harmonization, simulated enhancement values had a median (IQR) of 0.46 (0.34–0.49). After harmonization, the IQR was reduced: median (IQR): 0.44 (0.44–0.45). In the phantom, the IQR also decreased, median (IQR): 0.96 (0.59–1.22) before harmonization, 0.96 (0.91–1.02) after harmonization. Harmonization yielded significantly (P < 0.001) better overlap in parenchymal enhancement between the cohorts: median (IQR) was 0.46 (0.37–0.58) for cohort 1 vs. 0.37 (0.30–0.44) for cohort 2 before harmonization (57% overlap); and 0.35 (0.28–0.43) vs. .0.37 (0.30–0.44) after harmonization (85% overlap).

Data Conclusion

The proposed practical harmonization method enables an accurate comparison between patients scanned with differences in imaging parameters.

Level of Evidence

3

Technical Efficacy Stage

4