1
|
Perrin JM, Monchal T, Texier G, Salou-Regis L, Goudard Y. Concordance of CT imaging and surgical lesions in penetrating abdominal trauma. J Visc Surg 2023; 160:407-416. [PMID: 37481414 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2023.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The management of penetrating abdominal wounds has greatly benefited from the development of computed tomography (CT), particularly in stable patients. In this setting, the scanner is the reference examination. Our study aims to evaluate the performance of preoperative CT in the assessment of penetrating abdominal lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between January 1, 2015 and January 1, 2022, 81 patients were hospitalized following penetrating abdominal trauma at the Army Training Hospitals of Sainte-Anne and Laveran. Fifty-one stable patients who had an abdominopelvic CT scan and thereafter underwent abdominal surgery (laparotomy or laparoscopy) were included. Radiological and surgical data were collected from the electronic record and compared by a descriptive analysis (calculation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the CT for the detection of lesions of the various organs) and by a correlation of the CT findings with surgical findings using Kripendorff's alpha coefficient. RESULTS The cohort was largely male (n=45; 88%), with injuries by knife wound in 62.7% of cases (n=32) and gunshot in 35.3% (n=18) of cases. The median age was 36years (25-47). The median index of severity score (ISS) was 17 (10-26). Excellent agreement between predicted and actual findings was obtained for solid organs (α=0.801) with high sensitivity and specificity (81.8% and 96.6%, respectively). The largest discrepancies were observed for the hollow organs (α=26.2%, sensitivity of 53.3% and specificity of 76.2%) and the diaphragm (α=67.3%, sensitivity 75%, specificity 92.3%). Surgical exploration was non-therapeutic for five patients (9.8%). The failure rate for non-operative treatment was 10% (n=1). CONCLUSION CT detection of solid organ lesions in patients with penetrating abdominal wounds is excellent. However, the detection of hollow organ and diaphragmatic wounds remains a challenge with a risk of over- and underdiagnosis. Laparoscopic exploration should be able to fill in the gaps in the CT findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Mathieu Perrin
- Visceral Surgery Department, Military Teaching Hospital Laveran, Marseille, France.
| | - Tristan Monchal
- Visceral Surgery Department, Military Teaching Hospital Sainte-Anne, Toulon, France
| | - Gaëtan Texier
- Aix Marseille University, IRD, AP-HM, SSA, VITROME, IHU Méditerrannée Infection, Marseille, France; Centre d'épidémiologie et de Santé Publique des Armées (CESPA), Marseille, France
| | - Laure Salou-Regis
- Visceral Surgery Department, Military Teaching Hospital Laveran, Marseille, France
| | - Yvain Goudard
- Visceral Surgery Department, Military Teaching Hospital Laveran, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giuffrida M, Perrone G, Abu-Zidan F, Agnoletti V, Ansaloni L, Baiocchi GL, Bendinelli C, Biffl WL, Bonavina L, Bravi F, Carcoforo P, Ceresoli M, Chichom-Mefire A, Coccolini F, Coimbra R, de'Angelis N, de Moya M, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Fraga GP, Galante J, Ivatury R, Kashuk J, Kelly MD, Kirkpatrick AW, Kluger Y, Koike K, Leppaniemi A, Maier RV, Moore EE, Peitzmann A, Sakakushev B, Sartelli M, Sugrue M, Tian BWCA, Broek RT, Vallicelli C, Wani I, Weber DG, Docimo G, Catena F. Management of complicated diaphragmatic hernia in the acute setting: a WSES position paper. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:43. [PMID: 37496073 PMCID: PMC10373334 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00510-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diaphragmatic hernia (DH) presenting acutely can be a potentially life-threatening condition. Its management continues to be debatable. METHODS A bibliographic search using major databases was performed using the terms "emergency surgery" "diaphragmatic hernia," "traumatic diaphragmatic rupture" and "congenital diaphragmatic hernia." GRADE methodology was used to evaluate the evidence and give recommendations. RESULTS CT scan of the chest and abdomen is the diagnostic gold standard to evaluate complicated DH. Appropriate preoperative assessment and prompt surgical intervention are important for a clinical success. Complicated DH repair is best performed via the use of biological and bioabsorbable meshes which have proven to reduce recurrence. The laparoscopic approach is the preferred technique in hemodynamically stable patients without significant comorbidities because it facilitates early diagnosis of small diaphragmatic injuries from traumatic wounds in the thoraco-abdominal area and reduces postoperative complications. Open surgery should be reserved for situations when skills and equipment for laparoscopy are not available, where exploratory laparotomy is needed, or if the patient is hemodynamically unstable. Damage Control Surgery is an option in the management of critical and unstable patients. CONCLUSIONS Complicated diaphragmatic hernia is a rare life-threatening condition. CT scan of the chest and abdomen is the gold standard for diagnosing the diaphragmatic hernia. Laparoscopic repair is the best treatment option for stable patients with complicated diaphragmatic hernias. Open repair is considered necessary in majority of unstable patients in whom Damage Control Surgery can be life-saving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gennaro Perrone
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Maggiore Hospital, Via A. Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
| | - Fikri Abu-Zidan
- Research Office, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- General Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Cino Bendinelli
- John Hunter Hospital, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Walter L Biffl
- Acute Care Surgery at The Queen's Medical Center, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'I, Honolulu, USA
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Department of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Bravi
- Healthcare Administration, Santa Maria Delle Croci Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Paolo Carcoforo
- Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Ferrara and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- General and Emergency Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Monza, Italy
| | - Alain Chichom-Mefire
- Department of Surgery and Obstetrics/Gynaecology, Regional Hospital, Limbe, Cameroon
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Riverside University Health System Medical Center, , Riverside, California, USA
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Marc de Moya
- Trauma/Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of General and Metabolic Surgery, Poissy and Saint-Germain-en-Laye Hospitals, Poissy, France
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Department of General Surgery, San Benedetto del Tronto General Hospital, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Gustavo Pereira Fraga
- Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Joseph Galante
- Trauma Department, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Rao Ivatury
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Jeffry Kashuk
- Department of Surgery, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- Department of General, Acute Care, Abdominal Wall Reconstruction, and Trauma Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Kaoru Koike
- Department of Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ari Leppaniemi
- Abdominal Center, University Hospital Meilahti, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ronald V Maier
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ernest Eugene Moore
- Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center,, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Andrew Peitzmann
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Boris Sakakushev
- General Surgery Department, Medical University, University Hospital St George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | | | - Michael Sugrue
- Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital, Letterkenny, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Brian W C A Tian
- Department of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Richard Ten Broek
- Surgery Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Imtaz Wani
- Department of Minimal Access and General Surgery, Government Gousia Hospital, Srinagar, India
| | - Dieter G Weber
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Giovanni Docimo
- Department of Medical and Advanced Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reitano E, Cioffi SPB, Airoldi C, Chiara O, La Greca G, Cimbanassi S. Current trends in the diagnosis and management of traumatic diaphragmatic injuries: A systematic review and a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of blunt trauma. Injury 2022; 53:3586-3595. [PMID: 35803743 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traumatic diaphragmatic injuries (TDI) are wounds or ruptures of the diaphragm due to thoraco-abdominal trauma. Nowadays, CT-scan is considered the gold standard for TDI diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the current diagnostic accuracy of CT-scan in the diagnosis of TDI and describe the management of this type of injury. METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent reviewers searched the literature in a systematic fashion using online databases, including Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar. Human studies investigating the diagnosis and the following management of TDI were included. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative likelihood (with corresponding 95% confidence intervals) were analyzed based on the bivariate model for blunt TDI. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies was used for the quality assessment of selected articles. The PROSPERO registration number was as follows: CRD42022301282. RESULTS Fifteen studies published between 2001 and 2019 were included. All included studies reported a contrast-enhanced computed tomography as the preferred method to obtain diagnostic imaging. Left-sided TDI was the type of injury most frequently found. False negative TDI at CT-scan were more frequent than false positive TDI (11.13 ± 23.24 vs. 2.66 ± 6.65). Six studies on blunt TDI were included in the meta-analysis, showing a high sensitivity [0.80 (95%CI 0.65-0.90)] and specificity [0.98 (95%CI 0.89-1.00)] of the CT-scan in detecting TDI. Overall, 7 articles reported laparotomy as the method of choice to repair TDI. Only 3 studies reported a laparoscopic and/or thoracoscopic approach to TDI repair. CONCLUSION CT-scan has a good sensitivity and specificity for blunt TDI diagnosis. However, TDI diagnosis and management are often delayed. The use of water-soluble contrast in CT-scan should be considered when the diagnosis of TDI is not defined after the first scan, and clinical suspicion is still high. In this context, a highly trained trauma team is essential for trauma management and correct imaging interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Reitano
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Via Solaroli 17, 28100, Novara, Italy.
| | | | - Chiara Airoldi
- Unit of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Department of Translation Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, AOU Maggiore della Carità, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- Unit of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Department of Translation Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, AOU Maggiore della Carità, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Gaetano La Greca
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological sciences, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 97, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Stefania Cimbanassi
- University of Milan, General surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Niguarda, Milano, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|