Radiation dose reduction capabilities of a new C-arm system with optimized hard- and software

Radiation dose during transarterial chemoembolization and associated factors

PURPOSE

To provide detailed reports on radiation doses during transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) era and to identify the associated factors.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 385 consecutive patients who underwent initial conventional TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between January 2016 and December 2017. In most cases, CBCT was performed at the common hepatic artery or celiac axis to confirm the location of the tumor and the three-dimensional hepatic artery anatomy. Superselective TACE was performed for all technically feasible cases. Information on total dose area product (DAP), total cumulative air kerma (CAK), fluoroscopy time, and DAP and CAK of each digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and CBCT scan was recorded. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with increased DAP during TACE.

RESULTS

The mean values of total DAP and CAK were 165.2 ± 81.2 (Gy·cm²) and 837.1 ± 571.0 (mGy), respectively. The mean fluoroscopy time was 19.1 ± 10.3 min. The mean DAP caused by fluoroscopy, DSA, and CBCT was 51.8 ± 43.9, 28.0 ± 24.1, and 83.9 ± 42.1 Gy·cm², respectively. Male sex, a high body mass index, largest tumor size > 3 cm, presence of aberrant right and left hepatic arteries, and superselective TACE were identified as independent predictors of increased total DAP during TACE.

CONCLUSION

We were able to provide detailed reports on radiation doses during TACE and associated factors.

Impact of dose reducing software on patient and staff temple dose during fluoroscopically guided pacemaker insertion, closure devices implantation and coronary angiography procedures

The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of dose reducing software (ClarityIQ) on patient and staff dose during fluoroscopically guided cardiac procedures. Dose measurements were collected in a room without dose reducing software (n = 157) and compared with similar procedures performed in two rooms with the software (n = 1141). Procedures included diagnostic coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, deployment of cardiac closure devices (for occlusion of atrial septal defect, patent foramen ovale, and atrial appendage) and insertion of permanent pacemakers. The dose reducing software was found to be effective in reducing patient and staff dose by approximately 50%. This study has added to the limited literature reporting on the capability of dose reducing software to decrease radiation exposure during the implantation of cardiac closure devices, as well as demonstrating a reduction in dose to the cardiologist and nursing staff. Administrators should ensure timely upgrades to angiographic equipment to safeguard patients and staff against the potentially adverse effects of radiation exposure. Regardless of the use of dose reducing software, the mean occupational dose during closure devices was in descending order scout > scrub > cardiologist. Scrub nurse dose was found to be higher than the cardiologist during closure devices (0.98/0.26 μSv) and diagnostic coronary angiograms (1.51/0.82 μSv). Nursing staff should be aware that their levels of radiation dose during some cardiac procedures may come close to or even exceed that of the cardiologist.

Comparison of radiation doses between hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer

Objective

To analyze the radiation dose received by patients during hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) procedures and the related influencing factors.

Methods

Data of 162 cases in the HAIC group and 230 cases in the TACE group were collected. The included covariates were Age (<45/45–59/≥60 years), BMI levels (underweight/normal weight/obesity), focus Dye of tumor (present/absent), lesion size (<5cm/≥5cm), superselection (present/absent), hepatic vascular variation (present/absent). The endpoints were postoperative dose-area product (DAP), exposure time and Air kerma (AK).

Results

Of all included patients, the HAIC group patients were younger than those in the TACE group (P ​= ​0.028). The proportion of patients with large lesions in the HAIC group was higher than the TACE group (45.7% vs. 33.9%, P ​= ​0.019). The proportion of patients who had superselection was lower in the HAIC group as compared to the TACE group (61.7% vs. 82.2%, P ​< ​0.001). Generally, the HAIC group has lower DAP, exposure time and AK by 36.3% (P ​< ​0.001), 38.2% (P ​< ​0.001), and 41.3% (P ​< ​0.001) than the TACE group, respectively. Linear regression analysis showed the procedure method (HAIC/TACE, P ​< ​0.001), type of DSA machine (Pheno/FD20, P ​< ​0.001), BMI levels (P ​< ​0.001), age (P ​= ​0.021), lesion size (<5cm/≥5 ​cm, P ​= ​0.031) significantly correlated with low DAP. In the HAIC group, the type of DSA machine and BMI correlated with the radiation dose, while in the TACE group, the type of DSA machine, BMI, and lesion size correlated with the radiation dose.

Conclusion

Compared with TACE, HAIC enables doctors and patients to receive lower radiation doses. Obese patients in both HAIC and TACE groups increase the radiation exposure in interventional doctors and patients, but large lesions only affect the radiation dose in the TACE procedure.