Comparison between 3-point Dixon- and CHESS-based OMERACT-recommended MRI protocols in hands of patients with suspicion of early rheumatoid arthritis

Image quality and evaluation ability of magnetic resonance imaging techniques for thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: Dixon fat-suppression technique vs. spectral attenuated inversion recovery

Purpose

We aimed to compare two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, Dixon and spectral attenuated inversion recovery (SPAIR) fat-suppression, in terms of image quality and suitability for evaluating thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) lesion characteristics.

Methods

This cross-sectional, retrospective study involved 70 patients with TAO (140 eyes) who underwent orbital coronal MRI examinations, including Dixon-transverse relaxation (T2)-weighted imaging (T2WI) and SPAIR-T2WI, between 2020 and 2022. We compared the fat-suppression quality and artifacts, noise (N), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal intensity ratio (SIR) of extraocular muscles (SIR-EOM) and lacrimal glands (SIR-LG), and TAO activity evaluation efficiency.

Results

Dixon-T2WI showed a higher frequency of better subjective image quality and suitability for evaluating the characteristics of TAO lesions (65.7% vs. 14.3%) than SPAIR-T2WI. Fat-suppression quality and artifact scores were lower for Dixon-T2WI than for SPAIR-T2WI (p < 0.001). The N, SNR, and CNR values, EOM-SIR, and LG-SIR were higher for orbital coronal Dixon-T2WI than for SPAIR-T2WI (all p < 0.001). Clinical activity scores (CASs) showed positive correlations with SIR. The correlation between EOM-SIR and LG-SIR of orbital coronal Dixon-T2WI with CAS was higher than that of SPAIR-T2WI (0.590 vs. 0.493, all p < 0.001; 0.340 vs. 0.295, all p < 0.01). EOM-SIR and LG-SIR of Dixon-T2WI yielded a higher area under the curve than SPAIR-T2WI for evaluating TAO activity (0.865 vs. 0.760, p < 0.001; 0.695 vs. 0.617, p = 0.017).

Conclusion

Dixon-T2WI yields higher image quality than SPAIR-T2WI. Furthermore, it has a stronger ability to evaluate TAO inflammation than SPAIR, with higher sensitivity and specificity in active TAO staging.

Comparison between 2D FSE T2-weighted Dixon MRI and contrast-enhanced 2D FSE and 3D FSPGR T1-weighted Dixon MRI to quantify inflammation in hands of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare two-dimensional (2D) T2-weighted, contrast-enhanced 2D T1-weighted and contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted Dixon MRI sequences to assess disease activity using the RAMRIS scoring system in hands of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients (19 women, 6 men; mean age 51.4 years ± 12.7 years [SD], age range: 28-70 years) with rheumatoid arthritis prospectively underwent MRI examination of both hands at 1.5 T using 2D fast spin-echo (FSE) T2-weighted, contrast-enhanced 2D FSE T1-weighted and contrast-enhanced 3D fast spoiled gradient echo (FSPGR) T1-weighted Dixon sequences. Three radiologists independently assessed disease activity according to RAMRIS using Dixon water-only and fat-only images. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess inter-technique and interobserver agreements.

RESULTS

Agreement to assess total RAMRIS score was very good between the MRI protocols (mean ICC ranging from 0.81 to 0.93) and between readers (mean ICC ranging from 0.91 to 0.94). Mean total RAMRIS scores of the three readers were significantly greater with contrast-enhanced 3D FSPGR T1-weighted (42.73 ± 29.39) than with contrast-enhanced 2D FSE T1-weighted (35.81 ± 25.48) and 2D FSE T2-weighted (32.20 ± 25.06) Dixon sequences.

CONCLUSION

2D FSE T2-weighted, contrast-enhanced 2D FSE T1-weighted Dixon and contrast-enhanced 3D FSPGR T1-weighted Dixon protocols are reproducible alternatives for the RAMRIS scoring in hands of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Coupling contrast-enhanced 3D FSPGR T1-weighted and 2D FSE T2-weighted sequences might be the most efficient option to completely assess the rheumatoid arthritis -related synovial and bone changes with the Dixon method.

Towards a simplified fluid-sensitive MRI protocol in small joints of the hand in early arthritis patients: reliability between modified Dixon and regular Gadolinium enhanced TSE fat saturated MRI-sequences

OBJECTIVE

MRI of small joints plays an important role in the early detection and early treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Despite its sensitivity to demonstrate inflammation, clinical use is hampered by accessibility, long scan time, intravenous contrast, and consequent high costs. To improve the feasibility of MRI implementation in clinical practice, we introduce a modified Dixon sequence, which does not require contrast and reduces total acquisition time to 6 min. Because the reliability in relation to conventional MRI sequences is unknown, we determined this.

METHODS

In 29 consecutive early arthritis patients, coronal and axial T2-weighted modified Dixon acquisitions on 3.0 T MRI scanner were acquired from metacarpophalangeal 2-5 to the wrist, followed by the standard contrast-enhanced protocol on 1.5 T extremity MRI. Two readers scored osteitis, synovitis and tenosynovitis (summed as total MRI-inflammation), and erosions (all summed as total Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Score (RAMRIS)). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between readers, and comparing the two sequences, were studied. Spearman correlations were determined.

RESULTS

Performance between readers was good/excellent. Comparing modified Dixon and conventional sequences revealed good/excellent reliability: ICC for total MRI-inflammation score was 0.84 (95% CI:0.70-0.92), for erosions 0.90 (95% CI:0.79-0.96), and for the total RAMRIS score 0.88 (95% CI:0.77-0.94). The scores of total MRI-inflammation, total erosions, and total RAMRIS were highly correlated (ρ = 0.80, ρ = 0.81, ρ = 0.82, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The modified Dixon protocol is reliable compared to the conventional MRI protocol, suggesting it is accurate to detect MRI inflammation. The good correlation may be the first step towards a patient-friendly, short and affordable MRI protocol, which can facilitate the implementation of MRI for early detection of inflammation in rheumatology practice.

The value of MRI for detecting subclinical joint inflammation in clinically suspect arthralgia

In the last decade, much research has focused on the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the symptomatic phase preceding the onset of clinical arthritis. Observational studies on imaging have revealed that subclinical joint inflammation in patients with arthralgia at risk for RA precedes and predicts the onset of clinically apparent arthritis. Moreover, the results of two placebo-controlled randomised proof-of-concept trials in patients with arthralgia and MRI-detected subclinical inflammation studies will soon be available. The initial results are encouraging and suggest a beneficial effect of DMARD treatment on subclinical inflammation. Since this may increase the necessity to detect subclinical joint inflammation in persons with arthralgia that are at risk for RA, we will here review what has been learnt about subclinical inflammation in at-risk individuals by means of imaging. We will focus on MRI as this method has the best sensitivity and reproducibility. We evaluate the prognostic value of MRI-detected subclinical inflammation and assess the lessons learnt from MRIs about the tissues that are inflamed early on and are associated with the clinical phenotype in arthralgia at risk for RA, for example, subclinical tenosynovitis underlying pain and impaired hand function. Finally, because long scan times and the need for intravenous-contrast agent contribute to high costs and limited feasibility of current MRI protocols, we discuss progress that is being made in the field of MRI and that can result in a future-proof way of imaging that is useful for assessment of joint inflammation on a large scale, also in a society with social distancing due to COVID-19 restrictions.

MRI of Hands with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: Usefulness of Three-Point Dixon Sequences to Quantitatively Assess Disease Activity

The use of efficient treatment with a treat-to-target strategy combined with early detection of the disease completely changed the imaging presentation and outcome of newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has become the reference technique in clinical research to detect and quantify inflammatory involvement of the soft tissues (synovitis and tenosynovitis) and bone marrow (osteitis) along with structural damages of the bone (erosions) in hands of patients with RA. Three-point Dixon MRI may be a valuable alternative to the currently recommended sequences as it yields effective fat signal suppression, high imaging quality and reproducible assessment of disease activity.

India ink artifact on Dixon out-of-phase images can be used as a landmark to measure joint space width at MRI

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of joint space width (JSW) measurement on Dixon MR images with the "India ink" artifact between cartilage and bone marrow as a landmark for the subchondral plate and to correlate it with radiographic JSW.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both hands of six volunteers (three women, three men; mean age, 36.7 ± 10.4 [SD] years) and 24 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (16 women, 8 men; mean age, 45.7 ± 14.5 [SD] years) were imaged with MRI Dixon sequences and radiographs. Two radiologists (R1, R2) separately measured JSW in 11 joints per hand on all Dixon images in volunteers, on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted out-of-phase images in patients and on radiographs in both groups. Inter-technique, intra-observer and inter-observer agreements were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland Altman analysis.

RESULTS

In volunteers, agreement between JSW measurements on MRI and radiographs was the highest with T1-weighted Dixon out-of-phase images (mean ICC ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 for R1 and 0.65 to 0.74 for R2). In patients, median bias between JSW measurements at first and second readings was not statistically significantly different from 0 on T1-weighted Dixon out-of-phase images (mean bias of 0.00 and + 0.01 mm) and radiographs (mean bias of 0.00 and +0.01 mm). Median bias of the difference between measurements of R1 and R2 was statistically significantly different from 0 on T1-weighted Dixon out-of-phase images (mean bias of -0.11 and -0.09 mm; P < 0.039) and radiographs (mean bias of -0.24 and -0.20 mm; P < 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Measurement of hand JSW on T1-weighted Dixon out-of-phase images using India ink artifact as a landmark for the subchondral plate is repeatable and reproducible.

Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted Dixon water- and fat-only images to assess osteitis and erosions according to RAMRIS in hands of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE

To assess the agreement between readers using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted Dixon water- and fat-only images and OMERACT-recommended sequences for the scoring of osteitis and erosions according to the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) MRI scoring system (RAMRIS) in hands of patients with early RA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both hands of 24 patients (16 women, 8 men; mean age, 45.7±14.5 [SD] years; age range: 25-70 years) with early RA were prospectively imaged with fat-saturated T2-weighted sequences, non-Dixon T1-weighted imaging prior to contrast material injection and T1-weighted Dixon imaging after contrast material injection at 1.5T. There were Two radiologists separately quantified osteitis and erosions according to RAMRIS using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted Dixon water-only and fat-saturated T2-weighted images for osteitis and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted Dixon fat-only and T1-weighted images prior to contrast material injection for erosions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess inter-technique, intra-observer and inter-observer agreement.

RESULTS

Mean ICC for the agreement between Dixon and non-Dixon images ranged from 0.68 (95%CI: 0.20-0.90) to 0.99 (95%CI: 0.95-1.00) for the scoring of osteitis and from 0.77 (95%CI: 0.38-0.93) to 0.99 (95%CI: 0.95-1.00) for the scoring of erosions. Mean ICC for the agreement between first and second readings ranged from 0.94 (95%CI: 0.81-0.98) to 0.97 (95%CI: 0.91-0.99) for the scoring of osteitis using Dixon and 0.91 (95%CI: 0.72-0.97) to 0.98 (95%CI: 0.92-0.99) using non-Dixon images and from 0.80 (95%CI: 0.45-0.94) to 0.97 (95%CI: 0.91-0.99) for the scoring of erosions using Dixon and 0.72 (95%CI: 0.29-0.91) to 0.98 (95%CI: 0.92-0.99) using non-Dixon images.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted Dixon water- and fat-only images can serve as an alternative to fat-saturated T2-weighted and T1-weighted MRI sequences for the assessment of osteitis and erosions according to the RAMRIS scoring system in hands of patients with early RA.