High-resolution three-dimensional T1-weighted hepatobiliary MR cholangiography using Gd-EOB-DTPA for assessment of biliary tree anatomy: Parallel imaging versus compressed sensing

Breath-hold High-resolution T1-weighted Gradient Echo Liver MR Imaging with Compressed Sensing Obtained during the Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Hepatobiliary Phase: Image Quality and Lesion Visibility Compared with a Standard T1-weighted Sequence

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of breath-hold (BH) high-resolution (HR) T1-weighted gradient echo hepatobiliary phase (HBP) imaging using compressed sensing (CS) in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI in comparison with standard HBP imaging using parallel imaging (PI).

METHODS

The study included 122 patients with liver tumors with hypointensity in the HBP who underwent both HR HBP imaging with CS and standard HBP imaging with PI. Two radiologists evaluated the liver edge sharpness, hepatic vessel conspicuity, bile duct conspicuity, image noise, and overall image quality, as well as the lesion conspicuity on HR and standard HBP imaging and the contrast-enhanced (CE) MR cholangiography (MRC) image quality reconstructed from HBP images. As a quantitative analysis, the SNR of the liver and the liver to lesion signal intensity ratio (LLSIR) were also determined.

RESULTS

The liver edge sharpness, hepatic vessel conspicuity, bile duct conspicuity, and overall image quality as well as the lesion conspicuity and the LLSIR on HR HBP imaging with CS were significantly higher than those on standard HBP imaging (all of P < 0.001). The image quality of CE-MRC reconstructed from HR HBP imaging with CS was also significantly higher than that from standard HBP imaging (P < 0.001). Conversely, the SNR of liver in standard HBP was significantly higher than that in HR HBP with CS (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

BH HR HBP imaging with CS provided an improved overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, and CE-MRC visualization when compared with standard HBP imaging without extending the acquisition time.

Imaging of the Liver and Pancreas: The Added Value of MRI

MR is a powerful diagnostic tool in the diagnosis and management of most hepatic and pancreatic diseases. Thanks to its multiple sequences, the use of dedicated contrast media and special techniques, it allows a multiparametric approach able to provide both morphological and functional information for many pathological conditions. The knowledge of correct technique is fundamental in order to obtain a correct diagnosis. In this paper, different MR sequences will be illustrated in the evaluation of liver and pancreatic diseases, especially those sequences which provide information not otherwise obtainable with other imaging techniques. Practical MR protocols with the most common indications of MR in the study of the liver and pancreas are provided.

Compressed sensing for breath-hold high-resolution hepatobiliary phase imaging: image noise, artifact, biliary anatomy evaluation, and focal lesion detection in comparison with parallel imaging

PURPOSE

To assess image quality, performance for biliary anatomy diagnosis, and focal lesion detection rate of breath-hold high-resolution 3D T1-weighted hepatobiliary phase imaging using compressed sensing (CS HBP) compared to standard HBP using conventional parallel imaging.

METHODS

This retrospective study assessed consecutive 125 patients who underwent CS HBP and standard HBP between November 2019 and July 2020. Optimized resolution and scan time for CS HBP were 1 × 1.4 × 1 mm³ and 15 s, while those for standard HBP were 1.3 × 1.8 × 3 mm³ and 16 s. Two independent radiologists evaluated qualitative indices on the clarity of liver margin, visibility of the hepatic vessel and bile duct, image noise, and artifact on a 5-point scale. Biliary anatomy, confidence for biliary anatomy diagnosis, expected number of bile duct openings, and number of focal lesions were assessed. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Pearson chi-square test, and sensitivity for focal lesion were used for statistical analysis. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's kappa (κ) were used to determine inter-observer agreement.

RESULTS

CS HBP showed significantly better liver edge sharpness and bile duct visualization, but greater subjective image noise and non-respiratory artifacts compared to standard HBP. CS HBP showed higher number of concordantly assigned biliary anatomy across readers (86 vs. 80), indicating greater inter-observer agreement for biliary anatomy (κ, 0.67 vs. 0.45) and the number of bile duct openings (ICC, 0.860 vs. 0.579) with significantly higher diagnostic confidence (4.70-4.74 vs. 3.96-4.55; p = 0.002). Both readers identified more focal lesions in CS HBP than in standard HBP (88.2% and 84.5% vs. 66.3% and 73.4%).

CONCLUSION

Breath-hold high-resolution CS HBP was a feasible clinical sequence providing superior liver edge sharpness, bile duct visualization, and focal lesion detection rate compared to standard HBP despite higher noise and artifact. Due to improved spatial resolution, CS HBP yielded a higher inter-observer agreement and confidence for the biliary anatomy diagnosis.