Radiomics analysis of CT imaging for differentiating gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas from gastric adenocarcinomas

Synergizing traditional CT imaging with radiomics: a novel model for preoperative diagnosis of gastric neuroendocrine and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma

Objective

To develop diagnostic models for differentiating gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (g-NEC) and gastric mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (g-MANEC) from gastric adenocarcinoma (g-ADC) based on traditional contrast enhanced CT imaging features and radiomics features.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 90 g-(MA)NEC (g-MANEC and g-NEC) patients matched 1:1 by T-stage with 90 g-ADC patients. Traditional CT features were analyzed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Tumor segmentation and radiomics features extraction were performed with Slicer and PyRadiomics. Feature selection was conducted through univariable analysis, correlation analysis, LASSO, and multivariable stepwise logistic. The combined model incorporated clinical and radiomics predictors. Diagnostic performance was assessed with ROC curves and DeLong's test. The models' diagnostic efficacy was further validated in subgroup of g-NEC vs. g-ADC and g-MANEC vs. g-ADC cases.

Results

Tumor necrosis and lymph node metastasis were independent predictors for differentiating g-(MA)NEC from g-ADC (P < 0.05). The clinical model's AUC was 0.700 (training) and 0.667(validation). Five radiomics features were retained, with the radiomics model showing AUC of 0.809 (training) and 0.802 (validation). The combined model's AUCs were 0.853 (training) and 0.812 (validation), significantly outperforming the clinical model (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that the combined model exhibited acceptable performance in differentiating g-NEC from g-ADC and g-MANEC from g-ADC, with AUC of 0.887 and 0.823 in the training cohort and 0.852 and 0.762 in the validation cohort.

Conclusion

A combined model based on traditional CT imaging and radiomic features provides a non-invasive and effective preoperative diagnostic method for differentiating g-(MA)NEC from g-ADC.

An Illustrated Review of the Recent 2019 World Health Organization Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Radiologic and Pathologic Correlation

ABSTRACT

Recent advances in molecular pathology and an improved understanding of the etiology of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have given rise to an updated World Health Organization classification. Since gastroenteropancreatic NENs (GEP-NENs) are the most common forms of NENs and their incidence has been increasing constantly, they will be the focus of our attention. Here, we review the findings at the foundation of the new classification system, discuss how it impacts imaging research and radiological practice, and illustrate typical and atypical imaging and pathological findings. Gastroenteropancreatic NENs have a highly variable clinical course, which existing classification schemes based on proliferation rate were unable to fully capture. While well- and poorly differentiated NENs both express neuroendocrine markers, they are fundamentally different diseases, which may show similar proliferation rates. Genetic alterations specific to well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors graded 1 to 3 and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine cancers of small cell and large-cell subtype have been identified. The new tumor classification places new demands and creates opportunities for radiologists to continue providing the clinically most relevant report and on researchers to design projects, which continue to be clinically applicable.

Development of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics nomograms for the differentiation of nodular fasciitis from soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Accurate differentiation of nodular fasciitis (NF) from soft tissue sarcoma (STS) before surgery is essential for the subsequent diagnosis and treatment of patients.

PURPOSE

To develop and evaluate radiomics nomograms based on clinical factors and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the preoperative differentiation of NF from STS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the MRI data of 27 patients with pathologically diagnosed NF and 58 patients with STS who were randomly divided into training (n = 62) and validation (n = 23) groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the clinical factors and semantic features of MRI. Radiomics analysis was applied to fat-suppressed T1-weighted (T1W-FS) images, fat-suppressed T2-weighted (T2W-FS) images, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1W) images. The radiomics nomograms incorporating the radiomics signatures, clinical factors, and semantic features of MRI were developed. ROC curves and AUCs were carried out to compare the performance of the clinical factors, radiomics signatures, and clinical radiomics nomograms.

RESULTS

Tumor location, size, heterogeneous signal intensity on T2W-FS imaging, heterogeneous signal intensity on CE-T1W imaging, margin definitions on CE-T1W imaging, and septa were independent predictors for differentiating NF from STS (P < 0.05). The performance of the radiomics signatures based on T2W-FS imaging (AUC = 0.961) and CE-T1W imaging (AUC = 0.938) was better than that based on T1W-FS imaging (AUC = 0.833). The radiomics nomograms had AUCs of 0.949, which demonstrated good clinical utility and calibration.

CONCLUSION

The non-invasive clinical radiomics nomograms exhibited good performance in the differentiation of NF from STS, and they have clinical application in the preoperative diagnosis of diseases.

Prognostic value of computed tomography radiomics features in patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasm

Purpose

The present study aimed to investigate the clinical prognostic significance of radiomics signature (R-signature) in patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasm (GNEN).

Methods and Materials

A retrospective study of 182 patients with GNEN who underwent dual-phase enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning was conducted. LASSO-Cox regression analysis was used to screen the features and establish the arterial, venous and the arteriovenous phase combined R-signature, respectively. The association between the optimal R-signature with the best prognostic performance and overall survival (OS) was assessed in the training cohort and verified in the validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to identify the significant factors of clinicopathological characteristics for OS. Furthermore, the performance of a combined radiomics-clinical nomogram integrating the R-signature and independent clinicopathological risk factors was evaluated.

Results

The arteriovenous phase combined R-signature had the best performance in predicting OS, and its C-index value was better than the independent arterial and venous phase R-signature (0.803 vs 0.784 and 0.803 vs 0.756, P<0.001, respectively). The optimal R-signature was significantly associated with OS in the training cohort and validation cohort. GNEN patients could be successfully divided into high and low prognostic risk groups with radiomics score median. The combined radiomics-clinical nomogram combining this R-signature and independent clinicopathological risk factors (sex, age, treatment methods, T stage, N stage, M stage, tumor boundary, Ki67, CD56) exhibited significant prognostic superiority over clinical nomogram, R-signature alone, and traditional TNM staging system (C-index, 0.882 vs 0.861, 882 vs 0.803, and 0.882 vs 0.870 respectively, P<0.001). All calibration curves showed remarkable consistency between predicted and actual survival, and decision curve analysis verified the usefulness of the combined radiomics-clinical nomogram for clinical practice.

Conclusions

The R-signature could be used to stratify patients with GNEN into high and low risk groups. Furthermore, the combined radiomics-clinical nomogram provided better predictive accuracy than other predictive models and might aid clinicians with therapeutic decision-making and patient counseling.

CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiating gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma from gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicentre study

BACKGROUND

To develop a CT-based radiomics nomogram for the high-precision preoperative differentiation of gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma (GHAC) patients from gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

108 patients with GHAC from 6 centers and 108 GAC patients matched by age, sex and T stage undergoing pathological examination were retrospectively reviewed. Patients from 5 centers were divided into two cohorts (training and internal validation) at a 7:3 ratio, the remaining patients were external test cohort. Venous-phase CT images were retrieved for tumor segmentation and feature extraction. A radiomics model was developed by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method. The nomogram was developed by clinical factors and the radiomics score.

RESULTS

1409 features were extracted and a radiomics model consisting of 19 features was developed, which showed a favorable performance in discriminating GHAC from GAC (AUC_{training cohort} = 0.998, AUC_{internal validation set} = 0.942, AUC_{external test cohort} = 0.731). The radiomics nomogram, including the radiomics score, AFP, and CA72_4, achieved good calibration and discrimination (AUC_{training cohort} = 0.998, AUC_{internal validation set} = 0.954, AUC_{external test cohort} = 0.909).

CONCLUSIONS

The noninvasive CT-based nomogram, including radiomics score, AFP, and CA72_4, showed favorable predictive efficacy for differentiating GHAC from GAC and might be useful for clinical decision-making.

Development and external validation of a non-invasive imaging biomarker to estimate the microsatellite instability status of gastric cancer and its prognostic value: The combination of clinical and quantitative CT-imaging features

PURPOSE

Molecular testing for microsatellite instability (MSI) status plays a vital role in the clinical management of gastric cancer (GC). Nevertheless, challenges of routinely applied technology for MSI determination exist. This study aimed to develop and validate a non-invasive imaging biomarker for MSI assessment in GC and explore its prognostic value.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited 396 GC patients with pretreatment CT images from a single center and a public database and divided them into an original cohort (n = 356) and an external validation cohort (n = 40). The SMOTE algorithm was used to generate a balanced training cohort (n = 192) and the independent radiomics model, clinical model, and radiomics-clinic combined model were constructed for determining MSI status. The models' discrimination, calibration, clinical usefulness, and prognosis significance were evaluated by AUC, calibration, decision curve analyses, and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

The radiomics-clinic combined model derived from clinical and quantitative CT-based "Radscore" exhibited the best discriminatory abilities of MSI status in all cohorts, with AUCs of 0.836 (95% CI, 0.780-0.893) in the training cohort, 0.834 (95% CI, 0.688-0.981) in the external validation cohort, and 0.750 (95% CI, 0.682-0.819) in the original cohort, respectively. Meanwhile, the combined model demonstrated goodness of fitness, higher clinical net benefits, and significant positive integrated discrimination improvement compared with any independent model. While it showed no significant overall survival- or progression-free survival-based risk stratification ability (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The radiomics-clinic combined model could be a potential non-invasive biomarker for MSI status in GC, which help clinical decision-making, nevertheless, provided limited prognostic ability.

Development and validation of a contrast-enhanced CT-based radiomics nomogram for preoperative diagnosis in neuroendocrine carcinoma of digestive system

Objectives

To develop and validate a contrast-enhanced CT-based radiomics nomogram for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the digestive system.

Methods

The clinical data and contrast-enhanced CT images of 60 patients with pathologically confirmed neuroendocrine carcinoma of the digestive system and 60 patients with non-neuroendocrine carcinoma of the digestive system were retrospectively collected from August 2015 to December 2021 at Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, and randomly divided into a training cohort (n=84) and a validation cohort (n=36). Clinical characteristics were analyzed by logistic regression and a clinical diagnosis model was developed. Radiomics signature were established by extracting radiomic features from contrast-enhanced CT images. Based on the radiomic signature and clinical characteristics, radiomic nomogram was developed. ROC curves and Delong's test were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the three models, calibration curves and application decision curves were used to analyze the accuracy and clinical application value of nomogram.

Results

Logistic regression results showed that TNM stage (stage IV) (OR 6.8, 95% CI 1.320-43.164, p=0. 028) was an independent factor affecting the diagnosis for NECs of the digestive system, and a clinical model was constructed based on TNM stage (stage IV). The AUCs of the clinical model, radiomics signature, and radiomics nomogram for the diagnosis of NECs of the digestive system in the training, validation cohorts and pooled patients were 0.643, 0.893, 0.913; 0.722, 0.867, 0.932 and 0.667, 0.887, 0.917 respectively. The AUCs of radiomics signature and radiomics nomogram were higher than clinical model, with statistically significant difference (Z=4.46, 6.85, both p < 0.001); the AUC difference between radiomics signature and radiomics nomogram was not statistically significant (Z=1.63, p = 0.104). The results of the calibration curve showed favorable agreement between the predicted values of the nomogram and the pathological results, and the decision curve analysis indicated that the nomogram had favorable application in clinical practice.

Conclusions

The nomogram constructed based on contrast-enhanced CT radiomics and clinical characteristics was able to effectively diagnose neuroendocrine carcinoma of the digestive system.

Role of radiomics in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal cancer

Gastrointestinal cancer (GIC) has high morbidity and mortality as one of the main causes of cancer death. Preoperative risk stratification is critical to guide patient management, but traditional imaging studies have difficulty predicting its biological behavior. The emerging field of radiomics allows the conversion of potential pathophysiological information in existing medical images that cannot be visually recognized into high-dimensional quantitative image features. Tumor lesion characterization, therapeutic response evaluation, and survival prediction can be achieved by analyzing the relationships between these features and clinical and genetic data. In recent years, the clinical application of radiomics to GIC has increased dramatically. In this editorial, we describe the latest progress in the application of radiomics to GIC and discuss the value of its potential clinical applications, as well as its limitations and future directions.

A computed tomography-based preoperative risk scoring system to distinguish lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma from non-lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma

Purpose

The aim of this study was to develop a preoperative risk scoring model for distinguishing lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma (LELGC) from non-LELGC based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images.

Methods

Clinicopathological features and CT findings of patients with LELGC and non-LELGC in our hospital from January 2016 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed and compared. A preoperative risk stratification model and a risk scoring system were developed using logistic regression.

Results

Twenty patients with LELGC and 40 patients with non-LELGC were included in the training cohort. Significant differences were observed in Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection and vascular invasion between the two groups (p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed in the distribution of location, enhancement pattern, homogeneous enhancement, CT-defined lymph node status, and attenuations in the non-contrast, arterial, and venous phases (all p < 0.05). Enhancement pattern, CT-defined lymph node status, and attenuation in venous phase were independent predictors of LELGC. The optimal cutoff score of distinguishing LELGC from non-LELGC was 3.5. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of risk identification model in the training cohort were 0.904, 87.5%, 80.0%, and 85.0%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of risk identification model in the validation cohort were 0.705 (95% CI 0.434–0.957), 75.0%, 63.6%, and 66.7%, respectively.

Conclusion

A preoperative risk identification model based on CT imaging data could be helpful for distinguishing LELGC from non-LELGC.

GEP-NET radiomics: a systematic review and radiomics quality score assessment

OBJECTIVE

The number of radiomics studies in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) is rapidly increasing. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the available evidence of radiomics for clinical outcome measures in GEP-NETs, to understand which applications hold the most promise and which areas lack evidence.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Wiley/Cochrane Library databases were searched and a forward and backward reference check of the identified studies was executed. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients with GEP-NETs and (2) radiomics analysis on CT, MRI or PET. Two reviewers independently agreed on eligibility and assessed methodological quality with the radiomics quality score (RQS) and extracted outcome data.

RESULTS

In total, 1364 unique studies were identified and 45 were included for analysis. Most studies focused on GEP-NET grade and differential diagnosis of GEP-NETs from other neoplasms, while only a minority analysed treatment response or long-term outcomes. Several studies were able to predict tumour grade or to differentiate GEP-NETs from other lesions with a good performance (AUCs 0.74-0.96 and AUCs 0.80-0.99, respectively). Only one study developed a model to predict recurrence in pancreas NETs (AUC 0.77). The included studies reached a mean RQS of 18%.

CONCLUSION

Although radiomics for GEP-NETs is still a relatively new area, some promising models have been developed. Future research should focus on developing robust models for clinically relevant aims such as prediction of response or long-term outcome in GEP-NET, since evidence for these aims is still scarce.

KEY POINTS

• The majority of radiomics studies in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours is of low quality. • Most evidence for radiomics is available for the identification of tumour grade or differentiation of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours from other neoplasms. • Radiomics for the prediction of response or long-term outcome in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours warrants further research.

MRI-based radiomics model for distinguishing endometrial carcinoma from benign mimics: A multicenter study

PURPOSE

To develop and validate an MRI-based radiomics model for preoperatively distinguishing endometrial carcinoma (EC) with benign mimics in a multicenter setting.

METHODS

Preoperative MRI scans of EC patients were retrospectively reviewed and divided into training set (158 patients from device 1 in center A), test set #1 (78 patients from device 2 in center A) and test set #2 (109 patients from device 3 in center B). Two radiologists performed manual delineation of tumor segmentation on the map of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI). The features were extracted and firstly selected using Chi-square test, followed by refining using binary least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. The support vector machine (SVM) was employed to build the radiomics model, which is tuned in the training set using 10-fold cross-validation, and then assessed on the test set. Performance of the model was determined by area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and F1-score.

RESULTS

Five most informative features are selected from the extracted 3142 features. The SVM with linear kernel was employed to build the radiomics model. The AUCs of the model were 0.989 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.968-0.997) for the training set, 0.999 (95% CI: 0.991-1.000) for test set #1, 0.961 (95% CI: 0.902-0.983) for test set #2. Accuracies of the model were 0.937 for the training set (precision: 0.919, recall: 0.963, F1-score: 0.940), 0.974 for test set #1 (precision: 0.949, recall: 1.000, F1-score: 0.974) and 0.908 for test set #2 (precision: 0.899, recall: 0.954, F1-score: 0.925). These results confirmed the efficacy of this model in predicting EC in different centers.

CONCLUSION

The MRI-based radiomics model showed promising potential for distinguishing EC with benign mimics and might be useful for surgical management of EC.

Artificial Intelligence in the Imaging of Gastric Cancer: Current Applications and Future Direction

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common cancers and one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Precise diagnosis and evaluation of GC, especially using noninvasive methods, are fundamental to optimal therapeutic decision-making. Despite the recent rapid advancements in technology, pretreatment diagnostic accuracy varies between modalities, and correlations between imaging and histological features are far from perfect. Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, particularly hand-crafted radiomics and deep learning, have offered hope in addressing these issues. AI has been used widely in GC research, because of its ability to convert medical images into minable data and to detect invisible textures. In this article, we systematically reviewed the methodological processes (data acquisition, lesion segmentation, feature extraction, feature selection, and model construction) involved in AI. We also summarized the current clinical applications of AI in GC research, which include characterization, differential diagnosis, treatment response monitoring, and prognosis prediction. Challenges and opportunities in AI-based GC research are highlighted for consideration in future studies.