1
|
Zhou Y, Eastman E, Lee C, Scott A. Optimal dose determination for coronary artery calcium scoring CT at standard tube voltage. Eur J Radiol 2023; 167:111029. [PMID: 37579562 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Coronary artery calcium scoring (CACs) at 120 kVp is the standard practice. It is an important tool for preventative management of asymptomatic patients. However, the current dose delivery, albeit patient-size dependent, does not connect the CACs specific noise requirement to the dose, causing significant dose variations. We propose a new approach for optimal dose determination by incorporating the patient-size dependent noise threshold. METHODS A polyethylene-based Mercury phantom of various diameters was scanned with a dual-source CT using CACs gating at different volume CT dose index (CTDIvol). The relationship of noise to the diameter and CTDIvol was obtained. The phantom diameter was then converted to the patient chest diameter through a retrospective analysis of a clinical cohort (N = 140). Finally, the patient-size dependent noise threshold was applied, and the optimal dose was derived. The prescribed doses were compared with those from a clinical CACs cohort (N = 262). RESULTS A power-exponential relationship was found for the noise versus CTDIvol and phantom diameter (R2 = 0.988). The phantom diameter versus the patient effective diameter was found to obey a linear relationship (R2 = 0.998). Two noise threshold settings were made for dose options: one for more dose saving, and another for tighter noise constraint. Retrospective comparisons with clinical CACs studies showed an average dose reduction of 23% in 80.5% of the cases with option 1. The average dose reduction is 23% in 77.9% of the cases with option 2. CONCLUSION A new optimal dose scheme dictated by the target noise was established for CACs at 120 kVp. The proposed dose modulation can serve as the baseline from which further dose reduction is possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifang Zhou
- Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Emi Eastman
- Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Christina Lee
- Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Alexander Scott
- Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fink N, Zsarnoczay E, Schoepf UJ, O'Doherty J, Griffith JP, Pinos D, Tesche C, Ricke J, Willemink MJ, Varga-Szemes A, Emrich T. Radiation Dose Reduction for Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using a Virtual Noniodine Algorithm on Photon-Counting Detector Computed-Tomography Phantom Data. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13091540. [PMID: 37174932 PMCID: PMC10177425 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13091540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: On the basis of the hypothesis that virtual noniodine (VNI)-based coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) is feasible at reduced radiation doses, this study assesses the impact of radiation dose reduction on the accuracy of this VNI algorithm on a photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT. Methods: In a systematic in vitro setting, a phantom for CACS simulating three chest sizes was scanned on a clinical PCD-CT. The standard radiation dose was chosen at volumetric CT dose indices (CTDIVol) of 1.5, 3.3, 7.0 mGy for small, medium-sized, and large phantoms, and was gradually reduced by adjusting the tube current resulting in 100, 75, 50, and 25%, respectively. VNI images were reconstructed at 55 keV, quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR)1, and at 60 keV/QIR4, and evaluated regarding image quality (image noise (IN), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)), and CACS. All VNI results were compared to true noncontrast (TNC)-based CACS at 70 keV and standard radiation dose (reference). Results: INTNC was significantly higher than INVNI, and INVNI at 55 keV/QIR1 higher than at 60 keV/QIR4 (100% dose: 16.7 ± 1.9 vs. 12.8 ± 1.7 vs. 7.7 ± 0.9; p < 0.001 for every radiation dose). CNRTNC was higher than CNRVNI, but it was better to use 60 keV/QIR4 (p < 0.001). CACSVNI showed strong correlation and agreement at every radiation dose (p < 0.001, r > 0.9, intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). The coefficients of the variation in root-mean squared error were less than 10% and thus clinically nonrelevant for the CACSVNI of every radiation dose. Conclusion: This phantom study suggests that CACSVNI is feasible on PCD-CT, even at reduced radiation dose while maintaining image quality and CACS accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Fink
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Emese Zsarnoczay
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
- Medical Imaging Center, Semmelweis University, Korányi Sándor utca 2, 1083 Budapest, Hungary
| | - U Joseph Schoepf
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Jim O'Doherty
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
- Siemens Medical Solutions, 40 Liberty Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355, USA
| | - Joseph P Griffith
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Daniel Pinos
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Christian Tesche
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
- Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Martin J Willemink
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Akos Varga-Szemes
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Tilman Emrich
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of Johannes-Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Rhine-Main, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mergen V, Higashigaito K, Allmendinger T, Manka R, Euler A, Alkadhi H, Eberhard M. Tube voltage-independent coronary calcium scoring on a first-generation dual-source photon-counting CT-a proof-of-principle phantom study. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING 2022; 38:905-912. [PMID: 34780012 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-021-02466-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate the accuracy of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring at various tube voltages and different monoenergetic image reconstructions on a first-generation dual-source photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT). A commercially available anthropomorphic chest phantom with calcium inserts was scanned at different tube voltages (90 kV, Sn100kV, 120 kV, and Sn140kV) on a first-generation dual-source PCD-CT system with quantum technology using automatic exposure control with an image quality (IQ) level of 20. The same phantom was also scanned on a conventional energy-integrating detector CT (120 kV; weighted filtered back projection) for reference. Extension rings were used to emulate different patient sizes. Virtual monoenergetic images at 65 keV and 70 keV applying different levels of quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) were reconstructed from the PCD-CT data sets. CAC scores were determined and compared to the reference. Radiation doses were noted. At an IQ level of 20, radiation doses ranged between 1.18 mGy and 4.64 mGy, depending on the tube voltage and phantom size. Imaging at 90 kV or Sn100kV was associated with a size-dependent radiation dose reduction between 23% and 48% compared to 120 kV. Tube voltage adapted image reconstructions with 65 keV and QIR 3 at 90 kV and with 70 keV and QIR 1 at Sn100kV allowed to calculate CAC scores comparable to conventional EID-CT scans with a percentage deviation of ≤ 5% for all phantom sizes. Our phantom study indicates that CAC scoring with dual-source PCD-CT is accurate at various tube voltages, offering the possibility of substantial radiation dose reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Mergen
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - K Higashigaito
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - R Manka
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - A Euler
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - H Alkadhi
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Eberhard
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|