Optimize scan timing in abdominal multiphase CT: Bolus tracking with an individualized post-trigger delay

Adjustment of scan delay for bolus tracking with cardiothoracic ratio of CT scout image for hepatic artery phase of hepatic dynamic CT

This study aimed to determine the scan delay for bolus tracking in the hepatic artery phase (HAP) of hepatic dynamic computed tomography (CT) using the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) from CT scout images. We retrospectively studied 188 patients who underwent hepatic dynamic CT, 24 of whom had scan delays adjusted for CTR. The contrast enhancement of the abdominal aorta, portal vein, hepatic vein, and hepatic parenchyma was calculated for HAP. The adequacy of the scan timing for HAP was assessed using three classifications: early, appropriate, or late. The effect of HAP on scan timing adequacy was determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the optimal cutoff value of CTR was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. The trigger times for bolus tracking (odds ratio: 1.58) and CTR (odds ratio: 1.23) were significantly affected by the appropriate scan timing of the HAP. The optimal cutoff value of CTR was 59.3%. The scan timing of HAP with a scan delay of 15 s was 14% of early and 86% of appropriate, and the proportion of early in CTR ≥ 60% (early, 52%; appropriate, 48%) was higher than that in CTR < 60% (early, 6%; appropriate, 94%). Adjusting the scan delay to 20 s in CTR ≥ 60% increased the proportion of appropriate (early, 4%; appropriate, 96%). The CTR of a CT scout image is an effective index for determining the scan delay for bolus tracking. Adjusting the scan delay by CTR can provide appropriate HAP images in more patients. Trial registration number: R-080; date of registration: 9 March 2023, retrospectively registered.

Image quality improvement in head and neck CT angiography: Individualized post-trigger delay versus fixed delay

PURPOSE

To compare the contrast media opacification of head and neck CT angiography (CTA) between conventional fixed trigger delay and individualized post-trigger delay (PTD).

METHODS

In this prospective study (April-October 2022), 196 consecutive participants were randomly divided into two groups to perform head and neck CTA in bolus tracking with either an individualized PTD (Group A) or a fixed 4-second PTD (Group B). All CT and contrast media protocol parameters were consistent between the two groups. One reader evaluated objective image quality, while two readers rated subjective image quality. Objective image quality was compared between groups via two-sample t-test, while the subjective ratings were compared with chi-square analysis.

RESULTS

Participants' clinical information including sex, age, weight, body weight index (BMI), and heart rate were not statistically different between two groups (all p > 0.05). Individualized PTD ranging from 3.5 to 7.9 s (average 5.6 s), which is shorter than fixed delays (p < 0.05). Both readers rated better subjective image quality for the Group A (p < 0.05). The mean vessel enhancement was significantly higher in Group A in all vessels (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the fixed post-trigger delay in bolus tracking technique, individualized post-trigger delay could achieve reliable scan timing, optimize vessel opacification and obtain better image quality for head and neck CT angiography.

Patient-specific post-trigger delay in coronary CT angiography: A prospective study comparing with fixed delay

OBJECTIVES

To validate the peak enhancement timing of a patient-specific post-trigger delay (PTD) in Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and compare its image quality against a fixed PTD.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 204 consecutive participants were randomly divided into two groups to perform CCTA in bolus tracking with either a fixed 5-second PTD (Group A) or a patient-specific PTD (Group B). Test bolus was also performed in Group B to determine the reference peak enhancement timing. One reader evaluated objective image quality, while two readers rated subjective image quality. The predicted PTD was validated through correlation and agreement analysis with the reference measurement. Objective image quality was compared between groups via two-sample t-test and linear regression, while the subjective ratings were compared with chi-square analysis.

RESULTS

The two groups each had 102 participants with comparable characteristics (52.9 ± 11.3 versus 52.1 ± 11.3 years of age, and 53 versus 52 males). The scan timing from patient-specific PTD demonstrated strong correlation (R = 0.77) and consistency (ICC = 0.618) with the reference peak timing. Both readers rated better subjective image quality for the Group B (p < 0.001). The mean vessel enhancement was significantly higher in Group B in all coronary vessels (all p < 0.05). After adjusting for the participant variation, the patient-specific PTD strategy was associated with an average of 33.5 HU higher enhancement compared to the fixed PTD.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-specific delay could achieve reliable scan timing, optimize vessel opacification and obtain better image quality in CCTA.

Effect of Patient Factors on Portal Vein and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement at Computed Tomography Scan With Protocol Combining Fixed Injection Duration and Patients’ Body Weight Tailored Dose of Contrast Material

Introduction

Fixed injection duration with patients’ body weight tailored dose of contrast material was recommended as the practical scan protocol in multiphasic contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT). This study evaluated the effect of the demographic variables on portal vein and hepatic contrast enhancement in hepatic arterial phase (HAP), aiming to reduce the patient-to-patient variability and optimize the HAP images.

Methods

This retrospective analysis included 87 patients who underwent abdominal enhancement multiphase CT from April to June 2022. All the patients were examined using protocol combining fixed injection duration and patients’ body weight tailored dose of contrast material. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed between all patient characteristics and the contrast-enhanced CT number of portal vein and hepatic parenchyma during HAP.

Results

Univariate linear regression analysis demonstrated statistically significant correlations between the CT number of hepatic parenchyma, and the body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), and total body weight (TBW) (all P < 0.001) during HAP. However, multivariate linear regression analysis showed that the BMI or BMI and age were of independent predictive values (P < 0.001). Also, only the age was independently and negatively related to the CT number of portal vein enhancement during HAP (r = 0.240, P < 0.05) according to univariate linear regression analysis.

Conclusions

Univariate linear regression analysis revealed a significant inverse correlation between portal vein CT value and age. By multivariate linear regression analysis, only the BMI and age were significantly correlated with liver parenchymal enhancement, while gender, TBW, BSA, and HT were not.