Pancreatic fibrosis by extracellular volume fraction using Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and relationship with pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic fibrosis assessment and association with pancreatic cancer: comparison with the extracellular volume fraction

AIMS

To compare the iodine washout rate (IWR) from multiphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) with the extracellular volume fraction (fECV) for assessing pancreatic fibrosis and its association with pancreatic cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 51 individuals (33 men; median age: 69 years; 21 with pancreatic cancer, 30 with other diseases) who underwent multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT and histological evaluation for fibrotic changes in pancreas. The histological pancreatic fibrosis fraction (HPFF) was assessed on Azan-stained sections. Pancreatic parenchymal enhancement values were measured to calculate IWR and fECV. Statistical methods, such as Spearman's rho and Mann-Whitney U-test, were used. Linear regression models using IWR and fECV were constructed to predict HPFF, with the performance expressed as root mean squared error (RMSE) and Akaike information criterion (AIC).

RESULTS

HPFF correlated with all CT parameters at the estimated transection line, strongest for IWRPPP-EP (r=-0.69, P<0.01). HPFF and fECV values were higher in the pancreatic cancer group than in controls (30% vs. 12.5%, P<0.01; 40.3% vs. 33.0%, P<0.01), whereas IWR values were lower (IWRPPP-EP: 43.3% vs. 55.0%, P<0.01; IWRPVP-EP: 25.0% vs. 33.5%, P<0.01). Linear regression models combining IWRPPP-EP + fECV and IWRPVP-EP + fECV were superior for predicting HPFF, with lower RMSE (9.23-9.35) and AIC (379.38-380.72) values than models with IWR or fECV alone.

CONCLUSION

IWRPPP-EP, IWRPVP-EP, and fECV were reliable biomarkers for noninvasively assessing pancreatic fibrosis and were associated with pancreatic cancer risk. Linear regression combining these variables showed enhanced predictive accuracy for pancreatic fibrosis.

Utility of dual-energy CT and advanced multiparametric MRI based imaging biomarkers of pancreatic fibrosis in grading the severity of chronic pancreatitis

PURPOSE

To non-invasively quantify pancreatic fibrosis and grade severity of chronic pancreatitis (CP) on dual-energy CT (DECT) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI).

METHODS

We included 72 patients (mean age:30years; 59 men) with suspected or confirmed CP from December 2019 to December 2021 graded as equivocal(n = 20), mild(n = 18), and moderate-marked(n = 34) using composite imaging and endoscopic ultrasound criteria. Study patients underwent multiphasic DECT and mpMRI of the abdomen. Normalized iodine concentration(NIC) and fat fraction(FF) on 6-minute delayed DECT, and T1 relaxation time(T1Rt), extracellular volume fraction(ECVf), intravoxel incoherent motion-based perfusion fraction(PF), and magnetization transfer ratio(MTR) on mpMRI of pancreas were compared. 20 renal donors(for DECT) and 20 patients with renal mass(for mpMRI) served as controls.

RESULTS

NIC of pancreas in controls and progressive grades of CP were 0.24 ± 0.05, 0.80 ± 0.18, 1.06 ± 0.23, 1.40 ± 0.36, FF were 9.28 ± 5.89, 14.19 ± 5.29, 17.31 ± 5.99, 29.32 ± 12.22, T1Rt were 590.11 ± 61.13, 801.93 ± 211.01, 1006.79 ± 352.18, 1388.01 ± 312.23ms, ECVf were 0.07 ± 0.03, 0.30 ± 0.12, 0.41 ± 0.12, 0.53 ± 0.13, PF were 0.38 ± 0.04, 0.28 ± 0.07, 0.25 ± 0.09, 0.21 ± 0.05 and MTR were 0.12 ± 0.03, 0.15 ± 0.06, 0.21 ± 0.07, 0.26 ± 0.06, respectively. There were significant differences for all quantitative parameters between controls and mild CP; for NIC, PF, and ECVf between controls and progressive CP grades (p < 0.05). Area under curve for NIC, FF, T1Rt, ECVf, PF, and MTR in differentiating controls and mild CP were 1.00, 0.86, 0.95, 1.00, 0.90 and 0.84 respectively and for NIC, FF, ECVf and PF in differentiating controls and equivocal CP were 1.00, 0.76, 0.95 and 0.92 respectively.

CONCLUSION

DECT and mpMRI were useful in quantifying pancreatic fibrosis and grading the severity of CP. NIC was the most accurate marker.

Hepatic and pancreatic extracellular volume fraction analysis using contrast-enhanced CT in patients with diabetes mellitus and pre-diabetes

PURPOSE

Liver and pancreatic fibrosis is associated with diabetes mellitus (DM), and liver fibrosis is associated with pancreatic fibrosis. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the hepatic and pancreatic extracellular volume fractions (fECVs), which correlate with tissue fibrosis, and their relationships with DM and pre-DM (pDM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We included 100 consecutive patients with known or suspected liver and/or pancreatic diseases who underwent contrast-enhanced CT. Patients were classified as nondiabetes, pDM, and DM with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels of < 5.7%, 5.7%-6.5%, and ≥ 6.5% or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels of < 100, 100-125 mg/dL, and ≥ 126 mg/dL, respectively. Subtraction images between unenhanced and equilibrium-phase images were prepared. The liver and the pancreas were automatically extracted using a high-speed, three-dimensional image analysis system, and their respective mean CT values were calculated. The enhancement degree of the aorta (Δaorta) was measured. fECV was calculated using the following equation: fECV = (100 - hematocrit) * Δliver or pancreas/Δaorta. Differences were investigated in hepatic and pancreatic fECVs among the three groups, and the correlation between each two in hepatic fECV, pancreatic fECV, and HbA1c was determined.

RESULTS

The pancreatic fECV, which was positively correlated with the hepatic fECV and HbA1c (r = 0.51, P < 0.001, and r = 0.51, P < 0.001, respectively), significantly differed among the three groups (P < 0.001) and was significantly greater in DM than in pDM or nondiabetes and in pDM with nondiabetes (P < 0.001). Hepatic fECV was significantly greater in DM than in nondiabetes (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The pancreatic fECV and pDM/DM are closely related.

Nomogram based on dual-energy CT-derived extracellular volume fraction for the prediction of microsatellite instability status in gastric cancer

Purpose

To develop and validate a nomogram based on extracellular volume (ECV) fraction derived from dual-energy CT (DECT) for preoperatively predicting microsatellite instability (MSI) status in gastric cancer (GC).

Materials and methods

A total of 123 patients with GCs who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT scans were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into MSI (n=41) and microsatellite stability (MSS, n=82) groups according to postoperative immunohistochemistry staining, then randomly assigned to the training (n=86) and validation cohorts (n=37). We extracted clinicopathological characteristics, CT imaging features, iodine concentrations (ICs), and normalized IC values against the aorta (nICs) in three enhanced phases. The ECV fraction derived from the iodine density map at the equilibrium phase was calculated. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk predictors for MSI status. Then, a nomogram was established, and its performance was evaluated by ROC analysis and Delong test. Its calibration performance and clinical utility were assessed by calibration curve and decision curve analysis, respectively.

Results

The ECV fraction, tumor location, and Borrmann type were independent predictors of MSI status (all P < 0.05) and were used to establish the nomogram. The nomogram yielded higher AUCs of 0.826 (0.729-0.899) and 0.833 (0.675-0.935) in training and validation cohorts than single variables (P<0.05), with good calibration and clinical utility.

Conclusions

The nomogram based on DECT-derived ECV fraction has the potential as a noninvasive biomarker to predict MSI status in GC patients.

Differential Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions Using Detective Flow Imaging Endoscopic Ultrasonography

The differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs) using B-mode endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is challenging. Detective flow imaging (DFI) offers the potential for detecting low-flow vessels in the pancreas, thus enhancing diagnostic accuracy. This retrospective study aimed to investigate DFI-EUS findings of SPLs and analyze their differential diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic cancer. We included 104 patients with pathologically confirmed SPLs who underwent EUS between April 2021 and June 2023. Expert endosonographers, blinded to the patients' clinical data, evaluated images obtained through B-mode, eFLOW, and DFI-EUS. The frame rate and vessel detection sensitivity were compared between eFLOW and DFI, and the diagnostic criteria for pancreatic cancer were established. The visualization rate for vessels in SPLs was significantly higher with DFI-EUS (96%) compared to eFLOW (27%). Additionally, DFI showed a superior frame rate, sensitivity (99%), and accuracy (88%) for detecting pancreatic cancer, although with a modest specificity (43%). On DFI-EUS, characteristics such as hypovascularity, peritumoral vessel distribution, or spotty vessel form were suggestive of pancreatic cancer. DFI-EUS significantly improved the visualization of vascular structures within the SPLs, highlighting its efficacy as a diagnostic modality for pancreatic cancer.

Comparing extracellular volume fraction with apparent diffusion coefficient for the characterization of breast tumors

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of dual-energy CT (DECT)-derived extracellular volume (ECV) fraction for characterization of breast tumors, compared to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and validated against histopathological findings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The ECV fraction and ADC were prospectively assessed in patients with breast tumors using chest DECT and breast MRI. The diagnostic performance of ECV fraction and ADC was accessed in predicting breast histopathological subtypes and pathological complete response (pCR) status. Histopathological sections were analyzed by digital image analysis. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to correlate between DECT and histopathological ECV fractions.

RESULTS

This study included 271 patients, with 314 breast lesions (61 benign and 253 malignant). The ECV fraction and ADC showed comparable area under the curve (AUC) for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions (p = 0.123) and invasive carcinoma from ductal carcinoma in situ (p = 0.115). There were significant differences in ECV fraction between different hormone receptors and Ki67 states (p = 0.001 ∼ 0.014), while ADC values only differed among various Ki67 states (p < 0.001). The ECV fraction was lower (p = 0.007), ADC was higher (p = 0.013) in pCR than in non-pCR group, with an AUC of 0.748 and 0.730 (p = 0.887), respectively. There was a positive correlation between DECT and histopathological ECV fractions (r = 0.615, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine chest DECT-derived ECV fraction is a viable quantitative imaging biomarker for predicting histopathological subtypes and pCR in patient with breast tumors, and correlated well with histopathology finding.

Extracellular volume fraction of liver and pancreas using spectral CT in hypertensive patients: A comparative study

BACKGROUND

Besides the direct impact on the cardiovascular system, hypertension is closely associated with organ damage in the kidneys, liver, and pancreas. Chronic liver and pancreatic damage in hypertensive patients may be detectable via imaging.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the correlation between hypertension-related indicators and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) of liver and pancreas measured by iodine maps, and to evaluate corresponding clinical value in chronic damage of liver and pancreas in hypertensive patients.

METHODS

A prospective study from June to September 2023 included abdominal patients who underwent contrast-enhanced spectral CT. Normal and various grades of hypertensive blood pressure groups were compared. Upper abdominal iodine maps were constructed, and liver and pancreatic ECVs calculated. Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman analyses evaluated ECV differences and correlations with hypertension indicators.

RESULTS

In 300 patients, hypertensive groups showed significantly higher liver and pancreatic ECV than the normotensive group, with ECV rising alongside hypertension severity. ECVliver displayed a stronger correlation with hypertension stages compared to ECVpancreas. Regression analysis identified hypertension severity as an independent predictor for increased ECV.

CONCLUSIONS

ECVliver and ECVpancreas positively correlates with hypertension indicators and serves as a potential clinical marker for chronic organ damage due to hypertension, with ECVliver being more strongly associated than ECVpancreas.

Prediction of pancreatic fibrosis by dual-energy CT-derived extracellular volume fraction: Comparison with MRI

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the correlation between dual-energy CT (DECT) and MRI measurements of the extracellular volume fraction (ECV) and to assess the accuracy of both methods in predicting pancreatic fibrosis (PF).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 43 patients who underwent pancreatectomy and preoperative pancreatic DECT and MRI between November 2018 and May 2022. The ECV was calculated using the T1 relaxation time (for MR-ECV) or absolute enhancement (for DECT-ECV) at equilibrium phase (180 s after contrast injection in our study). Pearson coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare the correlation between the two ECVs, Spearman correlations were used to investigate the association between imaging parameters and PF, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic performance of the ECVs for advanced fibrosis (F2-F3), and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between PF and imaging parameters.

RESULTS

There was a strong correlation between DECT- and MR-derived ECVs (r = 0.948; p < 0.001). The two ECVs were positively correlated with PF (DECT: r = 0.647, p < 0.001; MR: r = 0.614, p < 0.001), and the mean values were 0.34 ± 0.08 (range: 0.22-0.62) and 0.35 ± 0.09 (range: 0.24-0.66), respectively. The area under the operating characteristic curve (AUC) for subjects with advanced fibrosis diagnosed by ECV was 0.86 for DECT-ECV and 0.87 for MR-ECV. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the DECT-ECV was an independent predictor of PF.

CONCLUSIONS

The ECV could be an effective predictor of histological fibrosis, and DECT is equivalent to MRI for characterizing pancreatic ECV changes.

Usefulness of Three-Dimensional Iodine Mapping Quantified by Dual-Energy CT for Differentiating Thymic Epithelial Tumors

Background: Dual-energy CT has been reported to be useful for differentiating thymic epithelial tumors. The purpose is to evaluate thymic epithelial tumors by using three-dimensional (3D) iodine density histogram texture analysis on dual-energy CT and to investigate the association of extracellular volume fraction (ECV) with the fibrosis of thymic carcinoma. Methods: 42 patients with low-risk thymoma (n = 20), high-risk thymoma (n = 16), and thymic carcinoma (n = 6) were scanned by dual-energy CT. 3D iodine density histogram texture analysis was performed for each nodule on iodine density mapping: Seven texture features (max, min, median, average, standard deviation [SD], skewness, and kurtosis) were obtained. The iodine effect (average on DECT180s-average on unenhanced DECT) and ECV on DECT180s were measured. Tissue fibrosis was subjectively rated by one pathologist on a three-point grade. These quantitative data obtained by examining associations with thymic carcinoma and high-risk thymoma were analyzed with univariate and multivariate logistic regression models (LRMs). The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated by the receiver operating characteristic curves. p values < 0.05 were significant. Results: The multivariate LRM showed that ECV > 21.47% in DECT180s could predict thymic carcinoma (odds ratio [OR], 11.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-109; p = 0.035). Diagnostic performance was as follows: Sensitivity, 83.3%; specificity, 69.4%; AUC, 0.76. In high-risk thymoma vs. low-risk thymoma, the multivariate LRM showed that the iodine effect ≤1.31 mg/cc could predict high-risk thymoma (OR, 7; 95% CI, 1.02-39.1; p = 0.027). Diagnostic performance was as follows: Sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 50%; AUC, 0.69. Tissue fibrosis significantly correlated with thymic carcinoma (p = 0.026). Conclusions: ECV on DECT180s related to fibrosis may predict thymic carcinoma from thymic epithelial tumors, and the iodine effect on DECT180s may predict high-risk thymoma from thymoma.

Extracellular volume fraction using contrast-enhanced CT is useful in differentiating intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma

Objectives

To evaluate whether tumor extracellular volume fraction (fECV) on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) aids in the differentiation between intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

In this retrospective study, 113 patients with pathologically confirmed ICC (n = 39) or HCC (n = 74) who had undergone preoperative contrast-enhanced CT were enrolled. Enhancement values of the tumor (Etumor) and aorta (Eaorta) were obtained in the precontrast and equilibrium phase CT images. fECV was calculated using the following equation: fECV [%] = Etumor/Eaorta × (100 - hematocrit [%]). fECV values were compared between the ICC and HCC groups using Welch's t-test. The diagnostic performance of fECV for differentiating ICC and HCC was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. fECV and the CT imaging features of tumors were evaluated by two radiologists. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors predicting a diagnosis of ICC.

Results

Mean fECV was significantly higher in ICCs (43.8% ± 13.2%) than that in HCCs (31.6% ± 9.0%, p < 0.001). The area under the curve for differentiating ICC from HCC was 0.763 when the cutoff value of fECV was 41.5%. The multivariate analysis identified fECV (unit OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.01-1.21; p < 0.05), peripheral rim enhancement during the arterial phase (OR: 17.0; 95% CI: 1.29-225; p < 0.05), and absence of washout pattern (OR: 235; 95% CI: 14.03-3933; p < 0.001) as independent CT features for differentiating between the two tumor types.

Conclusions

A high value of fECV, peripheral rim enhancement during the arterial phase, and absence of washout pattern were independent factors in the differentiation of ICC from HCC.