Reverse encoding distortion correction for diffusion-weighted MRI: Efficacy for improving image quality and ADC evaluation for differentiating malignant from benign areas in suspected prostatic cancer patients

Reverse Encoding Distortion Correction for Clinical Head Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Initial Experience

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the recently commercialized reverse encoding distortion correction (RDC) method for echo-planar imaging (EPI) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) by applying clinical head MRI.

METHODS

This study included 50 consecutive patients who underwent head MRI, including single-shot (SS) EPI DWI and RDC-EPI DWI. For evaluation of normal structures, qualitative scores for image distortion, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) values, distortion ratios, and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were assessed in the pons, temporal lobe at the skull base, and frontal lobe at the level of the lateral ventricles in 30 patients. To evaluate pathologies, qualitative scores for image distortion were assessed for 25 intracranial and 21 extracranial pathologies identified in 32 patients.

RESULTS

Qualitative scores for image distortion, DSC values, distortion ratios, and mean ADC values of the pons and temporal lobe were significantly different between SS-EPI DWI and RDC-EPI DWI, whereas those of the frontal lobe at the level of the lateral ventricles were not significantly different between the 2 DWIs. The qualitative scores for image distortion and mean ADC values of extracranial pathologies were significantly different between the DWIs, whereas those of intracranial pathologies were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

RDC-EPI DWI significantly reduced image distortion and showed higher mean ADC values of the brain parenchyma in the skull base and extracranial pathologies.

Thin-slice reverse encoding distortion correction DWI facilitates visualization of non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET)/pituitary adenoma and surrounding normal structures

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the clinical usefulness of thin-slice echo-planar imaging (EPI)-based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with an on-console distortion correction technique, termed reverse encoding distortion correction DWI (RDC-DWI), in patients with non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET)/pituitary adenoma.

METHODS

Patients with non-functioning PitNET/pituitary adenoma who underwent 3-T RDC-DWI between December 2021 and September 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Image quality was compared among RDC-DWI, DWI with correction for distortion induced by B0 inhomogeneity alone (B0-corrected-DWI), and original EPI-based DWI with anterior-posterior phase-encoding direction (AP-DWI). Susceptibility artifact, anatomical visualization of cranial nerves, overall tumor visualization, and visualization of cavernous sinus invasion were assessed qualitatively. Quantitative assessment of geometric distortion was performed by evaluation of anterior and posterior displacement between each DWI and the corresponding three-dimensional T2-weighted imaging. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient values were measured.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients (age 70.8 ± 9.9 years [mean ± standard deviation]; 33 females) with non-functioning PitNET/pituitary adenoma were evaluated. In terms of susceptibility artifacts in the frontal and temporal lobes, visualization of left trigeminal nerve, overall tumor visualization, and anterior displacement, RDC-DWI performed the best and B0-corrected-DWI performed better than AP-DWI. The right oculomotor and right trigeminal nerves were better visualized by RDC-DWI than by B0-corrected-DWI and AP-DWI. Visualization of cavernous sinus invasion and posterior displacement were better by RDC-DWI and B0-corrected-DWI than by AP-DWI. SNR and CNR were the highest for RDC-DWI.

CONCLUSIONS

RDC-DWI achieved excellent image quality regarding susceptibility artifact, geometric distortion, and tumor visualization in patients with non-functioning PitNET/pituitary adenoma.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

RDC-DWI facilitates excellent visualization of the pituitary region and surrounding normal structures, and its on-console distortion correction technique is convenient. RDC-DWI can clearly depict cavernous sinus invasion of PitNET/pituitary adenoma even without contrast medium.

KEY POINTS

• RDC-DWI is an EPI-based DWI technique with a novel on-console distortion correction technique. • RDC-DWI corrects distortion due to B0 field inhomogeneity and eddy current. • We evaluated the usefulness of thin-slice RDC-DWI in non-functioning PitNET/pituitary adenoma. • RDC-DWI exhibited excellent visualization in the pituitary region and surrounding structures. • In addition, the on-console distortion correction of RDC-DWI is clinically convenient.

Diffusion weighted imaging with reverse encoding distortion correction: Improvement of image quality and distortion for accurate ADC evaluation in in vitro and in vivo studies

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vivo study was to determine the effect of reverse encoding direction (RDC) on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements and its efficacy for improving image quality and diagnostic performance for differentiating malignant from benign tumors on head and neck diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with head and neck tumors underwent DWI with and without RDC and pathological examinations. Their tumors were then divided into two groups: malignant (n = 21) and benign (n = 27). To determine the utility of RDC for DWI, the difference in the deformation ratio (DR) between DWI and T2-weighted images of each tumor was determined for each tumor area. To compare ADC measurement accuracy of DWIs with and without RDC for each patient, ADC values for tumors and spinal cord were determined by using ROI measurements. To compare DR and ADC between two methods, Student's t-tests were performed. Then, ADC values were compared between malignant and benign tumors by Student's t-test on each DWI. Finally, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were compared by means of McNemar's test.

RESULTS

DR of DWI with RDC was significantly smaller than that without RDC (p < 0.0001). There were significant differences in ADC between malignant and benign lesions on each DWI (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant difference of diagnostic accuracy between the two DWIs (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

RDC can improve image quality and distortion of DWI and may have potential for more accurate ADC evaluation and differentiation of malignant from benign head and neck tumors.