Ultra-high resolution photon-counting CT with tin prefiltration for bone-metal interface visualization

Polyenergetic reconstruction mitigates streak artifacts by dual source imaging in chest photon counting detector computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the efficacy of polyenergetic reconstruction methods in reducing streak artifacts caused by dual source imaging in Photon Counting Detector Computed Tomography (PCD-CT) imaging, thereby improving image quality and diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, involving 50 patients who underwent chest Computed Tomography Angiography with PCD-CT, focusing on those with streak artifacts. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed on images reconstructed using monoenergetic and polyenergetic techniques. Quantitative evaluations measured the attenuation of tracheal air density in regions affected by streak artifacts, while qualitative assessments employed a modified Likert scale to rate image quality. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests and Spearman's correlation, alongside assessments of inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

There was significantly lower attenuation of tracheal air density on the polyenergetic reconstructions (Median - 1010 ± 62 HU vs -930 ± 110 HU; P < 0.001), and significantly decreased variation on the polyenergetic reconstructions (Median 65.2 ± 79.5 HU vs 38.8 ± 33.9 HU; P < 0.001). The median modified-Likert scale were significantly better for the polyenergetic reconstructions (median modified-Likert 4 ± 0.5 vs 2.5 ± 1; P < 0.001). The inter-rater agreement was substantial and not significantly different between reconstructions (Gwet's ACPolyenergetic = 0.78 vs Gwet's ACVMI = 0.775).

CONCLUSION

Polyenergetic reconstruction significantly mitigates streak artifacts in PCD-CT imaging, enhancing quantitative and qualitative image quality. This advancement addresses a known limitation of current PCD-CT reconstruction techniques, offering a promising approach to improving diagnostic reliability and accuracy in clinical practice. We demonstrate that future software implementations can resolve this artifact.

Photon-Counting Detector CT Applications in Musculoskeletal Radiology

ABSTRACT

Photon-counting detectors (PCDs) have emerged as one of the most influential technical developments for medical imaging in recent memory. Surpassing conventional systems with energy-integrating detector technology in many aspects, PCD-CT scanners provide superior spatial resolution and dose efficiency for all radiological subspecialities. Demanding detailed display of trabecular microarchitecture and extensive anatomical coverage frequently within the same scan, musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging in particular can be a beneficiary of PCD-CT's remarkable performance. Since PCD-CT provides users with a plethora of customization options for both image acquisition and reconstruction, however, MSK radiologists need to be familiar with the scanner to unlock its full potential. From filter-based spectral shaping for artifact reduction over full field-of-view ultra-high-resolution scans to postprocessing of single- or dual-source multienergy data, almost every imaging task can be met with an optimized approach in PCD-CT. The objectives of this review were to give an overview of the most promising applications of PCD-CT in MSK imaging to date, to state current limitations, and to highlight directions for future research and developments.

Photon-Counting Computed Tomography: Experience in Musculoskeletal Imaging

Since the emergence of the first photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) system in late 2021, its advantages and a wide range of applications in all fields of radiology have been demonstrated. Compared to standard energy-integrating detector-CT, PCCT allows for superior geometric dose efficiency in every examination. While this aspect by itself is groundbreaking, the advantages do not stop there. PCCT facilitates an unprecedented combination of ultra-high-resolution imaging without dose penalty or field-of-view restrictions, detector-based elimination of electronic noise, and ubiquitous multi-energy spectral information. Considering the high demands of orthopedic imaging for the visualization of minuscule details while simultaneously covering large portions of skeletal and soft tissue anatomy, no subspecialty may benefit more from this novel detector technology than musculoskeletal radiology. Deeply rooted in experimental and clinical research, this review article aims to provide an introduction to the cosmos of PCCT, explain its technical basics, and highlight the most promising applications for patient care, while also mentioning current limitations that need to be overcome.

Postoperative Extremity Tomosynthesis-A Superimposition-Free Alternative to Standard Radiography?

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the performance of tomosynthesis in the presence of osteosynthetic implants, aiming to overcome superimposition-induced limitations in conventional radiograms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After surgical fracture induction and subsequent osteosynthesis, 8 cadaveric fracture models (wrist, metacarpus, ankle, metatarsus) were scanned with the prototypical tomosynthesis mode of a multiuse x-ray system. Tomosynthesis protocols at 60, 80, and 116 kV (sweep angle 10°, 13 FPS) were compared with standard radiograms. Five radiologists independently rated diagnostic assessability based on an equidistant 7-point scale focusing on fracture delineation, intra-articular screw placement, and implant positioning. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to analyze interrater agreement.

RESULTS

Radiation dose in radiography was 0.48 ± 0.26 dGy·cm2 versus 0.12 ± 0.01, 0.36 ± 0.02, and 1.95 ± 0.11 dGy·cm2 for tomosynthesis scans at 60, 80, and 116 kV. Delineation of fracture lines was superior for 80/116 kV tomosynthesis compared with radiograms (P ≤ 0.003). Assessability of intra-articular screw placement was deemed favorable for all tomosynthesis protocols (P ≤ 0.004), whereas superiority for evaluation of implant positioning could not be ascertained (all P's ≥ 0.599). Diagnostic confidence was higher for 80/116 kV tomosynthesis versus radiograms and 60 kV tomosynthesis (P ≤ 0.002). Interrater agreement was good for fracture delineation (ICC, 0.803; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.598-0.904), intra-articular screw placement (ICC, 0.802; 95% CI, 0.599-0.903), implant positioning (ICC, 0.855; 95% CI, 0.729-0.926), and diagnostic confidence (ICC, 0.842; 95% CI, 0.556-0.934).

CONCLUSIONS

In the postoperative workup of extremity fractures, tomosynthesis allows for superior assessment of fracture lines and intra-articular screw positioning with greater diagnostic confidence at radiation doses comparable to conventional radiograms.

A comparative study of image quality and diagnostic confidence in diagnosis and follow-up of scaphoid fractures using photon-counting detector CT and energy-integrating detector CT

PURPOSE

Scaphoid fractures in patients and assessment of healing using PCD-CT have, as far as we know, not yet been studied. Therefore, the aim was to compare photon counting detector CT (PCD-CT) with energy integrating detector CT (EID-CT) in terms of fracture visibility and evaluation of fracture healing.

METHOD

Eight patients with scaphoid fracture were examined with EID-CT and PCD-CT within the first week post-trauma, and with additional scans at 4, 6 and 8 weeks. Our clinical protocol for wrist examination with EID-CT was used (CTDIvol 3.1 ± 0.1 mGy, UHR kernel Ur77). For PCD-CT matched radiation dose, reconstruction kernel Br89. Quantitative analyses of noise, CNR, trabecular and cortical sharpness, and bone volume fraction were conducted. Five radiologists evaluated the images for fracture visibility, fracture gap consolidation and image quality, and rated their confidence in the diagnosis.

RESULTS

The trabecular and cortical sharpness were superior in images obtained with PCD-CT compared with EID-CT. A successive reduction in trabecular bone volume fraction during the immobilized periods was found with both systems. Despite higher noise and lower CNR with PCD-CT, radiologists rated the image quality of PCD-CT as superior. The visibility of the fracture line within 1-week post-trauma was rated higher with PCD-CT as was diagnostic confidence, but the subsequent assessments of fracture gap consolidation during healing process and the confidence in diagnosis were found equivalent between both systems.

CONCLUSION

PCD-CT offers superior visibility of bone microstructure compared with EID-CT. The evaluation of fracture healing and confidence in diagnosis were rated equally with both systems, but the radiologists found primary fracture visibility and overall image quality superior with PCD-CT.