Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: Diagnostic role of gadolinium enhanced MR cisternography

High-Resolution Computed Tomography as an Initial Diagnostic and Localization Tool in Patients with Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea: A Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: This study was performed to investigate the utility of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) for the initial localization of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Methods: HRCT data regarding the point of cerebrospinal fluid leakage (as confirmed in the operating room), collected up to December 2022, were extracted from five databases. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Results: The search revealed eight relevant studies with a total of 254 patients. The diagnostic odds ratio of the imaging studies was 10.0729 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4486; 41.4376; I2 = 54.1%). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.8. Sensitivity, specificity, the negative predictive value, and the positive predictive value were 0.7550 (95% CI: 0.6163; 0.8553; I2 = 69.8%), 0.8502 (95% CI: 0.5986; 0.9557, I2 = 49.3%), 0.4106 (95% CI: 0.2418; 0.6035; I2 = 59.0%), and 0.9575 (95% CI: 0.8955; 0.9834; I2 = 27.7%), respectively. Conclusions: HRCT can be used to accurately localize cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea because it shows bony defects in high detail. However, it has limited utility for the evaluation of active leakage, and localization is difficult in the presence of coexisting lesions.

Efficacy of Imaging Methods in the Detection and Diagnosis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic efficacy of various imaging methods in patients with suspected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Cochrane Trials, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to December 2021.

REVIEW METHODS

Diagnostic accuracy was compared among seven radiological methods: computed tomography (CT), CT cisternography (CTC), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance cisternography (MRC), CT + MRI, radionuclide cisternography, and intrathecal gadolinium (Gd)-MRC. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were used as outcomes of the analysis. Both a traditional pairwise meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-three trials were included in the analysis. The results of a network meta-analysis performed on a network consisting of seven diagnostic methods showed that all imaging modalities had greater diagnostic accuracy than CT, with the exception of CTC, which had lower sensitivity. Only intrathecal Gd-MRC was significantly superior to other imaging methods with regard to sensitivity and accuracy. Gd-MRC also showed the greatest surface under the cumulative ranking curve values for all of the outcomes (sensitivity: 0.9200; specificity: 0.8364; accuracy: 0.8920).

CONCLUSION

This network meta-analysis demonstrates that intrathecal Gd-MRC is the most useful diagnostic method to detect CSF rhinorrhea. Laryngoscope, 2022.

Surgical Repair of Skull Base CSF Leaks after Cisternography Diagnosis: Analysis of Validity and Surgical Outcome and Impact on Future Treatment Strategies

Skull base cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks can lead to severe complications and require appropriate diagnosis and treatment. Cisternography is applied when exact localization via conventional imaging is not successful. The present study is aimed at identifying factors with potential impact on radiological results and surgical success. Cisternography followed by surgical repair due to skull base CSF leaks was performed in 63 cases between 2002 and 2020. The clinical and radiological findings were analyzed retrospectively. The etiology of CSF leaks was traumatic in 30.2%, spontaneous in 36.5%, and iatrogenic in 33.3%. The sensitivity of cisternography was 87.9%. Spontaneous CSF leaks tended to be diagnosed less frequently via cisternography and were significantly less frequently localized intraoperatively. The median postoperative follow-up period was 34 months. The primary surgical success rate was 79.4%, with a significantly higher success rate for lateral than for anterior skull base defects. Surgical failure tended to be lower in iatrogenic and higher in traumatic defects. Cisternography proved to be a highly sensitive method to localize skull base CSF leaks and can be recommended for advanced diagnostics. Iatrogenic leaks seemed to be more likely to have a favorable surgical outcome, whereas traumatic leaks tended to have a lower surgical success rate.

Usefulness of imaging studies for diagnosing and localizing cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the usefulness of diagnosis by imaging studies for the localization of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.

METHODS

PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases were searched up to July 2021. True and false positive and negative data were collected along with the characteristics of each study. Methodological quality was assessed using the QADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies involving 472 patients were included. The diagnostic odds ratio of imaging studies was 13.6195 (95% confidence interval [7.4756; 24.8129]; I² = 28.1%). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.712. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were 0.8507 ([0.7773; 0.9029]; 72.1%), 0.7827 ([0.6865; 0.8556], 26.8%), 0.5828 ([0.4398; 0.7132]; 67.4%), and 0.9407 ([0.8935; 0.9678]; 59.1%), respectively. In subgroup analysis, there were significant differences in sensitivity (computed tomography, 0.7421; computed tomography cisternography, 0.8872; magnetic resonance imaging, 0.8365; magnetic resonance cisternography, 0.8565; and intrathecal gadolinium magnetic resonance cisternography, 0.9307; radionuclide cisteronography, 0.7097; p  =  0.0481), and negative predictive value among imaging modalities (computed tomography, 0.3028; computed tomography cisternography, 0.4848; magnetic resonance imaging, 0.4658; magnetic resonance cisternography, 0.7465; and intrathecal gadolinium magnetic resonance cisternography, 0.8611, and radionuclide cisteronography, 0.5263; p  =  0.0046). There were no significant differences among imaging modalities in specificity, positive predictive value, or diagnostic odds ratio (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Imaging studies can be used in the diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Gadolinium magnetic resonance cisternography showed the highest diagnostic accuracy. Also, magnetic resonance cisternography showed fair diagnostic accuracy without intrathecal injection. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Diagnosis and Localization of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea: A Systematic Review

Background

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea results from abnormal communications between the subarachnoid and sinonasal spaces. Accurate preoperative diagnosis and localization are vital for positive clinical outcomes. However, the diagnosis and localization of CSF rhinorrhea remain suboptimal due to a lack of accurate understanding of test characteristics.

Objective

This systematic review aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of various tests and imaging modalities for diagnosing and localizing CSF rhinorrhea.

Methods

A systematic review of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Results

Our search identified 4039 articles—53 cohort studies and 24 case series describing 1622 patients were included. The studies were heterogeneous and had a wide range of sensitivities and specificities. Many specificities were incalculable due to a lack of true negative and false positive results, thus precluding a meta-analysis. Median sensitivities and specificities were calculated for cohort studies of the following investigations: high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) 0.93/0.50 (sensitivity/specificity), magnetic resonance cisternography (MRC) 0.94/0.77, computed tomography cisternography (CTC) 0.95/1.00, radionuclide cisternography (RNC) 0.90/0.50, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cisternography (CEMRC) 0.99/1.00, endoscopy 0.58/1.00, topical intranasal fluorescein (TIF) 1.00/incalculable, intrathecal fluorescein (ITF) 0.96/1.00. Case series were reviewed separately. Etiology and site-specific data were also analyzed.

Conclusion

MR cisternography is more accurate than high-resolution CT at diagnosing and localizing CSF rhinorrhea. CT cisternography, contrast-enhanced MR cisternography, and radionuclide cisternography have good diagnostic characteristics but are invasive. Intrathecal fluorescein shows promising data but has not been widely adopted for purely diagnostic use. Office endoscopy has limited data but does not sufficiently diagnose CSF rhinorrhea independently. These findings confirm with current guidelines and evidence.

Safety of Intrathecal Administration of Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background The use of MR cisternography with intrathecal administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) is limited by a lack of understanding of the relationship between intrathecal GBCA exposure and dose-related adverse events. Purpose To perform a systematic review to establish an understanding of the dose-response relationship of intrathecal GBCAs and to characterize related adverse events, particularly at higher doses. Materials and Methods Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Central databases were searched for studies reporting intrathecal GBCA use. Data extraction included studies focused on rates and types of adverse events after intrathecal GBCA exposure. A two-tailed independent sample t test statistic was used to evaluate the relationship between GBCA dose and the presence of serious versus nonserious adverse events. Meta-analysis was used to determine the overall incidence of adverse events. Study quality and publication bias were assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale and a funnel plot (effect size measured using Hedges' g followed by the Egger test), respectively. Results Fifty-three studies with a total of 1036 patients were included for analysis. The overall rate of adverse events after intrathecal administration of GBCA was 13% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.3%, 18%). Meta-analysis revealed moderate heterogeneity (I² = 62%). Serious adverse event rates could not be determined with meta-analysis. They were reported in 10 studies and were primarily neurologic in nature, with two cases of coma-one resulting in death. Serious adverse events were associated with significantly higher GBCA doses when compared with nonserious adverse events (mean difference, 4.5 mmol; 95% CI: 2.3 mmol, 6.6 mmol; P = .008). For serious adverse events, there was no clear dose-dependent increase in severity above 2.0 mmol. Conclusion Overall, intrathecal administration of GBCAs at doses greater than 1.0 mmol are associated with serious neurotoxic complications with relative clinical safety at lower doses. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kanal in this issue.

[A modern approach to the diagnosis of nasal liquorrhea]

Nasal liquorrhea is cerebrospinal fluid leakage from cerebrospinal fluid spaces of the cerebral cavity into the nasal cavity or paranasal sinuses due to congenital or acquired abnormalities of the skull base bones and meninges of various etiologies. The severity of liquorrhea varies from hidden manifestations to profuse leakage of cerebrospinal fluid from the nasal cavity. The diagnosis of overt nasal liquorrhea is not problematic, but the diagnosis of latent liquorrhea is a challenge. In this case, the disease leads to potentially fatal complications, such as meningitis (the risk amounts to 10-37%), pneumocephaly, pneumonia, etc. These peculiarites give rise to two main tasks: early diagnosis confirming liquorrhea and accurate identification of the CSF fistula location when planning further surgical management.

PURPOSE

The study purpose was to review and comparatively analyze all modern methods of diagnosing nasal liquorrhea as well as to substantiate the most effective and promising approaches and algorithms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included papers in English and Russian found in the Pubmed database and related to the diagnosis of basal liquorrhea of different etiology and localization.

RESULTS

This review demonstrates that diagnostic tests vary widely in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, invasiveness, and cost. Given all the criteria, detection of beta-2 transferrin or beta-trace protein is the best method for confirming nasal liquorrhea, and high-resolution computed tomography is the best technique for localization of the abnormality.

CONCLUSION

Based on the review, we suggest a diagnostic algorithm for nasal liquorrhea. However, the evidence presented in this review is unfortunately not very reliable, which indicates the existing need for more accurate studies.

Detection of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks: Is There a Radiologic Standard of Care? A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks traditionally involves laboratory testing of markers and appropriate imaging. Surgical localization can be difficult, and the inability to accurately localize skull base defects leads to increased rates of repair failure and complications. Many imaging techniques localizing and identifying CSF leaks have been proposed. Comparisons of current and investigational imaging techniques used to localize CSF leaks are reviewed.

METHODS

A comprehensive and systematic search through PubMed, Scopus, and reference lists from relevant articles was completed to identify literature on sensitivities of different imaging methods for localization and detection of CSF leaks. Prospective, retrospective, and case series published since 1995 that addressed imaging techniques for CSF leaks confined to the skull base were included. Sensitivities of each major imaging technique proposed were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 133 studies initially were screened from 2125 studies on preliminary search. Of these, 38 studies were included based on inclusion criteria. Studies were segregated by imaging modality. A total of 1000 patients with CSF leaks subsequently were evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

Although radionuclide cisternography has been the historical standard, recent imaging techniques have emerged considering the low sensitivity. Computed tomography cisternography with contrast also has low sensitivity, even in active leaks. Although high-resolution computed tomography is commonly the initial study of choice, magnetic resonance imaging methods, particularly 3-dimensional imaging, may prove to be a more sensitive study of choice. Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging combination methods may show promise in localizing CSF leaks. Stratifying by status and etiology may be an important determinant. Further studies investigating various imaging techniques for localizing CSF leaks are needed.

Imaging of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea and Otorrhea

As the obesity epidemic grows in the United States, rhinorrhea and otorrhea from spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks secondary to untreated idiopathic intracranial hypertension are increasing in prevalence. CSF rhinorrhea and otorrhea should also be carefully evaluated in posttraumatic and postsurgical settings, because untreated CSF leaks often have serious consequences. The work-up, diagnosis, and characterization of a CSF leak can be complex, often requiring a multimodality approach to optimize surgical planning. This article reviews the causes of CSF leaks, describes the methodology used to work up a suspected leak, and discusses the challenges of making an accurate diagnosis.

Diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: an evidence-based review with recommendations

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic strategies employed for cases of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea vary widely due to limited evidence-based guidance.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from January 1990 through September 2014, to examine 9 diagnostic and localization modalities for CSF rhinorrhea. Benefit-harm assessments, value judgments and recommendations were made based on the available evidence. Study exclusion criteria were language other than English, pre-1990 studies, case reports, and nonrhinologic leak. All authors agreed on recommendations through an iterative process.

RESULTS

We reviewed 68 studies examining 9 practices pertinent to the diagnosis of CSF rhinorrhea, with a highest aggregate grade of evidence of C. The literature does not support the use of the ring sign, glucose testing, radionuclide cisternography (RNC), or computed tomography cisternography (CTC) for identification of CSF leak. Beta-2 transferrin is the most reliable confirmatory test for CSF leak. High-resolution CT (HRCT) is then recommended as the first-line study for localization. Magnetic resonance cisternography (MRC) should be used for CSF leak identification as a second line for each of these if beta-2 transferrin is not available or if HRCT is ambiguous. Intrathecal fluorescein (IF) may also be of benefit in certain clinical scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Despite relatively low levels of evidence, recommendations for the diagnosis and management of CSF rhinorrhea can be made based on the current literature. Higher-level studies are needed to better determine optimal diagnostic and clinical management approaches.