Evaluation of lesions of the internal ligaments of the wrist; conventional magnetic resonance imaging versus MR arthrography (MRA)

No evidence for the superiority of 3 T MRI over 1.5 T MRI for diagnosing wrist ligamentous lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSES

Our aim was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of native MRI regarding different ligamentous lesions of the wrist and to analyze the influence of technical characteristics, such as field strength, application of fat saturation, 3D sequences, and wrist coils.

METHODS

The systematic search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases. Studies that were published before the 12th of February 2024 were included. All studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of native wrist MRI to that of wrist arthroscopy for suspected ligamentous lesions were included. Results were analyzed by anatomic localization and technical aspects of the MRI. To assess the quality of included studies, we used the revised QUADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

The systematic search revealed 5,181 articles. Thirty-seven studies, reporting 3893 ligamentous lesions, were eligible for inclusion. The studies displayed heterogeneity in terms of technical conditions, such as field strength, the use of wrist coils, the application of 3D sequences and fat saturation. Research methods also varied. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 0.78 (0.66 - 0.86) and 0.81 (0.70 - 0.89) for 1.5T MRI, while sensitivity was 0.73 (0.68 - 0.78) and specificity was 0.90 (0.59 - 0.98) for 3T MRI. There was no significant difference between the two subgroups (p=0,3807 and p=0,4248). Sensitivity was 0.82 (0.75 - 0.87) for triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) lesions, 0.63 (0.50 - 0.74) for scapholunate ligament (SL) tears, and 0.41 (0.25 - 0.60) for lunotriquetral ligament (LT) lesions. Specificity for TFCC lesions was 0.82 (0.73 - 0.89), for SL tears 0.86 (0.73 - 0.93), and for LT lesions 0.93 (0.81 - 0.98).

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity and specificity of MRI is influenced by the anatomic location of the lesion and technical conditions. In terms of diagnostic accuracy, no significant difference was found between 1.5T and 3T MRI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III. Systematic review of Level II. - III.

STUDIES

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist for clinically important lesions of the major interosseous ligaments and triangular fibrocartilage complex; correlation with radiocarpal arthroscopy

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the utility of MRI in separating clinically relevant from minor or incidental lesions of the triangular fibrocartilage complex and the major interosseous ligaments in the wrist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we identified 89 patients and correlated MRI finding with subsequent arthroscopy. Triangular fibrocartilage complex abnormalities have been subdivided into disc lesions-central and radial-or ulnar-sided tears according to MRI appearances and surgical findings as the clinical and surgical approach is very different. Interosseous ligament tears were subdivided into partial or complete, highlighting the principle of recognising surgically relevant lesions.

RESULTS

For simple central to radial tears and perforations of the triangular fibrocartilage complex, MRI was 98.3% accurate. MRI identified all peripheral triangular fibrocartilage complex tears seen at arthroscopy; however, the specificity of 66.7% may reflect partly the use of arthroscopy limited to the radiocarpal joint. MRI proved 95.4% accurate for surgically relevant scapholunate interosseous ligament tears and was highly accurate at separating limited from complete lunotriquetral interosseous ligament tears showing 100% accuracy for complete tears.

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows excellent correlation between MRI and arthroscopic findings that determine surgical relevance with a very high sensitivity for triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions and accurate separation of minor versus surgically relevant ligamentous tears.