Percutaneous ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis in advanced upper abdominal cancer pain

A Comparison of Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy-guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer

Background & Aims:

Celiac plexus neurolysis is an elegant way of reducing pain in patients with pancreatic cancer. The aim of this work was to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided celiac plexus neurolysis in pancreatic cancer management.

Methods:

This study included 60 patients presenting with pancreatic cancer pain; who were subjected to one session of celiac plexus neurolysis and were divided equally into two groups: - Group (1): included 30 patients (12 femalesamp;18 males); who were exposed to ultrasound (US)- guided celiac plexus neurolysis and group (2): included 30 patients (10 females & 20 males) who were exposed to fluoroscopy-guided celiac plexus neurolysis. Abdominal pain was assisted by visual analogue score (VAS).

Results:

Regarding VAS, our results revealed that all patients showed improvement after celiac plexus neurolysis either through ultrasound technique or via percutaneous fluoroscopy technique. Furthermore, the ultrasound group recorded more significant pain relief with improved VAS than the fluoroscopy group immediately and on long-term follow-up with mean ± SD as follows: - Immediately (9.2 ± 0.8) to (2.5 ± 0.7) vs. (9.1 ± 0.7) to (3.5 ± 0.82, respectively); After 1 week (1.1 ± 0.8 vs. 3.6 ± 1.7, respectively), after 1 month ( 1 ± 0.9 vs. 3.7 ± 1.9), after three months (1.7 ± 1.01 vs. 5.9 ± 1.7, respectively) and after 6 months (2.3 ± 0.6 vs. 7.5 ± 1.6, respectively).

Conclusion:

The study revealed that ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis is more durable, tolerable, effective and safe compared to fluoroscopy-guided neurolysis of patient suffering from pancreatic cancer pain.

Indian Society for Study of Pain, Cancer Pain Special Interest Group Guidelines on Interventional Management for Cancer Pain

The Indian Society for Study of Pain (ISSP), Cancer Pain Special Interest Group guidelines on interventional management for cancer pain in adults provide a structured, stepwise approach which will help to improve the management of cancer pain and to provide the patients with minimally acceptable quality of life. The guidelines have been developed based on the available literature and evidence, to suit the needs, patient population, and situations in India. A questionnaire based on the key elements of each sub draft addressing certain inconclusive areas where evidence was lacking was made available on the ISSP website and circulated by e-mail to all the ISSP and Indian Association of Palliative Care members. We recommend using interventional management when conventional therapy fails to offer adequate benefits or causes undesirable side effects. Vertebroplasty should be offered to patients with uncontrolled bone pain when expertise is available.

Evaluation of outcomes of ultrasound guided celiac plexus neurolysis using immediate post procedure computed tomography: An observational study

BACKGROUND

An interventional procedure like celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) has a significant role in relieving intractable pain in patients with locally advanced abdominal malignancies. Ultrasound (USG) guidance enables performance of bedside CPN by real-time visualization of the needle trajectory. The objective of the study was to perform percutaneous USG-guided CPN and to verify technical outcomes of the procedure using a post-procedure CT scan.

METHODS

Eleven eligible patients of advanced upper abdominal malignancies having a pain score of >3/10 on visual analog scale (VAS) were recruited to undergo CPN. A post-procedure CT scan was performed to evaluate technical outcomes of the procedure. Patients were evaluated for pain relief. They were followed up at the 1st, 4th, and 6th weeks after CPN.

RESULTS

Eleven patients underwent USG-guided CPN. The injected drug was visualized as an echogenic cloud in ultrasound in 7 out of 11 (64%) patients. In the remaining 4 patients, the echogenic cloud was not well formed. In the post-procedure CT scan, the spread of the drug was seen in all 11 patients. This spread was bilaterally symmetrical in 7 (64%) patients and asymmetrical or unilateral in 4 (36%) patients. All patients in the immediate post-procedure period and 91% of the patients during the 1st-, 4th-, and 6th-week follow up had improvement in their pain scores.

CONCLUSION

A post-procedure CT scan was useful in verifying the technical outcome of USG-guided CPN in patients with advanced upper abdominal malignancies.