Value of diffusion weighted MRI in assessment of simple and complicated perianal fistula

Comparing the Efficacy of a Combination of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and T2-STIR (Short Tau Inversion Recovery) Imaging With Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Evaluation of Perianal Fistula

BACKGROUND

Perianal fistula is clinically diagnosed and commonly characterized using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and T2-weighted imaging are emerging techniques that can obviate the need for contrast injection in cases where contrast administration is not feasible or contraindicated. The main objective of our study was to compare the efficacy of the combination of DWI and T2 STIR (short tau inversion recovery) imaging with contrast-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis and characterization of perianal fistula.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with clinical perianal fistula with at least one external opening were evaluated with DWI, T2 STIR, and contrast MRI. A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India. The chi-square test was done to find the association between categorical variables. The Kappa test was done to estimate the agreement between two different tests in measuring the outcome. The validity of tests was measured using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy.

RESULTS

The combination of DWI and T2 STIR is equivalent to contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of primary and complicated perianal fistula. The combination of DWI and T2 STIR is superior to DWI alone in the classification and characterization of perianal fistula. However, DWI is superior to T2 STIR in differentiating perianal inflammation with abscess from perianal inflammation without abscess and can be used as an alternative to post-contrast fat-suppressed T1-WI in the detection of perianal abscesses and disease activity.

CONCLUSION

DWI can be used as an adjunct to T2 STIR, and the combination of DWI and T2 STIR can replace the post-contrast fat-suppressed T1 MRI sequence in the classification and characterization of perianal fistula.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the workup of patients with perianal fistulas

Background

Perianal sepsis and fistulas are common lesions. Fistula-in-ano is a tedious problem because of high recurrence rates and severe unexpected complications postoperatively. Many imaging modalities are used to evaluate this area. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been considered the gold standard procedure for perianal fistula assessment, i.e., it provides the surgeon with an accurate roadmap to select the best surgical approach, determines the extent of sphincter division, and estimates the risk of postoperative incontinence. We carried out a prospective diagnostic accuracy study involving 50 patients (mean age, 42.44 years) with perianal fistulas who underwent pelvic MRI with a 1.5 Tesla scanner using multiple sequences, including diffusion and post-contrast series that were either local or systemic. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic validity of pelvic MRI/MR fistulogram in perianal fistula assessment, identify perianal fistula-associated findings by MRI, and optimize the MRI technique with maximum technical safety.

Results

Intersphincteric fistulas were the most common type of perianal fistula observed based on Parks’ classification. Intersphincteric, trans-sphincteric, extrasphincteric, and suprasphincteric fistulas were found in 30 (60%), 12 (24%), 4 (8%), and 4 (8%) patients, respectively. According to St. James’ classification, 21 (42%), 9 (18%), 8 (16%), 4 (8%), and 8 (16%) patients had perianal fistula grades I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. The combination of variable MR sequences and MR fistulogram increased the diagnostic validity of MRI examinations. Our results correlated with surgical results (reference standard) with perfect interobserver reliability.

Conclusions

Of all imaging modalities, MRI has become a prerequisite for a successful surgery of a perianal fistula. MRI can identify: (a) fistula morphological details, (b) the relationship between the fistulous tract and the anal sphincter, (c) fistula wound healing, (d) an active versus chronic scarred fistula, (e) postoperative stigmata, and (f) a perianal fistula from its mimics. MRI with variable sequences and MRI fistulogram are successful combinations that increase diagnostic efficiency with technical safety by avoiding both ionizing radiation and systemic gadolinium.

Evaluating postoperative anal fistula prognosis by diffusion-weighted MRI

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore whether preoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) can be used to evaluate the prognosis of anal fistula and identify the influence factors of postoperative recurrence.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 117 patients with anal fistula who have undergone preoperative DW-MRI and surgery. All patients were followed up by telephone or reexamination within 2 years after surgery. Of the 117 patients, 35 were excluded due to loss of follow-up and only 82 were included in this study. MRI fistula imaging-related data were analyzed, and fistula severity was scored using criteria of both local extension of fistulas and active inflammation for a total maximum score of 22. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of the fistula in patients with anal fistula during preoperative MRI examination was measured. According to whether anal fistula patients are accompanied by perianal abscess, they are divided into two groups, namely anal fistula group and anal fistula with abscess group. Based on whether patients with anal fistula recur after surgery, they were further divided into recurrent group and non-recurrent group.

RESULTS

82 patients with anal fistula were included in this analysis, 23 of them recurred and 59 were cured. Among patients with perianal abscess, the mean ADC value of the recurrent group was (1.19 ± 0.21)×10^-3 mm²/s, which is significantly lower than that of the non-recurrent group (1.36 ± 0.19)×10^-3 mm²/s. There were significant statistical differences in ADC values between the two groups (p = 0.03). Among patients with anal fistulas without abscesses, 15 patients recurred after surgery, with a mean ADC value of (1.45 ± 0.27) ×10^-3 mm²/s, and 33 patients didn't occur, with a mean ADC value of (1.44 ± 0.31)×10^-3 mm²/s. The ADC value of preoperative fistula in patients was negative significant correlation with MRI findings score (r= -0.332, P = 0.002). Risk factors for the recurrence after anal fistula surgery include the time interval between MRI and operation, multiple fistula tracks. Fatigue, excessive intake of spicy or greasy food and diarrhea may also be external risk factors for postoperative recurrence of patients with anal fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

DW-MRI has important application value for the prognosis evaluation of anal fistula. Complex type of anal fistula and improper lifestyle are the main risk factors affecting the recurrence after anal fistula surgery.