Utility of coronal contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed FLAIR in the evaluation of optic neuropathy and atrophy

Comparison between contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed 3D FLAIR brain MR images and T2-weighted orbital MR images at 3 Tesla for the diagnosis of acute optic neuritis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the capabilities of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed (CE FS) three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3D FLAIR) brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with those of coronal T2-weighted orbital MRI obtained at 3 Tesla for the diagnosis of optic neuritis (ON).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who presented to our center with acute visual loss and underwent MRI examination of the orbits and the brain between November 2014 and February 2020 were retrospectively included. Three radiologists independently and blindly analyzed CE FS 3D FLAIR and coronal T2-weighted images. Disagreements in image interpretation were resolved by consensus with an independent neuroradiologist who was not involved in the initial reading sessions. The primary adjudication criterion for the diagnosis of ON was the presence of an optic nerve hypersignal. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CE 3D FLAIR brain images were compared with those of coronal T2-weighted orbital images using McNemar test. Artifacts were classified into three categories and compared between the two image sets.

RESULTS

A total of 1023 patients were included. There were 638 women and 385 men with a mean age of 42 ± 18.3 (standard deviation) years (age range: 6-92 years). Optic nerve hyperintensities were identified in 375/400 (94%) patients with ON using both 3D FLAIR and coronal T2-weighted images. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of both sequences were 94% (95% CI: 91.3-96.1), 79% (95% CI: 75.5-82.2), and 89% (95% CI: 86.8-90.7), respectively. Optic disc hypersignal was detected in 120/400 patients (30%) using 3D FLAIR compared to 3/400 (0.75%) using coronal T2-weighted images (P < 0.001). Optic radiation hypersignal was observed in 2/400 (0.5%) patients using 3D FLAIR images. Significantly more artifacts (moderate or severe) were observed on coronal T2-weighted images (801/1023; 78%) by comparison with 3D FLAIR images (448/1023; 44%) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The performance of 3D FLAIR brain MRI for the diagnosis of ON is not different from that of coronal T2-weighted orbital MRI and its use for optic nerve analysis may be beneficial.

Fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery sequence with fat suppression as an alternative to contrast-enhanced MRI in pediatric synovitis

BACKGROUND

Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery sequence (FLAIR) with fat suppression (FS) has not been validated in children.

OBJECTIVE

Compare FLAIR to T1-weighted post contrast (T1CE) in the detection of knee synovitis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Institutional review board (IRB) waived consent. Children who underwent T1CE and FLAIR sequences of the knee on a 3-T magnet from April 2021 to December 2021 were included. Two pediatric radiologists assessed axial FLAIR and T1CE images for synovitis and synovial thickness. Reliability and agreement were assessed. Sensitivities, specificities, and accuracy were calculated for FLAIR using T1CE as reference standard.

RESULTS

In total, 42 knees (39 patients) were assessed (median age 12.9 years (2.3-17.8 years); 62% male, 38% female). Readers judged 20/42 (48%) knees to have synovitis. Sensitivity of FLAIR for reader 1 was 79% (19/24; 95% CI 0.58, 0.93) and 84% (16/19; 95% CI 0.60, 0.97) for reader 2. Specificity of FLAIR for reader 1 was 94% (17/18; 95% CI 0.73, 1) and 83% (19/23; 95% CI 0.61, 0.95) for reader 2. Accuracy for readers 1 and 2 was 86% (36/42; 95% CI 0.71, 0.95) and 83% (35/42; 95% CI 0.69, 0.93), respectively. Inter-reader reliability was good (0.75-0.90) for synovial measurements for FLAIR (ICC = 0.80; 95% CI 0.71, 0.86) and moderate for T1 CE (ICC = 0.62 (95% CI 0.48, 0.73)).

CONCLUSION

FLAIR FS depicts synovium in the pediatric knee with similar reliability to T1 CE and may be an acceptable alternative to contrast in the initial diagnosis of synovitis.

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced 3D FLAIR sequence in acute optic neuritis

PURPOSE

Contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence of the brain has the potential for detecting optic nerve abnormality. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of whole-brain contrast-enhanced three-dimensional FLAIR with fat suppression (CE 3D FLAIR FS) sequence in detecting acute optic neuritis to dedicated orbit MRI and clinical diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients with acute optic neuritis who underwent whole-brain CE-3D-FLAIR FS and dedicated orbit MRI were retrospectively included. The hypersignal FLAIR of the optic nerve on whole-brain CE-3D-FLAIR FS, enhancement, and hypersignal T2W on orbit images were assessed. The optic nerve to frontal white matter signal intensity ratio on CE-FLAIR FS was calculated as maximum signal intensity ratio (SIR) and mean SIR.

RESULTS

Twenty-six hypersignals of optic nerves were found on CE-FLAIR FS from 30 pathologic nerves. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of CE FLAIR FS brain and dedicated orbital images for diagnosing acute optic neuritis were 77%, 93%, 96%, 65%, and 82% and 83%, 93%, 96%, 72%, and 86%, respectively. Optic nerve to frontal white matter SIR of the affected optic nerves was higher than that of normal optic nerves. Using a cutoff maximum SIR of 1.24 and cutoff mean SIR of 1.16, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 93%, 86%, 93%, 80%, and 89% and 93%, 86%, 93%, 86%, and 91%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The hypersignal of the optic nerve on whole-brain CE 3D FLAIR FS sequence has qualitative and quantitative diagnostic potential in patients with acute optic neuritis.

Assessment of lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: practical guidelines

MRI has improved the diagnostic work-up of multiple sclerosis, but inappropriate image interpretation and application of MRI diagnostic criteria contribute to misdiagnosis. Some diseases, now recognized as conditions distinct from multiple sclerosis, may satisfy the MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis (e.g. neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, Susac syndrome), thus making the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis more challenging, especially if biomarker testing (such as serum anti-AQP4 antibodies) is not informative. Improvements in MRI technology contribute and promise to better define the typical features of multiple sclerosis lesions (e.g. juxtacortical and periventricular location, cortical involvement). Greater understanding of some key aspects of multiple sclerosis pathobiology has allowed the identification of characteristics more specific to multiple sclerosis (e.g. central vein sign, subpial demyelination and lesional rims), which are not included in the current multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria. In this review, we provide the clinicians and researchers with a practical guide to enhance the proper recognition of multiple sclerosis lesions, including a thorough definition and illustration of typical MRI features, as well as a discussion of red flags suggestive of alternative diagnoses. We also discuss the possible place of emerging qualitative features of lesions which may become important in the near future.

Evaluating the Utility of a Postprocessing Algorithm for MRI Evaluation of Optic Neuritis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

MR imaging is useful for the detection and/or confirmation of optic neuritis. The objective of this study was to determine whether a postprocessing algorithm selectively increases the contrast-to-noise ratio of abnormal optic nerves in optic neuritis, facilitating this diagnosis on MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective case-control study, coronal FLAIR images and coronal contrast-enhanced T1WI from 44 patients (31 eyes with clinically confirmed optic neuritis and 28 control eyes) underwent processing using a proprietary postprocessing algorithm designed to detect and visually highlight regions of contiguous increases in signal intensity by increasing the signal intensities of regions that exceed a predetermined threshold. For quantitative evaluation of the effect on image processing, the contrast-to-noise ratio of equivalent ROIs and the contrast-to-noise ratio between optic nerves and normal-appearing white matter were measured on baseline and processed images. The effect of image-processing on diagnostic performance was evaluated by masked reviews of baseline and processed images by 6 readers with varying experience levels.

RESULTS

In abnormal nerves, processing resulted in an increase in the median contrast-to-noise ratio from 17.8 to 85.0 (P < .001) on FLAIR and from 19.4 to 93.7 (P < .001) on contrast-enhanced images. The contrast-to-noise ratio for control optic nerves was not affected by processing (P = 0.13). Image processing had a beneficial effect on radiologists' diagnostic performance, with an improvement in sensitivities for 5/6 readers and relatively unchanged specificities. Interobserver agreement improved following processing.

CONCLUSIONS

Processing resulted in a selective increase in the contrast-to-noise ratio for diseased nerves and corresponding improvement in the detection of optic neuritis on MR imaging by radiologists.

Contrast-Enhanced 3D-FLAIR Imaging of the Optic Nerve and Optic Nerve Head: Novel Neuroimaging Findings of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The sensitivity of contrast-enhanced 3D-FLAIR has not been assessed in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether hyperintensity of the optic nerve/optic nerve head on contrast-enhanced 3D-FLAIR imaging is associated with papilledema in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted from 2012 to 2015 of patients with clinically diagnosed idiopathic intracranial hypertension and age- and sex-matched controls who had MR imaging with contrast-enhanced 3D-FLAIR. Two neuroradiologists graded each optic nerve/optic nerve head on a scale of 0-3. This grade was then correlated with the Frisén Scale, an ophthalmologic scale used for grading papilledema from 0 (normal) to 5 (severe edema). To estimate the correlation between the MR imaging and Frisén scores, we calculated the Kendall τ coefficient.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (3 men, 43 women) with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and 61 controls (5 men, 56 women) with normal findings on MR imaging were included in this study. For both eyes, there was moderate correlation between the 2 scales (right eye: τ = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31-0.57; left eye: τ = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24-0.49). Interreader reliability for MR imaging scores showed high interreader reliability (right eye: κ = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88; left eye: κ = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.94). Contrast-enhanced 3D-FLAIR imaging correlates with the Frisén Scale for moderate-to-severe papilledema and less so for mild papilledema.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperintensity of the optic nerve/optic nerve head on contrast-enhanced 3D-FLAIR is sensitive for the detection of papilledema in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension, which may be useful when prompt diagnosis is crucial.

Contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed FLAIR for the characterization of leptomeningeal inflammation in optic neuritis

BACKGROUND

Leptomeningeal contrast enhancement on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images has been reported in patients with multiple sclerosis and interpreted as a biomarker of inflammation. In this study, we sought to evaluate this phenomenon in patients with optic neuritis (ON).

METHODS

A total of 42 patients with suspected ON were included in this prospective study and underwent a dedicated study magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol including native and contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed thin-section axial and coronal FLAIR images on an 1.5 T magnetic resonance (MR) system.

RESULTS

After diagnostic workup, 34 patients with final diagnosis of ON were analyzed in detail. On contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed FLAIR images, 25 (73.5%) patients with ON demonstrated perioptic leptomeningeal enhancement, and in 3 (8.8%) patients, this was even the only pathological MRI finding. In comparison, patients with perioptic leptomeningeal enhancement on contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed FLAIR images had a higher prevalence of additional hyperintense brain lesions ( p = 0.022) as well as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-specific oligoclonal bands ( p = 0.013) than patients without.

CONCLUSION

Perioptic leptomeningeal contrast enhancement on fat-suppressed FLAIR images is a novel marker in ON and possibly reflects a leptomeningeal inflammatory process preceding or accompanying ON. Thin-section contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed FLAIR images might be a useful addition in MRI protocols for patients with suspected ON.

Role of coronal high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging in acute optic neuritis: a comparison with axial orientation

PURPOSE

Through a comparison with the axial orientation, we aimed to evaluate the role of coronal high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in acute optic neuritis based on diagnostic accuracy and the reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements.

METHODS

Orbital DWI, using readout-segmented, parallel imaging, and 2D navigator-based reacquisition (RESOLVE-DWI), was performed on 49 patients with acute vision loss. The coronal (thickness = 3 mm) and axial (thickness = 2 mm) diffusion images were evaluated by two neuroradiologists retrospectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated through diagnostic test; the inter- and intra-observer reliabilities were assessed with a weighted Cohen's kappa test. In addition, the agreement of ADC measurement among observers was evaluated by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), and Bland-Altman plots. Comparison of ADC values was also performed by unpaired t test.

RESULTS

Among the 49 patients, 47 clinically positive optic nerves and 51 clinically negative optic nerves were found. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 85.1/87.2%, 90.2/94.12%, and 87.8/90.8%, respectively, for coronal RESOLVE-DWI and 83.0/85.1%, 66.7/76.5%, and 75.5/79.6%, respectively, for axial RESOLVE-DWI. The inter-observer kappa values were 0.710 and 0.806 for axial and coronal RESOLVE-DWI, respectively, and the intra-observer kappa values were 0.822 and 0.909, respectively (each P < 0.0001). Regarding the reproducibility of ADC measurements on axial and coronal RESOLVE-DWI, the ICCs among observers were 0.846 and 0.941, respectively, and the CV values were 7.046 and 4.810%, respectively. Bland-Altman plots revealed smaller inter-observer variability on coronal RESOLVE-DWI. ADC values were significantly lower in positive group (each P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Higher specificity and better reproducibility of ADC measurements were found for coronal RESOLVE-DWI, which demonstrated the feasibility of the use of coronal RESOLVE-DWI to examine acute optic neuritis patients.