Multiple liver pseudotumors due to hepatic steatosis and fatty sparing: A non-invasive imaging approach

Multifocal Nodular Fatty Sparing Mimicking Hepatic Tumors

Hepatic steatosis is frequent; however, it may present with unusual patterns, resulting in a diagnostic dilemma. Herein, we present a case of fatty liver and multifocal nodular hepatic lesions that were found to be due to multifocal nodular fatty sparing, which mimics metastasis or primary multifocal tumors. As the differential diagnosis of such lesions can be difficult based on ultrasound alone, the knowledge of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings is crucial. It enables the radiologists to make the correct diagnosis and alleviate the patient from unnecessary biopsies.

Incidental Liver Lesions in children: A practical and evidence-based approach

Incidental liver lesions are increasingly being discovered in the context of the increased use of ultrasound studies and the majority are benign. In children, although individually rare, the differential diagnosis is broad and therefore a systematic approach is of utmost importance to reduce the radiological and disease burden in children and their families. This review article collected current evidence and provides fundamental information for the clinician regarding specific differential diagnoses and unique imaging features of benign liver lesions in children. Ultimately, we propose a practical stepwise approach mainly involving clinical and radiological workup. Laboratory tests and histopathological examination may be necessary in the presence of red flags or in indeterminate lesions.

Computed tomography-based evaluation of segmental variation of liver density and its implications

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become a major health concern. Focal fat deposition frequently seems to involve segment IV b. This indicates a consistent pattern of fat deposition in the liver. The present study evaluates the pattern of fat distribution in the liver using computed tomogram (CT) attenuation index.

METHODS

Two radiologists evaluated 517 non-contrast CT scan images of the abdomen and pelvis. Two 40-mm² regions of interest (ROIs) were selected from each segment. The hepatic segmental densities (HSDs) were obtained by calculating the mean densities of areas of corresponding liver segments. The mean hepatic attenuation (MHA) was quantified by obtaining the mean segmental densities. Densities were compared between the segments and with the MHA.

RESULTS

The mean age (SD) of the patients was 55.5 year (15.6), and 276 (53.4%) were males. The overall mean hepatic density was 53.05 (95% CI, 52.95-53.15) Hounsfield units (HU). The lowest mean HSD was observed in segment IV b and the highest mean HSD was observed in segment V. Segments I, IV a and IV b showed significantly lower mean HSDs and segments V, VI and VIII showed significantly higher mean HSDs compared with the overall mean MHA/mean hepatic density (MHD), whereas mean HSDs of segments II, III and VII were not significantly different from the overall mean MHA/MHD.

CONCLUSION

Segment IV b seems to be the most vulnerable site for fat deposition; focal lesions here should be carefully evaluated. Segments II, III and VII seem to closely represent MHD.