1
|
Aly A, Tsapaki V, Ahmed AZ, Own A, Patro S, Al Naemi H, Kharita MH. Clinical diagnostic reference levels in neuroradiology based on clinical indication. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2024; 200:755-762. [PMID: 38702851 PMCID: PMC11148473 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncae113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
This study focuses on patient radiation exposure in interventional neuroradiology (INR) procedures, a field that has advanced significantly since its inception in the 1980s. INR employs minimally invasive techniques to treat complex cerebrovascular diseases in the head, neck, and spine. The study establishes diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for three clinical indications (CIs): stroke (S), brain aneurysms (ANs), and brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM). Data from 209 adult patients were analyzed, and DRLs were determined in terms of various dosimetric and technical quantities. For stroke, the established DRLs median values were found to be 78 Gy cm2, 378 mGy, 118 mGy, 12 min, 442 images, and 15 runs. Similarly, DRLs for brain AN are 85 Gy cm2, 611 mGy, 95.5 mGy, 19.5, 717 images, and 26 runs. For brain AVM, the DRL's are 180 Gy cm2, 1144 mGy, 537 mGy, 36 min, 1375 images, and 31 runs. Notably, this study is unique in reporting DRLs for specific CIs within INR procedures, providing valuable insights for optimizing patient safety and radiation exposure management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antar Aly
- Medical Physics Section, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar
- Radiology Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha 24144, Qatar
| | - Virginia Tsapaki
- Medical Physics Department, Konstantopoulio Hospital, 142 33 Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Ahmed Own
- Neurosurgery Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar
| | - Satya Patro
- Neurosurgery Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar
| | - Huda Al Naemi
- Radiology Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha 24144, Qatar
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dalah EZ, Alsuwaidi JS, AlKtebi RS, AlMulla MAA, Gupta P. Establishing Protocol-based Dose Metrics for Common Abdomen and Pelvis Computed Tomography Protocols. Curr Med Imaging 2024; 20:e220523217204. [PMID: 37218187 DOI: 10.2174/1573405620666230522151357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The majority of the existing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) that have been established for computed tomography (CT) are based on various anatomical locations, such as the head, chest, abdomen, etc. However, DRLs are initiated to improve radiation protection by conducting a comparison of similar examinations with similar objectives. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of establishing dose baselines based on common CT protocols for patients who underwent enhanced CT abdomen and pelvis exams. METHODS Dose length product total (tDLPs), volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), effective dose (E), and scan acquisition parameters for a total of 216 adult patients, who underwent an enhanced CT abdomen and pelvis exams over a one-year period, were obtained and retrospectively analyzed. Spearman coefficient and one-way ANOVA tests were used to check significant differences between dose metrics and the different CT protocols. RESULTS The data exhibited 9 different CT protocols to acquire an enhanced CT abdomen and pelvis exam at our institute. Out of these, 4 were found more common, i.e., CT protocols were acquired for a minimum of 10 cases. Triphasic liver demonstrated the highest mean and median tDLPs across all 4 CT protocols. Triphasic liver protocol registered the highest E followed by gastric sleeve protocol with a mean of 28.7 and 24.7 mSv, respectively. Significant differences (p < 0.0001) were found between the tDLPs of anatomical location and the CT protocol. CONCLUSION Evidently, wide variability exists across CT dose indices and patient dose metrics relying on anatomical-based dose baseline, i.e., DRLs. Patient dose optimizations require establishing dose baselines based on CT protocols rather than the anatomical location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Entesar Zawam Dalah
- Department of Head Quarter Diagnostic Imaging, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- College of Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Jamila Salam Alsuwaidi
- Department of Clinical Support Services and Nursing Sector, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Reem Salim AlKtebi
- Department of Radiology, Rashid Hospital, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Priyank Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Rashid Hospital, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abdulwahid Noor K, Mohd Norsuddin N, Abdul Karim MK, Che Isa IN, Alshamsi W. Estimating Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Mammography in Dubai. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 14:8. [PMID: 38201317 PMCID: PMC10804395 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14010008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
As the total volume of mammograms in Dubai is increasing consistently, it is crucial to focus on the process of dose optimization by determining dose reference levels for such sensitive radiographic examinations as mammography. This work aimed to determine local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for mammography procedures in Dubai at different ranges of breast thickness. A total of 2599 anonymized mammograms were randomly retrieved from a central dose survey database. Mammographic cases for screening women aged from 40 to 69 years were included, while cases of breast implants and breast thickness outside the range of 20-100 mm were excluded. Mean, median, and 75 percentiles were obtained for the mean glandular dose (MGD) distribution of each mammography projection for all compressed breast thickness (CBT) ranges. The local DRLs for mammography in Dubai were found to be between 0.80 mGy and 0.82 mGy for the craniocaudal (CC) projection and between 0.89 mGy and 0.971.8 mGy for the mediolateral oblique (MLO) projection. Local DRLs were proposed according to different breast thicknesses, starting from 20 to 100 mm. All groups of CBT showed a slight difference in MGD values, with higher values in MLO views rather than CC views. The local DRLs in this study were lower than some other Middle Eastern countries and lower than the standard reference levels reported by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) at 3 mGy/view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaltham Abdulwahid Noor
- Dubai Health Academic Corporate, Radiology Department, Rashid Hospital, Dubai 00971, United Arab Emirates;
- Center of Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Investigative Studies (CODTIS), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia;
| | - Norhashimah Mohd Norsuddin
- Center of Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Investigative Studies (CODTIS), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia;
| | | | - Iza Nurzawani Che Isa
- Center of Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Investigative Studies (CODTIS), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia;
| | - Wadha Alshamsi
- SEHA, Medical Physics Department, Al Ain Hospital, Abu Dhabi 80050, United Arab Emirates;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aldahery ST. Assessment of radiographers' knowledge about radiation doses and DRLs in computed tomography departments in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. Saudi Pharm J 2023; 31:101820. [PMID: 37928978 PMCID: PMC10622684 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess radiographers' understanding of radiation safety considering the newly approved national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) as an optimization tool for radiation dose. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia among radiographers working at local hospitals in Jeddah city from February to March 2022. The survey comprised of 22 questions involving demographic information; and general information related to radiation dose; CTDIvol and DRLs. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26. Chi-square test was used to compare demographic groups regarding their distribution of responses with 0.05 as the level of significance. Results A total of 169 radiographers participated in the study (39 % females, 60 % males). Most of the participants (91 %) were aware of the description of the ALARA principle. It was noted that (47 %) of the participants indicated that the routine scanning protocols are designed by the radiologists. The majority of them (78 %) were confident to manipulate the CT scanning parameters properly. In addition, half of the participants (53 %) were aware of the CTDIvol and DLP. Unexpectedly, none of the demographic variables were significantly associated with the radiographers' knowledge about radiation dose, p-values are > 0.05. Conclusion Although radiographers demonstrated good knowledge of radiation protection, limited awareness of DRLs was noted among radiographers and lack of implementing and optimizing the local dose of the DRLs in this study. Therefore, education and training for healthcare professionals including radiographers are necessary to enhance clinical practical performance in radiology departments.
Collapse
|
5
|
Sebelego I, Acho S, van der Merwe B, Rae WID. Size based dependence of patient dose metrics, and image quality metrics for clinical indicator-based imaging protocols in abdominal CT procedures. Radiography (Lond) 2023; 29:961-974. [PMID: 37572570 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Diagnostic reference level (DRL) values for computed tomography (CT) based on clinical indication are warranted since imaging protocols are indication-dependent. This study proposes clinical DRL values using the CT dose metrics and five patient size-related parameters while considering image quality. METHODS The volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP) and five size-related parameters of size-specific dose estimates (SSDE), namely the anterior-posterior (AP) dimension, lateral (LAT) dimension, sum dimension, effective diameter, and the body mass index (BMI), were used to calculate DRL values for CT chest-abdomen-pelvis (CAP) and abdomen-pelvis (AbP) protocols. DRL values of the clinical indications for cancer, urinary system stones and other pathologies were assessed based on the BMI classifications using the median and 75th percentile. An image subtraction algorithm was used to assess the image quality metrics (IQM) of the CT images. RESULTS The 75th percentile for SSDEAP dimension for CAP cancer was 19.7, 14.9 and 12.7 mGy at Hospitals A, C and E, respectively. The median DLP for other AbP pathologies was 556.3, 1452.0 and 1960.7 mGy.cm for normal weight, overweight and obese patients, respectively, at Hospital A. The image quality varied among BMI classifications for different clinically indicated examinations. Although the dose increased with BMI, the image quality index was consistent because automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) was used. CONCLUSION DRL values are influenced by patient size-related parameters and the clinical indication protocols, while the image quality index is independent of the BMI. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Size-related clinical DRL values and image quality index can be used to monitor and optimise dose and image quality. Acquisition parameters and image quality indexes should be investigated and adjusted when unusually high DRL values are noted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Sebelego
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
| | - S Acho
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - B van der Merwe
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - W I D Rae
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa; Medical Imaging Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li X, Steigerwalt D, Rehani MM. T-shirt size as a classification for body habitus in computed tomography (CT) and development of size-based dose reference levels for different indications. Eur J Radiol 2022; 151:110289. [PMID: 35397408 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the impact of patient size on dose indices and develop size-based reference levels (50th and 75th percentiles) for 20 body CT exams for routine and organ-specific clinical indications. METHODS Based on effective diameter estimated from adult body CT, each acquisition was classified into T-shirt size as XXS, XS, S, M, L, XL, and XXL. Radiation dose indices for each size and each exam type were correlated. RESULTS About 0.93 million CT exams from 256 CT facilities in the United States were analysed. Taking T-shirt size M as a reference, the CTDIvol for other sizes were: XXS (∼60%), XS (∼65%), S (∼75%), L (∼130%), XL (∼165%), XXL (∼210%), or grossly small patients received about 60% of the dose as compared to M sized patients and XXL required doubling the dose. Taking ratio of the dose indices of the largest to smallest size, it was evident that SSDE variation was much less (about 50%) than that in CTDIvol, but there was still nearly 40 to 220% variation in SSDE across the range of t-shirt sizes. The 50th and 75th percentile values are presented for CTDIvol, SSDE and DLP for each of the 20 CT exams and for each of the seven T-shirt sizes. CONCLUSIONS A novel approach expressing body habitus in terms of T-shirt size is not only simple and intuitive, but it also provides a tool to have a perception of differences in dose metrices among patients of different body build.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinhua Li
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Str, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | | | - Madan M Rehani
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Str, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
El Mansouri M, Choukri A, Nhila O, Talbi M. Evaluation of radiation dose in lumbar spine computed tomography in a single Moroccan center. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
8
|
Dalah EZ, Alsuwaidi JS, Hamed MS, Gani AHA, Beevi HAA, Panangatil AG, Funtelar CO, Ferrer AY, Al Hussein SGAB, Albedwawi SA. Challenges experienced in establishing clinical indication based diagnostic reference levels: Pilot study. Eur J Radiol 2022; 148:110046. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
9
|
Damilakis J, Vassileva J. The growing potential of diagnostic reference levels as a dynamic tool for dose optimization. Phys Med 2021; 84:285-287. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|