3D CT cinematic rendering of pediatric thoracic vascular anomalies

Clinical implementation of cinematic rendering

Cinematic rendering is a recently developed photorealistic display technique for standard volumetric data sets. It has broad-reaching applications in cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, abdominopelvic, and thoracic imaging. It has been used for surgical planning and has emerging use in educational settings. We review the logistics of performing this post-processing step and its integration into existing workflow.

Expanded experience with cardiovascular black blood cinematic rendering

Black blood cinematic rendering (BBCR) is a newly described preset for cinematic rendering, which creates photorealistic displays from volumetric data sets with the contrast-enhanced blood pool displayed as dark and transparent. That set of features potentially provides for enhanced visualization of endomyocardial and intraluminal pathology, as well as cardiac devices. The similarity of the images to black-blood magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may allow for expansion of the evaluation of certain types of pathology into patient populations unable to undergo MRI. In the emergency setting, the rapid acquisition time and reasonable post-processing time make this technique clinically feasible. In this expanded experience, we demonstrate an expanded clinical experience with the BBCR technique, highlighting the applications for intraluminal cardiovascular evaluation, especially focused on current and potential emergency radiology applications.

Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study

Purpose: Correctly classifying distal femur fractures is essential for surgical treatment planning and patient prognosis. This study assesses the potential of Cinematic Rendering (CR) in classifying these fractures, emphasizing its reported ability to produce more realistic images than Volume Rendering (VR). Methods: Data from 88 consecutive patients with distal femoral fractures collected between July 2013 and July 2020 were included. Two orthopedic surgeons independently evaluated the fractures using CR and VR. The inter-rater and intra-rater agreement was evaluated by using the Cicchetti-Allison weighted Kappa method. Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were also calculated. Diagnostic confidence scores (DCSs) for both imaging methods were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Results: CR reconstruction yielded excellent inter-observer (Kappa = 0.989) and intra-observer (Kappa = 0.992) agreement, outperforming VR (Kappa = 0.941 and 0.905, respectively). While metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores were higher for CR, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). However, DCAs significantly favored CR (p < 0.05). Conclusion: CR offers a superior visualization of distal femur fractures than VR. It enhances fracture classification accuracy and bolsters diagnostic confidence. The high inter- and intra-observer agreement underscores its reliability, suggesting its potential clinical importance.