The role of staging investigations for oesophago-gastric carcinoma

UR, Jesus VHF, Jr WLC, Prolla G. Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumours' consensus guidelines for the management of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is among the ten most common types of cancer worldwide. Most cases and deaths related to the disease occur in developing countries. Local socio-economic, epidemiologic and healthcare particularities led us to create a Brazilian guideline for the management of gastric carcinomas. The Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumors (GTG) invited 50 physicians with different backgrounds, including radiology, pathology, endoscopy, nuclear medicine, genetics, oncological surgery, radiotherapy and clinical oncology, to collaborate. This document was prepared based on an extensive review of topics related to heredity, diagnosis, staging, pathology, endoscopy, surgery, radiation, systemic therapy and follow-up, which was followed by presentation, discussion, and voting by the panel members. It provides updated evidence-based recommendations to guide clinical management of gastric carcinomas in several scenarios and clinical settings.

New insights in diagnostic laparoscopy

The basic concept of Diagnostic Laparoscopy (DL) is old but not old-fashioned. – Before the rise of tomography and ultrasound there was just the direct look into the abdomen and onto the affected organ available. As open surgery comes along with trauma, blood loss and infection, every effort have been made to improve the access strategies. Finally, due to innovation in optics, video technology and computer science, the look into the abdomen through a “keyhole” is a standard procedure today. – In this review we give an overview of history, implications and cost-effectiveness of DL, attempting an extrapolation of its future role.

Role of laparoscopy in hepatobiliary malignancies

The many benefits of laparoscopy, including smaller incision, reduced length of hospital stay and more rapid return to normal function, have seen its popularity grow in recent years. With concurrent improvements in non-surgical cancer management the importance of accurate staging is becoming increasingly important. There are two main applications of laparoscopic surgery in managing hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) malignancy: accurate staging of disease and resection. We aim to summarize the use of laparoscopy in these contexts. The role of staging laparoscopy has become routine in certain cancers, in particular T[2] staged, locally advanced gastric cancer, hilar cholangiocarcinoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. For other cancers, in particular colorectal, laparoscopy has now become the gold standard management for resection such that there is no role for stand-alone staging laparoscopy. In HPB cancers, although staging laparoscopy may play a role, with ever improving radiology, its role remains controversial.

Monitoring the early biologic response of esophageal carcinoma after irradiation with 18F-FLT: an in-vitro and in-vivo study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to explore the value of 3'-deoxy-3'-[F]fluorothymidine (F-FLT) and F-FLT PET in monitoring the early biologic response of esophageal carcinoma after irradiation in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

After 2, 4, and 8 h of irradiation at different doses (0, 5, 10, and 15 Gy) of esophageal carcinoma cells in vitro, the uptake ratio of F-FLT, the relative cell survival rate, and ATP levels were measured. The tumor uptake ratio of F-FLT [tumor-to-nontumor (T/NT)] was measured through PET scans before and on the first, seventh, and 15th day after irradiation. The expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki-67 was determined in both untreated and treated tumors.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the uptake ratio changes of F-FLT after 2 h of irradiation with 5 Gy showed no statistical significance (3.65±0.17 vs. 4.00±0.17%, P>0.05), whereas the uptake ratios of the other groups decreased notably (F=33.93, P<0.01). The differences in the relative survival rates were not statistically significant (F=4.02, P>0.05). Linear regression analysis indicated a significant correlation between F-FLT and ATP levels (r=0.89, P<0.01). On F-FLT PET scan images of the xenografts, the baseline uptake ratio (T/NT) was 2.24±0.06. It decreased to 1.99±0.09, 1.85±0.04, and 1.15±0.10 at 1, 7, and 15 days after irradiation with 10 Gy. Tumor uptake of F-FLT was closely correlated with proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki-67 expressions (r=0.83, P<0.001, and r=0.88, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The uptake changes of F-FLT in esophageal carcinoma cells and tumor xenografts may reflect the early biological response of esophageal carcinoma after irradiation. Thus, F-FLT PET may be potentially used to monitor the early response of esophageal carcinoma after radiotherapy.

Value of EUS in Determining Curative Resectability in Reference to CT and FDG-PET: The Optimal Sequence in Preoperative Staging of Esophageal Cancer?

BACKGROUND

F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the optimal sequence in staging esophageal cancer has not been investigated adequately.

METHODS

The staging records of 216 consecutive operable patients with esophageal cancer were reviewed blindly. Different staging strategies were analyzed, and the likelihood ratio (LR) of each module was calculated conditionally on individual patient characteristics. A logistic regression approach was used to determine the most favorable staging strategy.

RESULTS

Initial EUS results were not significantly related to the LRs of initial CT and FDG-PET results. The positive LR (LR+) of EUS-fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was 4, irrespective of CT and FDG-PET outcomes. The LR+ of FDG-PET varied from 13 (negative CT) to 6 (positive CT). The LR+ of CT ranged from 3-4 (negative FDG-PET) to 2-3 (positive FDG-PET). Age, histology, and tumor length had no significant impact on the LRs of the three diagnostic tests.

CONCLUSIONS

This study argues in favor of PET/CT rather than EUS as a predictor of curative resectability in esophageal cancer. EUS does not correspond with either CT or FDG-PET. LRs of FDG-PET were substantially different between subgroups of negative and positive CT results and vice versa.

Laparoscopy in gastrointestinal malignancies

This paper presents an update of the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in gastrointestinal malignancy. A review of indications, surgical technique, and radicality of laparoscopy in the field of gastrointestinal cancer surgery is discussed. The feasibility and safety of laparoscopic procedures are compared with established and implemented standards in the diagnosis and treatment of oncological disorders. It is important to appreciate that only the "access" is different with all its attendant advantages. The use of laparoscopy in tumor staging and palliative and curative resection is evaluated on review of the literature, and special indications for a laparoscopic approach in gastrointestinal malignancy in different organs are discussed. In conclusion, MIS is safe and feasible, with many short-term advantages; long-term results should be further assessed in randomized controlled studies. Until the outcomes of such studies are available MIS for malignant disease should be performed by experienced surgeons in specialized centers.

Hospital volume does not influence long-term survival of patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal or gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Guidelines suggest that surgery for oesophageal and gastric cancer should be conducted in large cancer centres. This national study examined the relationship between hospital volume and outcome in Scotland.

METHODS

This was a prospective, population-based study of 3293 consecutive patients with oesophageal or gastric cancer diagnosed between 1997 and 1999. Some 1302 patients underwent surgery and were followed for 5 years after operation.

RESULTS

The 5-year adjusted overall survival rate for the 3293 patients was 18.7 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 17.2 to 20.2) per cent and that after surgical resection was 39.6 (95 per cent c.i. 36.3 to 43.0) per cent. Death within 1 year after surgical resection was associated with a postoperative complication (odds ratio (OR) 2.5 (95 per cent c.i. 1.6 to 3.8); P < 0.001) or resection margin involvement by tumour (OR 7.2 (95 per cent c.i. 1.1 to 47.5); P = 0.042) after adjustment for age, sex and tumour location. There was no relationship between hospital volume and postoperative morbidity or mortality, nor between survival and volume of patients either for hospital of diagnosis or hospital of surgery.

CONCLUSION

This population-based study of oesophageal and gastric cancer suggests that the link between hospital volume and long-term survival for patients undergoing surgery requires re-evaluation.

Staginglaparoskopie in der Onkologie

The availability of more treatment options for gastrointestinal cancer requires precise and reliable pretherapeutic staging. Despite impressive technical progress in modern imaging procedures, this high level of staging quality is not yet warranted in all instances. Visual exploration of the abdominal cavity in extended diagnostic laparoscopy (EDL), including surgical dissection of areas which are primarily inaccessible, biopsy retrieval, and laparoscopic ultrasound, is superior in the diagnostic workup of early peritoneal carcinomatosis and (small) liver metastases. It is helpful to evaluate lymph node infliction and local resectability. In esophageal carcinoma, pretherapeutic EDL is valuable in case of advanced adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (AEG I according to Siewert), whereas the incidence of abdominal tumor manifestations in squamous cell carcinoma is too low to perform staging laparoscopy. In advanced gastric cancer, EDL yields relevant additional information in up to 20% of cases. If a multimodal therapeutic strategy is considered, EDL should be obligatory at least in prospective therapeutic studies. In carcinoma of the pancreas, EDL is in general not recommended by the majority of centers. Selective use (in particular in advanced cancer with a high probability of local irresectability) is gaining importance. In hepatobiliary malignancy including colorectal metastases, the high yield of additional information by EDL was confirmed in recent studies.

Combined preoperative endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography for prediction of R0 resection in upper gastrointestinal tract cancer

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the ability of combined endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography to predict R0 resection and avoid unnecessary surgery in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer (UGIC).

METHODS

A total of 411 consecutive patients with UGIC (182 pancreatic cancers, 134 gastric cancers and 95 oesophageal cancers) treated between January 2002 and May 2004 were analysed prospectively. The allocation of patients into resectability groups by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) was compared with the treatment actually undertaken.

RESULTS

The combination of EUS and LUS correctly predicted R0 resection in 90.6 per cent, R1-R2 in 91 per cent and irresectability in 91.4 per cent of patients. Ten patients (2.4 per cent) had explorative laparotomy only. There were no complications associated with the EUS and LUS procedures.

CONCLUSION

The routine use of EUS and LUS before surgery predicted R0 resection in nine of ten patients and reduced the number of unnecessary laparotomies to less than 3 per cent.