Surgical cytoreduction in recurrent ovarian carcinoma in patients with complete response to paclitaxel-platinum

Cytoreductive surgery is feasible in patients with limited regional platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the efficacy of cytoreductive surgery versus chemotherapy for the treatment of limited regional, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical records of all patients with PROC treated in our center between March 2015 and March 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the oncology outcomes of patients who received cytoreduction or chemotherapy alone at relapse and presented information about postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Among 52 patients with limited regional recurrence, 40.4% (21/52) underwent cytoreduction because of platinum resistance, and 59.6% (31/52) received chemotherapy alone. No residual disease (R0) was achieved in 20 patients (95.2%). The severe morbidity rate within 30 days after the surgery was 15%. The median follow-up was 70.6 months. Compared with the chemotherapy alone group, the surgery group with R0 had better progression-free survival (PFS) (10.6 vs. 5.1 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.421; P = 0.0035) and post-relapse survival (PRS) (32.6 vs. 16.3 months; HR = 0.478; P = 0.047), but there was no difference in overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Laparoscopy is associated with lesser intraoperative blood loss with no differences in survival and postoperative complications compared to the open approach (P = 0.0042). Subgroup survival analysis showed that compared with chemotherapy alone, surgery prolonged PFS in patients regardless of tumor size (greater than or equal to 4 cm or less). Surgery group patients who achieved R0 had an objective response rate (ORR) of 36.8% (7/19), among whom 40% (4/10) received platinum rechallenge chemotherapy and 33.3% (3/9) were administered non-platinum chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

When well-selected PROC patients with limited regional recurrence achieved R0, their outcomes were superior to those of patients who received only chemotherapy with an acceptable morbidity rate. Laparoscope technology could be a reliable alternative surgical approach. The reintroduction of platinum agents may be considered following surgery. Further analyses in a larger population are warranted to elucidate the risks and benefits of this surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy strategy.

Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The survival impact of secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer was studied.

METHODS

We identified published studies from 1983 to 2021 following our inclusion criteria from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library. To integrate the effect size of single-arm studies, meta-analysis was performed using death rate as a primary outcome. The effect of complete cytoreduction and optimal cytoreduction on survival was evaluated using meta-regression. The pooled death rate was presented with a 95% CI. The publication bias was evaluated with the funnel plot and Egger's test, and sensitivity analysis was performed. To overcome missing death rates, the linear regression model was performed on log-transformed median overall survival (OS) time using study size as a weight.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies with 2,805 patients reporting death rates were used for this meta-analysis of the 80 eligible studies. There was strong heterogeneity, with the P value of the Cochrane Q test of < 0.0001 and Higgins's I² statistics of 86%; thus, we considered a random effect model. The pooled death rate was 44.2% (95% CI, 39.0 to 49.5), and both the complete and optimal cytoreductions were associated with better survival outcomes as significant moderators in the meta-regression model (P < .001 and P = .005, respectively). Although 14 studies were located outside the funnel plot, Egger's test indicated no publication bias (P = .327). A sensitivity analysis excluding 14 studies showed similar results. In the linear regression model on the basis of 57 studies, the median OS time increased by 8.97% and 7.04% when the complete and optimal cytoreduction proportion increased by 10%, respectively, after adjusting other variables.

CONCLUSION

Secondary cytoreductive surgery, resulting in maximal tumor resection, significantly prolongs OS in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Posterior pelvic exenteration for ovarian cancer: surgical and oncological outcomes

Objective

Posterior pelvic exenteration (PPE) can be required to achieve complete resection in ovarian cancer (OC) patients with large pelvic disease. This study aimed to analyze morbidity, complete resection rate, and survival of PPE.

Methods

Ninety patients who underwent PPE in our Comprehensive Cancer Center between January 2010 and February 2021 were retrospectively identified. To analyze practice evolution, 2 periods were determined: P1 from 2010 to 2017 and P2 from 2018 to 2021.

Results

A 82.2% complete resection rate after PPE was obtained, with rectal anastomosis in 96.7% of patients. Complication rate was at 30% (grade 3 in 9 patients), without significant difference according to periods or quality of resection. In a binary logistic regression adjusted on age and stoma, only age of 51–74 years old was associated with a lower rate of complication (odds ratio=0.223; p=0.026). Median overall and disease-free survivals (OS and DFS) from initial diagnosis were 75.21 and 29.84 months, respectively. A negative impact on OS and DFS was observed in case of incomplete resection, and on DFS in case of final cytoreductive surgery (FCS: after ≥6 chemotherapy cycles). Age ≥75-years had a negative impact on DFS for new OC surgery. For patients with complete resection, OS and DFS were decreased in case of interval cytoreductive surgery and FCS in comparison with primary cytoreductive surgery.

Conclusion

PPE is an effective surgical measure to achieve complete resection for a majority of patients. High rate of colorectal anastomosis was achieved without any mortality, with acceptable morbidity and high protective stoma rate.

Posterior-pelvic-exenteration (PPE) can be required to achieve complete cyto-reductive-surgery (CS) in ovarian cancer (OC) patients. A 82.2% complete-CS rate was obtained for PPE, with rectal anastomosis in 96.7%. Complication rate was 30%. Negative impact on DFS for patients with incomplete-CS or final-CS or age ≥75-years for new OC and PPE.

The survival outcome and complication of secondary cytoreductive surgery plus chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness and safety of secondary cytoreductive surgery plus chemotherapy (SCS + CT) in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). Our secondary purpose was to analyze whether patients could benefit from complete resection.

Methods

We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception to April 2021. We used appropriate scales to assess the risk of bias. Data from included studies that reported median PFS or OS were weighted by individual study sample size, and aggregated for meta-analysis. We calculated the pooled proportion of complications within 30 days after surgery.

Results

We identified 13 articles, including three RCTs and ten retrospective cohort studies. A total of 4572 patients were included, of which 916 patients achieved complete resection, and all patients were comparable at baseline. Compared with chemotherapy alone, SCS + CT significantly improved the PFS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.43–0.67) and OS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44–0.81). Contrary to the results of cohort studies, the meta-analysis of RCTs showed that SCS + CT could not bring OS benefits (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.66–1.3). The subgroup analysis showed the prognostic importance of complete resection. Compared with chemotherapy alone, complete resection was associated with longer PFS (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.45–0.61) and OS (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.39–0.81), while incomplete resection had no survival benefit. Additionally, complete resection could maximize survival benefit compared with incomplete resection (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.46–0.69; HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.50–0.75). The pooled proportion for complications at 30 days was 21% (95% CI: 0.12–0.30), and there was no statistical difference in chemotherapy toxicity between the two groups.

Conclusion

The review indicated that SCS + CT based regimens was correlated with better clinical prognosis for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, but the interpretation of OS should be cautious. The meta-analysis emphasizes the importance of complete resection, suggesting that the potential benefits of prolonging survival may outweigh the disadvantages of any short-term complications associated with surgery.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13048-021-00842-9.

Image-Guided Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Oligometastatic Ovarian and Non-Ovarian Gynecologic Tumors

PURPOSE

To assess the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of percutaneous thermal ablation (TA) in the treatment of metastatic gynecologic (GYN) tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A study cohort of 42 consecutive women (mean age, 59. years; range, 25-78 years) with metastatic GYN tumors (119 metastatic tumors) treated with radiofrequency (n = 47 tumors), microwave (n = 47 tumors), or cryogenic (n = 30 tumors) ablation from over 2,800 ablations performed from January 2001 to January 2019 was identified. The primary GYN neoplasms consisted of ovarian (27 patients; 77 tumors; mean tumor diameter [MTD], 2.50 cm), uterine (7 patients; 26 tumors; MTD, 1.89 cm), endometrial (5 patients; 10 tumors; MTD, 2.8 cm), vaginal (2 patients; 5 tumors; MTD, 2.40 cm), and cervical (1 patient; 1 tumor; MTD, 1.90 cm) cancers. In order of descending frequency, metastatic tumors treated by TA were located in the liver or liver capsule (74%), lungs (13%), and peritoneal implants (9%). Single tumors were also treated in the kidneys, rectus muscle, perirectal soft tissue (2.5%), and retroperitoneal lymph nodes (1.6%). All efficacy parameters of TA and definitions of major and minor adverse events are categorized by the latest Society of Interventional Radiology reporting standards.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of treated patients was 10 months. After the initial ablation, 95.6% of the patients achieved a complete tumor response confirmed by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography. On surveillance imaging, 8.5% of the ablated tumors developed local progression over a median follow-up period of 4.1 months. Five of 8 tumors with local recurrence underwent repeated treatment over a mean follow-up period of 18 months, and 4 of 5 tumors achieved complete eradication after 1 additional treatment session that resulted in a secondary efficacy of 80%. The overall technique efficacy of TA was 96.2% over a median follow-up period of 10 months.

CONCLUSIONS

TA was safe and effective for the local control of metastatic GYN tumors in the lungs, abdomen, and pelvis, with an overall survival rate of 37.5 months and a local progression-free survival rate of 16.5 months, with only 4.8% of treated patients experiencing a major adverse event.

Cytoreductive Surgery for Heavily Pre-Treated, Platinum-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: A Two-Center Retrospective Experience

Few retrospective studies have shown a benefit in selected patients affected by heavily pre-treated, platinum-resistant ovarian carcinomas (PROCs) who have undergone cytoreduction at relapse. However, the role of tertiary and quaternary cytoreductive surgery is not fully defined. Our aim was to evaluate survival and surgical morbidity and mortality after maximal cytoreduction in this setting. We evaluated all consecutive patients undergoing cytoreduction for platinum-resistance over an 8-year period (2010–2018) in two different centers. Fifty patients (median age 52.5 years, range 34–75) were included; the median number of previous chemotherapy lines was three (range 1–7) and the median number of previous surgeries was one (range 1–4). Completeness of cytoreduction (CC = 0) was achieved in 22 patients (44%). Rates of major operative morbidity and 30-day mortality were 38% and 8%, respectively. Median follow-up was 35 months. The absence of tumor residual (CC = 0) was associated with a significantly better overall survival (OS) compared to the CC > 0 subgroup (median OS 32.9 months (95% CI 21.6–44.2) vs. 4.8 months (95% CI n.a.–9.8), hazard ratio (HR) 4.21 (95% CI 2.07–8.60), p < 0.001). Optimal cytoreduction is feasible and associated with promising OS in selected, heavily pre-treated PROCs. Further prospective studies are required to better define the role of surgery in platinum-resistant disease.

Extended Pelvic Resections as Part of Secondary Cytoreduction for Relapsed Ovarian Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIM

Ovarian cancer presents an aggressive tumor biology, a significant number of patients experiencing recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of secondary debulking surgery for relapsed ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2014 and 2018, debulking surgery for relapsed ovarian cancer was performed in 40 cases.

RESULTS

Debulking surgery to no residual disease was achieved in 31 cases; among the remaining cases, an R1 resection was feasible in six cases, while in the remaining three cases an R2 resection was performed. The most commonly performed visceral resections were represented by rectosigmoidian resection, right colon resection, total or partial cystectomy and unilateral or bilateral ureteral resection. The early postoperative morbidity rate was 32.5% while the postoperative mortality rate was 2.5%.

CONCLUSION

Extended pelvic resections are feasible in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer and might be performed with acceptable rates of postoperative complications.

Surgery for Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in the Netherlands: A Population-Based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The value of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer is controversial. The aim of this population-based study was to investigate the role of SCS in the Netherlands.

METHODS

Data of 408 patients who underwent SCS between 2000 and 2013 were retrospectively collected from 38 Dutch hospitals. Survival after complete and incomplete SCS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves. Factors associated with overall survival (OS) were explored with Cox regression.

RESULTS

Median OS after SCS was 51 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 44.8-57.2). Complete SCS was achieved in 295 (72.3%) patients, with an OS of 57 months (95% CI, 49.0-65.0) compared with 28 months (95% CI, 20.8-35.2) in patients with incomplete SCS (log-rank test; P < 0.001). Nonserous histology (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.45-0.95), a long progression free interval (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.07-1.18), a good performance status (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.94), SCS without preoperative chemotherapy (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-1.01), and complete SCS (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.33-0.64) were prognostic factors for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based retrospective study showed that there might be a role for SCS in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer especially when complete SCS can be accomplished. However, before adopting SCS as a standard treatment modality for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, results of 3 ongoing prospectively randomized trials are needed.

Update on the Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death for all gynecologic malignancies in developed countries, largely owing to the late stage of diagnosis. Despite response to initial surgery and chemotherapy, more than 65% of patients will have recurrent or persistent diseases. Approximately 50% of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer are asymptomatic. Recurrences are often diagnosed using a combination of tests, including cancer antigen 125, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography scan. The most significant prognostic factor among women with recurrent ovarian cancer is the length of time from initial diagnosis to recurrence. Treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer involves chemotherapy, with or without surgery. In selected patients, secondary cytoreductive surgery might significantly improve survival. Radiotherapy may have a role in the treatment of a small group of patients with localized symptomatic masses. New treatment modalities for women with recurrent ovarian cancer are needed, as none of the available treatments are curative.

Survival Impact of Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer in an Asian Population

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery in Asian patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and to assess prognostic variables on overall post-recurrence survival time.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who underwent secondary cytoreduction at the Gynaecological Cancer Center at the KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, between 1999 and 2009. Eligible patients included those who had been firstly treated by primary cytoreductive surgery and followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and had a period of clinical remission of at least six months and subsequently underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrence. Univariate analysis was performed to evaluate various variables influencing the overall survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients met our eligibility criteria. The median age was 52 years (range=31-78 years). The median time from completion of primary treatment to recurrence was 25.1 months (range=6.4-83.4). Secondary cytoreduction was optimal in 20 of 25 patients (80%). The median follow-up duration was 38.9 months (range=17.8-72.4) and median overall survival time was 33.1 months (95% confidence interval, 15.3-undefined.). Ten (40.0%) patients required bowel resection, but no end colostomy was performed. One (4.0%) patient had wedge resection of the liver, one (4.0%) had a distal pancreatectomy, one (4.0%) had a unilateral nephrectomy, and one (4.0%) had adrenalectomy. There were no operative deaths. The overall survival of patients who responded to secondary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly longer than those patients who did not respond to the treatment. Of those patients who responded to the surgical management, patients with clear cell carcinoma fared well compared to those with the endometrioid, mucinous adenocarcinoma, and papillary serous type (p<0.001). Complete secondary cytoreductive surgery appeared to have some relationship to overall survival but was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

In carefully selected patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, optimal cytoreductive surgery is possible and in a subgroup of patients who respond to surgery and chemotherapy survival is significantly longer.

Secondary Complete Cytoreduction in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Benefit of Optimal Patient Selection Using Scoring System

Objective

Complete tumor cytoreduction seems to be beneficial for patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (REOC). The challenge is to identify patients eligible for such surgery. Several scores based on simple clinical parameters have attempted to predict resectability and help in patient selection for surgery in REOC.

The aims of this study were to assess the performance of these models in an independent population and to evaluate the impact of complete resection.

Materials and Methods

A total of 194 patients with REOC between January 2000 and December 2010 were included in 2 French centers. Two scores were used: the AGO DESKTOP OVAR trial score and a score from Tian et al.

The performance (sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values) of these scores was evaluated in our population. Survival curves were constructed to evaluate the survival impact of surgery on recurrence.

Results

Positive predictive values for complete resection were 80.6% and 74.0% for the DESKTOP trial score and the Tian score, respectively. The false-negative rate was high for both models (65.4% and 71.4%, respectively). We found a significantly higher survival in the patients with complete resection (59.4 vs 17.9 months,P< 0.01) even after adjustment for the confounding variables (hazard ratio [HR], 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–6.3;P= 0.04).

Conclusions

In REOC, surgery seems to have a positive impact on survival, if complete surgery can be achieved. However, factors predicting complete resection are not yet clearly defined. Recurrence-free interval and initial resection seem to be the most relevant factors. Laparoscopic evaluation could help to clarify the indications for surgery.

Surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The standard management of primary ovarian cancer is optimal cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. Most women with primary ovarian cancer achieve remission on this combination therapy. For women achieving clinical remission after completion of initial treatment, most (60%) with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer will ultimately develop recurrent disease. However, the standard treatment of women with recurrent ovarian cancer remains poorly defined. Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer has been suggested to be associated with increased overall survival.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of optimal secondary cytoreductive surgery for women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. To assess the impact of various residual tumour sizes, over a range between 0 cm and 2 cm, on overall survival.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to December 2012. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field. For databases other than MEDLINE, the search strategy has been adapted accordingly.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Retrospective data on residual disease, or data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective/retrospective observational studies that included a multivariate analysis of 50 or more adult women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy. We only included studies that defined optimal cytoreduction as surgery leading to residual tumours with a maximum diameter of any threshold up to 2 cm.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (KG, TA) independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible the data were synthesised in a meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

There were no RCTs; however, we found nine non-randomised studies that reported on 1194 women with comparison of residual disease after secondary cytoreduction using a multivariate analysis that met our inclusion criteria. These retrospective and prospective studies assessed survival after secondary cytoreductive surgery in women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.Meta- and single-study analyses show the prognostic importance of complete cytoreduction to microscopic disease, since overall survival was significantly prolonged in these groups of women (most studies showed a large statistically significant greater risk of death in all residual disease groups compared to microscopic disease).Recurrence-free survival was not reported in any of the studies. All of the studies included at least 50 women and used statistical adjustment for important prognostic factors. One study compared sub-optimal (> 1 cm) versus optimal (< 1 cm) cytoreduction and demonstrated benefit to achieving cytoreduction to less than 1 cm, if microscopic disease could not be achieved (hazard ratio (HR) 3.51, 95% CI 1.84 to 6.70). Similarly, one study found that women whose tumour had been cytoreduced to less than 0.5 cm had less risk of death compared to those with residual disease greater than 0.5 cm after surgery (HR not reported; P value < 0.001).There is high risk of bias due to the non-randomised nature of these studies, where, despite statistical adjustment for important prognostic factors, selection is based on retrospective achievability of cytoreduction, not an intention to treat, and so a degree of bias is inevitable.Adverse events, quality of life and cost-effectiveness were not reported in any of the studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, ability to achieve surgery with complete cytoreduction (no visible residual disease) is associated with significant improvement in overall survival. However, in the absence of RCT evidence, it is not clear whether this is solely due to surgical effect or due to tumour biology. Indirect evidence would support surgery to achieve complete cytoreduction in selected women. The risks of major surgery need to be carefully balanced against potential benefits on a case-by-case basis.

Diagnosis and management of peritoneal metastases from ovarian cancer

The management and the outcome of peritoneal metastases or recurrence from epithelial ovarian cancer are presented. The biology and the diagnostic tools of EOC peritoneal metastasis with a comprehensive approach and the most recent literatures data are discussed. The definition and the role of surgery and chemotherapy are presented in order to focuse on the controversial points. Finally, the paper discusses the new data about the introduction of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Surgery for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Cytoreductive surgery is accepted as a major treatment of primary ovarian cancer. The role in recurrent ovarian cancer remains a field of discussion and controversy, mainly owing to missing data from prospective randomized trials and lack of universal definitions. Retrospective data indicate that complete resection of recurrent tumor formations should be aimed for, since survival prolongation is mainly seen for patients with no residual disease. Thus, it is most important to find predictors of complete resection, on the one hand to offer the best therapeutic chances to patients, but on the other hand to protect patients with limited life expectancy from additional surgical burden. The first prospective surgical trial in recurrent ovarian cancer, AGO-DESKTOP II validated a score (‘AGO score’) for complete resection. It was shown that patients with a good general condition (ECOG 0), no residual disease after surgery for primary ovarian cancer and absence of ascites in presurgical diagnostics have a 76% likelihood of undergoing complete resection. In this article, further recent data regarding surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer are going to be discussed and the advantages of incorporating these patients into randomized trials are highlighted.

Prospective Validation Study of a Predictive Score for Operability of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: The Multicenter Intergroup Study DESKTOP II. A Project of the AGO Kommission OVAR, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO-Austria, and MITO

Purpose:

The DESKTOP I trial proposed a score for the prediction of complete cytoreduction in recurrent ovarian cancer. Resectability was assumed if 3 factors were present: (1) complete resection at first surgery, (2) good performance status, and (3) absence of ascites. The DESKTOP II trial was planned to verify this hypothesis prospectively in a multicenter setting.

Methods:

Participating centers prospectively enrolled all consecutive patients with platinum-sensitive first or second relapse. The score was applied to all patients, but centers were free to decide on therapy. All further therapies were documented, and the outcome of patients was analyzed. A 75% complete resection rate in 110 prospectively classified patients had to be achieved to confirm a positive predictive value of 2 or higher of 3 with 95% probability.

Results:

A total of 516 patients were screened within 19 months; of these, 261 patients (51%) were classified as score positive, and 129 patients with a positive score and first relapse were operated on. The rate of complete resection was 76%, thus confirming the validity of this score regarding positive prediction of complete resectability in 2 or more of 3 patients. Complication rates were moderate including second operations in 11% and perioperative mortality in 0.8%.

Conclusions:

This score is the first prospectively validated instrument to positively predict surgical outcome in recurrent ovarian cancer. It can aid in the selection of patients who might benefit from secondary cytoreductive surgery and will be enrolled in the recently started randomized prospective DESKTOP III trial investigating the role of surgery in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

Maximal cytoreductive effort in epithelial ovarian cancer surgery

The surgical management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer involves cytoreduction, or removal of grossly-evident tumor. Residual disease after surgical cytoreduction of ovarian cancer has been shown to be strongly associated with survival. The goal of surgery is "optimal" surgical cytoreduction, which is generally defined as residual disease of 1 cm or less. However, the designation of "optimal" surgical cytoreduction has evolved to include maximal surgical effort and no gross residual disease. In order to achieve this, more aggressive surgical procedures such as rectosigmoidectomy, diaphragm peritonectomy, partial liver resection, and video-assisted thoracic surgery are reported and increasingly utilized in the surgical management of advanced ovarian cancer. The role of maximal surgical effort also extends to the recurrent setting where the goal of surgery should be complete cytoreduction. Patient selection is important in identifying appropriate candidates for surgical cytoreduction in the recurrent setting. The purpose of this article is to review the role of maximum surgical effort in primary and recurrent ovarian cancer.

Perioperative morbidity and outcome of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite radical surgical and chemotherapeutic treatment of ovarian cancer, the majority of patients develop recurrent disease. Secondary cytoreductive surgery can result in favourable outcome in selected patients, but information regarding feasibility, safety and perioperative outcome of these often complex procedures is limited.

METHODS

Surgical parameters in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer selected for secondary cytoreduction were analysed and compared to patients undergoing primary cytoreduction.

RESULTS

In total, 222 patients undergoing radical cytoreduction were analysed (48 patients for relapsed disease and 174 patients at primary diagnosis of advanced ovarian cancer). The range of surgical procedures was similar in both groups. In 48% of secondary cytoreductions 'optimal surgical results' (residual tumour <1 cm) were obtained and 33% of the patients had no residual disease compared to 82% and 58% at primary cytoreduction. There was no significant difference in perioperative complication rates. The duration of surgery was shorter and the number of transfused blood products was smaller at secondary cytoreduction (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Secondary cytoreduction in relapsed ovarian cancer is safe and feasible and perioperative outcome is not inferior compared to primary cytoreduction. Surgery-associated morbidity should represent a minor aspect in the selection and counselling of patients regarding treatment options for recurrent ovarian cancer.

Secondary cytoreductive surgery in the management of platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the surgical and survival outcomes after secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCRS) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and to identify patients who would most benefit from SCRS.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria consisted of (1) recurrent EOC; (2) disease-free interval (DFI) >or=6 months after primary therapy; and (3) SCRS with therapeutic intent followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria in the interval 1992-2008. Median DFI was 20 months (range: 6-109 months). Median time in surgery was 240 min (range: 60-680 min), and median estimated blood loss was 100 ml (range: 50-3,000 ml). There was no significant perioperative complication requiring reoperation. Complete resection of all visible tumor tissue was achieved in 37 patients (55.2%), with residual tumors (RT) <or=1 cm remaining in four patients (6%). After a mean follow-up of 41 months (range: 6-145 months), the 2- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 32% and 10%, respectively, and the 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 58% and 26%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, DFI >24 months and RT <or=1 cm were significant predictors of DFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

SCRS is safe and effective, with a low rate of complications. Patients who benefited most from this surgery were those with a DFI >24 months and patients who achieved optimal cytoreduction.

Surgery in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: benefits on Survival for patients with residual disease of 0.1-1 cm after secondary cytoreduction

AIMS

Recent retrospective trials stated that a benefit of surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer may be limited to patients in whom a complete cytoreduction (R0) could be achieved. Most of them pointed out there was no difference in survival between residual disease of 0.1-1 cm (R1) and >1 cm (R2). The aim of this study was to evaluate survival benefits from cytoreduction to R1.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2006, 123 patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing secondary cytoreduction were identified from tumor registry databases.

RESULTS

The median age at recurrence was 51 years (range: 28-84). Fifty-one (41.5%) patients had R0, 46 (37.4%) patients had R1, and 26 (21.1%) patients had R2 resection. The median survival of the entire cohort was 31.7 months, with an estimated 5-year survival of 31.1%. The median survival and estimated 5-year survival for patients with R1 were 31.1 months and 23.9%, and there were significant differences in survival when compared to 15.6 months and 6.4% in R2 (chi(2) = 7.45, P = 0.006), 63.2 months (mean survival) and 54.4% in complete cytoreduction (chi(2) = 8.93, P = 0.0028).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete secondary cytoreduction is the strongest survival determinant in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, whereas patients with residual disease of 0.1-1 cm may also benefit from secondary cytoreduction.

Role of cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer

Cytoreductive surgery is well established in patients with primary ovarian cancer. The benefit of surgery in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer remains a controversial matter. There is a large heterogeneity in surgical results published in the literature, possibly caused by infrastructure, surgeons' philosophy and belief in adding various surgical skills. This might also be a result of different preoperative selection procedures. Further questions to be addressed are the definition of surgical end points and whether there are predictive factors for a successful surgery. The surgical end point in recurrent ovarian cancer should be complete resection. Predictive factors could help identify patients in whom complete resection is possible.

Prognostic factors of secondary cytoreductive surgery for patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify the prognostic factors of secondary cytoreductive surgery on survival in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery between May 2001 and October 2007 at the National Cancer Center, Korea were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were executed to evaluate the potential variables for overall survival.

RESULTS

In total, 54 patients met the inclusion criteria. Optimal cytoreduction to <0.5 cm residual disease was achieved in 87% of patients who had received secondary cytoreductive surgery. Univariate analysis revealed that site of recurrence (median survival, 53 months for the largest tumors in the pelvis vs. 24 months for the largest tumors except for the pelvis; p=0.007), progression free survival (PFS) (median survival, 43 months for PFS>/=12 months vs. 24 months for PFS<12 months; p=0.036), and number of recurrence sites (median survival, 49 months for single recurred tumor vs 29 months for multiple recurred tumors; p=0.036) were significantly associated with overall survival. On multivariate analysis, prognostic factors that correlated with improved survival were site of recurrence (p=0.013), and PFS (p=0.043).

CONCLUSION

In the author's analysis, a significant survival benefit was identified for the recurred largest tumors within the pelvis and PFS>/=12 months. Secondary cytoreductive surgery should be offered in selected patients and large prospective studies are needed to define the selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery.

Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer: role of peritoneal carcinomatosis: exploratory analysis of the DESKTOP I Trial about risk factors, surgical implications, and prognostic value of peritoneal carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND

Almost all retrospective trials pointed out that a benefit of surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer may be limited to patients in whom a macroscopic complete resection could be achieved. Peritoneal carcinomatosis has been reported to be either a negative predictor for resectability or a negative prognostic factor, or both. The role of peritoneal carcinomatosis in a multicenter trial was investigated.

METHODS

Exploratory analysis of the DESKTOP I trial (multicenter trial of patients undergoing surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer, 2000 to 2003).

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients (50%) who underwent surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer had peritoneal carcinomatosis. Univariate analyses showed worse overall survival for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis compared with patients without carcinomatosis (P < .0001). Patients with and without peritoneal carcinomatosis had a complete resection rate of 26% and 74%, respectively (P < .0001). This corresponded with the observation that patients with complete resection had a better prognosis than those with minimal residual disease of 1 to 5 mm, which commonly reflects peritoneal carcinomatosis (P = .0002). However, patients who underwent complete resection, despite peritoneal carcinomatosis, had a 2-year survival rate of 77%, which was similar to the 2-year survival rate of patients with completely debulked disease who did not have peritoneal carcinomatosis (81%) (P = .96). Analysis of prognostic factors did not show any independent effect of peritoneal carcinomatosis on survival in patients who underwent complete resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal carcinomatosis was a negative predictor for complete resection but had no effect on prognosis if complete resection could be achieved. Improving surgical skills might be one step to increase the proportion of patients who might benefit from surgery for recurrent disease.

Cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative effect of multiple prognostic variables on overall post-recurrence survival time among cohorts of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery.

METHODS

Forty cohorts of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (2019 patients) meeting study inclusion criteria were identified from the MEDLINE database (1983-2007). Simple and multiple linear regression analyses, with weighted correlation calculations, were used to assess the effect on median post-recurrence survival time of the following variables: year of publication, age, disease-free interval, localized disease, tumor grade and histology, the proportion of patients undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery, requirement for bowel resection, and the sequence of cytoreductive surgery and salvage chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The mean weighted median disease-free interval prior to cytoreductive surgery was 20.2 months, and the mean weighted median overall post-recurrence survival time was 30.3 months. The weighted mean proportion of patients in each cohort undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery was 52.2%. Median survival improved with increasing year of publication (p=0.009); however, the only statistically significant clinical variable independently associated with post-recurrence survival time was the proportion of patients undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery (p=0.019). After controlling for all other factors, each 10% increase in the proportion of patients undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery was associated with a 3.0 month increase in median cohort survival time.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing operative intervention for recurrent ovarian cancer, the proportion of patients undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery is independently associated with overall post-recurrence survival time. For this select group of patients, the surgical objective should be resection of all macroscopic disease.

Cytoreductive surgery for patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify favorable preoperative characteristics and examine the impact of secondary cytoreductive surgery on survival for patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer were identified in our surgical database for the period 1988-2004. Patient charts were reviewed and data collected regarding patient demographics, surgical management, preoperative evaluation, perioperative complications, and oncologic outcome.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients met eligibility criteria. Preoperative factors that correlated with improved survival were disease-free interval of greater than 12 months (p<0.01) and residual disease after primary surgery of <2 cm (p<0.02). Other preoperative factors evaluated but not found significant included radiographic findings, physical findings, previous histology, stage, grade, previous chemotherapy, prior recurrence, and serum CA-125 level. Optimal resection to <1 cm residual disease was achieved in 86% of patients who had secondary cytoreduction. Small bowel and colon resection for cytoreduction occurred in 7% and 51% of patients, respectively. Operative complications occurred in 14% and postoperative complications occurred in 21% of patients. The median survival of patients who were optimally cytoreduced to <1 cm was 30 months compared to 17 months for patients with residual disease>or=1 cm (p<0.05). Operative factors that were evaluated and did not significantly effect survival were location of recurrence, presence of ascites, and extent of recurrence. Recurrent or progressive disease occurred in 75% of patients during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

When selecting patients for secondary cytoreduction, the most significant preoperative factors are disease-free interval and success of a prior cytoreductive effort. Once secondary cytoreductive surgery is attempted, the most important factor for improved survival is optimal cytoreduction. Of equal importance is counseling regarding the significant risk for bowel surgery, colostomy, and complications.

Role of surgery in ovarian carcinoma

Surgery plays a critical role in the optimal management of all stages of ovarian carcinoma. In apparent early-stage ovarian cancer, a comprehensive surgical evaluation allows stratification of patients into low- and high-risk categories. Low-risk patients may be candidates for fertility-sparing surgery and can safely avoid chemotherapy and be observed. Treatment of patients with high-risk early- or advanced-stage ovarian cancer usually requires a combined modality approach. Although it is well known that epithelial ovarian cancer is moderately chemosensitive, what distinguishes it most from other metastatic solid tumors is that surgical cytoreduction of tumor volume is highly correlated with prolongation of patient survival. Procedures such as radical pelvic surgery, bowel resection, and aggressive upper abdominal surgery are commonly required to achieve optimal cytoreduction. Women who develop recurrent disease may be eligible for a secondary cytoreductive surgery or may require a surgical intervention to palliate disease-related symptoms. For women at high risk of ovarian cancer, prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy significantly reduces the incidence of this disease. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the surgical management of ovarian carcinoma. The roles of primary, interval, and secondary cytoreductive surgeries; second-look procedures; and palliative surgery are reviewed. The indications for fertility-sparing and minimally invasive surgery as well as the current guidelines for prophylactic surgery in high-risk mutation carriers are also discussed.

Current management strategies for ovarian cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer originates in the layer of cells that covers the surface of the ovaries. The disease spreads readily throughout the peritoneal cavity and to the lymphatics, often before causing symptoms. Of the cancers unique to women, ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate. Most women are diagnosed as having advanced stage disease, and efforts to develop new screening approaches for ovarian cancer are a high priority. Optimal treatment of ovarian cancer begins with optimal cytoreductive surgery followed by combination chemotherapy. Ovarian cancer, even in advanced stages, is sensitive to a variety of chemotherapeutics. Although improved chemotherapy has increased 5-year survival rates, overall survival gains have been limited because of our inability to eradicate all disease. Technologic advances that allow us to examine the molecular machinery that drives ovarian cancer cells have helped to identify numerous therapeutic targets within these cells. In this review, we provide an overview of ovarian cancer with particular emphasis on recent advances in operative management and systemic therapies.

Cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The issue facing clinicians managing ovarian cancer has evolved over the past three decades from treatment for cure and subsequently palliation, to prolongation of survival for most patients. The purpose of this paper is to review the data, rationale, and issues surrounding cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer and its potential role in this new paradigm shift.

RECENT FINDINGS

Abundant retrospective series report prolongation of survival with secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer. Selection bias, publication bias, and subsequent therapies, however, are confounding factors for survival. As management of ovarian cancer has recently evolved to a treatment of a 'chronic disease', surgery (which has a definite role in primary therapy) should be considered.

SUMMARY

No prospective randomized studies have been performed to date, and therefore adoption of this method of management has been limited. The absence of good data leaves clinicians without clear direction on how to best manage patients. Patients with favorable characteristics such as a long disease-free interval, good performance status, a single or few small intra-abdominal recurrences may benefit from secondary cytoreduction. A prospective randomized study is needed.

Secondary cytoreductive surgery for localized, recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of prognostic factors and survival outcome

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery in the outcome of patients who had recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma that was limited to <or=5 recurrence sites within the abdomen or pelvis on preoperative imaging studies and attempt to define selection criteria associated with improved survival, with specific attention to the number of lesions suspicious for recurrent disease.

METHODS

: Patients who underwent secondary surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer between September 1997 and March 2005 were identified retrospectively from tumor registry databases. Study inclusion criteria required a complete clinical response to primary therapy, >or=12 months between initial diagnosis and recurrence, and <or=5 recurrence sites on preoperative imaging studies. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the effect of clinicopathologic variables on overall postrecurrence survival.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients met the study inclusion criteria. The median patient age at recurrence was 57.7 years, and the median diagnosis-to-recurrence interval was 32 months (range, 12-164 months). Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 41 patients (74.5%). On multivariate analysis, the statistically significant and independent predictors of overall survival were a diagnosis-to-recurrence interval >or=18 months (median survival, 49 months vs 3 months; P < .01), the number of radiographic recurrence sites (median survival, 50 months for patients with 1 or 2 sites vs 12 months for patients with 3 to 5 sites; P < .03), and residual disease (median survival, 50 months for patients with no macroscopic residual disease vs 7.2 months for patients with macroscopic residual disease; P < .01). Age, tumor grade, histology, CA-125 level, ascites, and tumor size were not associated significantly with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

: The current data supported the definition of localized recurrent ovarian cancer as patients with 1 or 2 radiographic recurrence sites. In this select population, a diagnosis-to-recurrence interval >or=18 months and complete secondary surgical cytoreduction, which was achievable in the majority of patients, were associated with a median postrecurrence survival of approximately 50 months.

Surveillance procedures for patients treated for epithelial ovarian cancer: a review of the literature

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer in the Western countries. Approximately 20%–30% of patients with early-stage disease and 50%–75% of those with advanced disease who obtain a complete response following first-line chemotherapy will ultimately develop recurrent disease, which more frequently involves the pelvis and abdomen. Few formal guidelines exist regarding the surveillance of these patients, and there is no agreement in the literature about the type and timing of examinations to perform. Moreover, the objective of follow-up is unclear as recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer continues to be a therapeutic dilemma and quite all the relapsed patients will eventually die of their disease. The follow-up of asymptomatic patients generally include complete clinical history, serum cancer antigen (CA)125 assay, physical examination, and often ultrasound examination, whereas additional radiologic imaging techniques are usually performed when symptoms or signs appear.18Fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose (18FDG)–positron emission tomography (PET) has a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 85% approximately for the detection of recurrent disease, and this examination appears to be particularly useful for the diagnosis of recurrence when CA125 levels are rising and conventional imaging is inconclusive or negative. Recently, technologic advances have led to novel combined18FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) devices, which perform contemporaneous acquisition of both18FDG-PET and CT images. The role of18FDG-PET/CT for the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer is very promising, and this technique may be especially useful for the selection of patients with late recurrent disease who may benefit from secondary cytoreductive surgery.

Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP OVAR Trial

BACKGROUND

The role of cytoreductive surgery in relapsed ovarian cancer is not clearly defined. Therefore, patient selection remains arbitrary and depends on the center's preference rather than on established selection criteria. The Descriptive Evaluation of preoperative Selection KriTeria for OPerability in recurrent OVARian cancer (DESKTOP OVAR) trial was undertaken to form a hypothesis for a panel of criteria for selecting patients who might benefit from surgery in relapsed ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The DESKTOP trial was an exploratory study based on data from a retrospective analysis of hospital records. Twenty-five member institutions of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Committee (AGO OC) and AGO-OVAR boards collected data on their patients with cytoreductive surgery for relapsed invasive epithelial ovarian cancer performed in 2000-2003.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-seven patients were included. Complete resection was associated with significantly longer survival compared with surgery leaving any postoperative residuals [median 45.2 vs. 19.7 months; hazard ratio (HR) 3.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.27-6.05; P < .0001]. Variables associated with complete resection were performance status (PS) [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 vs. > 0; P < .001], International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage at initial diagnosis (FIGO I/II vs. III/IV, P = .036), residual tumor after primary surgery (none vs. present, P <.001), and absence of ascites > 500 ml (P < .001). A combination of PS, early FIGO stage initially or no residual tumor after first surgery, and absence of ascites could predict complete resection in 79% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Only complete resection was associated with prolonged survival in recurrent ovarian cancer. The identified criteria panel will be verified in a prospective trial (AGO-DESKTOP II) evaluating whether it will render a useful tool for selecting the right patients for cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer.

Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Ovarian Cancer Metastasis to the Liver: Indications, Outcomes, and Role in Patient Management

OBJECTIVE

Stages III and IV ovarian cancer are treated with a combination of chemotherapy and resection, in some cases including second and third surgical procedures, to achieve cytoreduction. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation has proved effective in local control of hepatic tumors. We report early experience with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in the management of isolated foci of metastatic ovarian cancer and assess the efficacy of the technique in achieving and maintaining local control by percutaneous cytoreduction.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is effective in achieving local control in selected patients with metastasis from ovarian cancer. In patients with limited macroscopic disease, cytoreduction can be achieved without surgery.

Guidelines and selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The benefit of cytoreductive surgery for patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer has not been defined clearly. The objective of this study was to identify prognostic factors for survival in patients who underwent secondary cytoreduction for recurrent, platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer and to establish generally applicable guidelines and selection criteria.

METHODS

The authors reviewed all patients who underwent secondary cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer from 1987 to 2001. Potential prognostic factors were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 157 patients underwent secondary cytoreduction, and 153 of those patients were evaluable. After secondary cytoreduction, the median follow-up was 36.9 months (range, 0.2-125.6 months), and the median survival was 41.7 months (95% confidence interval, 36.0-47.2 months). For patients who had a disease-free interval prior to recurrence of between 6 months and 12 months, the median survival was 30 months compared with 39 months for patients who had a disease-free interval between 13 months and 30 months and 51 months for patients who had a disease-free interval >30 months (P = .005). For patients who had a single site of recurrence, the median survival was 60 months compared with 42 months for patients who had multiple sites of recurrence and 28 months for patients who had carcinomatosis (P <.001). The median survival for patients who had residual disease that measured < or =0.5 cm was 56 months compared with 27 months for patients who had residual disease that measured >0.5 cm (P <.001). On multivariate analysis, disease-free interval (P = .004), the number of recurrence sites (P = .01), and residual disease (P <.001) were significant prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In the authors' analysis of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, a significant survival benefit was demonstrated for residual disease that measured < or = 0.5 cm. The disease-free interval and the number of recurrence sites should be used as selection criteria for offering secondary cytoreduction.

The role of surgery in ovarian cancer with special emphasis on cytoreductive surgery for recurrence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer has not clearly been defined, and randomized trials are lacking. Some series have reported favorable outcomes for selected patients. This review summarizes the available evidence for selecting patients and the results of cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

A Medline search identified 23 series including 1795 patients (21-285 patients per study). Patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for recurrence were highly selected. Complete tumor resection was feasible in 9 to 82% of patients and was commonly associated with prolonged survival. A variety of predictive and prognostic factors for complete resection were reported. Good performance status, disease characteristics (e.g. peritoneal carcinosis), and outcome of prior surgery seemed to have an impact on surgical outcome. By contrast, disease-free survival played only a minor role, especially in patients with recurrence later than 6 months after primary treatment.

SUMMARY

Prospective evaluation of predictive scores for successful cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer is urgently needed. In a second step, randomized trials evaluating the role of surgery in the treatment strategy of recurrent ovarian cancer should be initiated. Until then, experienced and trained surgeons might offer surgery for recurrent disease to individually selected patients after giving information about the potential benefit and about the limited available evidence regarding this strategy.

Recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: validation and improvement of an established prognostic index

OBJECTIVES

To validate and improve an established prognostic index in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A Canadian three-covariate prognostic index (tumour grade at diagnosis, initial performance status, and time to relapse/primary progression (TRP)) was validated in a well-defined cohort of comparable Danish patients. Potential parameters to be included in an improved prognostic index were revealed by univariate and multivariate analyses in the Danish validation group.

RESULTS

The Canadian index validated in the Danish patient population (n=189) found a statistical significant difference in survival between the prognostic groups good and intermediate (P<0.0001), whereas there was no significant difference in survival between the prognostic groups intermediate and poor (P=0.51). In order to improve the accuracy of the index, the candidate parameters, treatment free interval (TFI), CA125 level and performance status, at time of relapse/primary progression, were added, whereas the parameters, tumour grade, and initial performance status, from the Canadian index were excluded. As the correlation coefficient between TRP and TFI was very high (r=0.91), TRP was substituted with TFI in the improved prognostic model. The final model was: 0.8 (performance status)+0.33 log (CA125)-1.31 log (TFI). The improved model was a good predictor of one-year survival (AUC 0.85; logistic regression; P<0.0001). The median survival (with 95% CI) of the four prognostic groups (A-D) was 50.6 (34.0-not available), 25.0 (22.1-33.6), 11.3 (8.5-12.9), and 5.2 (3.5-6.3) months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel prognostic model (the Copenhagen index) for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer is presented.

The role of secondary cytoreduction in the treatment of ovarian cancer: Hacettepe University experience

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to evaluate the role of secondary cytoreduction in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Secondarily, cytoreduced patients were retrospectively analyzed with respect to the clinicopathologic variables.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients were evaluated in this report. Multivariable analysis revealed 3 factors to be significant: optimal cytoreduction during primary (P = .003, odds ratio [OR]: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.14-0.66), secondary cytoreduction (P = .04, OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.22-0.99), and the endometrioid histologic type (P = .005, OR: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.02-0.48). Intrinsic factors of the tumors (grade, stage, age), size, and number of recurrent tumors were nonsignificant.

CONCLUSION

Secondary cytoreductive surgery should be offered in selected recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Further prospective randomized series are needed to determine specific recommendations.

Secondary cytoreduction for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer

Standard treatment for advanced epithelial cancer includes primary cytoreductive surgery followed by combination chemotherapy. Optimal primary debulking is associated with improved clinical response rates to primary chemotherapy and longer overall survival. Still, at least 60% of advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients who are without clinical evidence of disease after completing primary therapy ultimately develop recurrent disease. Despite significant efforts, standard treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer remains poorly defined. In view of the new refinement in surgical techniques and medical treatments and the extended disease-free interval, physicians and patients face the dilemma of how to handle further management in this subgroup of patients. A clear understanding of the prognostic factors and expectations from the procedure are necessary in order to identify candidates adequately.