Stage migration in colorectal cancer related to improved lymph node assessment

Survival Contradiction in Stage II, IIIA, And IIIB Colon Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result-Based Analysis

There exists an inconsistency between stage and survival in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for colon cancer. In this study, we compared the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of colon cancer patients with stage II, IIIA, and IIIB disease based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to generate overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) curves. The Cox regression was employed to identify risk factors. The competing risk model was completed by the cumulative incidence function and Gray's test. In the final population of 31,361 colon cancer patients, Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that stage IIIA had the highest OS and CSS, followed by stage IIA and IIIB, and IIB and IIC showed the worst OS and CSS. In the Cox model, the stage was proven to be an independent prognostic factor. In the competing risk model, stage IIIA colon cancer patients had the lowest 5-year cancer-specific death rate in stages II, IIIA, and IIIB. In conclusion, the prognosis of colon cancer patients in stage IIA was worse than that of patients in stage IIIA, while the survival rate of stage IIB and IIC was lower than that of stage IIIB.

Molecular testing to deliver personalized chemotherapy recommendations: risking over and undertreatment

BACKGROUND

In the adjuvant setting of cancer treatment, de-escalation strategies have the goal of omitting or minimizing treatment in patients, without compromising outcomes. Historically, eligibility for adjuvant treatment solely relied on the patient's clinical and tumor's pathological characteristics. At the turn of the century, based on new biological understanding, molecular-based strategies were tested and sometimes implemented.

MAIN BODY

However, we illustrate how molecularly based de-escalation strategies may paradoxically lead to overtreatment. This may happen when the novel approach is tested in lieu of standard management and may not yield the same results when being implemented in addition to usual practice. In the DYNAMIC trial, adjuvant chemotherapy decision in stage II colon cancer was compared between a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based approach and the standard care. We show this may result in more patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and may expose a similar proportion of patients to chemotherapy if the novel strategy is implemented in addition to usual practice. The other potential risk is undertreatment. We provide an illustration of early breast cancer, where the decision of adjuvant chemotherapy based on the gene expression signature MammaPrint may lead to inferior outcomes as compared with the clinico-pathologic strategy. This may also happen when non-inferiority designs have large margins. Among solutions, it should be acknowledged that clinico-pathological features, like T4 in colon cancer, may not be abandoned and replaced by novel strategies in real-life practice. Therefore, novel strategies should be tested in addition to standard of care, and not in lieu of. Second, de-escalation trials should focus on the settings where the standard of care has a widespread agreement. This would avoid the risk of testing non-inferiority against an ineffective therapy, which guarantees successes without providing informative data.

CONCLUSION

Simply because a molecular test is rational does not mean it can improve patient outcomes. Here, we highlight how molecular test-based strategies may result in either overtreatment or undertreatment. In the rapidly evolving field of medicine, where technological advances may be transformative, our piece highlights scientific pitfalls to be aware of when considering running such trials or before implementing novel strategies in daily practice.

Primary tumour immune response and lymph node yields in colon cancer

Background

The mechanism underlying improved survival in non-metastatic colon cancer with higher lymph node (LN) yield is unknown. This study aimed to identify whether molecular features in the primary tumour were predictive of LN yield.

Methods

Clinical, genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and methylation data of non-metastatic, colon cancers studied in The Cancer Genome Atlas were interrogated for associations with LN yield. Based on maximal survival effects, patients were segregated into high (>15) and low (≤15) LN yield. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed on transcriptomic changes to identify biological processes associated with LN yield. Correlations were validated in an independent set of Stage II colon cancers.

Results

High LN yield was found predictive of overall and disease-free survival. There was no association of higher LN yield and increasing nodal positivity. High LN yield was strongly linked with gene expression changes associated with the adaptive and dendritic cell immune response. This association was most prominent in node-negative cancers. Analogous findings were reproduced in the validation dataset.

Conclusion

The study shows a strong association of an activated immune response in tumours with a high LN yield. Immunogenic tumours have a better prognosis, likely explaining the survival benefit with higher LN yields.

High Tissue TLR5 Expression Predicts Better Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC), the third most common cancer globally, caused 881,000 cancer deaths in 2018. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), the primary sensors of pathogen-associated molecular patterns and damage-associated molecular patterns, activate innate and adaptive immune systems and participate in the development of an inflammatory tumor microenvironment. We aimed to explore the prognostic value of TLR3, TLR5, TLR7, and TLR9 tissue expressions in CRC patients.

METHODS

Using immunohistochemistry, we analyzed tissue microarray samples from 825 CRC patients who underwent surgery between 1982 and 2002 at the Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. After analyzing a pilot series of 205 tissue samples, we included only TLR5 and TLR7 in the remainder of the patient series. We evaluated the associations between TLR5 and TLR7 tissue expressions, clinicopathologic variables, and survival. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, we generated survival curves, determining significance using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses relied on the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-specific survival was 55.9% among TLR5-negative (95% confidence interval [CI] 50.6-61.2%) and 61.9% (95% CI 56.6-67.2%; p = 0.011, log-rank test) among TLR5-positive patients. In the Cox multivariate survival analysis adjusted for age, sex, stage, location, and grade, positive TLR5 immunoexpression (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74; 95% CI 0.59-0.92; p = 0.007) served as an independent positive prognostic factor. TLR7 immunoexpression exhibited no prognostic value in the survival analysis across the entire cohort (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.78-1.20; p = 0.754) nor in subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

We show for the first time that a high TLR5 tumor tissue expression associates with a better prognosis in CRC patients.

The prognostic role of tissue TLR2 and TLR4 in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC), the second most common cancer globally, resulted in 881,000 deaths in 2018. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are crucial to detecting pathogen invasion and inducing the host’s immune response. This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of TLR2 and TLR4 tumor expressions in colorectal cancer patients. We studied the immunohistochemical expressions of TLR2 and TLR4 using tissue microarray specimens from 825 patients undergoing surgery in the Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, between 1982 and 2002. We assessed the relationships between TLR2 and TLR4 expressions and clinicopathological variables and patient survival. We generated survival curves using the Kaplan-Meier method, determining significance with the log-rank test. Among patients with lymph node–positive disease and no distant metastases (Dukes C), a strong TLR2 immunoactivity associated with a better prognosis (p < 0.001). Among patients with local Dukes B disease, a strong TLR4 immunoactivity associated with a worse disease-specific survival (DSS; p = 0.017). In the multivariate survival analysis, moderate TLR4 immunoactivity compared with strong TLR4 immunoactivity (hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49–0.89, p = 0.007) served as an independent prognostic factor. In the multivariate analysis for the Dukes subgroups, moderate TLR2 immunoactivity (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.56–4.44, p < 0.001) compared with strong TLR2 immunoactivity served as an independent negative prognostic factor in the Dukes C subgroup. TLR2 and TLR4 might be new prognostic factors to indicate which CRC patients require adjuvant therapy and which could spare from an unnecessary follow-up, but further investigations are needed.

Survival benefit of lymph node dissection in surgery for colon cancer in elderly patients: A multicenter propensity score-matched study in Japan

INTRODUCTION

In surgery for elderly patients with colorectal cancer, it is unclear whether radical lymph node (LN) dissection safely offers a survival benefit. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the LN yield in elderly patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

The subjects were selected from a surgical database of 2065 patients aged ≥80 years old who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer at 41 hospitals in Japan between 2003 and 2007. The patients were divided into groups according to the number LN harvested: <12 and ≥12. Propensity scores were subsequently matched to balance the baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 954 patients initially selected, 331 were in the <12 LN and 623 were in the ≥12 LN group. After cases were matched, 293 patients were allocated to each group, and all covariates were balanced. For short-term outcomes, the time for surgery was longer in the ≥12 LN group, but there was no significant difference in morbidity between the groups. Overall, relapse-free and cancer-specific survival rates were higher in the ≥12 LN group (P = 0.004, 0.001, and 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients aged ≥80 years old with stage II-III colon cancer, harvesting ≥12 LN provides a survival benefit, and therefore, limited LN dissection is not recommended in these patients.

Survival Contradiction Between Stage IIA and Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Background: When compared with patients harboring stage IIB and stage IIC disease, those with stage IIIA colorectal cancer have a better prognosis. We aimed to compare the cause-specific survival (CSS) of the patients with stage IIA rectal cancer with that of the patients with stage IIIA rectal cancer.

Methods: Data analyzed about patients with stage IIA and stage IIIA rectal cancer was from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We then validated the results using data derived from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC).

Results: A total of 16,788 patients (13,551 staged IIA and 3,237 staged IIIA) were identified in SEER database. A multivariate analysis manifested that patients with stage IIIA disease were more likely to have a better CSS (HR 0.894, 95% CI 0.816-0.979, p=0.016) compared with patients with stage IIA rectal cancer. In the subgroup of patients whose number of lymph nodes harvested (LNH) <12, multivariate analysis signified that patients with stage IIIA disease were more prone to have favorable CSS (HR 0.805, 95% CI 0.719-0.901, p<0.001) compared with patients with stage IIA rectal cancer. In LNH≥12 subgroup, the Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference between patients experiencing stage IIA and IIIA rectal cancer (p=0.618). Validation of data from FUSCC proved that patients with stage IIIA rectal cancer were more inclined to have better CSS (HR 0.407, 95% CI 0.187-0.885, p=0.019) in comparison to those with stage IIA rectal cancer. Specifically, in LNH<12 subgroup, the survival outcomes of stage IIIA patients were significantly better than that of the stage IIA patients (p=0.019), while there was no statistical significance between these two stages in the subgroup of patients with LNH≥12 (p=0.180).

Conclusions: Patients with stage IIA rectal cancer have poorer CSS than patients with stage IIIA rectal cancer, particularly when inadequate lymph nodes are harvested.

Colorectal cancer incidence and survival by sub-site and stage of diagnosis: a population-based study at the advent of national screening

BACKGROUND

The location and staging of a colorectal cancer (CRC) determine prognosis and choice of treatment. We examined the sub-site, sex, and stage distribution for CRC in Ireland for patients diagnosed in the period immediately prior to the implementation of a national screening programme.

METHODS

Incident cases of CRC were abstracted from the National Cancer Registry for the period 1994-2012 (n = 38,912). Incidence proportions and 3-year cancer-related survival were calculated.

RESULTS

The incidence of CRC during 2010-2012 averaged 1021 females and 1424 males per year. While the overall incidence rate of CRC was static during 1994-2012, this masked a significant increase in the rate of proximal colon tumours (+1.3 % per year), a decreases in the rate of tumours of overlapping/colon NOS (-2.2 % per year), and no change in the rates of cancers of the distal colon and rectosigmoid junction (RSJ)/rectum. Proximal tumours occurred more frequently in females (F vs. M, 38 vs. 29 %), in older persons and increased over time. Compared to distal colon tumours, proximal colon [RR risk ratio 1.08, 95 % CI (1.05, 1.10)] and RSJ/rectum tumours [RR 1.08 (1.05, 1.11)] were more likely to be diagnosed at late stage. The proportion of late-stage tumours increased steadily over five diagnosis periods [e.g., 1994-1997 (51 %) vs. 2010-2012 (57 %), RR 1.12 (1.08, 1.16)]. Cancer survival improved over four diagnosis periods.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a distal-to-proximal shift and a trend towards diagnosis at late stage during 1994-2012. Some reversal of this trend is expected following the implementation of a national screening programme.

Colorectal multidisciplinary meeting audit to determine patient benefit

BACKGROUND

New Zealand tumour standards require discussion of all cases of colorectal cancer in a multidisciplinary meeting (MDM), but supporting evidence is lacking. The aim was to determine which patients benefit from MDM discussion.

METHODS

A retrospective and prospective audit was undertaken of all patients discussed in the Christchurch Hospital colorectal MDM over 12 months to November 2014, who were compared with contemporaneous patients not discussed and identified through Hospital discharge codes.

RESULTS

In total, 641 patients were identified, with 459 (70%) discussed in the MDM, on average 7 years younger than not discussed. The proportion discussed by location was 39.2% colon, 63% rectosigmoid, 98% rectal, 96.6% anal. Discussed patients were more likely to have magnetic resonance imaging (68% cf 9.3%), fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan (18% versus 2%) and chest computerized tomography scan (50% versus 26%). For colon cancer, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I and II, 91% of 68 non-discussed patients went straight to surgery compared with 48% of 27 discussed in the MDM; for AJCC stage III uptake of adjuvant chemotherapy was the same whether discussed or not. An R0 resection was achieved for 91% of discussed patients, and 96% of not discussed. A clear referrer's plan, prospectively recorded in 94 patients, was changed after the MDM in 23%. Clinical staging was changed in 20 patients (4%), none with colon cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Discussion in the MDM influenced management, but was unlikely to change management for AJCC stage I/II colon cancer, who could be spared mandatory review in the MDM and be discussed selectively as treating clinicians decide.

[Survival rate after D3-lymphadenectomy for right-sided colic cancer: case-match study]

The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of D3-lymphadenectomy in compliance with «no-touch» principle and mesocolectomy with traditional hemicolectomy in patients with right-sided colon cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

It is retrospective-prospective comparative case-match study. From prospectively collected database patients with right-sided colon cancer stage I-III treated in 2009-2013 without adjuvant chemotherapy were selected. Patients who underwent conventional right-sided hemicolectomy with D2-lymphadenectomy in the regional oncologic dispensary formed the first group. The second group included patients after right-sided hemicolectomy with D3-lymphadenectomy, «no-touch» principle and mesocolectomy performed in academic hospital of the third level. From both groups 'case-match' patients by gender, age, stage and location of primary tumor were selected. Each group consisted of 50 patients.

RESULTS

Overall and cancer-related 5-year survival was significantly higher in the second group - 80.9% vs. 56.0% (p=0.01) and 93.4% vs. 59.8% (p=0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSION

D3-lymphadenectomy and mesocolectomy for right-sided colon cancer stage I-III without adjuvant chemotherapy provides significantly better overall and cancer-related 5-year survival compared with conventional right-sided hemicolectomy. Thus, D3-lymphadenectomy and mesocolectomy in compliance with «no-touch» principle for right-sided colon cancer is reproducible and effective in Russian conditions.

Lymph node count and prognosis in colorectal cancer: the influence of examination quality

Colorectal cancer guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II disease when less than 12 lymph nodes are assessed. The recommendation bases on previous studies showing an association of a low lymph node count and adverse outcome. Compared to current standards, however, the quality of lymph node examination in the studies was low. We, therefore, investigated the prognostic role of <12 lymph nodes in cancers diagnosed adherent to current quality measures. Stage I-IV colorectal cancers from 1,899 patients enrolled into a population-based cohort study were investigated for the prognostic impact of a lymph node count <12. The stage specific share of patients diagnosed with ≥12 nodes (stage I-IV: 62, 85, 85, 78%, respectively) was used to compare lymph node examination quality to other studies. We found no impact of a lymph node count <12 on overall, cancer-specific or recurrence-free survival for any tumour stage. Compared to studies reporting an adverse prognostic impact of a low lymph node count in stages II and III the stage-specific shares of patients with ≥12 nodes were markedly higher in this study (85% vs. 24-58% in previous analyses) and this correlated with increased rates of stage III compared to stage II cancers. In conclusion our data indicate, that the previously reported effect of a low lymph node count on the patients' outcomes is eliminated by improved lymph node examination quality and thus question the general applicability of a 12 lymph node cut off for adjuvant chemotherapy decision making in stage II disease.

Time trends in chemotherapy (administration and costs) and relative survival in stage III colon cancer patients - a large population-based study from 1990 to 2008

BACKGROUND

Use of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer has increased since several trials have shown the beneficial effect on survival. In this population-based study we show time trends in the administration and costs of chemotherapy and relative survival of patients with stage III colon cancer.

METHODS

All patients surgically treated for adenocarcinoma of the colon stage III between 1990 and 2008 in The Netherlands were included. Relative survival (using period analyses) and Relative Excess Risks of death (RER) were calculated. The costs of chemotherapy were estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 24 111 colon cancer patients with stage III were included in the cohort. The administration (from 9.5% in 1990 to 61.8% in 2008; p < 0.001) and costs of chemotherapy (from €38 467 in 1990 to €3 876 150 in 2008) increased during the study period. Multivariable relative survival improved for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (RER 0.93; 95% CI 0.92-0.94; p < 0.001). In contrast, relative survival remained stable for patients, younger than 80 years, who did not receive chemotherapy (RER 1.00; 95% CI 1.00-1.01; p = 0.3). Patients aged 80 years and older without chemotherapy, relative survival increased during the study period (RER 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.99; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The administration, the costs of chemotherapy and the survival of patients with stage III colon cancer increased over time. Whereas the costs and administration of chemotherapy increased extensively, relative survival increased to a lesser extent. For patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy relative survival increased equally in all age groups.

Evaluation of lymph nodes in patients with colon cancer undergoing colon resection: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Though lymph node status may predict long-term outcome of patients with non-metastatic colon cancer, discordant findings exist among various expressions of lymph node status. The present study was designed to assess the prognostic value among these lymph node evaluations.

METHODS

The analysis was based on surgical patients with newly diagnosed colon adenocarcinoma registered in the Taiwan Cancer Database from 2003 to 2005. Exclusion criteria included those patients who had stage IV disease, those whose survival period was <1 month, or those whose lymph node information was unavailable. Studied variables included total number of lymph nodes (LNT), number of positive lymph nodes (LNP), number of negative lymph nodes (LNN), ratio of positive lymph nodes (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS).

RESULTS

Of 16,790 newly diagnosed colon cancer patients, there were 9,644 (65.4 ± 13.5 years; male 54.9 %) patients with non-metastatic disease who met the criteria. Correlation analyses for patients with stage III disease showed that LNR and LODDS were highly correlated, as were LNT and LNN. By the Cox proportional hazard model, LNT was prognostic of long-term survival in patients with stage II disease, while LNR and LNP were the most powerful prognosticators for patients with stage III disease (p < 0.001). Both the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis and area under the curve indicated that LNR had the best discriminating capability to predict 5-year survival (0.704, 0.700, and 0.709 for overall, disease-free, and disease-specific survival, respectively), followed by LODDS.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients undergoing resection for colon cancer, LNR, LODDS, and LNP are better prognostic factors for those with stage III disease than LNT is for patients with stage III disease.

Expression of cyclin D1a and D1b as predictive factors for treatment response in colorectal cancer

Background:

The aim of this study was to investigate the value of the cyclin D1 isoforms D1a and D1b as prognostic factors and their relevance as predictors of response to adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and levamisole (5-FU/LEV) in colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods:

Protein expression of nuclear cyclin D1a and D1b was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 335 CRC patients treated with surgery alone or with adjuvant therapy using 5-FU/LEV. The prognostic and predictive value of these two molecular markers and clinicopathological factors were evaluated statistically in univariate and multivariate survival analyses.

Results:

Neither cyclin D1a nor D1b showed any prognostic value in CRC or colon cancer patients. However, high cyclin D1a predicted benefit from adjuvant therapy measured in 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and CRC-specific survival (CSS) compared to surgery alone in colon cancer (P=0.012 and P=0.038, respectively) and especially in colon cancer stage III patients (P=0.005 and P=0.019, respectively) in univariate analyses. An interaction between treatment group and cyclin D1a could be shown for RFS (P=0.004) and CSS (P=0.025) in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion:

Our study identifies high cyclin D1a protein expression as a positive predictive factor for the benefit of adjuvant 5-FU/LEV treatment in colon cancer, particularly in stage III colon cancer.

Increased lymph node harvest in patients operated on for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based study

AIM

In recent decades, the focus has been on the treatment of rectal cancer with improved surgical techniques. This has resulted in improved results for patients with rectal cancer. Recently, the focus has shifted to colon cancer surgery with the introduction of preoperative staging, new surgical techniques, quality control and enhanced recovery programmes. The change in operative techniques has been most pronounced for patients with tumours on the right side of the colon, with more extensive resections and proximal ligations of the vessels. The aim of this study was to assess the number of analysed lymph nodes and the metastatic index (MI) in patients operated on for right-sided colon cancer in the Stockholm area between 1996 and 2009.

METHOD

All patients operated on for cancer of the right colon between January 1996 and December 2009 were divided into three groups based on the year in which they were operated (period 1, 1996-1999; period 2, 2000-2004; and period 3, 2005-2009). The number of lymph nodes and lymph node status were analysed.

RESULTS

In total, 3536 patients were operated on for right-sided colon cancer during the study period. There was a significantly lower proportion of emergency operations in the third time period. The mean number of lymph nodes examined increased significantly during the overall study period (seven in period 1, 11 in period 2 and 18 in period 3; P < 0.001). A significant drop in MI was seen during the third time period (0.25, compared with 0.40 in period 1 and 0.40 in period 2; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

During the study period there was an increase in the number of analysed lymph nodes and a decrease in MI after right-sided hemicolectomies. Further investigations are needed to evaluate the potential impact on short-term and long-term outcome.

Risk groups defined by Recursive Partitioning Analysis of patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma treated with colorectal resection

BACKGROUND

To define different prognostic groups of surgical colorectal adenocarcinoma patients derived from recursive partitioning analysis (RPA).

METHODS

Ten thousand four hundred ninety four patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma underwent colorectal resection from Taiwan Cancer Database during 2003 to 2005 were included in this study. Exclusion criteria included those patients with stage IV disease or without number information of lymph nodes. For the definition of risk groups, the method of classification and regression tree was performed. Main primary outcome was 5-year cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

We identified six prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival, resulting in seven terminal nodes. Four risk groups were defined as following: Group 1 (mild risk, 1,698 patients), Group 2 (moderate risk, 3,129 patients), Group 3 (high risk, 4,605 patients) and Group 4 (very high risk, 1,062 patients). The 5-year cancer-specific survival for Group 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 86.6%, 62.7%, 55.9%, and 36.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Hazard ratio of death was 2.13, 5.52 and 10.56 (95% confidence interval 1.74-2.60, 4.58-6.66 and 8.66-12.9, respectively) times for Group 2, 3, and 4 as compared to Group 1. The predictive capability of these grouping was also similar in terms of overall and progression-free survival.

CONCLUSION

The use of RPA offered an alternative grouping method that could predict the survival of patients who underwent surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma.

The survival gap between middle-aged and elderly colon cancer patients. Time trends in treatment and survival

AIMS

For several types of cancer, including colon cancer, the survival gap between middle-aged patients and elderly patients widened between 1988 and 1999 in Europe. The aim of our study was to describe treatments and compare survival rates over time (1991-2005) between middle-aged (<65 years), aged (65-74 years) and elderly (≥ 75 years) colon cancer patients in the mid-western part of the Netherlands to assess whether this survival gap further increased.

METHODS

All 8926 patients with invasive colon cancer diagnosed between 1991 and 2005 were selected from the Comprehensive Cancer Centre West. Relative survival was calculated. Relative Excess Risks of death (RER) were estimated using a multivariable generalized linear model with a Poisson distribution.

RESULTS

There were no significant changes in the treatment for stage I and II colon. Patients with stage III and IV more often received chemotherapy over time (from 9.6% to 54.3% and from 7.5% to 44.2% for all ages, respectively), while less stage IV patients were operated on (from 73.1% to 55.2%). Relative 5-year survival increased significantly for middle-aged patients (RER = 0.97, 95%CI = 0.95-0.98, p < 0.001), borderline significantly (RER = 0.98, 95%CI = 0.97-0.99, p = 0.05) for elderly patients and not significantly for aged patients (RER = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.97-1.00, p = 0.08) after adjustment for sex, age, grade, stage, and treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival gap earlier found by the EUROCARE is confirmed for the mid-western part of the Netherlands, even after adjustment for age, sex, grade, stage and treatment. However, present study does not show an increase in the survival gap between middle-aged and elderly patients.

Metastatic lymph node ratio in stage III rectal cancer; prognostic significance in addition to the 7th edition of the TNM classification

AIMS

Optimal staging in rectal cancer is indispensable for the decision on further treatment and estimation of prognosis. This study assesses the prognostic capacity of the metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) in addition to the new TNM classification.

METHODS

LNR was determined, in stage III patients from the Dutch TME-trial. Six year median follow up data from the trial database were used to analyse the relation of LNR to overall survival (OS) and local recurrence (LR). The relation of LNR to lymph node yield was assessed and appropriate cut off values of LNR for clinical use were determined.

RESULTS

605 patients were analyzed. 278 underwent pre-operative radiotherapy. 82 patients developed a local recurrence and 289 distant metastases. LNR was an independent risk factor for OS, hazard ratio (HR) 2.10 (95% CI 1.35-3.27) (in addition to age >= 65 years, involved circumferential resection margin (CRM) and new TNM stage) and LR, HR 2.25 (95% CI 1.02-4.56) (in addition to pre-operative radiotherapy and involved CRM). LNR is predictive of OS and LR from a lymph node yield of more than one and more than five respectively. A LNR value of 0.60 offers the best cut off to identify high risk patients (5-years OS was 61 vs. 32%, HR 2.45 (95% CI 1.96-3.08) and 5-years LR rate 12.6 versus 16.3%, HR 1.65 (95% CI 1.03-2.64)).

CONCLUSIONS

LNR is an independent risk factor for OS and LR in addition to the 7th edition of the TNM classification. It can aid in predicting prognosis and identifying patients that should be considered for adjuvant treatment.

Tumour differentiation grade is associated with TNM staging and the risk of node metastasis in colorectal cancer

AIM

The tumour differentiation grade has been shown by numerous multivariate analyses to be a stage-independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the importance of differentiation grading for the staging of colorectal cancer and how it relates to the components of the TNM system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was a retrospective single-centre analysis of all patients undergoing surgical resection for colorectal cancer during the period 2002-2007 (n = 1239). The clinical parameters and pathology data of overall stage, differentiation grade, local tumour (T)-stage and metastasis status (M-stage) were included as well as the lymph node count of both assessed and metastatic nodes. The differentiation grade was correlated with demography, overall stage and each component of the TNM staging system. The correlation between differentiation grade and N-stage was also explored for the separate T-stages.

RESULTS

The tumour differentiation grade correlated significantly with the overall TNM stage (p < 0.0001). The grade significantly correlated with the T-stage and the risk of having lymph node metastasis (p < 0.0001). A high grade was associated with a higher positive lymph node count in stage III disease (p < 0.0002). For the T-stages, the risk of node metastasis was significantly linked to the tumour grade. A low grade (G1) T2 had a 17% risk of lymph node metastasis compared to a 44% risk for a high grade (G4) T2.

CONCLUSION

Tumour differentiation is an important prognostic factor. It correlates significantly with the overall stage of the TNM system and also to each of its components. The risk of having lymph node metastasis for each T-stage also correlates with the tumour grade. The findings can be of importance in postoperative risk assessment or when considering local resection procedures like TEM.

A study of the MTHFR gene polymorphism C677T in colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine the clinical significance of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphism C677T in colorectal cancer (CRC). The hypothesis was that the genotype could affect the risk of cancer development and the results of cancer treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Genotyping was made for a random 30% (n = 544) of all patients treated for CRC at our unit from 1999 to 2006 (n = 1812). Basic clinical and pathologic factors were analyzed by genotype group and also compared with those of the entire cohort. Tolerability of chemotherapy and possible side effects were analyzed by genotype. Survival was analyzed by genotype for all stages for patients treated between 1999 and 2003. The genotype prevalence was also compared with a control material of healthy blood donors.

RESULTS

No genotype was associated with an increased risk of CRC or higher cancer stage. The patients with CT/TT genotype had significantly greater risk of suffering side effects from fluoropyrimidine (5-fluorouracil) treatment (P < .05). In stage III colon cancer, the patients with CT/TT genotype had a poorer prognosis than those with the CC genotype. The difference was significant in univariate (P < .003) and multivariate (P < .040) analysis. Though the genotype-associated side effect risks remained in stage IV, the effect on survival was not significant (P < .1).

CONCLUSION

The MTHFR polymorphism C677T does, in our material, not affect the risk of CRC; however, it can affect the sensitivity to chemotherapy and the risk of side-effects and therefore survival in stage III and possibly stage IV colon cancer. It could be a future predictive factor in the choice of a treatment regimen.

lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in patients with stage III rectal cancer treated with total mesorectal excision followed by chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the prognostic impact of lymph node ratio (LNR) on survival in the patients with Stage III rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 421 consecutive patients who underwent total mesorectal excision followed by chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer from 1996 to 2006. The 232 patients with positive lymph nodes (LNs) were divided into four groups according to LNR quartiles: LNR <or=0.1 (n = 69), <or=0.2 (n = 49), <or=0.4 (n = 54), and >0.4 (n = 60). The association between LNR and survival was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analysis with covariates of prognostic significance in univariate analysis.

RESULTS

The median numbers of examined and positive LNs were 17 and 3, respectively, and the median LNR was 0.20 (range, 0.03-1). There was a strong correlation between the number of positive LNs and LNR (r = 0.724, p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 53 months (range, 9-138 months), the actuarial overall survival and disease-free survival rates at 5 years were 69% and 56%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate decreased as LNR increased (<or=0.1, 89%; <or=0.2, 67%; <or=0.4, 64%; >0.4, 50%; p < 0.001). Lymph node ratio was also a significant prognostic factor on Cox regression analysis (<or=0.1, hazard ratio [HR] = 1; <or=0.2, HR = 1.3, p = 0.623; <or=0.4, HR = 2.4, p = 0.047; >0.4, HR = 3.7, p = 0.005). Lymph node ratio had a prognostic effect on overall survival in subgroups of patients with N1 (p = 0.032) and N2 (p = 0.034) tumors.

CONCLUSION

Lymph node ratio was the most significant predictor of survival in the patients with Stage III rectal cancer who had undergone postoperative chemoradiation.

Increased lymph node harvest from colorectal cancer resections using GEWF solution: a randomised study

Background:

The lymph node harvest from colorectal specimens is pivotal for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), independent of N stage.

Aims:

To determine whether the use of GEWF solution (glacial acetic acid, ethanol, distilled water and formaldehyde) could improve the lymph node harvest in CRC specimens.

Methods:

Consecutive fresh colonic (n = 60) and rectal (n = 60) specimens from patients with primary CRC resected at Aarhus University Hospital THG between March 2006 and July 2007 were randomised to either conventional preparation or GEWF preparation and examined in a standard manner.

Results:

For colonic as well as rectal specimens, the GEWF solution increased the mean lymph node harvest from 9 and 10 to 16 and 17 lymph nodes per specimen compared to conventional prepared specimens (p<0.001). Using the recommended threshold of 12 lymph nodes to ensure adequacy of nodal harvest, the adequacy increased from less than half to almost three quarters independent of tumour origin (p<0.037). The proportion of node-negative specimens was not significantly different between the two preparation groups.

Conclusion:

The use of GEWF solution in patients with CRC significantly increases the lymph node harvest of resected specimens.

A study of lymph node ratio as a prognostic marker in colon cancer

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate and describe the lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic parameter for patients with colon cancer. As lymphatic involvement is the key, focus was set at stage III disease. Interest was directed at the possibility of identifying high-risk groups and the clinical implementation and consequence.

METHOD

The study was retrospective using a database of clinical data of all cancer patients treated at our unit. It has been continuous in registration, inclusion and update since 1999 including survival and clinical features. All patients (n=265) diagnosed with stage III colon cancer during 1999-2003 were included for the study. LNR was calculated and quartile groups were created. LNR and associated parameters were analysed towards 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Basic patient data as well as surgery, pathology and postoperative treatment were taken into consideration.

RESULTS

Significant differences in disease-free survival were found for TNM N-status, tumour differentiation grade and LNR quartile group. There was a difference in 3-year DFS from 80% in LNR group 1 compared with less than 30% in group 4. These results were of prognostic interest both independently and in interaction with each other. High-risk groups could be identified and in the worst prognosis LNR group we also found a tendency towards more side effects with adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The lymph node ratio, the quota between the number of lymph node metastasis and assessed lymph nodes, is a highly significant (p<0.001) prognostic factor in stage III colon cancer. It can be an aid in identifying risk groups that could benefit from a more intense postoperative surveillance and possibly bring changes in adjuvant treatment strategy. More studies of clinical data, genetic and biochemical markers are needed in this patient group to understand the possible difference in tumour behaviour and tailor the treatment.