Gastric GIST: a single institutional retrospective experience with surgical treatment for primary disease

Laparoscopic partial gastrectomy for a giant bleeding GIST of the stomach: A case report

Introduction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare neoplasms often located in the stomach. Elective laparoscopic surgery is the well-established treatment. Often these tumors have a presentation with acute gastrointestinal bleeding and/or as large masses that challenge mini invasive laparoscopic approach. This article describes the case of a patient with large gastric GIST with bleeding onset and discusses the feasibility and safety of emergency laparoscopy.

Presentation of case

A 36-year-old man presented with melena and severe anaemia. An upper endoscopy and abdominal CT scan showed a large gastric fundal submucosal mass of more than 10 cm of diameter close to the superior splenic pole. Because of relapsing bleeding he was submitted to emergency laparoscopy with complete resection of the gastric mass by partial gastrectomy.

Discussion

Laparoscopic approach to GIST larger than 10 cm is still a challenging surgical task and the feasibility depends on multiple factors including the location and size of the lesions. Few series of patients have been described in the literature. This case described a giant GIST with major and relapsing gastrointestinal bleeding that induced an emergency surgically approach with a minimally invasive laparoscopic partial gastric resection.

Conclusions

This report described a case of giant gastric GIST that presented with repeated and severe gastrointestinal bleeding and was treated by emergency laparoscopic gastric resection. The feasibility and advantages of the surgical technique are discussed. The best surgical approach in these rare cases has still to be evaluated on individual basis.

•

Laparoscopic surgical approach for giant gastric GIST is still challenging

•

Emergency surgery for bleeding GIST has not been frequently described

•

Laparoscopic surgical resection of giant gist is feasible but has to be evaluated on an individual basis

Do microscopic surgical margins matter for primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor?

BACKGROUND

Although tumor size and mitotic rate are established prognostic factors for worse survival in patients undergoing surgical resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors, the impact of microscopic margins, or R1 resection, is not completely established.

METHODS

Patients who received no neoadjuvant therapy and underwent surgical resection for stage I to III gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors were identified from the 2010 to 2013 National Cancer Database and divided into 2 cohorts, R0 and R1 resections. Cox proportional hazards ratio and Kaplan Meier survival estimates were utilized to analyze 5-y overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 2,084 patients, those with R1 resection (57, 2.7%) were more likely to have tumors >10 cm (28.1% vs 11.9%, odds ratio 3.51, P = .017) and stage III disease (26.3% vs 11.2%, odds ratio 2.26, P = .047). Although margin status was associated with higher risk tumors, it was not associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy. After multivariate Cox regression, R1 and R0 patients did not have a difference in 5-y overall survival (82.5% vs 88.6%, hazards ratio 1.26, P = .49). When stratified by stage of disease, there remained no difference in survival across all stages when comparing R1 and R0 patients.

CONCLUSION

Positive microscopic margins are uncommon but do not appear to impact survival outcomes in patients with resected localized gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Efficacy of Surgery and Imatinib Mesylate in the Treatment of Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Systematic Review

Aims and background

In patients with localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors, surgery remains the elective treatment. Nowadays, imatinib therapy has been standardized in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors, showing continuous improvements in progression-free and overall survival. A combination of imatinib therapy and surgery may also be effective in a subset of patients with metastatic or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors. In this review, the authors analyzed the role of imatinib mesylate associated to surgery in unresectable and/or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Methods and study design

We searched for all published and unpublished randomized controlled clinical trials and controlled clinical trials. We conducted the review according to the recommendations of The Cochrane Collaboration. We used Review Manager 5 software for the statistical analysis.

Results

There are currently no randomized controlled clinical trials or controlled clinical trials on this issue. We performed a subgroup analysis in the patients pre-operatively treated with imatinib mesylate. This subgroup revealed a minor incidence of recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors and a greater incidence of locally unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the responsive disease group (P = 0.001). In this patient group, more complete resections were observed (P = 0.00001). Furthermore, in the same patient group we observed a more significant 12 and 24-month disease-free survival after imatinib treatment and complete resection (respectively P = 0.06 and P = 0.003) and also a better 24-month overall survival (P = 0.004).

Conclusions

There is actually only one ongoing European randomized study evaluating surgery of residual disease in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors responding to imatinib mesylate. Imatinib mesylate represents the standard treatment as preoperative supplement for locally unresectable and/or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and a trial to compare the approach versus surgery alone is not necessary. For patients responding to imatinib or patients with prolonged stable disease, resection of residual disease should be considered. A phase III randomized study evaluating surgery of residual disease in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor responding to imatinib mesylate, EORTC 62063, has been opened. Moreover, surgery should be considered for patients at higher risk of complications during pharmacological debulking. In advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors, the advantages of the integrated treatment are significant in the complete or partial response disease group in terms of more complete resections and better disease-free and overall survival.

Prognostic Factors of Patients with Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor after Curative Resection: A Retrospective Analysis of 406 Consecutive Cases in a Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have a highly variable clinical course, and recurrent disease sometimes develops despite curative surgery. This study was undertaken to investigate the surgical role in treating gastric GISTs and evaluate the clinicopathological features of a large series of patients who underwent curative resection for gastric GISTs to clarify which features were independent prognostic factors.

METHODS

The clinicopathological data of 406 patients with gastric GISTs who underwent curative resection at 4 university hospitals in Daegu, South Korea, from March 1998 to March 2012 were reviewed. All cases were confirmed as gastric GISTs by immunohistochemical staining, in which CD117 or CD34 was positive. Clinical follow-up was performed periodically, and disease-free survival rates were retrospectively investigated using the medical records.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 42.9 months (range: 2-166). There were 11 recurrent patients (2.7%). Due to the small number of recurrences, age, sex and location were controlled using propensity score matching before performing any statistical analysis. Tumor size, mitotic count, NIH classification, and cellularity were judged to be independent prognostic factors for recurrence by univariate analysis. In a multivariate analysis, tumor size and mitotic count were significantly and independently related to recurrence, and tumor size was determined to be the most important prognostic factor for recurrence after curative resection (hazard ratio: 1.204; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this multicenter study demonstrate that disease-free survival rates are good. Tumor size was disclosed as the most important factor for recurrence in gastric GIST patients who underwent radical resection.

Laparoscopic-Assisted Endoscopic Resection of a Gastric Leiomyoma

Leiomyomas are infrequent benign intestinal tumors that can arise at any age and location within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. These tumors can cause symptoms including abdominal pain, obstruction, intussusception, volvulus, GI bleeding, or a mass and should be resected if symptomatic. Open surgical resection is considered the standard for removing these tumors. However, recent improvements in endoscopic and laparoscopic equipment have made it possible to utilize minimally invasive techniques of tumor removal including complete endoscopic resection or endoscopic-assisted laparoscopic resection. We present the case of an adolescent female with a large mass located at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) causing GI bleeding. Given the location of the mass near the GEJ and the morbidity associated with surgical resection, we performed laparoscopic-assisted complete endoscopic resection of tumor. In addition, this tumor had an unusual immunohistochemical-staining pattern, with focal expression of markers more often seen in GI stromal tumors, elucidating a gray area between these two tumor classes with potential implications for patient follow-up. Laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic resection of benign tumors is a useful technique that can be employed to facilitate resection of mucosal and subserosal masses near the GEJ with minimal morbidity.

Surgical treatment of GIST--an institutional experience of a high-volume center

BACKGROUND

Discovery of the molecular pathogenesis of Gastrointestinal stromal tumors led to the development of targeted therapies, revolutionizing their treatment. However, surgery is still the mainstay of GIST therapy and the only chance for cure.

AIM

Here we present a single institutional consecutive case series of 159 GIST-patients.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

A total of 159 GIST-patients who underwent resection between 1994 and 2011 were reviewed for clinicopathohistological data, informations on surgical and medical therapy and further follow-up, outcome and survival data.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic (25.2%) and open (71.1%) GIST surgery achieved complete resection rates of 97.5% and 85.2%, whereas 44.4% of incomplete and 6.6% of complete resected patients died from GIST. Compared to open surgery laparoscopy significantly reduced duration of operation (183.4 vs. 130.6 min), length of hospitalization (16.1 vs. 8.3 d) and morbidity (23% vs. 7.5%). Mean survival time was 3.7 ± 2.7 years (R0: 5.1 a and R1: 2.6 a) and the mean overall survival was 4.5 ± 3.8 years.

CONCLUSION

Complete surgical resection is the primary goal and laparoscopy can be performed safely in a subset of GIST-patients with potential perioperative advantages. Although not proven by the present study the authors assume that multimodal GIST-treatment, as performed in reference-centers, is required for advanced or high risk disease. Our data suggest the potential for minimally invasive GIST resection to achieving comparable oncological outcomes as after open surgery while providing low morbidity rates.

Prognostic factors in surgically managed gastrointestinal stromal tumours

OBJECTIVE

To determine prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with surgically managed gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 374 patients with pathologically confirmed GISTs. Medical records were reviewed and prognostic factors associated with adverse outcomes were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 337 patients underwent complete resection with curative intent; 37 underwent incomplete resection. Overall mean survival time was 127.3 months; 5-year survival rate was 70.4%. Multivariate analyses determined that tumour size, risk status (of recurrence or metastasis) and surgical procedure were significant predictive factors for survival. There was a significant difference in the 5-year survival rate between patients who received adjuvant imatinib compared with those who did not (75.1% versus 13.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with GISTs managed by surgical resection combined with targeted chemotherapy had a good prognosis. Clinical factors predictive of survival included tumour size, risk status and surgical procedure.

Long term survival results for gastric GIST: is laparoscopic surgery for large gastric GIST feasible?

Background

Recently, laparoscopic resection for relatively small sized gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has been widely accepted as minimally invasive surgery. However, no report on the long-term safety and efficacy of this surgery for large sized gastric GISTs has been published to date.

Methods

Between July 1998 and January 2011, 104 consecutive patients who underwent resection for gastric GISTs were enrolled in this retrospective study. We assessed the clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative outcomes, patient survival, and tumor recurrence.

Results

Of the 104 patients with gastric GISTs who were included in the study, there were 47 males and 57 females whose mean age was 59.8 years. Sixty-four patients (61.5%) had symptoms associated with tumor. Ten patients included in the group 1, 49 in the group 2, 15 in the group 3a, 9 in the group 5, 14 in the group 6a, and 7 in the group 6b. There was one minor complication and no mortalities. Recurrence was noted in 5 patients, with a median follow-up period of 49.3 months (range, 8.4 to 164.4). The 5-year overall and disease free survival rates of 104 patients were 98.6% and 94.8%, respectively. When comparing large tumor (5–10 cm) between laparoscopic and open surgery, there were statistically differences in age, tumor size, tumor location, and length of hospitalization. There were no statistical differences in the 5-year survival rate between laparoscopic and open surgery for large tumor (5-10cm).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic surgery is feasible and effective as an oncologic treatment of gastric GISTs. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery can be an acceptable alternative to open methods for gastric GISTs of size bigger than 5 cm.

Systematic review of escalated imatinib doses compared with sunitinib or best supportive care, for the treatment of people with unresectable/metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours whose disease has progressed on the standard imatinib dose

Introduction

We conducted a systematic review of evidence on the effectiveness of imatinib at escalated doses of 600 mg/day or 800 mg/day for treatment of adults with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), following progression on imatinib at the 400 mg/day dose, compared with sunitinib and/or ‘best supportive care’.

Methods

Electronic searches were undertaken to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised studies, and case series reporting outcome data on survival, quality of life or adverse events. Titles and abstracts were screened by two reviewers and full text reports of potentially relevant studies assessed for inclusion. Included studies were quality assessed by two reviewers and data were extracted. Five studies reported data on the relevant population and were included.

Results and Discussion

Median overall survival for imatinib (800 mg/day) and sunitinib both were less than 2 years. Around 25% of patients required either an imatinib dose delay or reduction. Approximately one-third of patients receiving dose escalated imatinib (either dose) showed either response or stable disease. Amongst those responding to the escalated 800 mg/day dose, median progression-free survival was over 25 months. The statistical likelihood of response may depend on exon mutational status. There were few data and those that were available were potentially biased, due to their non-randomised nature. Further data are needed to justify international guideline recommendations on imatinib dose escalation.

Conclusion

A prospective audit of management and outcomes for unresectable GIST patients treated with dose escalation upon progression at 400 mg/day may be appropriate as an RCT may be unfeasible.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection of submucosal gastric tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a minimally invasive method for en bloc resection of gastrointestinal lesions, such as early cancer or submucosal tumor. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate a novel EFTR prototype device for full-thickness resection of the gastric wall containing artificial submucosal lesions.

METHODS

Six artificial submucosal tumors were surgically created in the gastric submucosa by implanting 8-mm cork beads in anesthetized pigs. EFTR of the lesions was attempted using a prototype device which consists of a large transparent plastic cap, loaded onto the tip of the endoscope, into which the submucosal lesion and the surrounding gastrointestinal wall can be pulled by using suction, a grasping forceps, or a dedicated anchoring device. An over-the-scope clip (OTSC) can be deployed underneath the submucosal lesion and a pre-loaded snare is used for EFTR above the OTSC.

RESULTS

The median procedure time was 15 min (interquartile range 11-22). Successful resection of the artificial submucosal lesion was achieved in 4/6 (67%) cases. Successful EFTR of the gastric wall was achieved in 3/6 (50%) cases. In all cases, the OTSC closed the EFTR site completely.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric EFTR using the novel EFTR prototype device is feasible in a live animal model. The technique can achieve a full-thickness gastric wall and submucosal tumor resection with reliable closure of the gastric wall, but further refinements of the technique and device are necessary in order to reliably resect submucosal lesions, especially larger ones.

Pediatric gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Pediatric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare entity that can be quite different from its adult counterpart. This report provides a comprehensive review on the diagnosis and management of this tumor in children and adolescents, including its oncogenesis and associated syndromes. Surgery remains a mainstay of treatment, but there are no standard guidelines available at this time regarding the best practice for multimodality therapy as our understanding of the biology of GIST is still in evolution. Therefore, pediatric patients with GIST should be ideally treated in the context of clinical trials at specialized, multidisciplinary centers throughout the course of their disease, especially because these patients may live for years after diagnosis.

Different sites and prognoses of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: report of 187 cases

BACKGROUND

The stomach is the most common site of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), but the clinical behavior of gastric GISTs at different sites is unclear. This study was designed to evaluate the clinicopathological (CP) parameters and influence of different gastric sites on outcome in patients with GIST.

METHODS

The CP and follow-up records of 187 patients with GIST who were treated at TianJin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital between January 1985 and December 2006 were reviewed. There were 97 men and 90 women (aged 17-88 (median, 56.5) years). CP factors were assessed for overall survival (OS) by using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The numbers of cases of upper, middle, and lower third gastric GISTs were 69 (36.9%), 103 (55.1%), and 15 (8%), respectively. Sites of GISTs in the middle or upper stomach, tumor size, intermediate- or high-risk groups, high mitotic count, and low resection status were associated with poor OS (p = 0.041, 0.046, 0.006, 0.000, 0.000, respectively) in a univariate analysis. In a multivariate analysis, tumor location in the upper and middle third of the stomach (p = 0.035), an intermediate or high risk (p = 0.01), and incomplete resection status (p = 0.006) were predictive of poor OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in intermediate- and high-risk groups had an unfavorable outcome. A complete resection is the most important treatment for survival. The location of GIST in the lower third of the stomach may be a favorable factor, and the significance of different tumor sites for prognosis of gastric GISTs needs to be further clarified.

Post-operative imatinib in patients with intermediate or high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor

AIMS

This study aims to determine whether adjuvant treatment with imatinib improves recurrence-free survival (RFS) in Chinese patients undergoing complete resection of localized primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) compared with those not receiving adjuvant therapy. We also sought a correlation between c-KIT mutations and RFS.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone complete tumor resection with intermediate or high risk of recurrence were enrolled in a single-center, non-randomized, prospective study. Patients either received adjuvant imatinib therapy (400 mg once-daily) for 3 years or did not. Mutation analyses of c-KIT were performed on available archival tumor samples.

RESULTS

105 patients were enrolled: 56 in the treatment group and 49 in the control group. Median follow-up was 45(43.1-46.9) months. RFS at 1, 2 and 3 years were higher in the treatment group than in the control group (100% vs. 90% at 1 year; 96% vs. 57% at 2 years; 89% versus 48% at 3 years, P < 0.001, HR = 0.188). Subgroup analyses showed that adjuvant therapy significantly decreased the risk of recurrence in patients whether at high risk or at intermediate risk compared with control patients (3-year RFS: 95% vs. 72%, in intermediate risk; 85% versus 31% in high risk; P < 0.001). In addition, imatinib adjuvant treatment decreased the risk of death (P = 0.025, [corrected] HR = 0.254).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant imatinib can improve 1-, 2- and 3-year RFS rates in patients at intermediate or high risk of recurrence after complete tumor resection.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR-TCC-00000582.

Esophagogastric junction gastrointestinal stromal tumor: Resection vs enucleation

Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are extremely uncommon, representing approximately 5% of GISTs with the majority of esophageal GISTs occurring at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). The treatment options available for these GISTs are fairly controversial. Many different options are nowadays at our disposal. From surgery to the target therapies we have the possibility to treat the majority of GISTs, including those which are defined as unresectable. The EGJ GISTs represent a stimulating challenge for the surgeon. The anatomical location increases the possibility of post-operative complications. As the role of negative margins in GIST surgery is still controversial and the efficacy of target therapy has been demonstrated, why not treat EGJ GISTs with enucleation and, where indicated, adjuvant target therapy?

[Controversies in the surgical treatment of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST)]

It is estimated that 50% of GIST are located at the time of their diagnosis. A complete surgical resection can be performed in up to 95% of these cases, making this the most important prognostic factor. This surgery must fulfil a series of technical requirements so as to be really effective, as it has to be R0, with no tumour rupture, with preservation of the pseudo-capsule, etc. Although the majority of GIST are gastric, their location in other anatomical areas, such as the oesophagus, duodenum or rectum, require the surgeon to use more complex techniques. Laparoscopy is increasingly used; however, we must avoid its use, due to there being few experienced groups or if there are large tumours. The use of neoadjuvant therapy has revived great interest by allowing to resection tumours that were once non-resectable or in very compromised anatomical locations, with less aggressive surgery. The use of pre-surgical biopsy is not exempt from serious risks, thus it should only be used for establishing a neoadjuvant treatment or if there are diagnostic doubts with other diseases in high risk patients.

Surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) have served as a model for the application of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of solid neoplasms. Operative and medical management of GISTs is rapidly evolving, but current guidelines appear restricted to basic non-organ-specific recommendations.

METHODS

A PubMed search was made of the English literature from 1998 to 2008 for references containing the terms 'gastrointestinal stromal tumours' and 'surgery'. This paper reviews the various operative strategies so far reported for GISTs within the digestive tract.

RESULTS

Many original procedures tailored to the specific characteristics of these rare sarcomas have been reported. GISTs exhibit distinct features, in particular an absence of metastases within locoregional lymph nodes. Operations requiring extended lymph node dissection, typically designed for adenocarcinomas, such as gastrectomy with extended lymph node dissection, Whipple's procedure and total mesorectum excision, are inappropriate for treating GISTs originating from the stomach, duodenum and rectum respectively.

CONCLUSION

GISTs allow the possibility of performing oncologically adequate but limited (wedge; segmental) resections. Such surgery can be carried out in a variety of ways, such as open, laparoscopic, trans-sacral or endoscopic.

Surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: analysis of outcome with respect to surgical margins and technique

This report reviews the methods and goals of treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. GISTs express CD117, which serves as an immunohistochemical diagnostic marker. Surgical excision is the definitive treatment for all primary GISTs greater than 2 cm without evidence of peritoneal seeding or metastasis. Preoperative or intraoperative biopsy is not indicated except when the differential diagnosis includes another type of malignancy. Resection may be performed by traditional open surgery or by laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted procedures. Regardless of the approach, oncological precautions must be strictly observed. Tumor disruption is to be avoided at all costs; tumor enucleation leaves a tumor-seeded pseudocapsule behind and is considered insufficient. Because GISTs rarely metastasize through the lymphatics, routine lymphadenectomy is not indicated. The importance of achieving negative microscopic margins is controversial, although patients who undergo incomplete microscopic resection may be at greater risk of locoregional recurrence. Other factors, such as tumor grade and size, may play a more significant role in predicting recurrence. Cases of advanced disease or involvement of adjacent structures should be evaluated on an individual basis by a multidisciplinary team.

Prognostic stratification of high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of targeted therapy

BACKGROUND

Recently, a trial of adjuvant imatinib for primary R0-resected intermediate and high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) significantly improved recurrence-free survival. But identifying patients having higher chances of recurrence will reduce economic losses and prevent adverse side effects caused by adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

Tissue samples from 93 patients with high-risk GISTs were studied for p16, CD34, and CD44 protein expression and mutations of KIT and PDGFRA gene. Clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and mutation results were compared with clinical outcome by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

KIT mutations were observed in 75 cases (81%) including 46 exon 11 deletion mutations and 31 deletions affecting codons 557-558. A novel 12 bp deletion mutation (KHNG484-488) on KIT exon 9 was detected in a small intestinal GIST. For recurrence-free survival, R0 resection, organ-confined disease stage, and female sex are better prognostic factors in univariate analysis and disease stage was the only factor predicting recurrence (P = 0.02) in multivariate analysis. In overall survival, mutation types, presence of mutation, location of GISTs, and mitosis were significant by univariate analysis. After multivariate analysis, mitotic counts and presence of KIT mutation corresponded to independent prognostic factors. Moreover, mitosis, KIT exon 11 deletion mutation, and deletions affecting exon 557-558 predict recurrence in R0-resected high-risk GISTs (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Prognostic stratification in high-risk GISTs will help identify patients with high-risk GIST who may benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Long-term follow-up in 54 surgically treated patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the alimentary tract. Since these tumours are rather resistant to radiation and conventional chemotherapy, prognosis may be poor. Imatinib, a KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been shown to have dramatic antitumour effects on GISTs; however, surgical en bloc resection of the tumour with free resection margins remains still the first option for cure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Here, we present a retrospective study with 54 consecutive GIST patients who were treated surgically at our University Hospital between 1993 and 2005 and were followed up at 5 and 10 years.

RESULTS

The disease-specific survival rate was 94% at 1 year, 91% at 3 years, 76% at 5 years, and 72% at 10 years. In univariate analysis, tumour size, mitotic rate, morphology, and necrosis predicted survival in patients with negative margins. Age, sex, and symptoms did not influence outcome.

CONCLUSION

GISTs have a high incidence of associated secondary malignancies which may have a significant influence on prognosis and outcome. Patients with R0 resections had a significantly better survival rate of 86% at 5 years and of 81% at 10 years than those with R1 and R2 resections (21% and 0%).