1
|
Hendriks MP, Jager A, Ebben KCWJ, van Til JA, Siesling S. Clinical decision support systems for multidisciplinary team decision-making in patients with solid cancer: Composition of an implementation model based on a scoping review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 195:104267. [PMID: 38311011 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Generating guideline-based recommendations during multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings in solid cancers is getting more complex due to increasing amount of information needed to follow the guidelines. Usage of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can simplify and optimize decision-making. However, CDSS implementation is lagging behind. Therefore, we aim to compose a CDSS implementation model. By performing a scoping review of the currently reported CDSSs for MDT decision-making we determined 102 barriers and 86 facilitators for CDSS implementation out of 44 papers describing 20 different CDSSs. The most frequently reported barriers and facilitators for CDSS implementation supporting MDT decision-making concerned CDSS maintenance (e.g. incorporating guideline updates), validity of recommendations and interoperability with electronic health records. Based on the identified barriers and facilitators, we composed a CDSS implementation model describing clinical utility, analytic validity and clinical validity to guide CDSS integration more successfully in the clinical workflow to support MDTs in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathijs P Hendriks
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), PO Box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Northwest Clinics, PO Box 501, 1800 AM Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Kees C W J Ebben
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), PO Box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Janine A van Til
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, the Netherlands.
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), PO Box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Viganò L, Jayakody Arachchige VS, Fiz F. Is precision medicine for colorectal liver metastases still a utopia? New perspectives by modern biomarkers, radiomics, and artificial intelligence. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:608-623. [PMID: 35317421 PMCID: PMC8900542 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i6.608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The management of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer is still debated. Several therapeutic options and treatment strategies are available for an extremely heterogeneous clinical scenario. Adequate prediction of patients’ outcomes and of the effectiveness of chemotherapy and loco-regional treatments are crucial to reach a precision medicine approach. This has been an unmet need for a long time, but recent studies have opened new perspectives. New morphological biomarkers have been identified. The dynamic evaluation of the metastases across a time interval, with or without chemotherapy, provided a reliable assessment of the tumor biology. Genetics have been explored and, thanks to their strong association with prognosis, have the potential to drive treatment planning. The liver-tumor interface has been identified as one of the main determinants of tumor progression, and its components, in particular the immune infiltrate, are the focus of major research. Image mining and analyses provided new insights on tumor biology and are expected to have a relevant impact on clinical practice. Artificial intelligence is a further step forward. The present paper depicts the evolution of clinical decision-making for patients affected by colorectal liver metastases, facing modern biomarkers and innovative opportunities that will characterize the evolution of clinical research and practice in the next few years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Viganò
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele 20072, MI, Italy
| | - Visala S Jayakody Arachchige
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele 20072, MI, Italy
| | - Francesco Fiz
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Simoneau E, Hassanain M, Shaheen M, Aljiffry M, Molla N, Chaudhury P, Anil S, Khashper A, Valenti D, Metrakos P. Portal vein embolization and its effect on tumour progression for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Br J Surg 2015; 102:1240-9. [PMID: 26109487 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2014] [Revised: 05/08/2015] [Accepted: 05/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) exhibiting disease progression after portal vein embolization (PVE). METHODS Patients with CRCLM requiring PVE before hepatectomy between 2003 and 2014 were included. Clinical variables, and liver and tumour volumes determined by three-dimensional CT volumetry were assessed before and after PVE. Overall and disease-free survival data were obtained. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of tumour progression after PVE. RESULTS Of 141 patients who underwent PVE, 93 (66.0 per cent) had tumour progression and 17 (12.1 per cent) developed new contralateral lesions. Significantly fewer patients had resectable disease in the group with disease progression than among those with stable disease: 43 (46 per cent) of 93 versus 36 (75 per cent) of 48 respectively (P = 0.001). Median survival was similar in patients with and without tumour growth after PVE: 22.5 versus 26.0 months for patients with unresectable tumours (P = 0.706) and 46.2 versus 52.2 months for those with resectable disease (P = 0.953). However, disease-free survival for patients with tumour progression after PVE was shorter than that for patients with stable disease (6.0 versus 20.2 months; P = 0.045). Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was the only significant factor associated with tumour progression in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION Tumour progression after PVE did not affect overall survival, but patients with resected tumours who had tumour growth after embolization experienced earlier recurrence. A borderline response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy seemed to be associated with tumour progression after PVE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Simoneau
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - M Hassanain
- Division of Oncology, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - M Shaheen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - M Aljiffry
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - N Molla
- Department of Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - P Chaudhury
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Division of Oncology, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - S Anil
- Department of Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - A Khashper
- Department of Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - D Valenti
- Department of Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - P Metrakos
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Voorthuizen TV, van Gulik TM, Punt CJA. Defining resectability of colorectal liver metastases: how and why? COLORECTAL CANCER 2013. [DOI: 10.2217/crc.12.79] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
SUMMARY Treatment outcome in metastatic colorectal carcinoma has improved because of advancements in medical therapy and increased use of liver resections. In primary nonresectable disease, prognosis improves when a secondary resection is performed after successful downsizing by neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Which patient groups may profit from a secondary liver resection and which neoadjuvant systemic therapy has the optimal chance of conversion to resectability has not been defined because various patient groups were selected in different studies and there is a lack of consensus on resectability. This invalidates cross-study comparisons of resection rates and survival rates. Prospective trials in which secondary resection rate is a predefined end point are needed and will allow more insight into this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theo van Voorthuizen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis JA Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zdenkowski N, Chen S, van der Westhuizen A, Ackland S. Curative strategies for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a review. Oncologist 2012; 17:201-11. [PMID: 22234631 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a very common malignancy and frequently manifests with liver metastases, often without other systemic disease. Margin-negative (R0) resection of limited metastatic disease, in conjunction with systemic antineoplastic agents, is the primary treatment strategy, leading to long survival times for appropriately selected patients. There is debate over whether the primary tumor and secondaries should be removed at the same time or in a staged manner. Chemotherapy is effective in converting some unresectable liver metastases into resectable disease, with a correspondingly better survival outcome. However, the ideal chemotherapy with or without biological agents and when it should be administered in the course of treatment are uncertain. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in initially resectable liver metastases is controversial. Local delivery of chemotherapy, with and without surgery, can lead to longer disease-free survival times, but it is not routinely used with curative intent. This review focuses on methods to maximize the disease-free survival interval using chemotherapy, surgery, and local methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Zdenkowski
- Department of Medical Oncology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Locked Bag No 7, Hunter Regional Mail Centre, Newcastle, NSW, 2310 Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly prevalent malignant disease in industrialized nations. The annual incidence of invasive CRC in the U.S. is among the highest in the world, and the liver is the only metastatic site in approximately one third of patients. Without treatment, patients with metastatic disease have a poor prognosis; however, long-term survival benefits and even cure have been reported in patients undergoing surgical resection of metastases. In addition, advances in chemotherapy, imaging, and surgical techniques have increased the proportion of patients who are eligible for resection. Combination therapy with fluorouracil and leucovorin has been the mainstay of treatment for metastatic CRC; however, the introduction of newer agents, such as oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and targeted agents, such as cetuximab and bevacizumab, has yielded improvements in response rates (RRs) and survival. Maximizing the exposure of hepatic metastases to high target concentrations of cytotoxic drugs using hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) increases RRs further than with systemic chemotherapy; however, the impact of HAI on survival is unclear. As the goals of chemotherapeutic treatment for metastatic CRC increasingly shift from palliation to prolongation of survival, improvement in RRs, and downsizing of tumors in order to enable or optimize resection, treatment in a multidisciplinary environment involving a medical oncologist, radiologist, and surgical oncologist with hepatobiliary expertise will become central to deciding the best course of therapy and timing of surgery.
Collapse
|