The location of small tumor deposits in the SLN predicts Non-SLN macrometastases in breast cancer patients

Tissue invasion and metastasis: Molecular, biological and clinical perspectives

Cancer is a key health issue across the world, causing substantial patient morbidity and mortality. Patient prognosis is tightly linked with metastatic dissemination of the disease to distant sites, with metastatic diseases accounting for a vast percentage of cancer patient mortality. While advances in this area have been made, the process of cancer metastasis and the factors governing cancer spread and establishment at secondary locations is still poorly understood. The current article summarizes recent progress in this area of research, both in the understanding of the underlying biological processes and in the therapeutic strategies for the management of metastasis. This review lists the disruption of E-cadherin and tight junctions, key signaling pathways, including urokinase type plasminogen activator (uPA), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene (PI3K/AKT), focal adhesion kinase (FAK), β-catenin/zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB-1) and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), together with inactivation of activator protein-1 (AP-1) and suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) activity as key targets and the use of phytochemicals, or natural products, such as those from Agaricus blazei, Albatrellus confluens, Cordyceps militaris, Ganoderma lucidum, Poria cocos and Silybum marianum, together with diet derived fatty acids gamma linolenic acid (GLA) and eicosapentanoic acid (EPA) and inhibitory compounds as useful approaches to target tissue invasion and metastasis as well as other hallmark areas of cancer. Together, these strategies could represent new, inexpensive, low toxicity strategies to aid in the management of cancer metastasis as well as having holistic effects against other cancer hallmarks.

High risk of non-sentinel node metastases in a group of breast cancer patients with micrometastases in the sentinel node

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel nodes is under debate. We aimed to establish two models to predict non-sentinel node (NSN) metastases in patients with micrometastases or isolated tumor cells (ITC) in sentinel nodes, to guide the decision for ALND. A total of 1,577 breast cancer patients with micrometastases and 304 with ITC in sentinel nodes, treated by sentinel lymph node dissection and ALND in 2002-2008 were identified in the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group database. Risk of NSN metastases was calculated according to clinicopathological variables in a logistic regression analysis. We identified tumor size, proportion of positive sentinel nodes, lymphovascular invasion, hormone receptor status and location of tumor in upper lateral quadrant of the breast as risk factors for NSN metastases in patients with micrometastases. A model based on these risk factors identified 5% of patients with a risk of NSN metastases on nearly 40%. The model was however unable to identify a subgroup of patients with a very low risk of NSN metastases. Among patients with ITC, we identified tumor size, age and proportion of positive sentinel nodes as risk factors. A model based on these risk factors identified 32% of patients with risk of NSN metastases on only 2%. Omission of ALND would be acceptable in this group of patients. In contrast, ALND may still be beneficial in the subgroup of patients with micrometastases and a high risk of NSN metastases.

Prognostic impact of isolated tumor cells in breast cancer axillary nodes: single tumor cell(s) versus tumor cell cluster(s) and microanatomic location

In breast cancer, it has been shown that pN0(i+) and pN1mi have a comparable negative impact on disease-free survival, compared with pN0. However, pN0(i+) is considered to be a heterogeneous group. We determined the effect of metastatic size and microanatomic location within the pN0(i+) group on breast cancer recurrence. We included all Dutch breast cancer patients diagnosed in 1998-2005 with favorable primary tumor characteristics and a final nodal status of pN0(i+). For this analysis, only patients without adjuvant systemic therapy were eligible (n = 513). Presence of single tumor cells versus cell clusters, metastatic size and microanatomic location were recorded. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival. Analyses were adjusted for age at diagnosis, tumor size, tumor grade, axillary treatment and hormone receptor status. The 5-year disease-free survival of patients with single tumor cell(s) (n = 93) was 78.6% and with tumor cell cluster(s) (n = 404) 77.1%. The hazard ratio for disease events was 1.05 (95% CI 0.63-1.76) for cell cluster(s) compared with single cell(s). In a Cox regression model, doubling of metastatic tumor size corresponded to a hazard ratio of 1.21 (95% CI 1.02-1.43). The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.90 (95% CI 0.54-1.50) for parenchymal (n = 112) versus sinusoidal location (n = 395). Single tumor cells bear similar prognostic information as small tumor cell clusters, even though results do suggest that within the pN0(i+) group, increasing size of nodal involvement is associated with reduced survival. Microanatomic location does not seem to have prognostic relevance.

Clinical significance of sentinel lymph node isolated tumour cells in breast cancer

The advent of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and improvements in histopathological and molecular analysis have increased the rate at which isolated tumour cells (ITC) are identified. However, their biological and clinical significance has been the subject of much debate. In this article we review the literature concerning SLNB with particular reference to ITC. The controversies regarding histopathological assessment, clinical relevance and management implications are explored. The literature review was facilitated by Medline, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Published studies have reported divergent results regarding the biological significance and clinical implications of ITC in general and SLN ITC in particular. Some studies demonstrate no associations, whilst others have found these to be indicators of poor prognosis, associated with non-SLN involvement, in addition to local recurrence and distant disease. Absolute consensus regarding the optimal analytical technique for SLN has yet to be reached, particularly concerning immunohistochemical (IHC) techniques targeting cytokeratins and contemporary molecular analysis. The clinical relevance of ITC within the SLN should be primarily determined by the magnitude of their impact on patient management and outcome measures. The modest up-staging within current classification systems is justified and reflects the marginally poorer prognosis for women with SLN ITC. Management need not be altered where further axillary treatment with surgical clearance or radiotherapy and systemic adjuvant treatment are already indicated. However, in the absence of level-1 guidance, each case requires discussion with regard to other tumour and patient related factors in the context of the multidisciplinary team. The identification of ITC remains highly dependent on the analytical technique employed and there exists potential for stage migration and impact on management decisions. Evidence supporting the routine analysis of deeper tissue sections by IHC is lacking and molecular technologies should be restricted to research purposes at present.

The Extent of Axillary Lymph Node Clearance Required Following Detection of Sentinel Node Micrometastases

Sentinel node (SN) micrometastases are an indication to proceed to axillary clearance. The aim of this study is to determine the extent and level of axillary clearance required for patients with SN micrometastases. All patients with SN micrometastases which were followed by axillary clearances from 1999 to 2007 were identified. Slides were reviewed by a histopathologist to detail characteristics of SN micrometastases including size and site. The SN micrometastases and primary tumor characteristics were correlated with the presence and level of non-SN micrometastases. Fifty patients who had micrometastases followed by axillary clearances were identified. Of those 18% (n = 9) had non-SN metastases.Seven patients had metastases to level I, one patient had metastases to level I and III and one patient had non-SN metastases to level III only. No patient had metastases to level II. Patients with non-SN metastases had very limited number of non-SNs involved (maximum 2 non-SNs). No variable, including site of the micrometastasis, was predictive of non-SN metastases. In patients with SN micrometastases, a limited level I axillary clearance can be justified in view of the low number of additional nodes involved and in particular, the low (4%) rate of spread to level II ⁄ III nodes.