Transection of vaginal cuff is an independent prognostic factor in stage I endometrial cancer

Range of Resection in Endometrial Cancer-Clinical Issues of Made-to-Measure Surgery

Endometrial cancer (EC) poses a significant health issue among women, and its incidence has been rising for a couple of decades. Surgery remains its principal treatment method and may have a curative, staging, or palliative aim. The type and extent of surgery depends on many factors, and the risks and benefits should be carefully weighed. While simple hysterectomy might be sufficient in early stage EC, modified-radical hysterectomy is sometimes indicated. In advanced disease, the evidence suggests that, similarly to ovarian cancer, optimal cytoreduction improves survival rate. The role of lymphadenectomy in EC patients has long been a controversial issue. The rationale for systematic lymphadenectomy and the procedure of the sentinel lymph node biopsy are thoroughly discussed. Finally, the impact of the molecular classification and new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system on EC treatment is outlined. Due to the increasing knowledge on the pathology and molecular features of EC, as well as the new advances in the adjuvant therapies, the surgical management of EC has become more complex. In the modern approach, it is essential to adjust the extent of the surgery to a specific patient, ensuring an optimal, made-to-measure personalized surgery. This narrative review focuses on the intricacies of surgical management of EC and aims at summarizing the available literature on the subject, providing an up-to-date clinical guide.

Prognostic Role of the Removed Vaginal Cuff and Its Correlation with L1CAM in Low-Risk Endometrial Adenocarcinoma

Objective: The aim of our study was to investigate the role of the excised vaginal cuff length as a prognostic factor in terms of DFS and recurrence rate/site, in low-risk endometrial cancer (EC) patients. Moreover, we correlated the recurrence with the expression of L1CAM. Material and Methods: From March 2001 to November 2016, a retrospective data collection was conducted of women undergoing surgical treatment for low-risk EC according to ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus guidelines. Patients were divided into three groups according to their vaginal cuff length: V0 without vaginal cuff, V1 with a vaginal cuff shorter than 1.5 cm and V2 with a vaginal cuff longer than or equal to 1.5 cm. Results: 344 patients were included in the study: 100 in the V0 group, 179 in the V1 group and 65 in the V2 group. The total recurrence rate was 6.1%: the number of patients with recurrence was 8 (8%), 10 (5.6%) and 3 (4.6%), in the V0, V1 and V2 group, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found in the recurrence rate among the three groups. Although the DFS was higher in the V2 group, the result was not significant. L1CAM was positive in 71.4% of recurrences and in 82% of the distant recurrences. Conclusions: The rate of recurrence in patients with EC at low risk of recurrence does not decrease as the length of the vaginal cuff removed increases. Furthermore, the size of the removed vaginal cuff does not affect either the site of recurrence or the likelihood of survival.

Does the extension of the type of hysterectomy contribute to the local control of endometrial cancer?

OBJECTIVE

To examine the necessity and sufficiency of different types of hysterectomy for the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer.

METHODS

This was a multicenter collaborative study conducted by 11 institutions. Among patients with stage I-III endometrial cancer who underwent surgery as the initial treatment (only chemotherapy was provided if adjuvant therapy was needed) from 2001 to 2012, we retrospectively examined the type of hysterectomy, clinicopathological factors, recurrence rate over a maximum period of 5 years, and the site of recurrence. The local recurrence rate was examined by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Among 1335 patients, 982 (73.6%) underwent simple hysterectomy (SH) and 353 (26.4%) underwent modified radical hysterectomy (mRH) and were observed for a mean duration of 51.8 months. No significant difference was observed in the rate of local recurrence between the SH and mRH groups (p = 0.928). In multivariate analysis, clinicopathological factors independently associated with localized recurrence included postmenopausal status [hazard ratio (HR) 5.036, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.506-16.841, p = 0.009], with stages II (HR 3.337, 95% CI 1.701-6.547, p < 0.001) and III (HR 2.445, 95% CI 1.280-4.668, p = 0.007), vs stage I and histological type 2 (HR 1.610, 95% CI 0.938-2.762, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For endometrial cancer patients requiring surgery, the selection of a more extensive type of hysterectomy did not reduce the rate of local recurrence. Therefore, there is little significance in performing mRH in such cases.

[Sentinel node procedure and endometrial cancer: senti-endo results]

Based on two randomized trials and a meta-analysis, the recommendations of the National Cancer Institute (INCa) have validated the absence of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy for patients with endometrial cancer at low risk (type 1 histology stage IA grade 1-2) and intermediate (type 1 histology stage IA grade 3 and IB grade 1-2) but without taking into account the contribution of the sentinel node (SN) procedure. The senti-endo trial assessing the role of the SN procedure in patients with early stages endometrial cancer showed that the detection rate by hemi-pelvis right and left were 77 and 76%, respectively. The detection rate per patient was 89%. Among patients with at least a SN detected, the detection was unilateral in 34 cases (31%) and bilateral in 77 cases (69%). Of the 111 patients with at least a SN detected, 19 had lymph node metastases (17%). Considering the hemi-pelvis right and left as a unit, no false negative case was observed, hence the sensitivity and NPV was 100%. Considering the NPV per patient, three false negative cases were observed. Among the 57 patients at low risk, six (11%) had lymph node metastases on SN with negative non sentinel nodes. Of the 33 patients at intermediate risk, five (15%) had lymph node metastases on SN with negative non sentinel nodes. Senti-endo results emphasize the contribution of the SN procedure to assess the nodal status in patients with low or intermediate risk group raising the issue on new definition of the recommendations of INCa.