The outcomes after surgical resection in pancreatic endocrine tumors: an institutional experience

Validation and modification of staging Systems for Poorly Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Background

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) staging classifications are two broadly used systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This study aims to identify the most accurate and useful tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) staging system for poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (pNECs).

Methods

An analysis was performed to evaluate the application of the ENETS, 7th edition (7th) AJCC and 8th edition (8th) AJCC staging classifications using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry (N = 568 patients), and a modified system based on the analysis of the 7th AJCC classification was proposed.

Results

In multivariable analyses, only the 7th AJCC staging system allocated patients into four different risk groups, although there was no significant difference. We modified the staging classification by maintaining the T and M definitions of the 7th AJCC staging and adopting new staging definitions. An increased hazard ratio (HR) of death was also observed from class I to class IV for the modified 7th (m7th) staging system (compared with stage I disease; HR for stage II =1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.73–2.06, P = 0.44; HR for stage III =2.20, 95% CI =1.06–4.56, P = 0.03; HR for stage IV =4.95, 95% CI =3.20–7.65, P < 0.001). The concordance index (C-index) was higher for local disease with the m7th AJCC staging system than with the 7th AJCC staging system.

Conclusions

The m7th AJCC staging system for pNECs proposed in this study provides improvements and may be assessed for potential adoption in the next edition.

Systematic review of current prognostication systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are a heterogenous group of rare tumors whose natural history remains poorly defined. Accurate prognostication of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is essential for guiding clinical decisions. This paper aims to summarize all the commonly utilized and recently proposed prognostication systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms published in the literature to date.

METHODS

A systematic review of Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase databases, of the period from January 1, 2000-November 29, 2016, was conducted to identify all published articles reporting on prognostication systems of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

RESULTS

A total of 23 articles were included in our review, and a total of 25 classification systems were identified. There were 2 modifications of the World Health Organization 2004 criteria, 4 modifications of the World Health Organization 2010 criteria, 2 modifications of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 2010 staging system, 3 modifications of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society 2006 tumor, node, metastasis staging system, 7 novel categorial classification systems, and 2 novel proposed continuous classifications. The most commonly included variables included age, size of tumor, presence of distant and lymph node metastases, Ki-67 index, and mitotic count.

CONCLUSION

Numerous prognostication systems have been proposed for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, of which the most commonly used systems presently include the World Health Organization 2010 criteria and the two tumor, node, metastasis staging systems by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society and the American Joint Commission on Cancer. However, prognostication systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms continue to evolve with time as more prognostication factors are identified. More validation and comparative studies are needed to identify the most effective prognostication system.

Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Gastroenteropancreatic System: A Comprehensive Review

To date, empirical literature has generally been considered lacking in relation to neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), the highly malignant subgroup of neuroendocrine neoplasms. NECs are often found in the lungs or the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system and can be of small or large cell type. Concentrating on GEP-NECs, we can conclude that survival times are poor, with a median of only 4–16 months depending on disease stage and primary site. Further, this aggressive disease appears to be on the rise, with incidence numbers increasing while survival times are stagnant. Treatment strategies concerning surgery are often undecided and second-line chemotherapy is not yet established. After an analysis of over 2600 articles, we can conclude that there is indeed more empirical literature concerning GEP-NECs available than previously assumed. This unique review is based on 333 selected articles and contains detailed information concerning all aspects of GEP-NECs. Namely, the classification, histology, genetic abnormalities, epidemiology, origin, biochemistry, imaging, treatment and survival of GEP-NECs are described. Also, organ-specific summaries with more detail in relation to disease presentation, diagnosis, treatment and survival are presented. Finally, key points are discussed with directions for future research priorities.

Endogenous hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia syndrome: surgical treatment

BACKGROUND

The endogenous hyperinsulinemic hypoglicemia syndrome (EHHS) can be caused by an insulinoma, or less frequently, by nesidioblastosis in the pediatric population, also known as non insulinoma pancreatic hypoglycemic syndrome (NIPHS) in adults. The aim of this paper is to show the strategy for the surgical treatment of ehhs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 19 patients with a final diagnosis of insulinoma or NIPHS who were treated surgically from january 2007 until june 2012 were included. We describe the clinical presentation and preoperative work-up. Emphasis is placed on the surgical technique, complications and long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

All patients had a positive fasting plasma glucose test. Preoperative localization of the lesions was possible in 89.4% of cases. The most frequent surgery was distal pancreatectomy with spleen preservation (9 cases). Three patients with insulinoma presented with synchronous metastases, which were treated with simultaneous surgery. There was no perioperative mortality and morbidity was 52.6%. Histological analysis revealed that 13 patients (68.4%) had benign insulinoma, 3 malignant insulinoma with liver metastases and 3 with a final diagnosis of SHPNI. Median follow-up was 20 months. All patients diagnosed with benign insulinoma or NIPHS had symptom resolution.

CONCLUSION

The surgical treatment of EHHS achieves excellent long-term results in the control of hypoglucemic symptoms.

Lymph nodes and survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

HYPOTHESIS

Lymph node metastases decrease survival in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs).

DESIGN

Prospective database searches.

SETTING

National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Stanford University Hospital (SUH).

PATIENTS

A total of 326 patients underwent surgical exploration for pNETs at the NIH (n = 216) and SUH (n = 110).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall survival, disease-related survival, and time to development of liver metastases.

RESULTS

Forty patients (12.3%) underwent enucleation and 305 (93.6%) underwent resection. Of the patients who underwent resection, 117 (35.9%) had partial pancreatectomy and 30 (9.2%) had a Whipple procedure. Forty-one patients also had liver resections, 21 had wedge resections, and 20 had lobectomies. Mean follow-up was 8.1 years (range, 0.3-28.6 years). The 10-year overall survival for patients with no metastases or lymph node metastases only was similar at 80%. As expected, patients with liver metastases had a significantly decreased 10-year survival of 30% (P < .001). The time to development of liver metastases was significantly reduced for patients with lymph node metastases alone compared with those with none (P < .001). For the NIH cohort with longer follow-up, disease-related survival was significantly different for those patients with no metastases, lymph node metastases alone, and liver metastases (P < .001). Extent of lymph node involvement in this subgroup showed that disease-related survival decreased as a function of the number of lymph nodes involved (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

As expected, liver metastases decrease survival of patients with pNETs. Patients with lymph node metastases alone have a shorter time to the development of liver metastases that is dependent on the number of lymph nodes involved. With sufficient long-term follow-up, lymph node metastases decrease disease-related survival. Careful evaluation of number and extent of lymph node involvement is warranted in all surgical procedures for pNETs.

Implications of incidentally discovered, nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors: short-term and long-term patient outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To describe the characteristics and outcomes after resection of incidentally discovered, nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs).

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Academic hospital.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients with an incidentally identified, nonfunctioning PET resected from May 1, 1977, through July 31, 2009.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Operative morbidity and survival after resection.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients with median age of 56 years (range, 21-85 years) underwent resection; tumor size ranged from 0.4 to 17.0 cm, with median size of 3.0 cm. No perioperative deaths were reported. Sixty-one patients (43.9%) experienced a perioperative complication. Twenty-six tumors (18.7%) were classified as benign, 39 (28.1%) as malignant, and 72 (51.8%) as uncertain. We were unable to confidently classify 2 tumors due to lack of information regarding mitotic rate in the pathology report. Complete follow-up was available for 112 patients (80.6%) (median, 34.2 months). Five-year actuarial survival rates were 88.8% for patients with benign disease, 92.5% for patients with tumors of uncertain biology, and 49.8% for those with malignant tumors (P = .01). Late metastasis, tumor recurrence, or disease progression were seen in 1 patient (3.8%) with tumors initially classified as benign, 8 patients (11.1%) with uncertain tumors, and 15 patients (38.5%) with tumors classified as malignant (P < .001). Of the 39 patients with tumors 2 cm or smaller, 3 (7.7%) had late metastases or recurrence. When compared with patients with symptomatic, nonfunctioning PETs, no large difference was observed in tumor size, patient age, disease, or survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidentally detected, nonfunctioning PETs can display aggressive behavior, even when small. Although patients with malignant disease had diminished survival and increased rates of recurrence, benign histologic findings did not eliminate the possibility of progression. Patients with incidentally discovered, nonfunctioning PETs should undergo tumor resection and careful postoperative surveillance, even if surgical pathologic findings suggest benign disease.

TNM stage and grade in predicting the prognosis of operated, non-functioning neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas--a single-institution experience

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic significance of TNM and grading categories in curatively resected non-functioning neuroendocrine pancreatic carcinoma (nfnepC).

METHOD

Eighteen nfnepC were retrospectively analyzed for differences in survival.

RESULTS

(1) There was a correlation between pT (P = 0.026), respectively pM categories (P = 0.016) and survival. (2) G categories and length of survival were closely correlated (P = 0.0036). (3) Disease stages I-IV had a significant effect on survival (P = 0.051). (4) The WHO classification in well and poorly differentiated carcinomas proved to be the most conclusive predictive factor (P = 0.0009). (5) Subgroups with significantly different prognoses determined by histological grade were present within disease stage II.

CONCLUSIONS

The retrospective analysis showed a good correlation between survival and pT, pM, tumor stage, G categories, and WHO classification in well and poorly differentiated carcinomas. Including histological differentiation in the staging system or carrying it out separately in well and poorly differentiated carcinomas, could enhance the predictive potential of TNM-based disease stages.

Breast and lung metastasis from pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are an uncommon malignancy, accounting for a small percentage of all pancreatic malignancies. Due to their insidious course, most PNETs present with metastatic disease. Although reports in the literature describe PNET metastasis to the liver, lung and brain, to date there are no reports of stage IV disease involving the breast. Moreover, the lack of consensus regarding classification and treatment of this entity leaves practitioners without standards of practice or a firm base from which to formulate prognosis. In this report, the case of a previously healthy 51-year-old woman with stage IV PNET is examined. After combined neoadjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil, carboplatin, etoposide and radiation, surgical resection revealed metastatic PNET to the breast and lung, with no microscopic evidence of residual disease within the pancreas. An extensive analysis of the presentation, diagnosis, imaging modalities, treatment options, and prognosis is included in the discussion. As demonstrated by our review, there is a need for further studies to delineate inconclusive evidence with respect to subtype classification, treatment and prognosis of PNETs.

Surgical resection and multidisciplinary care for primary and metastatic pancreatic islet cell carcinomas

INTRODUCTION

The role of multidisciplinary management of islet cell cancers (ICC) has not been fully investigated in a population-based setting.

METHODS

The Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program was assessed for patients with ICC between the years 1982 to 2006. Patients were stratified by treatment received and clinicopathologic characteristics and survival were compared.

RESULTS

We identified 236 patients with ICC; 86 patients underwent curative-intent surgery with median survival for local, regional, and distant disease of 17.3, 12.2, and 4.0 years, respectively. In comparison, 102 patients underwent medical management alone; survival was significantly shorter when compared to the surgical cohort for local, regional, and distant disease (p < 0.05). To determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved survival, we compared patients who underwent surgery alone compared to patients who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Although patients with metastatic disease had 3-year longer survival with adjuvant chemotherapy, these improvements in survival were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection was associated with improved survival compared to medical management for any extent of disease in patients with ICC. Furthermore, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with survival but does warrant further examination in patients with metastatic disease.

Solid tumors of the body and tail of the pancreas

Solid lesions of the body and tail of the pancreas challenge all the diagnostic and technical skills of the modern gastrointestinal surgeon. The information available from modern computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) imaging provide diagnostic and anatomic data that give the surgeon precise information with which to plan an operation and to discuss with the patient during the preoperative visit. A preoperative evaluation includes a thorough history and a pancreas protocol CT scan, supplemented by MR imaging and EUS when needed, to differentiate between the various potential diagnoses. These same modalities can be essential in proper staging in the case of malignant lesions, thus aiding in management decisions. Most lesions ultimately require operative resection, barring metastatic disease, with the notable exception of autoimmune pancreatitis.