Prognostic factors and assessment of staging systems for head and neck soft tissue sarcomas in adults

Head and neck sarcomas: Thirty years of experience in a tertiary referral center in Brazil

PURPOSE

This study analyzed the demographics, clinicopathological, treatment, and survival characteristics of head and neck sarcomas (HNS) diagnosed in a tertiary reference center in Brazil.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HNS cases were retrospectively retrieved from the Department of Pathological Anatomy of the School of Medical Sciences of the State University of Campinas. The medical records were examined to extract demographic, clinicopathological, and follow-up information. The Pearson chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier curve, and Cox proportional hazards regression model were employed to identify survival and potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were included in the study. The majority were men (61.7%) with a mean age of 38.9 years. The nasal cavity (34.0%) was the most common anatomical site. The lesions are usually presented as volume increases (78.7%). The most common histological subtypes were chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Surgical excision alone was the most common treatment modality. Local recurrence was observed in 10 cases, and metastases in 3 cases. During a mean follow-up period of 71.9 months, from diagnosis to the last follow-up, 31 patients (65.9%) were alive without the disease. A total of 10 patients (21.3%) died of the HNS for a mean follow-up period of 14.3 months. The time to presentation of more than 6 months (p = 0.0309) and the presence of metastases (p = 0.0315) were identified as prognostic factors for survival, while male sex was found to be an independent prognostic factor for recurrence.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that the occurrence of a shorter lesion time to presentation and the presence of metastases were associated with a reduction in survival rates in patients with HNS.

Global frequency and distribution of head and neck sarcomas in adulthood: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Head and neck sarcomas (HNS) constitute a rare and heterogeneous cancer entity. Management remains a challenge due their rarity and different biological behaviour among tens of subtypes. This systematic review aimed to describe HNS global frequency and distribution in adulthood.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using PICOTS search strategies for qualitative question and it was written in accordance with PRISMA 2020 Statement. 70,653 publications were identified, and 15 variables were evaluated for a total of 2428 patients.

RESULTS

We identified 47 studies from 21 different countries from 5 different continents. Most of studies (83.3%) were performed in single institutions and America and Asia overruled for number of papers included (21 and 10, respectivelly). Osteosarcoma was more frequent, followed by chondrosarcoma, angiosarcoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Early stage accounted for almost 80% of cases; advanced stage prevailed in developing countries. 1783 patients (90.1%) underwent surgery and 780 (39.4%) had adjuvant therapy. 50.8% of patients experienced tumour recurrence and the lowest mortality rate was reported in Europe (29.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

HNS holds a relative poor prognosis possibly explained by the heterogeneity of the disease. Treatment of HNS has shown to be highly diverse among different countries, underlining the importance of uniformed treatment guidelines to achieve better patient management and to improve survival outcomes.

Current status of head and neck sarcomas in Japan in 2016-2019: an analysis using the national cancer registry

BACKGROUND

Head and neck sarcomas are especially rare in Asia, leading to limited clinical evidence. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, clinical features, treatment status, and outcome of these sarcomas using data from the National Cancer Registry in Japan.

METHODS

All head and neck sarcomas diagnosed between 2016 and 2019 and recorded in the National Cancer Registry were analyzed. Data on sex, age, primary site, histological type, stage, treatment modality, and prognostic information were collected. Age-adjusted incidence and 3-year survival rates of patients with head and neck sarcomas were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 635 head and neck sarcoma patients were identified. Head and neck sarcoma occurred more frequently in men and patients in their 70 s. The age-adjusted annual incidence rate was 0.125 per 100,000 patients in the 2015 Japanese model or 0.089 per 100,000 patients in the world population model. The nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses were the most frequent primary sites, with rhabdomyosarcoma as the most common histologic type. Treatment typically involved chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma, whereas surgical approaches for other types. Three-year survival rate of head and neck sarcoma patients was 64.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Head and neck sarcomas occurred rarely, but most frequently in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses in Japan. Poor outcomes were observed for sarcoma patients than for non-sarcoma head and neck cancer patients.

Synovial sarcoma of the maxilla: A challenging diagnostic case report and literature review

Synovial sarcoma, a malignant mesenchymal tumor, is primarily associated with the extremities. Nevertheless, its appearance within the head and neck region, particularly in the maxillary area, is remarkably rare. This rarity underscores the significance of each case in unraveling the complexities of its behavior and management strategies. The core focus of this research is a detailed case report involving a 6-year-old female patient who presented with a conspicuous swelling in the left posterior maxilla. Subsequent incisional biopsy led to microscopic identification of malignant spindle cell proliferation, marked by dysplastic changes, and abundant mitoses. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis demonstrated negative reactivity for neural and muscular markers, while positive expression of Vimentin, Bcl-2, and TLE1. These morphological and IHC findings coalesced to definitively diagnose synovial sarcoma, substantiated by a notable 40% Ki67 proliferative index. The chosen treatment strategy encompassed surgery and radiotherapy, which yielded successful outcomes, with no recurrence observed during the one-year follow-up period. Beyond the specific case, this article undertakes a review of existing literature, meticulously analyzing nine similar cases reported in scholarly sources.

Time to Local Recurrence as a Predictor of Survival in Adult Head and Neck Soft Tissue Sarcoma

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the impact of the time interval from surgical resection to local recurrence (TTLR) on clinical outcomes in head and neck soft tissue sarcoma (HNSTS).

METHODS

A total of 401 patients who underwent R0 resection for primary HNSTS were included in this study. Patients with local recurrence as the first event after their initial resection were divided into early local recurrence (ELR) or late local recurrence (LLR) groups according to TTLR. Multiple survival analyses were performed to identify the independent prognostic predictors of overall survival (OS) and survival after local recurrence (SAR).

RESULTS

Two hundred and nine of the 401 patients (52.1%) developed local recurrence during a median follow-up period of 134.6 months. Patients in the ELR group had a shorter median OS time (35.0 vs. 120.6, p < 0.001) and lower 5-year OS rate (47.7% vs. 80.9%, p < 0.001) than those in the LLR group. Moreover, the ELR group exhibited worse SAR (p = 0.001) than the LLR group, and multivariate analyses demonstrated TTLR as an independent prognostic factor for SAR (p = 0.048) and OS (p = 0.004). Additionally, re-resection significantly prolonged SAR than other salvage interventions or no treatment (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with HNSTS, ELR after R0 resection presents adverse effects on OS and SAR than those with LLR, and TTLR could serve as a promising predictor for survival. Salvage therapies, especially the re-resection could improve SAR and should be recommended when there are surgical indications after recurrence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 133:2174-2182, 2023.

Pretreatment tumor sampling and prognostic factors in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Insufficient preoperative work-up and consequent intralesional or marginal resection of soft-tissue sarcomas of the head and neck (STSHNs) is common.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study comprised 63 patients with STSHN treated at the Helsinki University Hospital between 2005 and 2017. We assessed the effect of pretreatment tumor sampling on surgical margin status and need for supplemental surgery, as well as prognostic factors and survival.

RESULTS

The lack of representative pretreatment biopsy specimen was associated with unfavorable margin status. Primary surgery at a non-academic center was associated with need for supplemental surgery. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 68%, disease-specific survival (DSS) 71%, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) 61%. Higher tumor grade and primary tumor size over 5 cm were associated with reduced DSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis and management of STSHNs should be centralized to experienced academic centers. Decision-making between needle biopsy, open biopsy, or upfront radical surgery depends on tumor location and size.

Primary Sarcoma of the Head and Neck: Three Years’ Experience in a Tertiary Care Cancer Center

Introduction Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies originating from the transformed cells of mesenchymal lineage, representing only 1% of all the primary tumors arising within the head and neck region with a prevalence range of 4 to 10%. They are biologically different from the sarcomas of other sites because of the smaller size of the tumor at the time of presentation and higher chances of local recurrences. Due to the rarity in adults, there are very few studies on sarcomas of the head and neck. The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency and spectrum of primary sarcomas in the head and neck region.

Materials and Methods This is a retrospective descriptive study. The authors analyzed 40 cases of histologically and immunohistochemically proven primary sarcomas arising in the head and neck region according to three age groups, pediatric (<12 years), adolescent (12–19 years), and adults (> 19 years).

Results Primary sarcomas represented 0.06% and 2.4% of total cancer cases and total sarcoma cases, respectively. Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma was the most common histologic type, and nasopharynx the most common location in the pediatric population. Osteoblastic osteosarcomas and Ewing’s sarcoma were typical variants in adolescent age, affecting the hemimandible predominantly. In adults, osteosarcomas were commonest followed by conventional grade 1 chondrosarcoma. Treatment was planned according to the stage and grade of the tumor. Out of the 40 patients, 19 (47.5%) had a disease relapse within a period of 6 months from the completion of therapy.

Conclusion Head and neck sarcomas are notorious to recur. A timely and accurate diagnosis, proper staging, and multidisciplinary treatment plan can yield good patient outcomes.

How Can a Multidisciplinary Approach Improve Prognosis of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas of Extremities?

Soft-tissue sarcomas are malignant tumors that require good management within specialized centers. Our study aims to assess the benefit of handling these kinds of tumors using the Multidisciplinary Meeting (MDM) approach. The current paper details this approach through a prospective study that has lasted for 42 months in the HASSAN II University Hospital Center, Fez, Morocco. During this research work, 116 cases were selected with an average age of 53 years. In 95.7% of the cases, it was found that the lower limb was the most frequent tumor type (78.4%). Also, ninety-two (92) patients (79.3%) have had a prior biopsy. Ninety-nine (99) patients (85.3%) have received a magnetic resonance imaging scan (MRI) before surgery. Sixty-three (63) patients were operated on, including R0 resection used for 37 patients, R1 used for 21 patients, and R2 used for five patients. As a result, liposarcomas were the most frequent type (30.1%), followed by synovial sarcomas (14.6%), leiomyosarcomas (9.5%), ewing sarcoma (8.6), and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (7.7%). In addition, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used for 36 patients. The other 22 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The overall survival rate was 60.56 months, which proves a significant improvement, thanks to the multidisciplinary meeting approach. Conclusion. The conducted investigation has shown that using MDM for managing soft-tissue sarcomas of extremities improves the patients' survival rate. Moreover, results have proven MDM might allow optimal treatment regarding less local recurrence and metastasis.

Head and neck sarcomas: treatment outcomes in a tertiary referral center in Argentina

PURPOSE

To analyze the clinical findings, management, and results of oncological treatments and to identify prognostic factors in patients diagnosed with head and neck sarcoma.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis including 48 adult patients with primary head and neck sarcomas, treated between 2006 and 2018 in a referral center of Argentina.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 44 months (range: 4-146 months). Five-year overall survival was 68%. On univariate analysis, radiation-induced sarcomas (p=0.038) had worse survival. Five-year disease-free survival was 58% and local recurrence at 2 years was 22.7%. On multivariate analysis, positive/close resection margins (p=0.031), radiation-induced sarcomas (p=0.037), and mandibular and oral cavity location (p=0.002) were independent prognostic factors associated to local recurrence and shorter disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Head and neck sarcomas are a rare entity. Surgery is feasible in more than 80% of patients, with an acceptable overall and disease-free survival. Radiation-induced sarcomas, location in the mandible and oral cavity, and close margins were significant prognostic factors in our population.

Association of T and N Categories of the American Joint Commission on Cancer, 8th Edition, With Metastasis and Survival in Patients With Orbital Sarcoma

Importance

No previous studies to date have validated the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition of the TNM classification for orbital sarcoma.

Objectives

To determine the prognostic performance of the most recent TNM classification for orbital sarcoma and to identify other prognostic factors for local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and death due to disease.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This single-center retrospective cohort study included 73 consecutive patients treated for orbital sarcoma from March 1, 2003, through June 30, 2018. Data were analyzed from November 1 to December 31, 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

T and N categories at presentation and disease-related outcomes, including local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis (DM), and death due to disease (DD).

Results

The 73 participants included 43 men (59%), and the median age was 21 (range, 0-77) years. The common histologic types were rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) (35 [48%]), solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma (10 [14%]), and Ewing sarcoma (8 [11%]). The most common TNM designations were T2 N0 M0 (26 [36%]) and T4 N0 M0 (24 [33%]). T category was associated with the risk of all disease-related outcomes, including local recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] for T2 vs T4, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.06-0.81]; HR for T3 vs T4, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.13-2.65]; P = .03), lymph node metastasis by the last follow-up (T1, 1 [14%]; T2, 0; T3, 0; T4, 12 [35%]; P = .001), DM (HR for T2 vs T4, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.08-1.07]; P = .04), and DD (HR of T2 vs T4, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.04-0.73]; HR of T3 vs T4, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.04-2.34]; P = .02). Higher risk of DM and higher risk of DD were associated with disease category of at least T3 (HR for DM, 3.24 [95% CI, 0.89-11.72; P = .06]; HR for DD, 6.32 [95% CI, 1.43-27.95; P = .005]), N1 disease (HR for DM, 13.33 [95% CI, 4.07-43.65; P < .001]; HR for DD, 7.07 [95% CI, 2.45-20.44; P < .001]), tumor size larger than 3 cm (HR for DM, 2.72 [95% CI, 0.92-8.05; P = .06]; HR for DD, 5.79 [95% CI, 1.85-18.14; P < .001]), and age of patient with RMS younger than 1 year or 10 years or older (HR for DM, 6.85 [95% CI, 0.83-56.53; P = .04]; HR for DD, 7.03 [95% CI, 0.85-57.83; P = .04]). Higher risk of local recurrence was associated with disease category of at least T3 (HR for<T3 vs≥T3, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.06-0.71]; P < .01) and tumor size greater than 3 cm (HR for ≤3 cm vs >3 cm, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.09-0.77]; P = .009). Higher risk of lymph node metastasis was associated with disease category of at least T3 (odds ratio [OR], 13.33 [95% CI, 1.77-602.30]; P = .004), alveolar RMS (OR, 9.98 [95% CI, 2.13-51.55]; P = .001), and age of patient with RMS younger than 1 year or 10 years or older (OR, 9.20 [95% CI, 1.01-458.29] P = .03).

Conclusions and Relevance

In patients with orbital sarcoma, T and N categories at presentation (defined by the AJCC 8th edition classification) correlate with metastasis and survival. These findings appear to support consideration of strict surveillance testing for regional nodal and systemic metastases in patients with orbital sarcoma with disease category of at least T3 and/or N1 disease.

Radiation Therapy in Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma-Current Knowledge and Future Directions: A Review and Expert Opinion

Simple Summary

Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral part of the treatment of adult soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). Although mainly used as perioperative therapy to increase local control in resectable STS with high risk features, it also plays an increasing role in the treatment of non-resectable primary tumors, oligometastatic situations, or for palliation. This review summarizes the current evidence for RT in adult STS including typical indications, outcomes, side effects, dose and fractionation regimens, and target volume definitions based on tumor localization and risk factors. It covers the different overall treatment approaches including RT either as part of a multimodal treatment strategy or as a sole treatment and is accompanied by a summary on ongoing clinical research pointing at future directions of RT in STS.

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral part of the treatment of adult soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). Although mainly used as perioperative therapy to increase local control in resectable STS with high risk features, it also plays an increasing role in the treatment of non-resectable primary tumors, oligometastatic situations, or for palliation. Modern radiation techniques, like intensity-modulated, image-guided, or stereotactic body RT, as well as special applications like intraoperative RT, brachytherapy, or particle therapy, have widened the therapeutic window allowing either dose escalation with improved efficacy or reduction of side effects with improved functional outcome. This review summarizes the current evidence for RT in adult STS including typical indications, outcomes, side effects, dose and fractionation regimens, and target volume definitions based on tumor localization and risk factors. It covers the different overall treatment approaches including RT either as part of a multimodal treatment strategy or as a sole treatment, namely its use as an adjunct to surgery in resectable STS (perioperative RT), as a primary treatment in non-resectable tumors (definitive RT), as a local treatment modality in oligometastatic disease or as palliative therapy. Due to the known differences in clinical course, general treatment options and, consequently, outcome depending on lesion localization, the main part of perioperative RT is divided into three sections according to body site (extremity/trunk wall, retroperitoneal, and head and neck STS) including the discussion of special applications of radiation techniques specifically amenable to this region. The review of the current evidence is accompanied by a summary on ongoing clinical research pointing at future directions of RT in STS.

Survival of Patients With Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Head and Neck

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate factors associated with overall survival (OS) of patients with non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas of the head and neck.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for cases of non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas of the head and neck between 2004 and 2014. Cases were categorized according to the World Health Organization classification of soft tissue tumors. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate associations with OS.

RESULTS

A total of 4,555 patients (63.6% male, 36.4% female, mean age 59.6 years) met inclusion criteria. The majority of tumors were classified as miscellaneous (35.9%), followed by vascular (20.1%), smooth muscle (13.5%), fibroblastic/myofibroblastic (12.1%), peripheral nerve (8.5%), adipocytic (7.4%), and undifferentiated (2.5%) sarcomas. The mean follow-up was 37.9 months, and overall mortality (MR) was 45.3%. The best prognosis was seen with fibroblastic/myofibroblastic sarcomas (MR = 20.6%, P < .001), whereas vascular sarcomas had the worst prognosis (MR = 67.6%, P < .001). Resection with clear margins had better OS than microscopically positive margins (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.43, P < .001) or grossly positive margins (HR = 2.97, P < .001). Radiation therapy was associated with better OS than no radiation (HR = 0.86, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas of the head and neck are associated with significant mortality. OS differs based on histologic subcategorization. Resection of the primary tumor with clear margins demonstrates improved OS for all histologies, suggesting this modality remains the preferred primary treatment when feasible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 131:E500-E508, 2021.

Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins for scalp angiosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Scalp angiosarcomas (AS) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas that present with outcomes different from other AS of the head and neck region. Due to the rarity of the disease, limited data on the clinical outcome of scalp AS are available. In particular, the prognostic significance of surgical margins remains controversial and the impact of margin status on survival has not been documented.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 41 scalp AS patients, including 30 patients with localized disease and 11 patients with initial distant metastasis, treated in our institution between 1997 and 2017. Survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. In the 30 patients without distant metastasis (localized disease), univariate and multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model were used to determine clinicopathologic characteristics associated with recurrence free survival (RFS), locoregional control (LRC), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Totally 41 patients diagnosed with scalp AS were identified, including 30 patients with localized disease and 11 patients with initial distant metastasis on diagnosis. Overall, the median follow-up period was 19.3 (range 0.3-128.5) months. The median survival time was 16.6 (range 0.3-144.3) months and the 5-year OS (95% Confidence Interval (CI)) rate was 22% (12%-42%). In the 30 patients with localized disease, univariate analysis showed that positive margins, either lateral-side or deep-side, were significant prognostic factors for RFS, LRC, and OS (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, positive margins emerged as adverse prognostic factors for RFS (Hazard Ratio (HR) 4.29, 95% CI, 1.71-10.75, p = 0.002), LRC (HR 6.35, 95% CI, 2.19-18.37, p = 0.001), and OS (HR 4.73, 95% CI, 1.71-13.07, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Scalp AS is associated with high local recurrence rates and poor survival outcomes. Positive surgical margins are adverse prognostic factors for survival.

Patterns of Radiotherapy Use and Outcomes in Head and Neck Soft-Tissue Sarcoma in a National Cohort

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

We used the National Cancer Database to identify the patterns of care and prognostic factors in adult patients with head and neck soft-tissue sarcoma (HNSTS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients age ≥ 18 years who were diagnosed with HNSTS between 2004 and 2013. Both χ² and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with radiation therapy (RT) utilization. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and Cox proportional regression was used to determine significant contributors to OS.

RESULTS

Our final cohort included 1,282 patients (682 treated with surgery only, 199 treated with RT only, and 401 treated with surgery and RT). Patients with younger age, poor tumor grade, rhabdomyosarcoma histology, and chemotherapy treatment were more likely to receive RT alone without surgery. Among the 1,083 surgical patients, RT utilization was associated with positive margins (odds ratio [OR]: 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-3.48), poor grade (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.95-4.38), and chemotherapy use (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.15-2.76). Radiotherapy utilization among surgical patients was not affected by demographic factors (age, sex, or ethnicity) or treatment institution (academic or community). For surgical patients, poor grade, large tumor size, and rhabdomyosarcoma histology were associated with worse OS on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis of HNSTS, younger patients with poor tumor grade and rhabdomyosarcoma histology were more likely to receive RT without surgery. Among surgical patients, adjuvant RT was more likely to be used for positive margins and poor grade, with no demographic disparities identified. Poor grade and rhabdomyosarcoma histology were negative prognostic factors for surgical patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 130:120-127, 2020.

Current update on the diagnosis and management of head and neck soft tissue sarcomas

Head and neck soft tissue sarcomas are a group of rare heterogeneous tumours arising from embryonic mesoderm. They comprise <1% of all head and neck malignancies and 5-15% of all sarcomas with most head and neck sarcomas arising from soft tissues. Although rare, they are associated with both high recurrence and mortality rates. We review the current management of head and neck soft tissue sarcomas.

Head and neck sarcomas: A single institute series

BACKGROUND

Sarcomas are tumours of mesenchymal origin, accounting for 1% of all malignancies.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 107 head and neck sarcoma cases, treated over a period of thirteen years.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients had with craniofacial bone sarcomas (BSs) (male: 33; female: 21) with high grade osteosarcoma being the most predominant type. The soft tissue sarcomas (STS) (53 patients; male: 28, female: 25) were histologically diverse with rhabdomyosarcomas and myxofibrosarcomas being the predominant types. The majority of BSs were managed with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, whereas in STSs treatment included predominantly surgery followed by radiotherapy. Overall survival estimates were 79% at 2years and 64% at 5years (mean follow-up period was 48months).

CONCLUSIONS

The mesenchymal origin of sarcomas, the pattern of disease spread and the different extent of cancellous bone infiltration in contrast to epithelial tumours, dictate distinct principles for surgical clearance.

Head and neck sarcomas: clinical and histopathological presentation, treatment modalities, and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Sarcoma of the head and neck is a rare condition that poses significant challenges in management and often requires radical multimodality treatment.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyse current clinical presentation, evaluation, management dilemmas and oncological outcomes.

METHODS

Computer records and case notes were analysed, and 39 patients were identified. Variables were compared using Pearson's chi-square test and the log-rank test, while survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The histopathological diagnosis was Kaposi sarcoma in 20.5 per cent of cases, chondrosarcoma in 15.3 per cent and osteosarcoma in 10.2 per cent. A range of other sarcomas were diagnosed in the remaining patients. The site of disease was most commonly sinonasal, followed by the oral cavity and larynx.

CONCLUSION

Wide local excision with clear resection margins is essential to achieve local control and long-term survival. There is a need for cross-specialty collaboration in order to accrue the evidence which will be necessary to improve long-term outcomes.

Primary unclassified sarcoma of the parotid gland: a case of diagnostic and therapeutic challenge

Malignant salivary gland sarcomas represent a clinically and histologically diagnostic challenge. Primary unclassified sarcomas of the parotid gland consist a rare salivary gland tumor. We report an unusual case of such a tumor, which occurred in the right parotid gland of a 54-year-old male and presented as an asymptomatic painless mass. The pathologoanatomical examination revealed a rhabdoid large-cell unclassified sarcoma. The patient was treated with superficial parotidectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. No recurrence was noted in a 10-year follow-up period. Due to the rare occurrence of primary unclassified sarcomas, there is no evidence-based treatment of choice. An optimal approach is best planned in a multidisciplinary setting, taking into consideration the resectability of the tumor, individual patient characteristics, presence of local or distant metastatic activity, local infiltrative behavior and tumor stage. A close follow-up of the patient is strongly recommended.

Head and Neck Soft Tissue Sarcomas Treated with Radiation Therapy

Head and neck soft tissue sarcomas (HNSTSs) are rare and heterogeneous cancers in which radiation therapy (RT) has an important role in local tumor control (LC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes and patterns of treatment failure in patients with HNSTS treated with RT. A retrospective review was performed of adult patients with HNSTS treated with RT from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2012. LC, locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and predictors thereof were assessed. Forty-eight patients with HNSTS were evaluated. Five-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of LC, LRC, DFS, and OS were 87, 73, 63, and 83%, respectively. Angiosarcomas were found to be associated with worse LC, LRC, DFS, and OS. Patients over the age of 60 had lower rates of DFS. HNSTSs comprise a diverse group of tumors that can be managed with various treatment regimens involving RT. Angiosarcomas have higher recurrence and mortality rates.

Outcomes of the treatment of head and neck sarcomas in a tertiary referral center

Head and neck sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumors that pose management challenges. We report our experience with these tumors. Forty consecutive patients treated for 44 head and neck sarcomas between 1997 and 2014 were culled from our prospectively maintained head and neck database. Five patients were excluded. The adult cohort consisted 29 (83%) patients of a mean age of 57.7 years, with 33 sarcomas. The most common diagnoses were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (27%) and chondroblastic osteosarcoma (21%). Clear surgical margins were achieved in 24/33 (73%) lesions. Twenty-two patients received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Fourteen patients developed local (n = 6), regional (n = 1) and distant (n = 7) recurrence. The overall 5-year survival was 66% with a mean survival interval of 66.5 months. Recurrent sarcoma, close (<1 mm) or involved surgical margins and advanced age were associated with statistically significantly reduced survival. The pediatric cohort consisted 6 (17%) patients, with a mean age of 9 years. Five patients had primary embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas and one had chondroblastic osteosarcoma. Clear surgical margins were achieved in five (83%) patients. All patients received adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Mean survival interval was 102 months. Three patients developed local (n = 1) or distant (n = 2) recurrence. Twenty-three free and 8 pedicled flaps were performed in 25 patients. Eleven out of thirty-nine (28%) lesions in 11 patients developed a complication. In conclusion, head and neck sarcomas are best managed by a multidisciplinary team at a tertiary head and neck referral center and resection with clear margins is vital for disease control.

Giant undifferentiated oropharyngeal sarcoma: a case report and review of the literature

We report on a patient who presented to the Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) clinic with swelling of the neck, dysphagia, headache, dyspnea and stridor. Imaging studies revealed an expansive heterogeneous process to the left retropharyngeal region. The mass was ovoid in shape, displaying moderate enhancement after intravenous contrast administration. Subsequently, a biopsy revealed the presence of undifferentiated sarcoma. The patient was treated with chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy, but follow-up exams at 6 months posttreatment revealed that while the tumor was stable, it persisted. Consequently, the patient was enrolled in a palliative care and pain control program and is currently being followed.

Adult sinonasal soft tissue sarcoma: analysis of 48 cases from the French Sarcoma Group database

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of primary sinonasal adult sarcoma, identify histological subtypes, and analyze prognostic factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHOD

Forty-eight adult sinonasal sarcomas included in the French Sarcoma Group database (Conticabase) were reviewed.

RESULTS

The most frequent tumor types were alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (33.3%), embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (14,6%), unclassified sarcoma (14.6%), and leiomyosarcoma (12.5%). All round cell tumors were rhabdomyosarcomas. The 5-year overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates were 62.3%, 73%, and 88.8%, respectively. Histotype was a prognostic factor for OS, MFS, and LRFS, with the worst prognosis associated with rhabdomyosarcomas, regardless of the subtype. The tumor grade influenced the OS and MFS. Surgery was a predictive factor for a complete response.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that sinonasal tract should be considered as an unfavorable site for rhabdomyosarcoma. Moreover, surgery should always be considered in treatment.

John M. Head and neck sarcomas: the UCLA experience

PURPOSE

To profile the clinical presentation, subtype distribution, and treatment results of sarcomas of the head and neck at a single tertiary academic center over an 11-year period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed by examining the records and reviewing the pathology of 186 patients with head and neck sarcomas treated at UCLA Medical Center from 2000 to 2011.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was 49 ± 22 years. 58% of the patients were male and 42% were female. Median duration of follow-up for the entire group was 18.5 months. The most common presenting symptom was a mass lesion in 59.9% of patients. The nasal cavity/sinus was the most common presenting site seen in 22% of patients. Solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma was the most common subtype. 15% of patients had evidence of prior radiation exposure. 26.3% of tumors were greater than 5 cm and 35.5% were high-grade. Margins were positive in 31.2% of patients. Lymph node metastasis was rare at 6.5%. Perineural invasion was identified in 6.5%. Among all subtypes, 5-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival were 50% and 49%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that grade and margin status were predictors of recurrence-free survival while grade and age affected overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Head and neck sarcomas are a rare entity frequently presenting as a mass lesion. In our series, lesions tended to be high-grade with a significant portion of surgical specimens having positive margins. Grade and margin status were the most important predictors of survival.

Head and neck sarcomas: a comprehensive cancer center experience

Head/neck sarcomas are rare, accounting for about 1% of head/neck malignancies and 5% of sarcomas. Outcomes have historically been worse in this group, due to anatomic constraints leading to difficulty in completely excising tumors, with high rates of local recurrence. We retrospectively analyzed cases of head/neck soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and osteogenic sarcomas managed in a multi-disciplinary setting at Fox Chase Cancer Center from 1999–2009 to describe clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment, outcomes, and prognostic factors for disease control and survival. Thirty patients with STS and seven patients with osteogenic sarcoma were identified. Most STS were high grade (23) and almost all were localized at presentation (28). Common histologies were synovial cell (6), rhabdomyosarcoma (5), angiosarcoma (4), liposarcoma (4) and leiomyosarcoma (3). The type of primary therapy and disease outcomes were analyzed. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The HR and 95% CI for Cox model and median DFS/OS analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated.

Follow-up strategies in head and neck cancer other than upper aerodigestive tract squamous cell carcinoma

Post-therapy follow-up for patients with head and neck cancer other than upper aerodigestive tract squamous cell carcinoma should meet several objectives: to detect both local, regional or distant recurrences, to evaluate acute and long-term treatment-related side effects, to guide the rehabilitation process, and to provide psychosocial support when needed. To our knowledge, there are no published reports in the literature dedicated to the follow-up of patients with these tumours. A comprehensive literature search for post-treatment follow-up strategies spanning from 1980 to 2012 was performed on several databases. This review focuses on malignant salivary gland tumors, soft tissue sarcomas, cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas, and sinonasal adenocarcinomas. Given the varying biological behavior and treatment-related factors and based on the literature, different recommendations are made on the follow-up of patients with the above-mentioned tumors.

Head and neck soft tissue sarcomas: unique lack of significance of synchronous node metastases

BACKGROUND

Regional lymph node metastasis (RLNM) has been identified as a poor prognostic indicator for patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities and trunk. However, the effect of RLNM on survival in patients with STS of the head and neck (HN) has not previously been explored. Our objective was to analyze RLNM as a prognostic indicator in HN-STS, and to compare this cohort to patients with STS of non-head and neck regions (NHN-STS).

METHODS

STS patients were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Only patients without concurrent distant metastasis who underwent surgery and pathologic node staging were included. Patients were categorized based on tumor location: (1) HN-STS and (2) NHN-STS. Clinicopathologic data and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared between node-negative and node-positive patients in each group.

RESULTS

We identified 183 cases of node-positive STS (25 HN-STS, 158 NHN-STS). In the HN-STS group, pN1 status was not associated with any of the clinicopathologic factors that we analyzed. DSS was similar among pN0 and pN1 patients with HN-STS (P = 0.59); however, in the NHN-STS group, node-positivity was significantly associated with disease-specific mortality (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Synchronous RLNM may not affect DSS in patients HN-STS. Node-positive patients with HN-STS appear to be unique from those with NHN-STS.

Prognostic factors and treatment strategies for adult head and neck soft tissue sarcoma

Adult head and neck soft tissue sarcomas are rare and display a variety of histological types and clinical characteristics; they are also associated with a variety of mortality risks. The purpose of this study was to examine all patients treated at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia for head and neck sarcoma during a 5-year period. Fifty-one adult patients were examined and treated for head and neck sarcomas from 2004 to 2009. The 51 tumours were histologically re-evaluated by expert pathologists and classified as low, intermediate or high grade sarcomas. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the surgical margins, histological grades, and clinical stages as prognostic factors for the disease. Adult head and neck soft tissue tumours are rare, and they are associated with poor prognosis for patients, especially at clinical stages III and IV. The average survival rate after 2 years is 45%, and most of these patients die because of disease progression and metastases.

Giant diaphragmatic angiosarcoma of adult: a case report and review of literature

Angiosarcoma is a rare vascular malignant soft tissue tumor, with highly malignant, invasive, and multifocal characteristics of biology, which is prone to local recurrence and distant metastasis, so the prognosis is extremely poor. It rarely involves the diaphragm. We present the case of an adult patient who had a primary giant angiosarcoma of the left-sided diaphragm.

Management of adult soft tissue sarcomas of the head and neck

Adult soft tissue sarcoma of the head and neck are rare and represent a heterogeneous group of tumours of different histological variants. Management of these neoplasms presents a great challenge. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma, fibrosarcoma, angiosarcoma and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour are the most frequently found sarcoma types in the head and neck. Although traditional morphological assessment is the foundation of clinical decision making, the role of immunohistochemistry and molecular biology are useful for diagnosis, prognosis and identification of possible targets for molecular therapy. The most frequently involved tumour sites are scalp/face, sinonasal tract/anterior skull base and parotid/neck. The management of soft tissue sarcomas in the head and neck is primarily surgical. Since it is difficult to obtain wide margins during surgical treatment in head and neck sarcomas, because of anatomic constraints, most patients undergo post-operative irradiation. Survival varies from 50 to 80%. Prognostic factors are tumour grade, margin status and tumour size. With further insight into the biology of soft tissue sarcoma, modern imaging techniques and new treatment options, we will most certainly be able to improve clinical outcome in patients with soft tissue sarcoma in the upcoming years.